J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2019 Week 8

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Ohio St 7-0 17 76.66 1
2 Alabama 7-0 68 71.05 11.1% 7.3% 3
3 LSU 7-0 49 70.61 0.9% 7.9% 5
4 Clemson 7-0 42 70.16 0.9% 8.5% 4
5 Penn St 7-0 57 68.53 3.2% 10.6% 7
6 Oklahoma 7-0 92 68.42 0.2% 10.7% 8
7 Wisconsin 6-1 36 68.21 0.4% 11.0% 2
8 Auburn 6-1 15 67.42 1.6% 12.1% 6
9 SMU 7-0 71 65.88 3.0% 14.1% 10
10 Notre Dame 5-1 29 65.37 1.0% 14.7% 12
11 Appalachian St 6-0 106 64.39 1.9% 16.0% 13
12 Baylor 7-0 89 64.23 0.3% 16.2% 15
13 Oregon 6-1 56 64.19 0.1% 16.3% 9
14 Cincinnati 6-1 18 64.17 0.0% 16.3% 14
15 Utah 6-1 79 63.85 0.6% 16.7% 24
16 Georgia 6-1 86 63.69 0.3% 16.9% 16
17 Memphis 6-1 82 62.83 1.7% 18.0% 21
18 Navy 5-1 78 62.60 0.5% 18.3% 22
19 Florida 7-1 72 62.06 1.1% 19.0% 20
20 Texas 5-2 14 61.16 1.8% 20.2% 18
21 Minnesota 7-0 114 60.96 0.4% 20.5% 29
22 Boise St 6-1 91 60.67 0.6% 20.9% 11
23 Iowa St 5-2 44 60.32 0.7% 21.3% 27
24 Iowa 5-2 28 60.27 0.1% 21.4% 25
25 Michigan 5-2 21 59.79 0.9% 22.0% 19
26 UCF 5-2 98 59.46 0.7% 22.4% 28
27 Michigan St 4-3 3 58.80 1.3% 23.3% 26
28 Wake Forest 6-1 74 58.67 0.3% 23.5% 32
29 USC 4-3 8 58.52 0.3% 23.7% 38
30 Washington 5-3 41 58.50 0.0% 23.7% 23
31 Air Force 5-2 62 58.40 0.2% 23.8% 34
32 Louisiana 5-2 81 57.63 1.5% 24.8% 39
33 Virginia 5-2 70 57.16 0.9% 25.4% 44
34 Missouri 5-2 108 56.96 0.4% 25.7% 17
35 Indiana 5-2 80 56.14 1.6% 26.8% 41
36 Tulane 5-2 75 55.96 0.4% 27.0% 30
37 Utah St 4-2 58 55.78 0.4% 27.2% 53
38 San Diego St 6-1 121 55.31 0.9% 27.9% 48
39 Arizona St 5-2 50 55.27 0.1% 27.9% 31
40 Kansas St 4-2 67 54.69 1.1% 28.7% 54
41 Oklahoma St 4-3 37 54.52 0.3% 28.9% 33
42 Texas A&M 4-3 24 54.50 0.0% 28.9% 49
43 Pittsburgh 5-2 31 54.15 0.7% 29.4% 55
44 Louisiana Tech 6-1 125 53.89 0.5% 29.7% 57
45 North Carolina 3-4 7 53.68 0.4% 30.0% 35
46 Temple 5-2 76 53.33 0.7% 30.4% 40
47 TCU 3-3 39 53.27 0.1% 30.5% 37
48 Louisville 4-3 16 53.10 0.3% 30.7% 43
49 Florida St 3-4 4 53.09 0.0% 30.7% 42
50 Wyoming 5-2 115 52.84 0.5% 31.1% 52
51 Duke 4-3 63 52.78 0.1% 31.1% 36
52 Washington St 4-3 93 52.56 0.4% 31.4% 73
53 UAB 6-1 130 52.34 0.4% 31.7% 63
54 Mississippi St 3-4 5 52.13 0.4% 32.0% 50
55 FL Atlantic 4-3 59 51.63 1.0% 32.7% 45
56 South Carolina 3-4 10 51.31 0.6% 33.1% 47
57 Nebraska 4-3 33 51.08 0.5% 33.4% 64
58 California 4-3 53 50.87 0.4% 33.6% 46
59 WKU 5-2 118 50.77 0.2% 33.8% 70
60 Boston College 4-3 102 50.69 0.2% 33.9% 80
61 Georgia St 5-2 117 49.79 1.8% 35.1% 74
62 Hawaii 4-3 51 49.34 0.9% 35.6% 51
63 Texas Tech 3-4 34 49.28 0.1% 35.7% 65
64 Ball St 4-3 105 49.09 0.4% 36.0% 88
65 Arizona 4-3 66 48.91 0.4% 36.2% 56
66 Miami FL 3-4 65 48.86 0.1% 36.3% 58
67 W Michigan 4-4 87 48.85 0.0% 36.3% 60
68 Maryland 3-4 69 48.78 0.1% 36.4% 66
69 C Michigan 5-3 123 48.73 0.1% 36.4% 76
70 Fresno St 3-3 95 48.66 0.1% 36.5% 94
71 Virginia Tech 5-2 124 48.31 0.7% 37.0% 86
72 NC State 4-3 101 48.16 0.3% 37.2% 59
73 BYU 3-4 11 48.02 0.3% 37.4% 95
74 Marshall 4-3 88 47.95 0.2% 37.5% 90
75 Southern Miss 4-3 90 47.94 0.0% 37.5% 67
76 Kentucky 3-4 26 47.93 0.0% 37.5% 69
77 Stanford 3-4 9 47.88 0.1% 37.5% 62
78 Syracuse 3-4 45 47.87 0.0% 37.6% 68
79 Colorado 3-4 20 47.67 0.4% 37.8% 61
80 Houston 3-4 47 47.58 0.2% 37.9% 85
81 Purdue 2-5 13 47.48 0.2% 38.1% 77
82 Liberty 5-2 129 47.36 0.2% 38.2% 83
83 Mississippi 3-5 32 47.35 0.0% 38.2% 71
84 Oregon St 3-4 60 47.27 0.2% 38.3% 93
85 Illinois 3-4 40 47.19 0.2% 38.4% 104
86 Tulsa 2-5 1 46.92 0.5% 38.8% 79
87 Army 3-4 97 46.65 0.5% 39.1% 72
88 UCLA 2-5 6 46.42 0.5% 39.5% 107
89 Florida Intl 4-3 126 46.22 0.4% 39.7% 92
90 Arkansas St 3-4 43 45.93 0.6% 40.1% 82
91 Ga Southern 3-3 55 45.89 0.1% 40.1% 100
92 West Virginia 3-4 23 45.71 0.4% 40.4% 78
93 South Florida 3-4 46 45.62 0.2% 40.5% 84
94 ULM 3-4 52 45.53 0.2% 40.6% 81
95 Miami OH 3-4 30 45.33 0.4% 40.9% 98
96 Tennessee 2-5 19 45.08 0.5% 41.2% 97
97 E Michigan 4-3 104 44.75 0.6% 41.6% 111
98 Toledo 4-3 120 44.60 0.3% 41.8% 75
99 Troy 3-3 127 44.56 0.1% 41.9% 101
100 Buffalo 3-4 107 44.35 0.4% 42.1% 102
101 Coastal Car 3-4 119 44.03 0.6% 42.6% 96
102 Northwestern 1-5 2 43.96 0.1% 42.7% 91
103 Ohio 3-4 103 43.81 0.3% 42.9% 113
104 Kansas 2-5 38 43.51 0.6% 43.2% 103
105 North Texas 3-4 99 43.49 0.0% 43.3% 106
106 Kent 3-4 85 42.86 1.2% 44.1% 87
107 Nevada 4-3 100 42.85 0.0% 44.1% 89
108 San Jose St 3-4 111 42.71 0.3% 44.3% 99
109 Texas St 2-4 48 41.35 2.7% 46.1% 110
110 East Carolina 3-4 110 41.02 0.7% 46.5% 108
111 Arkansas 2-5 83 40.70 0.6% 46.9% 109
112 MTSU 2-5 54 40.59 0.2% 47.1% 105
113 Georgia Tech 2-5 35 39.97 1.2% 47.9% 119
114 Vanderbilt 2-5 22 39.96 0.0% 47.9% 123
115 Charlotte 2-5 73 39.38 1.1% 48.6% 112
116 N Illinois 2-5 94 39.00 0.8% 49.1% 118
117 UT San Antonio 3-4 116 38.43 1.1% 49.9% 120
118 Colorado St 2-5 112 38.01 0.8% 50.4% 116
119 Bowling Green 2-5 64 37.53 1.0% 51.0% 114
120 UNLV 2-5 96 37.09 0.9% 51.6% 115
121 Rice 0-7 12 36.96 0.3% 51.8% 117
122 New Mexico 2-5 113 35.35 3.2% 53.9% 121
123 Rutgers 1-6 25 34.66 1.4% 54.8% 124
124 South Alabama 1-6 77 34.11 1.1% 55.5% 122
125 Old Dominion 1-6 84 33.54 1.1% 56.3% 125
126 Connecticut 1-6 61 32.50 2.1% 57.6% 126
127 New Mexico St 0-7 27 32.46 0.1% 57.7% 127
128 UTEP 1-5 122 28.82 7.2% 62.4% 128
129 Akron 0-7 109 24.87 7.8% 67.6% 129
130 Massachusetts 1-6 128 22.75 4.2% 70.3% 130

Best win: Ohio St. 42-0 vs. Cincinnati
Worst loss: Massachusetts 45-20 vs. Southern Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 55.89 76.66 34.66
2 Big 12 55.51 68.42 43.51
3 SEC 55.05 71.05 39.96
4 Pac-12 53.49 64.19 46.42
5 American 53.15 65.88 32.50
6 ACC 52.62 70.16 39.97
7 Mountain West 48.08 60.67 35.35
8 Sun Belt 47.32 64.39 34.11
9 Conference USA 43.71 53.89 28.82
10 MAC 42.81 49.09 24.87

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *