J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2021 Final

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Georgia 14-1 12 73.06 2
2 Michigan 12-2 4 68.90 8.3% 5.7% 1
3 Ohio St 11-2 8 68.83 0.1% 5.8% 3
4 Alabama 13-2 9 68.64 0.4% 6.1% 4
5 Cincinnati 13-1 59 66.37 4.5% 9.1% 5
6 Notre Dame 11-2 27 65.41 1.9% 10.5% 6
7 Oklahoma St 12-2 15 65.35 0.1% 10.6% 7
8 Baylor 12-2 28 64.71 1.3% 11.4% 12
9 Michigan St 11-2 17 63.72 2.0% 12.8% 8
10 Oklahoma 11-2 42 62.68 2.1% 14.2% 15
11 Wisconsin 9-4 3 62.45 0.5% 14.5% 9
12 Pittsburgh 11-3 65 61.53 1.8% 15.8% 11
13 Mississippi 10-3 25 61.30 0.5% 16.1% 10
14 Utah 10-4 51 61.08 0.4% 16.4% 13
15 Clemson 10-3 43 60.69 0.8% 16.9% 20
16 Wake Forest 11-3 58 60.38 0.6% 17.4% 19
17 Arkansas 9-4 19 60.30 0.2% 17.5% 22
18 Purdue 9-4 10 59.93 0.7% 18.0% 17
19 NC State 9-3 64 59.65 0.6% 18.4% 18
20 Iowa 10-4 14 59.59 0.1% 18.4% 14
21 Houston 12-2 108 59.52 0.1% 18.5% 27
22 Minnesota 9-4 35 59.44 0.2% 18.6% 24
23 Texas A&M 8-4 53 58.76 1.4% 19.6% 23
24 Kentucky 10-3 61 58.72 0.1% 19.6% 29
25 Penn St 7-6 7 58.51 0.4% 19.9% 16
26 San Diego St 12-2 79 58.47 0.1% 20.0% 33
27 Boise St 7-5 20 58.43 0.1% 20.0% 28
28 Louisiana 13-1 119 58.37 0.1% 20.1% 34
29 Air Force 10-3 74 58.33 0.1% 20.2% 31
30 UT San Antonio 12-2 100 58.13 0.4% 20.4% 25
31 BYU 10-3 62 58.12 0.0% 20.4% 21
32 Oregon 10-4 49 56.79 2.7% 22.3% 26
33 Appalachian St 10-4 84 56.73 0.1% 22.3% 30
34 Kansas St 8-5 40 56.60 0.3% 22.5% 43
35 Fresno St 10-3 101 56.56 0.1% 22.6% 38
36 WKU 9-5 89 56.53 0.0% 22.6% 46
37 Iowa St 7-6 30 56.52 0.0% 22.6% 35
38 UCLA 8-4 69 56.45 0.1% 22.7% 32
39 Utah St 11-3 96 55.82 1.3% 23.6% 47
40 Tennessee 7-6 29 55.80 0.1% 23.6% 37
41 Coastal Car 11-2 130 55.62 0.4% 23.9% 49
42 Army 9-4 73 55.48 0.3% 24.1% 45
43 SMU 8-4 87 55.05 0.9% 24.6% 42
44 Auburn 6-7 5 54.95 0.2% 24.8% 39
45 UAB 9-4 85 54.70 0.5% 25.1% 52
46 Mississippi St 7-6 32 54.03 1.3% 26.0% 36
47 Miami FL 7-5 39 53.94 0.2% 26.2% 41
48 Nevada 8-5 81 53.70 0.5% 26.5% 40
49 Arizona St 8-5 75 53.39 0.6% 26.9% 44
50 UCF 9-4 95 53.25 0.3% 27.1% 57
51 Liberty 8-5 105 53.20 0.1% 27.2% 62
52 Texas 5-7 6 52.99 0.4% 27.5% 56
53 Louisville 6-7 36 52.58 0.8% 28.0% 51
54 LSU 6-7 13 52.40 0.4% 28.3% 48
55 Maryland 7-6 18 52.34 0.1% 28.4% 59
56 Texas Tech 7-6 41 52.04 0.6% 28.8% 72
57 Oregon St 7-6 67 51.58 0.9% 29.4% 50
58 C Michigan 9-4 115 51.58 0.0% 29.4% 65
59 W Michigan 8-5 88 51.43 0.3% 29.6% 70
60 Washington St 7-6 68 51.38 0.1% 29.7% 53
61 Florida 6-7 50 51.34 0.1% 29.7% 55
62 Nebraska 3-9 2 51.15 0.4% 30.0% 58
63 West Virginia 6-7 21 51.13 0.0% 30.0% 64
64 South Carolina 7-6 38 51.10 0.1% 30.0% 71
65 Marshall 7-6 102 50.95 0.3% 30.3% 63
66 East Carolina 7-5 70 50.79 0.3% 30.5% 67
67 Illinois 5-7 16 50.53 0.5% 30.8% 61
68 North Carolina 6-7 46 50.43 0.2% 31.0% 54
69 Georgia St 8-5 90 50.31 0.2% 31.1% 78
70 Virginia 6-6 44 50.28 0.1% 31.2% 60
71 Miami OH 7-6 112 49.67 1.2% 32.0% 75
72 Tulsa 7-6 63 49.53 0.3% 32.2% 79
73 Toledo 7-6 129 49.35 0.4% 32.4% 66
74 N Illinois 9-5 94 49.19 0.3% 32.7% 69
75 Missouri 6-7 37 48.84 0.7% 33.1% 73
76 Florida St 5-7 48 48.12 1.4% 34.1% 74
77 Syracuse 5-7 52 48.10 0.0% 34.2% 77
78 Virginia Tech 6-7 60 47.96 0.3% 34.3% 68
79 Memphis 6-6 80 47.86 0.2% 34.5% 81
80 Boston College 6-6 92 47.86 0.0% 34.5% 80
81 TCU 5-7 26 47.22 1.3% 35.4% 84
82 Rutgers 5-8 23 47.04 0.4% 35.6% 76
83 Wyoming 7-6 109 46.80 0.5% 35.9% 89
84 Navy 4-8 11 46.57 0.5% 36.2% 83
85 MTSU 7-6 126 46.20 0.7% 36.8% 94
86 UTEP 7-6 121 46.13 0.1% 36.9% 88
87 California 5-7 99 45.78 0.7% 37.3% 82
88 E Michigan 7-6 118 45.33 0.9% 37.9% 85
89 USC 4-8 47 45.08 0.5% 38.3% 87
90 Ball St 6-7 91 44.93 0.3% 38.5% 86
91 North Texas 6-7 110 44.35 1.2% 39.3% 90
92 Hawaii 6-7 103 44.33 0.1% 39.3% 95
93 Old Dominion 6-7 117 44.21 0.2% 39.5% 93
94 Georgia Tech 3-9 31 43.92 0.6% 39.9% 92
95 Kent 7-7 104 43.73 0.4% 40.1% 91
96 Washington 4-8 83 42.99 1.5% 41.2% 96
97 Indiana 2-10 1 42.91 0.2% 41.3% 97
98 FL Atlantic 5-7 111 42.70 0.4% 41.6% 101
99 South Alabama 5-7 127 42.31 0.8% 42.1% 103
100 Colorado 4-8 56 41.94 0.7% 42.6% 98
101 Tulane 2-10 24 41.92 0.0% 42.6% 102
102 Troy 5-7 107 41.92 0.0% 42.6% 105
103 Northwestern 3-9 33 41.80 0.2% 42.8% 100
104 San Jose St 5-7 98 41.77 0.1% 42.8% 104
105 Stanford 3-9 34 41.76 0.0% 42.8% 99
106 Colorado St 3-9 77 40.80 1.9% 44.1% 106
107 ULM 4-8 72 39.82 2.0% 45.5% 109
108 Rice 4-8 71 39.40 0.8% 46.1% 110
109 Louisiana Tech 3-9 93 39.25 0.3% 46.3% 107
110 South Florida 2-10 45 39.12 0.3% 46.4% 108
111 UNLV 2-10 54 38.97 0.3% 46.7% 111
112 Buffalo 4-8 125 38.75 0.4% 47.0% 112
113 Charlotte 5-7 128 38.34 0.8% 47.5% 114
114 Bowling Green 4-8 120 37.69 1.3% 48.4% 113
115 Ga Southern 3-9 82 37.39 0.6% 48.8% 116
116 Kansas 2-10 22 36.96 0.9% 49.4% 117
117 Texas St 4-8 123 36.82 0.3% 49.6% 120
118 New Mexico 3-9 66 36.63 0.4% 49.9% 118
119 Duke 3-9 78 36.61 0.0% 49.9% 115
120 Ohio 3-9 124 36.13 1.0% 50.5% 119
121 Southern Miss 3-9 114 35.94 0.4% 50.8% 122
122 Arizona 1-11 55 34.94 2.0% 52.2% 121
123 Vanderbilt 2-10 57 34.74 0.4% 52.4% 123
124 Temple 3-9 76 34.68 0.1% 52.5% 124
125 Arkansas St 2-10 106 34.21 0.9% 53.2% 125
126 New Mexico St 2-10 86 33.24 1.9% 54.5% 126
127 Akron 2-10 113 31.61 3.3% 56.7% 127
128 Connecticut 1-11 97 29.47 4.3% 59.7% 128
129 Florida Intl 1-11 122 28.13 2.7% 61.5% 129
130 Massachusetts 1-11 116 26.57 10.1% 63.6% 130

Best win: Alabama 41-24 vs. Georgia
Worst loss: Massachusetts 35-10 vs. Maine

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 56.22 68.90 41.80
2 SEC 56.00 73.06 34.74
3 Big 12 54.62 65.35 36.96
4 ACC 51.57 61.53 36.61
5 American 49.52 66.37 34.68
6 Mountain West 49.22 58.47 36.63
7 Pac-12 48.60 61.08 34.94
8 Sun Belt 45.35 58.37 34.21
9 Conference USA 44.64 58.13 28.13
10 MAC 44.12 51.58 31.61

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *