J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2021 Week 12

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Georgia 11-0 41 72.39 1
2 Ohio St 10-1 19 70.41 4.0% 2.7% 2
3 Michigan 10-1 23 68.21 4.4% 5.8% 3
4 Notre Dame 10-1 12 66.84 2.8% 7.7% 4
5 Alabama 10-1 50 66.64 0.4% 7.9% 5
6 Cincinnati 11-0 92 66.13 1.0% 8.6% 6
7 Wisconsin 8-3 2 64.87 2.6% 10.4% 7
8 Oklahoma St 10-1 53 63.88 2.0% 11.7% 10
9 Michigan St 9-2 20 62.24 3.3% 14.0% 8
10 Mississippi 9-2 29 61.85 0.8% 14.6% 11
11 Iowa 9-2 21 61.70 0.3% 14.8% 12
12 Baylor 9-2 49 61.69 0.0% 14.8% 15
13 Oklahoma 10-1 64 61.33 0.7% 15.3% 17
14 Penn St 7-4 8 61.24 0.2% 15.4% 18
15 Wake Forest 9-2 48 61.04 0.4% 15.7% 9
16 Pittsburgh 9-2 83 60.43 1.2% 16.5% 19
17 UT San Antonio 11-0 124 60.33 0.2% 16.7% 14
18 Texas A&M 8-3 42 60.25 0.2% 16.8% 16
19 NC State 8-3 51 60.10 0.3% 17.0% 21
20 Utah 8-3 52 59.98 0.2% 17.1% 25
21 Houston 10-1 120 59.44 1.1% 17.9% 22
22 Purdue 7-4 3 59.25 0.4% 18.2% 26
23 Clemson 8-3 33 59.06 0.4% 18.4% 32
24 Boise St 7-4 27 59.03 0.1% 18.5% 24
25 BYU 9-2 63 58.80 0.5% 18.8% 20
26 Oregon 9-2 61 58.73 0.1% 18.9% 13
27 Appalachian St 9-2 96 58.58 0.3% 19.1% 27
28 Arkansas 7-4 14 57.82 1.5% 20.1% 23
29 Minnesota 7-4 32 57.03 1.6% 21.2% 37
30 Mississippi St 7-4 34 56.65 0.8% 21.7% 30
31 San Diego St 10-1 118 56.60 0.1% 21.8% 31
32 Air Force 8-3 77 56.46 0.3% 22.0% 34
33 Kentucky 8-3 70 55.87 1.2% 22.8% 38
34 Louisiana 10-1 126 55.65 0.5% 23.1% 43
35 SMU 8-3 86 55.63 0.0% 23.1% 28
36 Tennessee 6-5 17 55.56 0.2% 23.2% 46
37 Kansas St 7-4 45 55.49 0.1% 23.3% 33
38 Auburn 6-5 10 55.42 0.1% 23.4% 29
39 Louisville 6-5 28 55.15 0.6% 23.8% 44
40 UCLA 7-4 60 55.05 0.2% 23.9% 48
41 Iowa St 6-5 37 55.02 0.1% 24.0% 36
42 Army 7-3 84 54.80 0.4% 24.3% 35
43 Fresno St 8-3 91 54.62 0.4% 24.5% 41
44 Coastal Car 9-2 130 53.99 1.3% 25.4% 42
45 Miami FL 6-5 9 53.60 0.8% 25.9% 55
46 WKU 7-4 112 53.59 0.0% 26.0% 49
47 Arizona St 7-4 69 53.54 0.1% 26.0% 39
48 Nevada 7-4 81 53.51 0.1% 26.1% 45
49 Oregon St 7-4 76 53.38 0.3% 26.3% 59
50 North Carolina 6-5 43 52.56 1.6% 27.4% 51
51 Marshall 7-4 122 52.55 0.0% 27.4% 54
52 Virginia 6-5 24 52.14 0.8% 28.0% 50
53 Liberty 7-4 111 52.07 0.1% 28.1% 40
54 UAB 7-4 88 51.95 0.2% 28.2% 52
55 LSU 5-6 15 51.84 0.2% 28.4% 60
56 UCF 7-4 79 51.77 0.1% 28.5% 57
57 Nebraska 3-8 6 51.76 0.0% 28.5% 58
58 Florida 5-6 47 51.52 0.5% 28.8% 53
59 East Carolina 7-4 80 51.09 0.9% 29.4% 63
60 Utah St 8-3 101 51.09 0.0% 29.4% 47
61 Washington St 6-5 58 50.92 0.3% 29.7% 64
62 West Virginia 5-6 22 50.64 0.6% 30.0% 71
63 South Carolina 6-5 36 50.62 0.0% 30.1% 73
64 Rutgers 5-6 13 50.23 0.8% 30.6% 56
65 Texas 4-7 16 50.00 0.5% 30.9% 61
66 Illinois 4-7 5 49.91 0.2% 31.1% 67
67 N Illinois 8-3 95 49.86 0.1% 31.1% 70
68 Toledo 6-5 117 49.72 0.3% 31.3% 69
69 Florida St 5-6 26 49.50 0.4% 31.6% 75
70 Syracuse 5-6 40 49.45 0.1% 31.7% 62
71 Missouri 6-5 44 49.37 0.1% 31.8% 78
72 Boston College 6-5 82 49.36 0.0% 31.8% 65
73 Miami OH 6-5 100 49.24 0.2% 32.0% 74
74 Maryland 5-6 7 49.21 0.1% 32.0% 72
75 C Michigan 7-4 114 48.87 0.7% 32.5% 81
76 Texas Tech 6-5 57 48.82 0.1% 32.6% 68
77 Virginia Tech 5-6 56 48.66 0.3% 32.8% 66
78 E Michigan 7-4 123 47.66 2.0% 34.2% 82
79 TCU 5-6 35 47.40 0.5% 34.5% 80
80 W Michigan 6-5 87 47.23 0.4% 34.8% 76
81 Memphis 5-6 66 46.93 0.6% 35.2% 77
82 Georgia St 6-5 78 46.61 0.6% 35.6% 83
83 UTEP 7-4 129 46.53 0.2% 35.7% 85
84 Wyoming 6-5 102 46.52 0.0% 35.7% 91
85 Tulsa 5-6 62 46.45 0.1% 35.8% 89
86 USC 4-6 39 46.37 0.2% 35.9% 79
87 California 4-6 89 45.79 1.2% 36.7% 95
88 Ball St 5-6 75 44.93 1.7% 37.9% 84
89 Kent 6-5 103 44.39 1.1% 38.7% 96
90 Washington 4-7 74 44.31 0.2% 38.8% 86
91 Georgia Tech 3-8 31 44.26 0.1% 38.8% 90
92 Indiana 2-9 1 43.72 1.1% 39.6% 94
93 Northwestern 3-8 11 43.63 0.2% 39.7% 92
94 Old Dominion 5-6 109 43.27 0.7% 40.2% 98
95 Navy 2-8 4 43.19 0.2% 40.3% 99
96 FL Atlantic 5-6 107 42.95 0.5% 40.7% 87
97 MTSU 5-6 125 42.81 0.3% 40.9% 88
98 Colorado 4-7 54 42.29 1.0% 41.6% 105
99 Stanford 3-8 30 41.97 0.6% 42.0% 93
100 Troy 5-6 110 41.96 0.0% 42.0% 97
101 Tulane 2-9 18 41.84 0.2% 42.2% 110
102 North Texas 5-6 119 41.66 0.4% 42.4% 104
103 South Alabama 5-6 128 41.15 1.0% 43.2% 100
104 Colorado St 3-8 85 41.06 0.2% 43.3% 102
105 San Jose St 5-6 113 40.99 0.1% 43.4% 103
106 Hawaii 5-7 104 40.90 0.2% 43.5% 108
107 Louisiana Tech 3-8 73 39.83 2.2% 45.0% 101
108 Buffalo 4-7 121 39.21 1.3% 45.8% 109
109 South Florida 2-9 38 38.81 0.8% 46.4% 106
110 Charlotte 5-6 127 38.58 0.5% 46.7% 107
111 UNLV 2-9 59 38.33 0.5% 47.0% 113
112 ULM 4-7 93 38.16 0.4% 47.3% 112
113 Duke 3-8 67 37.79 0.7% 47.8% 111
114 Ohio 3-8 105 37.27 1.1% 48.5% 115
115 Rice 3-8 65 37.08 0.4% 48.8% 114
116 Ga Southern 3-8 98 36.39 1.4% 49.7% 118
117 New Mexico 3-8 71 36.24 0.3% 49.9% 119
118 Bowling Green 3-8 99 36.05 0.4% 50.2% 117
119 Kansas 2-9 25 35.64 0.8% 50.8% 121
120 Temple 3-8 68 35.35 0.6% 51.2% 116
121 Arizona 1-10 46 35.26 0.2% 51.3% 120
122 Texas St 3-8 115 34.77 1.0% 52.0% 122
123 Vanderbilt 2-9 55 34.70 0.1% 52.1% 123
124 Southern Miss 2-9 94 33.49 2.4% 53.7% 126
125 Arkansas St 2-9 97 33.47 0.0% 53.8% 124
126 Akron 2-9 106 31.84 3.3% 56.0% 125
127 New Mexico St 1-10 72 30.16 3.4% 58.3% 127
128 Connecticut 1-10 108 27.99 4.4% 61.3% 129
129 Florida Intl 1-10 116 27.63 0.7% 61.8% 128
130 Massachusetts 1-10 90 27.45 5.5% 62.1% 130

Best win: Ohio St 56-7 vs. Michigan St
Worst loss: Massachusetts 35-10 vs. Maine

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 56.67 70.41 43.63
2 SEC 55.75 72.39 34.70
3 Big 12 52.99 63.88 35.64
4 ACC 52.36 61.04 37.79
5 Pac-12 48.97 59.98 35.26
6 American 48.79 66.13 35.35
7 Mountain West 47.95 59.03 36.24
8 Sun Belt 44.07 58.58 33.47
9 MAC 43.86 49.86 31.84
10 Conference USA 43.73 60.33 27.63

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *