J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2021 Week 13

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Georgia 12-0 48 72.86 1
2 Michigan 11-1 13 69.54 6.6% 4.6% 3
3 Ohio St 10-2 9 69.09 0.9% 5.2% 2
4 Alabama 11-1 41 67.41 3.4% 7.5% 5
5 Notre Dame 11-1 25 67.11 0.6% 7.9% 4
6 Cincinnati 12-0 93 66.82 0.6% 8.3% 6
7 Oklahoma St 11-1 49 64.83 4.0% 11.0% 8
8 Wisconsin 8-4 2 63.03 3.6% 13.5% 7
9 Michigan St 10-2 14 63.03 0.0% 13.5% 9
10 Mississippi 10-2 30 62.91 0.2% 13.7% 10
11 Iowa 10-2 21 62.40 1.0% 14.4% 11
12 Wake Forest 10-2 58 62.03 0.7% 14.9% 15
13 Baylor 10-2 54 61.93 0.2% 15.0% 12
14 Pittsburgh 10-2 85 61.61 0.6% 15.5% 16
15 Utah 9-3 56 61.13 1.0% 16.1% 20
16 Oklahoma 10-2 55 60.85 0.6% 16.5% 13
17 Penn St 7-5 6 60.54 0.6% 16.9% 14
18 NC State 9-3 57 60.33 0.4% 17.2% 19
19 Clemson 9-3 44 60.24 0.2% 17.3% 23
20 Oregon 10-2 61 60.11 0.3% 17.5% 26
21 Purdue 8-4 4 60.06 0.1% 17.6% 22
22 Houston 11-1 128 59.47 1.2% 18.4% 21
23 Arkansas 8-4 15 59.36 0.2% 18.5% 28
24 San Diego St 11-1 99 59.32 0.1% 18.6% 31
25 BYU 10-2 66 59.31 0.0% 18.6% 25
26 Appalachian St 10-2 108 59.27 0.1% 18.7% 27
27 Texas A&M 8-4 42 59.25 0.0% 18.7% 18
28 Minnesota 8-4 22 59.10 0.3% 18.9% 29
29 UT San Antonio 11-1 119 58.46 1.3% 19.8% 17
30 Kentucky 9-3 65 58.27 0.4% 20.0% 33
31 Boise St 7-5 20 58.16 0.2% 20.2% 24
32 Air Force 9-3 86 57.70 0.9% 20.8% 32
33 UCLA 8-4 60 57.30 0.8% 21.4% 40
34 Army 8-3 74 56.91 0.8% 21.9% 42
35 Iowa St 7-5 45 56.65 0.5% 22.3% 41
36 Fresno St 9-3 91 56.53 0.2% 22.4% 43
37 Tennessee 7-5 31 56.44 0.2% 22.5% 36
38 Mississippi St 7-5 19 56.33 0.2% 22.7% 30
39 Louisiana 11-1 129 56.10 0.5% 23.0% 34
40 WKU 8-4 105 56.00 0.2% 23.1% 46
41 Auburn 6-6 7 55.86 0.3% 23.3% 38
42 Nevada 8-4 88 55.53 0.7% 23.8% 48
43 Coastal Car 10-2 130 54.86 1.4% 24.7% 44
44 Arizona St 8-4 78 54.67 0.4% 25.0% 47
45 SMU 8-4 89 54.67 0.0% 25.0% 35
46 Miami FL 7-5 23 54.62 0.1% 25.0% 45
47 Kansas St 7-5 47 54.60 0.0% 25.1% 37
48 LSU 6-6 8 54.20 0.8% 25.6% 55
49 UAB 8-4 92 53.59 1.2% 26.4% 54
50 Oregon St 7-5 64 53.41 0.4% 26.7% 49
51 Louisville 6-6 32 53.39 0.0% 26.7% 39
52 Washington St 7-5 63 52.87 1.0% 27.4% 61
53 Florida 6-6 50 52.66 0.4% 27.7% 58
54 North Carolina 6-6 37 52.64 0.0% 27.8% 50
55 Utah St 9-3 110 52.61 0.1% 27.8% 60
56 Texas 5-7 12 51.88 1.4% 28.8% 65
57 Marshall 7-5 112 51.81 0.1% 28.9% 51
58 Liberty 7-5 97 51.77 0.1% 28.9% 53
59 UCF 8-4 98 51.77 0.0% 29.0% 56
60 Nebraska 3-9 3 51.41 0.7% 29.4% 57
61 Maryland 6-6 5 51.34 0.2% 29.5% 74
62 Virginia 6-6 27 51.21 0.2% 29.7% 52
63 C Michigan 8-4 114 51.21 0.0% 29.7% 75
64 Illinois 5-7 10 51.09 0.2% 29.9% 66
65 West Virginia 6-6 39 51.08 0.0% 29.9% 62
66 Toledo 7-5 126 50.94 0.3% 30.1% 68
67 East Carolina 7-5 70 50.65 0.6% 30.5% 59
68 Virginia Tech 6-6 59 50.15 1.0% 31.2% 77
69 W Michigan 7-5 80 49.92 0.5% 31.5% 80
70 South Carolina 6-6 29 49.72 0.4% 31.8% 63
71 Texas Tech 6-6 52 49.27 0.9% 32.4% 76
72 Missouri 6-6 34 49.17 0.2% 32.5% 71
73 Miami OH 6-6 100 49.14 0.1% 32.6% 73
74 Georgia St 7-5 79 48.88 0.5% 32.9% 82
75 N Illinois 8-4 90 48.87 0.0% 32.9% 67
76 Florida St 5-7 36 48.86 0.0% 32.9% 69
77 Syracuse 5-7 40 48.58 0.6% 33.3% 70
78 Boston College 6-6 73 48.37 0.4% 33.6% 72
79 Tulsa 6-6 62 48.19 0.4% 33.9% 85
80 Rutgers 5-7 24 48.18 0.0% 33.9% 64
81 Memphis 6-6 81 47.58 1.2% 34.7% 81
82 USC 4-7 28 47.29 0.6% 35.1% 86
83 E Michigan 7-5 120 46.74 1.1% 35.9% 78
84 Ball St 6-6 87 46.58 0.3% 36.1% 88
85 UTEP 7-5 125 46.38 0.4% 36.4% 83
86 TCU 5-7 35 46.29 0.2% 36.5% 79
87 Kent 7-5 101 46.15 0.3% 36.7% 89
88 California 4-7 75 45.29 1.7% 37.8% 87
89 North Texas 6-6 111 45.20 0.2% 38.0% 102
90 Wyoming 6-6 104 45.18 0.0% 38.0% 84
91 Old Dominion 6-6 117 45.13 0.1% 38.1% 94
92 MTSU 6-6 124 44.82 0.6% 38.5% 97
93 Navy 3-8 11 44.68 0.3% 38.7% 95
94 Georgia Tech 3-9 17 44.54 0.3% 38.9% 91
95 Hawaii 6-7 96 44.29 0.5% 39.2% 106
96 Washington 4-8 67 43.82 1.0% 39.9% 90
97 Indiana 2-10 1 43.34 0.9% 40.5% 92
98 Colorado 4-8 46 42.76 1.2% 41.3% 98
99 Stanford 3-9 16 42.62 0.3% 41.5% 99
100 FL Atlantic 5-7 106 42.59 0.1% 41.6% 96
101 Northwestern 3-9 18 42.27 0.6% 42.0% 93
102 South Alabama 5-7 123 42.12 0.3% 42.2% 103
103 San Jose St 5-7 95 41.61 1.0% 42.9% 105
104 Tulane 2-10 26 41.60 0.0% 42.9% 101
105 Troy 5-7 107 41.40 0.4% 43.2% 100
106 Colorado St 3-9 72 40.81 1.2% 44.0% 104
107 ULM 4-8 76 39.53 2.6% 45.7% 112
108 Louisiana Tech 3-9 83 39.47 0.1% 45.8% 107
109 Rice 4-8 71 39.20 0.5% 46.2% 115
110 South Florida 2-10 43 39.11 0.2% 46.3% 109
111 UNLV 2-10 51 38.97 0.3% 46.5% 111
112 Buffalo 4-8 118 38.94 0.1% 46.6% 108
113 Charlotte 5-7 127 38.23 1.4% 47.5% 110
114 Bowling Green 4-8 113 38.06 0.3% 47.8% 118
115 Duke 3-9 69 37.25 1.6% 48.9% 113
116 Ga Southern 3-9 82 37.12 0.3% 49.1% 116
117 Ohio 3-9 116 36.39 1.4% 50.1% 114
118 New Mexico 3-9 68 36.29 0.2% 50.2% 117
119 Texas St 4-8 122 36.19 0.2% 50.3% 122
120 Kansas 2-10 33 36.08 0.2% 50.5% 119
121 Arizona 1-11 38 35.88 0.4% 50.8% 121
122 Southern Miss 3-9 115 35.65 0.4% 51.1% 124
123 Vanderbilt 2-10 53 35.11 1.1% 51.8% 123
124 Temple 3-9 77 34.46 1.3% 52.7% 120
125 Arkansas St 2-10 103 33.87 1.2% 53.5% 125
126 New Mexico St 2-10 84 33.05 1.6% 54.6% 127
127 Akron 2-10 102 31.99 2.1% 56.1% 126
128 Connecticut 1-11 94 29.24 5.5% 59.9% 128
129 Florida Intl 1-11 121 27.82 2.8% 61.8% 129
130 Massachusetts 1-11 109 26.79 10.4% 63.2% 130

Best win: Ohio St 56-7 vs. Michigan St
Worst loss: Massachusetts 35-10 vs. Maine

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 56.74 69.54 42.27
2 SEC 56.40 72.86 35.11
3 Big 12 53.35 64.83 36.08
4 ACC 52.42 62.03 37.25
5 Pac-12 49.76 61.13 35.88
6 American 49.00 66.82 34.46
7 Mountain West 48.92 59.32 36.29
8 Sun Belt 44.93 59.27 33.87
9 Conference USA 44.60 58.46 27.82
10 MAC 44.58 51.21 31.99

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *