J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2021 Week 14

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Michigan 12-1 11 72.04 2
2 Georgia 12-1 30 71.82 0.4% 0.3% 1
3 Ohio St 10-2 8 70.30 3.0% 2.4% 3
4 Alabama 12-1 22 70.06 0.5% 2.8% 4
5 Cincinnati 13-0 78 68.24 3.6% 5.3% 6
6 Notre Dame 11-1 25 68.09 0.3% 5.5% 5
7 Oklahoma St 11-2 36 64.69 6.7% 10.2% 7
8 Wisconsin 8-4 2 64.29 0.8% 10.8% 8
9 Michigan St 10-2 15 64.26 0.1% 10.8% 9
10 Mississippi 10-2 29 64.00 0.5% 11.2% 10
11 Pittsburgh 11-2 70 63.94 0.1% 11.2% 14
12 Baylor 11-2 45 63.78 0.3% 11.5% 13
13 Utah 10-3 56 63.19 1.2% 12.3% 15
14 Iowa 10-3 12 62.17 2.0% 13.7% 11
15 Penn St 7-5 5 61.79 0.8% 14.2% 17
16 Oklahoma 10-2 58 61.78 0.0% 14.2% 16
17 Purdue 8-4 4 61.21 1.1% 15.0% 21
18 Wake Forest 10-3 52 61.10 0.2% 15.2% 12
19 NC State 9-3 61 61.00 0.2% 15.3% 18
20 Clemson 9-3 50 60.87 0.2% 15.5% 19
21 Arkansas 8-4 16 60.34 1.1% 16.2% 23
22 BYU 10-2 64 60.33 0.0% 16.2% 25
23 Texas A&M 8-4 43 60.22 0.2% 16.4% 27
24 Minnesota 8-4 23 60.14 0.2% 16.5% 28
25 UT San Antonio 12-1 113 59.68 0.9% 17.1% 29
26 Oregon 10-3 51 59.54 0.3% 17.4% 20
27 Houston 11-2 117 59.07 0.9% 18.0% 22
28 Kentucky 9-3 66 58.91 0.3% 18.2% 30
29 Boise St 7-5 26 58.86 0.1% 18.3% 31
30 Appalachian St 10-3 101 58.44 0.8% 18.9% 26
31 Air Force 9-3 88 58.28 0.3% 19.1% 32
32 UCLA 8-4 60 58.14 0.3% 19.3% 33
33 San Diego St 11-2 91 57.81 0.7% 19.8% 24
34 Louisiana 12-1 123 57.61 0.4% 20.0% 39
35 Iowa St 7-5 47 57.51 0.2% 20.2% 35
36 Mississippi St 7-5 20 57.40 0.2% 20.3% 38
37 Tennessee 7-5 32 57.37 0.1% 20.4% 37
38 Army 8-3 80 57.31 0.1% 20.4% 34
39 Auburn 6-6 7 56.90 0.8% 21.0% 41
40 Fresno St 9-3 94 56.87 0.1% 21.1% 36
41 Nevada 8-4 90 56.09 1.5% 22.1% 42
42 Miami FL 7-5 24 55.72 0.7% 22.7% 46
43 WKU 8-5 93 55.57 0.3% 22.9% 40
44 Kansas St 7-5 48 55.53 0.1% 22.9% 47
45 Arizona St 8-4 74 55.50 0.1% 23.0% 44
46 Utah St 10-3 102 55.37 0.3% 23.1% 55
47 LSU 6-6 9 55.34 0.1% 23.2% 48
48 SMU 8-4 89 55.28 0.1% 23.3% 45
49 Coastal Car 10-2 130 55.02 0.5% 23.6% 43
50 Oregon St 7-5 63 54.28 1.4% 24.6% 50
51 Louisville 6-6 37 54.10 0.4% 24.9% 51
52 UAB 8-4 98 53.97 0.3% 25.1% 49
53 Washington St 7-5 62 53.88 0.2% 25.2% 52
54 North Carolina 6-6 38 53.54 0.7% 25.7% 54
55 Florida 6-6 53 53.45 0.2% 25.8% 53
56 Texas 5-7 14 52.95 1.0% 26.5% 56
57 Nebraska 3-9 3 52.65 0.6% 26.9% 60
58 Maryland 6-6 6 52.47 0.3% 27.2% 61
59 UCF 8-4 100 52.40 0.1% 27.3% 59
60 Liberty 7-5 103 52.31 0.2% 27.4% 58
61 Illinois 5-7 10 52.22 0.2% 27.5% 64
62 Virginia 6-6 27 52.20 0.0% 27.5% 62
63 West Virginia 6-6 40 52.07 0.3% 27.7% 65
64 Marshall 7-5 116 51.96 0.2% 27.9% 57
65 C Michigan 8-4 115 51.76 0.4% 28.1% 63
66 Toledo 7-5 126 51.55 0.4% 28.4% 66
67 East Carolina 7-5 71 51.14 0.8% 29.0% 67
68 Virginia Tech 6-6 59 51.12 0.0% 29.0% 68
69 N Illinois 9-4 92 50.81 0.6% 29.5% 75
70 W Michigan 7-5 77 50.77 0.1% 29.5% 69
71 South Carolina 6-6 34 50.40 0.7% 30.0% 70
72 Texas Tech 6-6 55 50.06 0.7% 30.5% 71
73 Missouri 6-6 39 49.85 0.4% 30.8% 72
74 Miami OH 6-6 104 49.65 0.4% 31.1% 73
75 Florida St 5-7 41 49.58 0.1% 31.2% 76
76 Rutgers 5-7 21 49.45 0.3% 31.4% 80
77 Syracuse 5-7 44 49.37 0.1% 31.5% 77
78 Georgia St 7-5 84 49.34 0.1% 31.5% 74
79 Boston College 6-6 75 48.94 0.8% 32.1% 78
80 Tulsa 6-6 65 48.81 0.3% 32.2% 79
81 Memphis 6-6 83 48.17 1.3% 33.1% 81
82 California 5-7 76 47.43 1.5% 34.2% 88
83 E Michigan 7-5 119 47.38 0.1% 34.2% 83
84 TCU 5-7 35 47.33 0.1% 34.3% 86
85 Ball St 6-6 87 47.29 0.1% 34.3% 84
86 USC 4-8 31 47.00 0.6% 34.8% 82
87 UTEP 7-5 127 46.80 0.4% 35.0% 85
88 Wyoming 6-6 105 45.97 1.6% 36.2% 90
89 North Texas 6-6 111 45.64 0.6% 36.6% 89
90 Kent 7-6 96 45.58 0.1% 36.7% 87
91 Georgia Tech 3-9 18 45.57 0.0% 36.7% 94
92 Navy 3-8 13 45.43 0.3% 36.9% 93
93 Old Dominion 6-6 121 45.24 0.4% 37.2% 91
94 MTSU 6-6 128 45.11 0.3% 37.4% 92
95 Hawaii 6-7 99 44.90 0.4% 37.7% 95
96 Washington 4-8 67 44.74 0.3% 37.9% 96
97 Indiana 2-10 1 44.62 0.2% 38.1% 97
98 Colorado 4-8 49 43.67 1.9% 39.4% 98
99 Stanford 3-9 17 43.62 0.1% 39.5% 99
100 Northwestern 3-9 19 43.42 0.4% 39.7% 101
101 FL Atlantic 5-7 110 42.85 1.1% 40.5% 100
102 South Alabama 5-7 125 42.47 0.7% 41.0% 102
103 Tulane 2-10 28 42.36 0.2% 41.2% 104
104 San Jose St 5-7 95 42.14 0.4% 41.5% 103
105 Troy 5-7 109 41.79 0.7% 42.0% 105
106 Colorado St 3-9 73 41.53 0.5% 42.4% 106
107 Louisiana Tech 3-9 85 40.02 3.0% 44.5% 108
108 ULM 4-8 81 40.00 0.0% 44.5% 107
109 South Florida 2-10 46 39.85 0.3% 44.7% 110
110 UNLV 2-10 54 39.71 0.3% 44.9% 111
111 Rice 4-8 72 39.68 0.1% 44.9% 109
112 Buffalo 4-8 120 39.42 0.5% 45.3% 112
113 Bowling Green 4-8 112 38.60 1.6% 46.4% 114
114 Charlotte 5-7 129 38.48 0.2% 46.6% 113
115 Duke 3-9 68 38.07 0.8% 47.1% 115
116 Ga Southern 3-9 86 37.58 1.0% 47.8% 116
117 Kansas 2-10 33 36.99 1.2% 48.6% 120
118 New Mexico 3-9 69 36.95 0.1% 48.7% 118
119 Ohio 3-9 118 36.90 0.1% 48.8% 117
120 Texas St 4-8 124 36.69 0.4% 49.1% 119
121 Arizona 1-11 42 36.63 0.1% 49.2% 121
122 Southern Miss 3-9 114 36.22 0.8% 49.7% 122
123 Vanderbilt 2-10 57 35.80 0.8% 50.3% 123
124 Temple 3-9 79 35.08 1.4% 51.3% 124
125 Arkansas St 2-10 107 34.28 1.6% 52.4% 125
126 New Mexico St 2-10 82 33.77 1.0% 53.1% 126
127 Akron 2-10 106 32.51 2.5% 54.9% 127
128 Connecticut 1-11 97 29.72 5.5% 58.7% 128
129 Florida Intl 1-11 122 28.06 3.3% 61.0% 129
130 Massachusetts 1-11 108 27.40 10.1% 62.0% 130

Best win: Alabama 41-24 vs. Georgia
Worst loss: Massachusetts 35-10 vs. Maine

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 57.93 72.04 43.42
2 SEC 57.28 71.82 35.80
3 Big 12 54.27 64.69 36.99
4 ACC 53.22 63.94 38.07
5 Pac-12 50.64 63.19 36.63
6 American 49.62 68.24 35.08
7 Mountain West 49.54 58.86 36.95
8 Sun Belt 45.32 58.44 34.28
9 MAC 45.18 51.76 32.51
10 Conference USA 44.95 59.68 28.06

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *