J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2019 Week 10

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Ohio St 8-0 5 77.39 1
2 Alabama 8-0 76 70.78 13.2% 8.5% 3
3 LSU 8-0 45 69.91 1.7% 9.7% 4
4 Penn St 8-0 41 69.80 0.2% 9.8% 5
5 Clemson 9-0 84 68.79 2.0% 11.1% 2
6 Wisconsin 6-2 11 65.76 6.0% 15.0% 6
7 Utah 8-1 65 65.10 1.3% 15.9% 10
8 Auburn 7-2 7 65.03 0.1% 16.0% 7
9 Georgia 7-1 60 64.95 0.2% 16.1% 14
10 Oklahoma 7-1 82 64.66 0.6% 16.4% 11
11 Oregon 8-1 52 64.52 0.3% 16.6% 15
12 Michigan 7-2 12 63.76 1.5% 17.6% 16
13 Cincinnati 7-1 17 63.56 0.4% 17.9% 8
14 Navy 7-1 83 63.04 1.0% 18.5% 17
15 Minnesota 8-0 105 62.95 0.2% 18.7% 18
16 Baylor 8-0 101 62.79 0.3% 18.9% 13
17 SMU 8-1 51 62.74 0.1% 18.9% 9
18 Memphis 8-1 72 62.48 0.5% 19.3% 22
19 UCF 7-2 81 62.30 0.4% 19.5% 20
20 Iowa 6-2 27 61.40 1.8% 20.7% 21
21 Appalachian St 7-1 107 60.98 0.8% 21.2% 12
22 Florida 7-2 43 60.96 0.0% 21.2% 19
23 Boise St 7-1 91 60.93 0.1% 21.3% 23
24 Notre Dame 6-2 21 60.32 1.2% 22.1% 24
25 Air Force 7-2 69 59.42 1.8% 23.2% 25
26 Wake Forest 7-1 94 59.07 0.7% 23.7% 26
27 Kansas St 6-2 47 58.94 0.3% 23.8% 32
28 Louisiana 6-2 85 58.90 0.1% 23.9% 28
29 Indiana 7-2 88 57.79 2.2% 25.3% 33
30 Texas 5-3 16 57.37 0.8% 25.9% 31
31 Iowa St 5-3 50 57.23 0.3% 26.0% 30
32 Oklahoma St 6-3 33 57.19 0.1% 26.1% 35
33 Washington 5-4 40 56.88 0.6% 26.5% 27
34 Texas A&M 6-3 49 56.59 0.6% 26.9% 36
35 Michigan St 4-4 2 56.20 0.8% 27.4% 34
36 Tulane 6-3 61 55.67 1.1% 28.1% 39
37 USC 5-4 8 55.49 0.3% 28.3% 29
38 Virginia 6-3 63 55.38 0.2% 28.4% 42
39 San Diego St 7-1 123 54.90 1.0% 29.1% 38
40 FL Atlantic 6-3 71 54.79 0.2% 29.2% 45
41 Louisville 5-3 20 53.77 2.0% 30.5% 43
42 TCU 4-4 30 53.73 0.1% 30.6% 37
43 Wyoming 6-2 125 53.49 0.5% 30.9% 44
44 Louisiana Tech 7-1 128 53.11 0.8% 31.4% 46
45 Pittsburgh 6-3 48 52.83 0.6% 31.7% 49
46 Missouri 5-3 108 52.73 0.2% 31.9% 48
47 North Carolina 4-5 9 52.62 0.2% 32.0% 41
48 Mississippi St 4-5 4 52.53 0.2% 32.1% 58
49 Miami FL 5-4 59 52.35 0.4% 32.4% 62
50 Georgia St 6-2 115 52.20 0.3% 32.6% 50
51 Washington St 4-4 73 52.03 0.3% 32.8% 51
52 Arizona St 5-3 64 51.71 0.6% 33.2% 53
53 BYU 4-4 6 51.64 0.1% 33.3% 67
54 Boston College 5-4 77 51.29 0.7% 33.7% 64
55 Florida St 4-5 10 51.28 0.0% 33.7% 40
56 Duke 4-4 58 51.13 0.3% 33.9% 54
57 Illinois 5-4 68 51.12 0.0% 34.0% 65
58 Tennessee 4-5 15 51.06 0.1% 34.0% 74
59 Kentucky 4-4 26 50.79 0.5% 34.4% 55
60 Temple 5-3 57 50.63 0.3% 34.6% 56
61 Ga Southern 5-3 56 50.60 0.1% 34.6% 75
62 Marshall 6-3 95 50.52 0.2% 34.7% 59
63 W Michigan 5-4 104 50.25 0.6% 35.1% 60
64 UCLA 4-5 14 50.24 0.0% 35.1% 68
65 Utah St 4-4 37 50.03 0.4% 35.4% 47
66 Oregon St 4-4 54 49.97 0.1% 35.4% 77
67 Buffalo 5-4 103 49.72 0.5% 35.8% 81
68 Stanford 4-4 13 49.63 0.2% 35.9% 63
69 South Carolina 4-5 22 49.60 0.1% 35.9% 73
70 Arkansas St 5-4 78 48.97 1.3% 36.7% 72
71 California 4-4 39 48.83 0.3% 36.9% 69
72 Southern Miss 5-3 110 48.50 0.7% 37.3% 70
73 UAB 6-2 130 48.50 0.0% 37.3% 52
74 Virginia Tech 5-3 112 48.41 0.2% 37.4% 71
75 Nebraska 4-5 35 48.41 0.0% 37.5% 57
76 Fresno St 5-4 96 48.35 0.1% 37.5% 92
77 C Michigan 6-4 122 48.19 0.3% 37.7% 91
78 South Florida 4-4 66 47.91 0.6% 38.1% 76
79 WKU 5-4 106 47.62 0.6% 38.5% 66
80 Hawaii 5-5 79 47.51 0.2% 38.6% 61
81 Miami OH 4-4 32 47.40 0.2% 38.8% 79
82 Ohio 4-4 93 47.01 0.8% 39.3% 84
83 Ball St 4-4 102 46.83 0.3% 39.5% 83
84 Purdue 3-6 18 46.83 0.0% 39.5% 94
85 Toledo 5-3 113 46.79 0.1% 39.5% 90
86 Houston 3-6 23 46.73 0.1% 39.6% 78
87 Mississippi 3-6 28 46.72 0.0% 39.6% 89
88 Texas Tech 3-5 67 46.25 0.9% 40.2% 88
89 Tulsa 2-7 1 46.04 0.4% 40.5% 80
90 Maryland 3-6 36 45.68 0.7% 41.0% 86
91 Liberty 6-3 129 45.43 0.5% 41.3% 100
92 NC State 4-4 100 45.21 0.4% 41.6% 82
93 Coastal Car 4-4 119 45.09 0.2% 41.7% 101
94 Army 3-6 80 44.95 0.3% 41.9% 95
95 Colorado 3-6 19 44.70 0.5% 42.2% 85
96 Arizona 4-5 74 44.34 0.7% 42.7% 87
97 West Virginia 3-5 31 44.31 0.1% 42.7% 102
98 San Jose St 4-5 98 44.08 0.5% 43.0% 97
99 Florida Intl 5-4 127 43.69 0.8% 43.5% 104
100 North Texas 4-5 118 43.51 0.4% 43.8% 107
101 Kansas 3-6 46 43.33 0.4% 44.0% 99
102 ULM 3-5 75 43.02 0.6% 44.4% 96
103 Syracuse 3-6 55 42.90 0.3% 44.6% 93
104 MTSU 3-6 53 42.82 0.2% 44.7% 98
105 Charlotte 4-5 92 42.81 0.0% 44.7% 113
106 Colorado St 4-5 121 42.61 0.4% 44.9% 112
107 E Michigan 4-5 87 42.45 0.3% 45.1% 103
108 Nevada 5-4 109 41.98 0.9% 45.8% 111
109 Troy 3-5 124 41.84 0.3% 45.9% 106
110 Northwestern 1-7 3 41.09 1.5% 46.9% 105
111 Kent 3-5 97 41.07 0.0% 46.9% 110
112 Arkansas 2-7 38 40.05 2.0% 48.3% 109
113 East Carolina 3-6 90 40.03 0.0% 48.3% 117
114 Georgia Tech 2-6 42 39.28 1.5% 49.2% 114
115 N Illinois 3-6 114 39.07 0.4% 49.5% 108
116 Texas St 2-6 44 38.57 1.0% 50.2% 115
117 Vanderbilt 2-6 29 38.07 1.0% 50.8% 116
118 Bowling Green 3-6 99 37.67 0.8% 51.3% 121
119 Rutgers 2-7 24 37.42 0.5% 51.7% 118
120 UT San Antonio 3-5 116 36.57 1.7% 52.7% 119
121 UNLV 2-7 89 36.18 0.8% 53.2% 120
122 Connecticut 2-7 62 35.42 1.5% 54.2% 123
123 Rice 0-9 25 34.59 1.7% 55.3% 122
124 New Mexico 2-7 111 33.70 1.8% 56.4% 124
125 South Alabama 1-7 70 33.54 0.3% 56.7% 125
126 Old Dominion 1-8 86 32.20 2.7% 58.4% 126
127 New Mexico St 0-8 34 31.10 2.2% 59.8% 127
128 UTEP 1-7 120 27.67 6.8% 64.2% 128
129 Akron 0-9 117 23.16 9.0% 70.1% 129
130 Massachusetts 1-8 126 22.36 1.6% 71.1% 130

Best win: Ohio St. 38-7 vs. Wisconsin
Worst loss: Massachusetts 45-20 vs. Southern Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 56.11 77.39 37.42
2 SEC 54.98 70.78 38.07
3 Big 12 54.58 64.66 43.33
4 American 53.05 63.56 35.42
5 Pac-12 52.79 65.10 44.34
6 ACC 51.74 68.79 39.28
7 Mountain West 47.77 60.93 33.70
8 Sun Belt 47.37 60.98 33.54
9 Conference USA 43.35 54.79 27.67
10 MAC 43.30 50.25 23.16

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *