J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2019 Week 11

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Ohio St 9-0 10 77.12 1
2 LSU 9-0 24 70.86 12.4% 8.1% 3
3 Alabama 8-1 46 69.09 3.5% 10.4% 2
4 Clemson 10-0 93 69.02 0.1% 10.5% 5
5 Penn St 8-1 30 67.47 3.1% 12.5% 4
6 Georgia 8-1 57 66.28 2.4% 14.1% 9
7 Wisconsin 7-2 8 65.96 0.6% 14.5% 6
8 Utah 8-1 68 65.46 1.0% 15.1% 7
9 Auburn 7-2 5 65.46 0.0% 15.1% 8
10 Oregon 8-1 47 65.16 0.6% 15.5% 11
11 Oklahoma 8-1 74 64.65 1.0% 16.2% 10
12 Minnesota 9-0 86 64.33 0.6% 16.6% 15
13 Michigan 7-2 11 64.05 0.6% 17.0% 12
14 Cincinnati 8-1 35 63.84 0.4% 17.2% 13
15 Navy 7-1 85 63.48 0.7% 17.7% 14
16 Memphis 8-1 64 63.37 0.2% 17.8% 18
17 Baylor 9-0 89 63.27 0.2% 18.0% 16
18 SMU 9-1 61 62.62 1.3% 18.8% 17
19 Notre Dame 7-2 23 62.26 0.7% 19.3% 24
20 Florida 8-2 50 62.01 0.5% 19.6% 22
21 Boise St 8-1 79 61.71 0.6% 20.0% 23
22 Appalachian St 8-1 105 61.29 0.8% 20.5% 21
23 Iowa 6-3 17 60.53 1.5% 21.5% 20
24 UCF 7-3 84 60.17 0.7% 22.0% 19
25 Louisiana 7-2 97 60.09 0.1% 22.1% 28
26 Air Force 7-2 67 59.96 0.3% 22.2% 25
27 Texas 6-3 12 58.59 2.7% 24.0% 30
28 Washington 6-4 37 58.51 0.1% 24.1% 33
29 Kansas St 6-3 38 57.73 1.6% 25.1% 27
30 Indiana 7-2 99 57.69 0.1% 25.2% 29
31 Oklahoma St 6-3 33 57.61 0.2% 25.3% 32
32 Iowa St 5-4 32 57.13 0.9% 25.9% 31
33 Texas A&M 6-3 48 56.84 0.6% 26.3% 34
34 USC 6-4 6 56.75 0.2% 26.4% 37
35 FL Atlantic 7-3 82 56.20 1.1% 27.1% 40
36 Tulane 6-3 62 56.14 0.1% 27.2% 36
37 Wake Forest 7-2 92 55.91 0.5% 27.5% 26
38 Virginia 7-3 76 55.60 0.6% 27.9% 38
39 Louisiana Tech 8-1 128 55.38 0.4% 28.2% 44
40 Miami FL 6-4 53 55.05 0.7% 28.6% 49
41 Michigan St 4-5 2 54.69 0.7% 29.1% 35
42 Wyoming 6-3 115 53.28 2.8% 30.9% 43
43 TCU 4-5 21 53.19 0.2% 31.0% 42
44 BYU 5-4 9 53.14 0.1% 31.1% 53
45 North Carolina 4-5 7 52.94 0.4% 31.4% 47
46 Mississippi St 4-5 3 52.93 0.0% 31.4% 48
47 Illinois 6-4 58 52.77 0.3% 31.6% 57
48 Florida St 5-5 14 52.69 0.2% 31.7% 55
49 Pittsburgh 6-3 54 52.66 0.0% 31.7% 45
50 San Diego St 7-2 125 52.62 0.1% 31.8% 39
51 Temple 6-3 66 52.15 0.9% 32.4% 60
52 Tennessee 5-5 22 52.07 0.2% 32.5% 58
53 Virginia Tech 6-3 104 51.64 0.8% 33.0% 74
54 Southern Miss 6-3 107 51.56 0.2% 33.2% 72
55 Louisville 5-4 16 51.52 0.1% 33.2% 41
56 Missouri 5-4 87 51.48 0.1% 33.2% 46
57 California 5-4 40 51.17 0.6% 33.7% 71
58 W Michigan 6-4 108 51.10 0.1% 33.7% 63
59 Marshall 6-3 95 50.96 0.3% 33.9% 62
60 Utah St 5-4 44 50.91 0.1% 34.0% 65
61 Arizona St 5-4 55 50.88 0.1% 34.0% 52
62 Georgia St 6-3 110 50.29 1.2% 34.8% 50
63 Washington St 4-5 73 50.01 0.6% 35.2% 51
64 UCLA 4-5 20 49.94 0.1% 35.2% 64
65 Boston College 5-5 77 49.86 0.2% 35.3% 54
66 Kentucky 4-5 28 49.83 0.1% 35.4% 59
67 Duke 4-5 43 49.78 0.1% 35.5% 56
68 Buffalo 5-4 111 49.77 0.0% 35.5% 67
69 Arkansas St 5-4 72 49.73 0.1% 35.5% 70
70 Hawaii 6-4 83 49.55 0.3% 35.7% 80
71 South Carolina 4-6 15 49.38 0.3% 36.0% 69
72 WKU 6-4 117 49.27 0.2% 36.1% 79
73 Oregon St 4-5 45 49.26 0.0% 36.1% 66
74 Nebraska 4-5 31 48.94 0.6% 36.5% 75
75 Texas Tech 4-5 75 48.67 0.5% 36.9% 88
76 Miami OH 5-4 41 48.62 0.1% 37.0% 81
77 C Michigan 6-4 121 48.51 0.2% 37.1% 77
78 Tulsa 3-7 1 48.41 0.2% 37.2% 89
79 Stanford 4-5 18 48.38 0.1% 37.3% 68
80 Ga Southern 5-4 69 47.99 0.8% 37.8% 61
81 Mississippi 4-6 56 47.99 0.0% 37.8% 87
82 Purdue 4-6 27 47.65 0.7% 38.2% 84
83 Toledo 6-3 119 47.60 0.1% 38.3% 85
84 South Florida 4-5 59 46.93 1.3% 39.2% 78
85 Fresno St 4-5 90 46.83 0.2% 39.3% 76
86 UAB 6-3 129 46.67 0.3% 39.5% 73
87 Houston 3-6 34 46.48 0.4% 39.7% 86
88 ULM 4-5 70 46.35 0.3% 39.9% 102
89 Colorado 4-6 26 46.26 0.2% 40.0% 95
90 Ohio 4-5 94 46.25 0.0% 40.0% 82
91 Army 4-6 109 46.22 0.1% 40.1% 94
92 Ball St 4-5 102 46.18 0.1% 40.1% 83
93 Maryland 3-7 13 45.83 0.7% 40.6% 90
94 Arizona 4-5 71 44.98 1.7% 41.7% 96
95 Troy 4-5 124 44.96 0.0% 41.7% 109
96 Liberty 6-4 130 44.83 0.3% 41.9% 91
97 Nevada 6-4 103 44.63 0.4% 42.1% 108
98 NC State 4-5 80 44.24 0.8% 42.6% 92
99 San Jose St 4-6 88 44.13 0.2% 42.8% 98
100 Coastal Car 4-5 112 43.75 0.8% 43.3% 93
101 Charlotte 5-5 113 43.57 0.4% 43.5% 105
102 Kansas 3-6 52 43.19 0.7% 44.0% 101
103 Florida Intl 5-5 126 43.09 0.2% 44.1% 99
104 Syracuse 3-6 65 42.94 0.3% 44.3% 103
105 North Texas 4-6 106 42.90 0.1% 44.4% 100
106 MTSU 3-6 63 42.86 0.1% 44.4% 104
107 E Michigan 4-5 91 42.59 0.5% 44.8% 107
108 West Virginia 3-6 39 42.55 0.1% 44.8% 97
109 Colorado St 4-5 122 42.54 0.0% 44.8% 106
110 Kent 3-6 98 41.01 3.0% 46.8% 111
111 Northwestern 1-8 4 40.67 0.7% 47.3% 110
112 East Carolina 3-7 78 40.52 0.3% 47.5% 113
113 Georgia Tech 2-7 36 39.90 1.2% 48.3% 114
114 Texas St 3-6 60 39.89 0.0% 48.3% 116
115 N Illinois 3-6 118 39.24 1.3% 49.1% 115
116 Arkansas 2-8 42 38.84 0.8% 49.6% 112
117 Bowling Green 3-6 96 38.19 1.3% 50.5% 118
118 Vanderbilt 2-7 19 37.90 0.6% 50.9% 117
119 UT San Antonio 4-5 123 37.72 0.4% 51.1% 120
120 Rutgers 2-7 29 37.55 0.3% 51.3% 119
121 UNLV 2-7 101 35.99 3.1% 53.3% 121
122 Connecticut 2-8 49 35.47 1.0% 54.0% 122
123 Rice 0-9 25 35.09 0.7% 54.5% 123
124 New Mexico 2-7 114 34.13 1.9% 55.7% 124
125 South Alabama 1-8 81 33.89 0.5% 56.1% 125
126 Old Dominion 1-9 100 32.68 2.4% 57.6% 126
127 New Mexico St 0-9 51 29.60 6.1% 61.6% 127
128 UTEP 1-8 116 29.03 1.1% 62.4% 128
129 Akron 0-9 120 23.55 10.9% 69.5% 129
130 Massachusetts 1-9 127 22.40 2.3% 71.0% 130

Best win: Ohio St. 38-7 vs. Wisconsin
Worst loss: Massachusetts 45-20 vs. Southern Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 56.09 77.12 37.55
2 SEC 55.07 70.86 37.90
3 Big 12 54.66 64.65 42.55
4 American 53.30 63.84 35.47
5 Pac-12 53.06 65.46 44.98
6 ACC 51.70 69.02 39.90
7 Mountain West 48.02 61.71 34.13
8 Sun Belt 47.82 61.29 33.89
9 Conference USA 44.07 56.20 29.03
10 MAC 43.55 51.10 23.55

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *