J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2019 Week 9

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Ohio St 8-0 6 77.59 1
2 Clemson 8-0 45 70.91 13.3% 8.6% 4
3 Alabama 8-0 82 70.22 1.4% 9.5% 2
4 LSU 8-0 36 69.86 0.7% 10.0% 3
5 Penn St 8-0 44 69.34 1.0% 10.6% 5
6 Wisconsin 6-2 15 65.41 7.8% 15.7% 7
7 Auburn 6-2 7 65.18 0.5% 16.0% 8
8 Cincinnati 6-1 9 65.00 0.4% 16.2% 14
9 SMU 8-0 68 64.93 0.1% 16.3% 9
10 Utah 7-1 80 64.62 0.6% 16.7% 15
11 Oklahoma 7-1 84 64.50 0.2% 16.9% 6
12 Appalachian St 7-0 114 63.90 1.2% 17.6% 11
13 Baylor 7-0 98 63.69 0.4% 17.9% 12
14 Georgia 6-1 92 63.38 0.6% 18.3% 16
15 Oregon 7-1 60 63.00 0.7% 18.8% 13
16 Michigan 6-2 10 62.98 0.0% 18.8% 25
17 Navy 6-1 66 62.67 0.6% 19.2% 18
18 Minnesota 8-0 108 62.47 0.4% 19.5% 21
19 Florida 7-1 74 61.86 1.2% 20.3% 19
20 UCF 6-2 89 61.57 0.6% 20.7% 26
21 Iowa 6-2 25 61.52 0.1% 20.7% 24
22 Memphis 7-1 90 61.35 0.3% 20.9% 17
23 Boise St 6-1 81 61.28 0.1% 21.0% 22
24 Notre Dame 5-2 23 60.43 1.7% 22.1% 10
25 Air Force 6-2 54 60.10 0.7% 22.5% 31
26 Wake Forest 6-1 83 58.17 3.9% 25.0% 28
27 Washington 5-3 53 57.95 0.4% 25.3% 30
28 Louisiana 5-2 79 57.65 0.6% 25.7% 32
29 USC 5-3 19 57.61 0.1% 25.7% 29
30 Iowa St 5-3 43 57.50 0.2% 25.9% 23
31 Texas 5-3 17 57.46 0.1% 25.9% 20
32 Kansas St 5-2 35 57.28 0.4% 26.2% 40
33 Indiana 6-2 77 57.05 0.5% 26.5% 35
34 Michigan St 4-4 2 56.26 1.6% 27.5% 27
35 Oklahoma St 5-3 33 55.86 0.8% 28.0% 41
36 Texas A&M 5-3 30 55.83 0.1% 28.0% 42
37 TCU 4-3 34 55.43 0.8% 28.6% 47
38 San Diego St 7-1 120 54.96 0.9% 29.2% 38
39 Tulane 5-3 62 54.43 1.0% 29.8% 36
40 Florida St 4-4 8 54.23 0.4% 30.1% 49
41 North Carolina 4-4 12 54.11 0.2% 30.3% 45
42 Virginia 5-3 71 54.07 0.1% 30.3% 33
43 Louisville 5-3 20 53.98 0.2% 30.4% 48
44 Wyoming 6-2 122 53.80 0.4% 30.7% 50
45 FL Atlantic 5-3 72 53.42 0.8% 31.1% 55
46 Louisiana Tech 7-1 129 52.94 1.0% 31.8% 44
47 Utah St 4-3 37 52.70 0.5% 32.1% 37
48 Missouri 5-3 104 52.67 0.1% 32.1% 34
49 Pittsburgh 5-3 32 51.91 1.5% 33.1% 43
50 Georgia St 6-2 115 51.84 0.1% 33.2% 61
51 Washington St 4-4 76 51.83 0.0% 33.2% 52
52 UAB 6-1 130 51.74 0.2% 33.3% 53
53 Arizona St 5-3 65 51.59 0.3% 33.5% 39
54 Duke 4-4 55 51.15 0.9% 34.1% 51
55 Kentucky 4-4 27 50.50 1.3% 34.9% 76
56 Temple 5-3 61 50.44 0.1% 35.0% 46
57 Nebraska 4-4 24 50.24 0.4% 35.3% 57
58 Mississippi St 3-5 4 50.16 0.1% 35.4% 54
59 Marshall 5-3 75 50.12 0.1% 35.4% 74
60 W Michigan 5-4 102 50.11 0.0% 35.4% 67
61 Hawaii 5-3 78 49.87 0.5% 35.7% 62
62 Miami FL 4-4 69 49.85 0.1% 35.8% 66
63 Stanford 4-4 13 49.65 0.4% 36.0% 77
64 Boston College 4-4 59 49.65 0.0% 36.0% 60
65 Illinois 4-4 49 49.64 0.0% 36.0% 85
66 WKU 5-3 116 48.93 1.4% 36.9% 59
67 BYU 3-4 5 48.48 0.9% 37.5% 73
68 UCLA 3-5 11 48.38 0.2% 37.6% 88
69 California 4-4 40 48.34 0.1% 37.7% 58
70 Southern Miss 5-3 111 48.27 0.1% 37.8% 75
71 Virginia Tech 5-2 124 47.97 0.6% 38.2% 71
72 Arkansas St 4-4 64 47.94 0.1% 38.2% 90
73 South Carolina 3-5 16 47.88 0.1% 38.3% 56
74 Tennessee 3-5 21 47.78 0.2% 38.4% 96
75 Ga Southern 4-3 88 47.71 0.1% 38.5% 91
76 South Florida 4-4 70 47.64 0.1% 38.6% 93
77 Oregon St 3-4 51 47.52 0.2% 38.8% 84
78 Houston 3-5 31 47.50 0.1% 38.8% 80
79 Miami OH 4-4 29 47.46 0.1% 38.8% 95
80 Tulsa 2-6 1 47.23 0.5% 39.1% 86
81 Buffalo 4-4 103 47.18 0.1% 39.2% 100
82 NC State 4-3 109 47.17 0.0% 39.2% 72
83 Ball St 4-4 95 47.08 0.2% 39.3% 64
84 Ohio 4-4 94 46.73 0.7% 39.8% 103
85 Colorado 3-5 18 46.72 0.0% 39.8% 79
86 Maryland 3-5 47 46.68 0.1% 39.8% 68
87 Arizona 4-4 67 46.67 0.0% 39.9% 65
88 Texas Tech 3-5 58 46.58 0.2% 40.0% 63
89 Mississippi 3-5 46 46.39 0.4% 40.2% 83
90 Toledo 5-3 118 46.22 0.3% 40.4% 98
91 C Michigan 5-4 123 45.68 1.1% 41.1% 69
92 Fresno St 3-4 100 45.59 0.2% 41.2% 70
93 Syracuse 3-5 50 45.32 0.5% 41.6% 78
94 Purdue 2-6 14 45.18 0.3% 41.8% 81
95 Army 3-5 96 44.92 0.5% 42.1% 87
96 ULM 3-4 63 44.76 0.3% 42.3% 94
97 San Jose St 4-4 107 44.52 0.5% 42.6% 108
98 MTSU 3-5 52 44.42 0.2% 42.7% 112
99 Kansas 3-5 57 44.37 0.1% 42.8% 104
100 Liberty 5-3 128 44.34 0.1% 42.9% 82
101 Coastal Car 3-4 117 44.29 0.1% 42.9% 101
102 West Virginia 3-4 41 43.88 0.8% 43.4% 92
103 E Michigan 4-4 99 43.86 0.0% 43.5% 97
104 Florida Intl 4-4 126 42.87 2.0% 44.8% 89
105 Northwestern 1-6 3 42.59 0.6% 45.1% 102
106 Troy 3-4 125 42.35 0.5% 45.4% 99
107 North Texas 3-5 101 42.30 0.1% 45.5% 105
108 N Illinois 3-5 112 41.19 2.2% 46.9% 116
109 Arkansas 2-6 39 41.10 0.2% 47.0% 111
110 Kent 3-5 97 40.86 0.5% 47.3% 106
111 Nevada 4-4 93 40.76 0.2% 47.5% 107
112 Colorado St 3-5 110 40.74 0.1% 47.5% 118
113 Charlotte 3-5 87 40.57 0.3% 47.7% 115
114 Georgia Tech 2-5 38 39.74 1.7% 48.8% 113
115 Texas St 2-5 48 39.40 0.7% 49.2% 109
116 Vanderbilt 2-5 26 39.16 0.5% 49.5% 114
117 East Carolina 3-5 106 38.80 0.7% 50.0% 110
118 Rutgers 2-6 28 38.19 1.2% 50.8% 123
119 UT San Antonio 3-4 121 37.70 1.0% 51.4% 117
120 UNLV 2-6 85 37.67 0.1% 51.5% 120
121 Bowling Green 2-6 73 35.31 4.7% 54.5% 119
122 Rice 0-8 22 35.17 0.3% 54.7% 121
123 Connecticut 2-6 91 35.11 0.1% 54.8% 126
124 New Mexico 2-6 105 34.43 1.4% 55.6% 122
125 South Alabama 1-7 56 34.12 0.6% 56.0% 124
126 Old Dominion 1-7 86 32.25 3.7% 58.4% 125
127 New Mexico St 0-8 42 30.22 4.1% 61.0% 127
128 UTEP 1-6 119 28.26 3.9% 63.6% 128
129 Akron 0-8 113 23.75 9.0% 69.4% 129
130 Massachusetts 1-7 127 22.16 3.2% 71.4% 130

Best win: Ohio St. 42-0 vs. Cincinnati
Worst loss: Massachusetts 45-20 vs. Southern Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 56.08 77.59 38.19
2 Big 12 54.66 64.50 43.88
3 SEC 54.43 70.22 39.16
4 American 53.06 65.00 35.11
5 Pac-12 52.83 64.62 46.67
6 ACC 52.02 70.91 39.74
7 Mountain West 48.03 61.28 34.43
8 Sun Belt 47.40 63.90 34.12
9 Conference USA 43.50 53.42 28.26
10 MAC 42.95 50.11 23.75

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *