J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2019 Week 12

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Ohio St 10-0 20 76.59 1
2 LSU 10-0 28 71.28 10.4% 6.9% 2
3 Clemson 11-0 88 70.68 1.2% 7.7% 4
4 Alabama 9-1 42 70.26 0.8% 8.3% 3
5 Penn St 9-1 21 68.29 3.9% 10.8% 5
6 Georgia 9-1 39 67.77 1.0% 11.5% 6
7 Utah 9-1 61 67.22 1.1% 12.2% 8
8 Wisconsin 8-2 8 67.15 0.1% 12.3% 7
9 Michigan 8-2 6 66.33 1.6% 13.4% 13
10 Oregon 9-1 57 65.97 0.7% 13.9% 10
11 Oklahoma 9-1 60 65.39 1.1% 14.6% 11
12 Notre Dame 8-2 14 65.05 0.7% 15.1% 19
13 Auburn 7-3 4 64.51 1.1% 15.8% 9
14 Cincinnati 9-1 37 63.83 1.3% 16.7% 14
15 Memphis 9-1 80 63.80 0.1% 16.7% 16
16 Minnesota 9-1 65 63.51 0.6% 17.1% 12
17 Florida 9-2 52 63.18 0.6% 17.5% 20
18 SMU 9-1 68 63.02 0.3% 17.7% 18
19 Appalachian St 9-1 105 62.74 0.5% 18.1% 22
20 Baylor 9-1 75 62.74 0.0% 18.1% 17
21 Iowa 7-3 5 62.72 0.0% 18.1% 23
22 Boise St 9-1 97 62.39 0.6% 18.5% 21
23 Navy 7-2 67 60.88 3.0% 20.5% 15
24 Air Force 8-2 81 60.78 0.2% 20.6% 26
25 UCF 7-3 91 60.54 0.5% 21.0% 24
26 Louisiana 8-2 108 60.09 0.9% 21.5% 25
27 Washington 6-4 33 59.15 1.8% 22.8% 28
28 USC 7-4 10 58.75 0.8% 23.3% 34
29 Iowa St 6-4 25 58.58 0.3% 23.5% 32
30 Oklahoma St 7-3 46 58.51 0.1% 23.6% 31
31 Texas A&M 7-3 56 58.49 0.1% 23.6% 33
32 Texas 6-4 13 57.93 1.1% 24.4% 27
33 Indiana 7-3 78 57.34 1.2% 25.1% 30
34 FL Atlantic 7-3 89 56.67 1.3% 26.0% 35
35 Virginia 7-3 82 56.17 1.0% 26.7% 38
36 Miami FL 6-4 51 55.83 0.7% 27.1% 40
37 Kansas St 6-4 50 55.63 0.4% 27.4% 29
38 Wake Forest 7-3 59 55.23 0.8% 27.9% 37
39 Pittsburgh 7-3 54 54.43 1.6% 28.9% 49
40 Tulane 6-4 69 54.39 0.1% 29.0% 36
41 San Diego St 8-2 124 54.16 0.5% 29.3% 50
42 Temple 7-3 66 54.04 0.2% 29.4% 51
43 TCU 5-5 29 53.91 0.3% 29.6% 43
44 BYU 6-4 31 53.89 0.0% 29.6% 44
45 Marshall 7-3 92 53.77 0.2% 29.8% 59
46 Michigan St 4-6 1 53.69 0.2% 29.9% 41
47 Louisville 6-4 23 53.55 0.3% 30.1% 55
48 Florida St 6-5 34 53.52 0.1% 30.1% 48
49 Virginia Tech 7-3 110 53.43 0.2% 30.2% 53
50 Illinois 6-4 58 53.42 0.0% 30.2% 47
51 Louisiana Tech 8-2 128 53.33 0.2% 30.4% 39
52 Southern Miss 7-3 114 53.04 0.6% 30.7% 54
53 Tennessee 5-5 18 52.72 0.6% 31.2% 52
54 Utah St 6-4 41 52.65 0.1% 31.3% 60
55 Washington St 5-5 79 52.52 0.3% 31.4% 63
56 Mississippi St 4-6 2 52.38 0.3% 31.6% 46
57 Wyoming 6-4 109 52.27 0.2% 31.8% 42
58 W Michigan 7-4 107 52.26 0.0% 31.8% 58
59 North Carolina 4-6 9 52.01 0.5% 32.1% 45
60 Kentucky 5-5 43 51.50 1.0% 32.8% 66
61 Missouri 5-5 73 51.08 0.8% 33.3% 56
62 Miami OH 6-4 53 51.02 0.1% 33.4% 76
63 Boston College 5-5 77 50.85 0.3% 33.6% 65
64 Hawaii 7-4 100 50.82 0.0% 33.6% 70
65 Ga Southern 6-4 72 50.77 0.1% 33.7% 80
66 Arizona St 5-5 55 50.69 0.2% 33.8% 61
67 Oregon St 5-5 47 50.56 0.3% 34.0% 73
68 Arkansas St 6-4 85 50.42 0.3% 34.2% 69
69 California 5-5 30 50.30 0.2% 34.3% 57
70 WKU 6-4 112 50.16 0.3% 34.5% 72
71 C Michigan 7-4 122 49.93 0.4% 34.8% 77
72 Georgia St 6-4 96 49.45 0.9% 35.4% 62
73 UCLA 4-6 11 49.39 0.1% 35.5% 64
74 Buffalo 5-5 106 49.19 0.4% 35.8% 68
75 Nebraska 4-6 16 49.10 0.2% 35.9% 74
76 Texas Tech 4-6 76 48.71 0.8% 36.4% 75
77 South Carolina 4-7 15 48.69 0.0% 36.4% 71
78 UAB 7-3 130 48.38 0.6% 36.8% 86
79 Tulsa 3-7 3 48.38 0.0% 36.8% 78
80 Purdue 4-6 24 48.35 0.0% 36.9% 82
81 Mississippi 4-7 36 48.23 0.2% 37.0% 81
82 Duke 4-6 45 47.72 1.0% 37.7% 67
83 Troy 5-5 125 47.62 0.2% 37.8% 95
84 South Florida 4-6 48 47.55 0.1% 37.9% 84
85 Army 5-6 123 47.35 0.4% 38.2% 91
86 Stanford 4-6 17 47.21 0.3% 38.4% 79
87 Toledo 6-4 120 46.85 0.7% 38.8% 83
88 Ohio 4-6 86 46.80 0.1% 38.9% 90
89 Colorado 4-6 26 46.79 0.0% 38.9% 89
90 Maryland 3-7 12 46.76 0.1% 38.9% 93
91 Syracuse 4-6 64 46.74 0.0% 39.0% 104
92 Fresno St 4-6 87 46.66 0.2% 39.1% 85
93 Houston 3-7 22 46.28 0.7% 39.6% 87
94 Ball St 4-6 99 46.27 0.0% 39.6% 92
95 Liberty 6-4 129 45.63 1.3% 40.4% 96
96 Nevada 6-4 103 45.28 0.7% 40.9% 97
97 ULM 4-6 70 45.16 0.2% 41.0% 88
98 West Virginia 4-6 38 45.07 0.2% 41.2% 108
99 Arizona 4-6 49 44.94 0.3% 41.3% 94
100 San Jose St 4-6 93 44.86 0.2% 41.4% 99
101 Coastal Car 4-6 104 44.29 1.1% 42.2% 100
102 NC State 4-6 71 44.18 0.2% 42.3% 98
103 E Michigan 5-5 117 44.10 0.1% 42.4% 107
104 Charlotte 5-5 111 43.99 0.2% 42.6% 101
105 Kent 4-6 102 43.21 1.5% 43.6% 110
106 Florida Intl 5-5 126 43.05 0.3% 43.8% 103
107 Kansas 3-7 44 42.95 0.2% 43.9% 102
108 North Texas 4-6 115 42.92 0.1% 44.0% 105
109 Colorado St 4-6 116 42.65 0.5% 44.3% 109
110 Northwestern 2-8 27 42.25 0.8% 44.8% 111
111 MTSU 3-7 83 42.23 0.0% 44.9% 106
112 N Illinois 4-6 113 41.77 0.9% 45.5% 115
113 East Carolina 3-7 90 40.79 1.9% 46.7% 112
114 Arkansas 2-8 40 39.40 2.7% 48.6% 116
115 Georgia Tech 2-8 32 39.22 0.4% 48.8% 113
116 Rutgers 2-8 7 39.19 0.1% 48.8% 120
117 Texas St 3-7 74 38.60 1.2% 49.6% 114
118 UT San Antonio 4-6 121 37.84 1.5% 50.6% 119
119 Vanderbilt 2-8 19 37.69 0.3% 50.8% 118
120 Rice 1-9 35 37.47 0.4% 51.1% 123
121 Bowling Green 3-7 94 37.43 0.1% 51.1% 117
122 UNLV 2-8 101 36.05 2.7% 52.9% 121
123 Connecticut 2-8 62 35.39 1.3% 53.8% 122
124 South Alabama 1-9 63 35.38 0.0% 53.8% 125
125 New Mexico 2-8 95 35.09 0.6% 54.2% 124
126 Old Dominion 1-9 98 33.47 3.2% 56.3% 126
127 New Mexico St 1-9 84 32.33 2.2% 57.8% 127
128 UTEP 1-9 118 28.96 6.6% 62.2% 128
129 Akron 0-10 119 24.38 9.0% 68.2% 129
130 Massachusetts 1-10 127 22.49 3.7% 70.6% 130

Best win: Ohio St. 38-7 vs. Wisconsin
Worst loss: Massachusetts 45-20 vs. Southern Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 56.76 76.59 39.19
2 SEC 55.51 71.28 37.69
3 Big 12 54.94 65.39 42.95
4 Pac-12 53.63 67.22 44.94
5 American 53.24 63.83 35.39
6 ACC 52.40 70.68 39.22
7 Mountain West 48.64 62.39 35.09
8 Sun Belt 48.45 62.74 35.38
9 Conference USA 44.66 56.67 28.96
10 MAC 44.43 52.26 24.38

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *