J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2019 Week 13

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Ohio St 11-0 12 76.45 1
2 Clemson 11-0 83 70.53 11.7% 7.7% 3
3 LSU 11-0 45 70.16 0.7% 8.2% 2
4 Alabama 10-1 81 68.43 3.4% 10.5% 4
5 Georgia 10-1 27 67.87 1.1% 11.2% 6
6 Wisconsin 9-2 8 67.40 0.9% 11.8% 8
7 Michigan 9-2 5 66.99 0.8% 12.4% 9
8 Utah 10-1 71 66.98 0.0% 12.4% 7
9 Penn St 9-2 7 66.59 0.8% 12.9% 5
10 Notre Dame 9-2 11 65.99 1.2% 13.7% 12
11 Oklahoma 10-1 63 64.90 2.1% 15.1% 11
12 Memphis 10-1 78 64.28 1.2% 15.9% 15
13 Oregon 9-2 58 63.57 1.4% 16.8% 10
14 Baylor 10-1 64 63.43 0.3% 17.0% 20
15 Boise St 10-1 91 63.30 0.3% 17.2% 22
16 Auburn 8-3 18 63.19 0.2% 17.3% 13
17 Cincinnati 10-1 39 63.15 0.1% 17.4% 14
18 Florida 9-2 57 62.87 0.6% 17.8% 17
19 Iowa 8-3 6 62.87 0.0% 17.8% 21
20 Minnesota 10-1 80 62.85 0.0% 17.8% 16
21 Appalachian St 10-1 110 62.79 0.1% 17.9% 19
22 Navy 8-2 49 61.79 2.0% 19.2% 23
23 SMU 9-2 55 61.15 1.2% 20.0% 18
24 Louisiana 9-2 108 60.98 0.3% 20.2% 26
25 Air Force 9-2 92 60.53 0.9% 20.8% 24
26 UCF 8-3 87 60.35 0.3% 21.1% 25
27 USC 8-4 13 59.20 2.3% 22.6% 28
28 Iowa St 7-4 32 58.43 1.5% 23.6% 29
29 Oklahoma St 8-3 62 58.09 0.7% 24.0% 30
30 Texas A&M 7-4 41 57.42 1.3% 24.9% 31
31 FL Atlantic 8-3 88 57.07 0.7% 25.4% 34
32 Virginia 8-3 85 57.00 0.1% 25.4% 35
33 Washington 6-5 42 56.66 0.7% 25.9% 27
34 Texas 6-5 4 56.10 1.1% 26.6% 32
35 Wake Forest 8-3 65 55.99 0.2% 26.8% 38
36 Kansas St 7-4 61 55.42 1.1% 27.5% 37
37 Indiana 7-4 59 55.41 0.0% 27.5% 33
38 Virginia Tech 8-3 107 55.12 0.6% 27.9% 49
39 Louisville 7-4 25 54.72 0.8% 28.4% 47
40 Michigan St 5-6 2 54.25 0.9% 29.0% 46
41 Miami FL 6-5 56 53.85 0.8% 29.6% 36
42 Tulane 6-5 50 53.77 0.2% 29.7% 40
43 Temple 7-4 48 53.50 0.5% 30.0% 42
44 Tennessee 6-5 20 53.37 0.3% 30.2% 53
45 Florida St 6-5 33 53.29 0.2% 30.3% 48
46 BYU 7-4 70 53.23 0.1% 30.4% 44
47 TCU 5-6 19 53.13 0.2% 30.5% 43
48 Washington St 6-5 73 53.04 0.2% 30.6% 55
49 Illinois 6-5 40 52.74 0.6% 31.0% 50
50 Arizona St 6-5 34 52.64 0.2% 31.1% 66
51 Wyoming 7-4 117 52.64 0.0% 31.1% 57
52 San Diego St 8-3 122 52.63 0.0% 31.2% 41
53 WKU 7-4 104 52.27 0.7% 31.6% 70
54 North Carolina 5-6 28 52.06 0.4% 31.9% 59
55 Pittsburgh 7-4 51 52.00 0.1% 32.0% 39
56 Mississippi St 5-6 9 51.97 0.1% 32.0% 56
57 Marshall 7-4 84 51.91 0.1% 32.1% 45
58 W Michigan 7-4 111 51.85 0.1% 32.2% 58
59 Kentucky 6-5 75 51.59 0.5% 32.5% 60
60 Hawaii 8-4 93 51.45 0.3% 32.7% 64
61 Arkansas St 7-4 77 51.36 0.2% 32.8% 68
62 Louisiana Tech 8-3 128 51.30 0.1% 32.9% 51
63 Utah St 6-5 29 50.87 0.9% 33.5% 54
64 Nebraska 5-6 23 50.71 0.3% 33.7% 75
65 Buffalo 6-5 106 50.70 0.0% 33.7% 74
66 California 6-5 36 50.63 0.1% 33.8% 69
67 Southern Miss 7-4 114 50.62 0.0% 33.8% 52
68 Miami OH 7-4 82 50.06 1.1% 34.5% 62
69 Missouri 5-6 66 50.05 0.0% 34.5% 61
70 Georgia St 7-4 102 49.97 0.2% 34.6% 72
71 UAB 8-3 130 49.75 0.4% 34.9% 78
72 C Michigan 7-4 123 49.71 0.1% 35.0% 71
73 Oregon St 5-6 46 49.68 0.1% 35.0% 67
74 Boston College 5-6 54 49.55 0.2% 35.2% 63
75 Ga Southern 6-5 68 49.54 0.0% 35.2% 65
76 Colorado 5-6 21 48.51 2.0% 36.6% 89
77 South Carolina 4-7 14 48.49 0.0% 36.6% 77
78 UCLA 4-7 3 48.17 0.6% 37.0% 73
79 Texas Tech 4-7 67 47.93 0.5% 37.3% 76
80 Ohio 5-6 96 47.91 0.0% 37.3% 88
81 Mississippi 4-7 37 47.90 0.0% 37.3% 81
82 Purdue 4-7 15 47.57 0.6% 37.8% 80
83 Houston 4-7 26 47.44 0.3% 38.0% 93
84 Army 5-6 125 47.41 0.1% 38.0% 85
85 Duke 4-7 38 46.74 1.3% 38.9% 82
86 Tulsa 3-8 1 46.68 0.1% 38.9% 79
87 South Florida 4-7 30 46.40 0.5% 39.3% 84
88 Charlotte 6-5 103 46.38 0.0% 39.3% 104
89 Stanford 4-7 22 46.06 0.6% 39.8% 86
90 ULM 5-6 72 46.03 0.1% 39.8% 97
91 Troy 5-6 121 46.00 0.0% 39.8% 83
92 Nevada 7-4 109 46.00 0.0% 39.8% 96
93 E Michigan 6-5 119 45.75 0.5% 40.2% 103
94 Fresno St 4-7 86 45.26 1.0% 40.8% 92
95 Florida Intl 6-5 126 45.22 0.1% 40.8% 106
96 Toledo 6-5 118 45.00 0.4% 41.1% 87
97 Ball St 4-7 99 44.91 0.2% 41.3% 94
98 Syracuse 4-7 69 44.65 0.5% 41.6% 91
99 West Virginia 4-7 31 44.40 0.5% 41.9% 98
100 Kent 5-6 95 44.36 0.1% 42.0% 105
101 Liberty 6-5 129 44.35 0.0% 42.0% 95
102 Maryland 3-8 16 44.21 0.3% 42.2% 90
103 Arizona 4-7 35 44.07 0.3% 42.4% 99
104 MTSU 4-7 90 43.77 0.6% 42.7% 111
105 Coastal Car 4-7 101 43.58 0.4% 43.0% 101
106 San Jose St 4-7 98 43.37 0.4% 43.3% 100
107 NC State 4-7 79 42.88 1.0% 43.9% 102
108 Kansas 3-8 43 42.19 1.3% 44.8% 107
109 Northwestern 2-9 17 42.11 0.2% 44.9% 110
110 Colorado St 4-7 112 41.73 0.8% 45.4% 109
111 East Carolina 4-7 100 41.38 0.7% 45.9% 113
112 North Texas 4-7 120 41.37 0.0% 45.9% 108
113 Georgia Tech 3-8 44 40.18 2.4% 47.4% 115
114 N Illinois 4-7 115 40.11 0.1% 47.5% 112
115 Arkansas 2-9 24 39.21 1.8% 48.7% 114
116 Rice 2-9 47 38.82 0.8% 49.2% 120
117 Vanderbilt 3-8 52 38.78 0.1% 49.3% 119
118 Texas St 3-8 53 38.48 0.6% 49.7% 117
119 Rutgers 2-9 10 37.88 1.2% 50.5% 116
120 UNLV 3-8 97 37.70 0.3% 50.7% 122
121 UT San Antonio 4-7 113 37.51 0.4% 50.9% 118
122 Bowling Green 3-8 94 35.96 3.1% 53.0% 121
123 New Mexico 2-9 76 35.25 1.4% 53.9% 125
124 South Alabama 1-10 60 35.22 0.1% 53.9% 124
125 Connecticut 2-9 74 34.62 1.2% 54.7% 123
126 New Mexico St 2-9 105 33.20 2.8% 56.6% 127
127 Old Dominion 1-10 89 33.06 0.3% 56.8% 126
128 UTEP 1-10 124 28.18 9.6% 63.1% 128
129 Akron 0-11 116 25.69 4.9% 66.4% 129
130 Massachusetts 1-11 127 22.91 5.5% 70.0% 130

Best win: Ohio St. 38-7 vs. Wisconsin
Worst loss: Massachusetts 45-20 vs. Southern Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 56.29 76.45 37.88
2 SEC 55.09 70.16 38.78
3 Big 12 54.40 64.90 42.19
4 Pac-12 53.27 66.98 44.07
5 American 52.88 64.28 34.62
6 ACC 52.04 70.53 40.18
7 Sun Belt 48.39 62.79 35.22
8 Mountain West 48.39 63.30 35.25
9 Conference USA 44.80 57.07 28.18
10 MAC 44.34 51.85 25.69

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *