J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2021 Pre-Bowl Games

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Michigan 12-1 11 72.08 1
2 Georgia 12-1 30 71.90 0.4% 0.3% 2
3 Ohio St 10-2 8 70.38 3.0% 2.4% 3
4 Alabama 12-1 22 70.13 0.5% 2.7% 4
5 Cincinnati 13-0 74 68.64 2.9% 4.8% 5
6 Notre Dame 11-1 23 68.34 0.6% 5.2% 6
7 Oklahoma St 11-2 36 64.81 6.9% 10.1% 7
8 Michigan St 10-2 15 64.30 1.0% 10.8% 9
9 Wisconsin 8-4 2 64.21 0.2% 10.9% 8
10 Mississippi 10-2 29 64.08 0.3% 11.1% 10
11 Pittsburgh 11-2 71 64.00 0.2% 11.2% 11
12 Baylor 11-2 45 63.88 0.2% 11.4% 12
13 Utah 10-3 56 63.29 1.2% 12.2% 13
14 Iowa 10-3 13 62.22 2.1% 13.7% 14
15 Oklahoma 10-2 58 61.89 0.6% 14.1% 16
16 Penn St 7-5 5 61.81 0.2% 14.3% 15
17 Purdue 8-4 4 61.25 1.1% 15.0% 17
18 NC State 9-3 61 61.08 0.3% 15.3% 19
19 Wake Forest 10-3 53 61.04 0.1% 15.3% 18
20 Clemson 9-3 50 60.92 0.2% 15.5% 20
21 BYU 10-2 65 60.45 0.9% 16.1% 22
22 Arkansas 8-4 17 60.41 0.1% 16.2% 21
23 Texas A&M 8-4 43 60.30 0.2% 16.4% 23
24 Minnesota 8-4 25 60.18 0.2% 16.5% 24
25 UT San Antonio 12-1 112 59.82 0.7% 17.0% 25
26 Oregon 10-3 51 59.63 0.4% 17.3% 26
27 Houston 11-2 115 59.48 0.3% 17.5% 27
28 Boise St 7-5 26 59.00 0.9% 18.2% 29
29 Kentucky 9-3 66 59.00 0.0% 18.2% 28
30 Appalachian St 10-3 100 58.58 0.8% 18.7% 30
31 Air Force 9-3 88 58.41 0.3% 19.0% 31
32 UCLA 8-4 60 58.25 0.3% 19.2% 32
33 San Diego St 11-2 91 57.92 0.6% 19.6% 33
34 Louisiana 12-1 123 57.71 0.4% 19.9% 34
35 Iowa St 7-5 47 57.60 0.2% 20.1% 35
36 Mississippi St 7-5 20 57.50 0.2% 20.2% 36
37 Tennessee 7-5 32 57.44 0.1% 20.3% 37
38 Fresno St 9-3 96 56.97 0.9% 21.0% 40
39 Auburn 6-6 7 56.95 0.0% 21.0% 39
40 Nevada 8-4 89 56.20 1.5% 22.0% 41
41 Miami FL 7-5 24 55.79 0.8% 22.6% 42
42 SMU 8-4 82 55.69 0.2% 22.7% 48
43 Kansas St 7-5 48 55.63 0.1% 22.8% 44
44 Arizona St 8-4 76 55.61 0.0% 22.9% 45
45 Army 8-4 84 55.59 0.0% 22.9% 38
46 WKU 8-5 99 55.57 0.0% 22.9% 43
47 Utah St 10-3 101 55.49 0.2% 23.0% 46
48 LSU 6-6 9 55.40 0.2% 23.1% 47
49 Coastal Car 10-2 130 55.12 0.5% 23.5% 49
50 Oregon St 7-5 64 54.38 1.5% 24.6% 50
51 Louisville 6-6 37 54.18 0.4% 24.8% 51
52 UAB 8-4 95 54.11 0.1% 24.9% 52
53 Washington St 7-5 62 53.98 0.3% 25.1% 53
54 North Carolina 6-6 38 53.60 0.7% 25.6% 54
55 Florida 6-6 52 53.54 0.1% 25.7% 55
56 Texas 5-7 14 53.05 1.0% 26.4% 56
57 UCF 8-4 93 52.80 0.5% 26.7% 59
58 Nebraska 3-9 3 52.68 0.2% 26.9% 57
59 Maryland 6-6 6 52.52 0.3% 27.1% 58
60 Virginia 6-6 28 52.27 0.5% 27.5% 62
61 Illinois 5-7 10 52.27 0.0% 27.5% 61
62 Liberty 7-5 103 52.26 0.0% 27.5% 60
63 Marshall 7-5 117 52.26 0.0% 27.5% 64
64 West Virginia 6-6 40 52.16 0.2% 27.6% 63
65 C Michigan 8-4 116 51.83 0.6% 28.1% 65
66 Toledo 7-5 127 51.63 0.4% 28.4% 66
67 East Carolina 7-5 69 51.55 0.1% 28.5% 67
68 Virginia Tech 6-6 59 51.20 0.7% 29.0% 68
69 N Illinois 9-4 92 50.88 0.6% 29.4% 69
70 W Michigan 7-5 80 50.84 0.1% 29.5% 70
71 South Carolina 6-6 35 50.50 0.7% 29.9% 71
72 Texas Tech 6-6 55 50.18 0.6% 30.4% 72
73 Missouri 6-6 39 49.93 0.5% 30.7% 73
74 Florida St 5-7 41 49.64 0.6% 31.1% 75
75 Miami OH 6-6 104 49.61 0.1% 31.2% 74
76 Rutgers 5-7 21 49.50 0.2% 31.3% 76
77 Syracuse 5-7 46 49.42 0.2% 31.4% 77
78 Georgia St 7-5 87 49.32 0.2% 31.6% 78
79 Tulsa 6-6 63 49.21 0.2% 31.7% 80
80 Boston College 6-6 79 49.02 0.4% 32.0% 79
81 Memphis 6-6 77 48.59 0.9% 32.6% 81
82 California 5-7 78 47.54 2.1% 34.1% 82
83 Navy 4-8 12 47.51 0.1% 34.1% 92
84 TCU 5-7 34 47.45 0.1% 34.2% 84
85 E Michigan 7-5 119 47.42 0.0% 34.2% 83
86 Ball St 6-6 90 47.22 0.4% 34.5% 85
87 USC 4-8 31 47.12 0.2% 34.6% 86
88 UTEP 7-5 126 46.93 0.4% 34.9% 87
89 Wyoming 6-6 105 46.06 1.7% 36.1% 88
90 North Texas 6-6 111 45.80 0.5% 36.5% 89
91 Kent 7-6 97 45.65 0.3% 36.7% 90
92 Georgia Tech 3-9 18 45.64 0.0% 36.7% 91
93 Old Dominion 6-6 121 45.35 0.6% 37.1% 93
94 MTSU 6-6 128 45.22 0.3% 37.3% 94
95 Hawaii 6-7 98 45.01 0.4% 37.6% 95
96 Washington 4-8 67 44.84 0.3% 37.8% 96
97 Indiana 2-10 1 44.67 0.3% 38.0% 97
98 Colorado 4-8 49 43.76 1.8% 39.3% 98
99 Stanford 3-9 16 43.73 0.1% 39.3% 99
100 Northwestern 3-9 19 43.45 0.5% 39.7% 100
101 FL Atlantic 5-7 109 42.97 0.9% 40.4% 101
102 Tulane 2-10 27 42.63 0.7% 40.9% 103
103 South Alabama 5-7 125 42.59 0.1% 40.9% 102
104 San Jose St 5-7 94 42.24 0.7% 41.4% 104
105 Troy 5-7 108 41.88 0.7% 41.9% 105
106 Colorado St 3-9 73 41.63 0.5% 42.2% 106
107 Louisiana Tech 3-9 85 40.16 2.9% 44.3% 107
108 South Florida 2-10 44 40.12 0.1% 44.3% 109
109 ULM 4-8 81 40.09 0.1% 44.4% 108
110 Rice 4-8 72 39.82 0.5% 44.8% 111
111 UNLV 2-10 54 39.81 0.0% 44.8% 110
112 Buffalo 4-8 120 39.49 0.6% 45.2% 112
113 Bowling Green 4-8 114 38.67 1.6% 46.3% 113
114 Charlotte 5-7 129 38.60 0.1% 46.4% 114
115 Duke 3-9 68 38.14 0.9% 47.1% 115
116 Ga Southern 3-9 86 37.69 0.9% 47.7% 116
117 Kansas 2-10 33 37.09 1.2% 48.6% 117
118 New Mexico 3-9 70 37.05 0.1% 48.6% 118
119 Ohio 3-9 118 36.97 0.2% 48.7% 119
120 Texas St 4-8 124 36.79 0.3% 49.0% 120
121 Arizona 1-11 42 36.73 0.1% 49.0% 121
122 Southern Miss 3-9 113 36.35 0.7% 49.6% 122
123 Vanderbilt 2-10 57 35.88 0.9% 50.2% 123
124 Temple 3-9 75 35.49 0.8% 50.8% 124
125 Arkansas St 2-10 107 34.44 2.1% 52.2% 125
126 New Mexico St 2-10 83 33.86 1.1% 53.0% 126
127 Akron 2-10 106 32.59 2.5% 54.8% 127
128 Connecticut 1-11 102 29.70 5.7% 58.8% 128
129 Florida Intl 1-11 122 28.19 3.0% 60.9% 129
130 Massachusetts 1-11 110 27.31 10.4% 62.1% 130

Best win: Alabama 41-24 vs. Georgia
Worst loss: Massachusetts 35-10 vs. Maine

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 57.97 72.08 43.45
2 SEC 57.35 71.90 35.88
3 Big 12 54.37 64.81 37.09
4 ACC 53.28 64.00 38.14
5 Pac-12 50.74 63.29 36.73
6 American 50.15 68.64 35.49
7 Mountain West 49.65 59.00 37.05
8 Sun Belt 45.42 58.58 34.44
9 MAC 45.23 51.83 32.59
10 Conference USA 45.08 59.82 28.19

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *