J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2019 Week 14

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Ohio St 12-0 6 76.83 1
2 LSU 12-0 38 70.87 11.8% 7.8% 3
3 Clemson 12-0 90 70.11 1.5% 8.7% 2
4 Wisconsin 10-2 5 68.04 4.1% 11.4% 6
5 Georgia 11-1 41 67.62 0.8% 12.0% 5
6 Utah 11-1 77 66.99 1.3% 12.8% 8
7 Alabama 10-2 67 66.66 0.7% 13.2% 4
8 Notre Dame 10-2 20 65.59 2.1% 14.6% 10
9 Penn St 10-2 21 65.57 0.0% 14.7% 9
10 Oklahoma 11-1 55 65.26 0.6% 15.1% 11
11 Memphis 11-1 66 65.01 0.5% 15.4% 12
12 Michigan 9-3 1 64.78 0.5% 15.7% 7
13 Auburn 9-3 8 63.81 1.9% 17.0% 16
14 Florida 10-2 49 63.63 0.4% 17.2% 18
15 Oregon 10-2 57 63.54 0.2% 17.3% 13
16 Baylor 11-1 76 63.53 0.0% 17.3% 14
17 Appalachian St 11-1 107 63.40 0.3% 17.5% 21
18 Boise St 11-1 94 62.75 1.3% 18.3% 15
19 Iowa 9-3 15 61.85 1.8% 19.5% 19
20 Navy 9-2 54 61.84 0.0% 19.5% 22
21 SMU 10-2 53 61.48 0.7% 20.0% 23
22 Cincinnati 10-2 29 61.20 0.6% 20.3% 17
23 Air Force 10-2 87 61.08 0.2% 20.5% 25
24 Minnesota 10-2 62 60.85 0.4% 20.8% 20
25 Louisiana 10-2 105 60.60 0.5% 21.1% 24
26 UCF 9-3 93 60.51 0.2% 21.2% 26
27 USC 8-4 14 58.75 3.5% 23.5% 27
28 FL Atlantic 9-3 83 58.04 1.4% 24.5% 31
29 Washington 7-5 42 57.51 1.1% 25.2% 33
30 Virginia 9-3 82 57.40 0.2% 25.3% 32
31 Texas 7-5 10 56.92 0.9% 25.9% 34
32 Oklahoma St 8-4 45 56.44 1.0% 26.5% 29
33 Iowa St 7-5 32 56.41 0.0% 26.6% 28
34 Kansas St 8-4 51 56.33 0.2% 26.7% 36
35 Texas A&M 7-5 23 55.68 1.3% 27.5% 30
36 Indiana 8-4 60 55.41 0.5% 27.9% 37
37 Michigan St 6-6 3 53.98 2.8% 29.7% 40
38 Tennessee 7-5 33 53.72 0.5% 30.1% 44
39 San Diego St 9-3 122 53.70 0.0% 30.1% 52
40 Temple 8-4 72 53.66 0.1% 30.2% 43
41 Wake Forest 8-4 71 53.56 0.2% 30.3% 35
42 Virginia Tech 8-4 101 53.49 0.1% 30.4% 38
43 Kentucky 7-5 74 53.31 0.4% 30.6% 59
44 Arizona St 7-5 46 52.93 0.7% 31.1% 50
45 North Carolina 6-6 47 52.71 0.5% 31.4% 54
46 Hawaii 9-4 92 52.63 0.1% 31.5% 60
47 Tulane 6-6 39 52.39 0.5% 31.8% 42
48 WKU 8-4 111 52.26 0.2% 32.0% 53
49 Marshall 8-4 85 52.16 0.2% 32.1% 57
50 Mississippi St 6-6 12 52.12 0.1% 32.2% 56
51 Louisville 7-5 28 52.08 0.1% 32.2% 39
52 Louisiana Tech 9-3 128 51.70 0.8% 32.7% 62
53 BYU 7-5 65 51.69 0.0% 32.7% 46
54 Wyoming 7-5 100 51.67 0.0% 32.7% 51
55 Miami FL 6-6 58 51.65 0.0% 32.8% 41
56 Buffalo 7-5 119 51.60 0.1% 32.8% 65
57 Florida St 6-6 27 51.53 0.1% 32.9% 45
58 California 7-5 44 51.34 0.4% 33.2% 66
59 TCU 5-7 26 51.31 0.0% 33.2% 47
60 Washington St 6-6 68 51.22 0.2% 33.3% 48
61 C Michigan 8-4 125 51.18 0.1% 33.4% 72
62 Ga Southern 7-5 69 51.08 0.2% 33.5% 75
63 Utah St 7-5 50 50.88 0.4% 33.8% 63
64 Missouri 6-6 75 50.57 0.6% 34.2% 69
65 Pittsburgh 7-5 48 50.54 0.1% 34.2% 55
66 Nebraska 5-7 18 50.41 0.3% 34.4% 64
67 UAB 9-3 130 50.15 0.5% 34.7% 71
68 W Michigan 7-5 118 50.09 0.1% 34.8% 58
69 Boston College 6-6 63 49.99 0.2% 34.9% 74
70 Illinois 6-6 52 49.79 0.4% 35.2% 49
71 Arkansas St 7-5 89 49.37 0.8% 35.7% 61
72 Southern Miss 7-5 104 49.22 0.3% 35.9% 67
73 Oregon St 5-7 34 48.74 0.9% 36.6% 73
74 Ohio 6-6 117 48.50 0.5% 36.9% 80
75 Miami OH 7-5 81 48.18 0.6% 37.3% 68
76 Duke 5-7 43 47.94 0.5% 37.6% 85
77 South Carolina 4-8 2 47.85 0.2% 37.7% 77
78 Georgia St 7-5 102 47.84 0.0% 37.7% 70
79 Tulsa 4-8 4 47.68 0.3% 37.9% 86
80 Colorado 5-7 11 47.46 0.4% 38.2% 76
81 Mississippi 4-8 36 47.31 0.3% 38.4% 81
82 Charlotte 7-5 116 47.03 0.6% 38.8% 88
83 Ball St 5-7 98 46.67 0.7% 39.3% 97
84 Purdue 4-8 17 46.62 0.1% 39.3% 82
85 UCLA 4-8 9 46.58 0.1% 39.4% 78
86 Houston 4-8 22 46.50 0.2% 39.5% 83
87 Texas Tech 4-8 61 46.26 0.5% 39.8% 79
88 ULM 5-7 59 46.04 0.4% 40.1% 90
89 Syracuse 5-7 70 46.03 0.0% 40.1% 98
90 Army 5-7 123 45.72 0.6% 40.5% 84
91 Kent 6-6 96 45.64 0.1% 40.6% 100
92 West Virginia 5-7 37 45.38 0.5% 40.9% 99
93 Liberty 7-5 129 45.37 0.0% 41.0% 101
94 Stanford 4-8 13 45.35 0.0% 41.0% 89
95 South Florida 4-8 25 45.09 0.5% 41.3% 87
96 Troy 5-7 108 45.00 0.2% 41.4% 91
97 Nevada 7-5 115 44.71 0.6% 41.8% 92
98 Florida Intl 6-6 124 44.64 0.1% 41.9% 95
99 E Michigan 6-6 121 44.64 0.0% 41.9% 93
100 Fresno St 4-8 86 44.53 0.2% 42.0% 94
101 San Jose St 5-7 99 44.28 0.5% 42.4% 106
102 Northwestern 3-9 19 44.16 0.2% 42.5% 109
103 Coastal Car 5-7 114 43.78 0.8% 43.0% 105
104 Maryland 3-9 16 43.68 0.2% 43.1% 102
105 Toledo 6-6 112 43.53 0.3% 43.3% 96
106 MTSU 4-8 84 43.29 0.5% 43.7% 104
107 Arizona 4-8 35 43.06 0.5% 44.0% 103
108 Colorado St 4-8 95 41.93 2.2% 45.4% 110
109 N Illinois 5-7 110 41.65 0.6% 45.8% 114
110 NC State 4-8 80 41.32 0.6% 46.2% 107
111 Kansas 3-9 30 41.27 0.1% 46.3% 108
112 North Texas 4-8 120 40.95 0.6% 46.7% 112
113 East Carolina 4-8 103 39.67 2.5% 48.4% 111
114 Georgia Tech 3-9 31 39.57 0.2% 48.5% 113
115 Rice 3-9 79 39.40 0.3% 48.7% 116
116 UNLV 4-8 97 39.24 0.3% 48.9% 120
117 Arkansas 2-10 24 38.74 1.0% 49.6% 115
118 Vanderbilt 3-9 40 38.50 0.5% 49.9% 117
119 Texas St 3-9 64 37.77 1.4% 50.8% 118
120 Rutgers 2-10 7 37.58 0.4% 51.1% 119
121 South Alabama 2-10 56 37.18 0.8% 51.6% 124
122 UT San Antonio 4-8 109 36.80 0.7% 52.1% 121
123 Bowling Green 3-9 88 35.04 3.5% 54.4% 122
124 New Mexico 2-10 73 34.99 0.1% 54.5% 123
125 Connecticut 2-10 78 33.47 3.0% 56.4% 125
126 New Mexico St 2-10 106 32.46 2.0% 57.8% 126
127 Old Dominion 1-11 91 32.43 0.1% 57.8% 127
128 UTEP 1-11 126 27.43 9.9% 64.3% 128
129 Akron 0-12 113 25.32 4.2% 67.0% 129
130 Massachusetts 1-11 127 22.78 5.0% 70.4% 130

Best win: Ohio St. 38-7 vs. Wisconsin
Worst loss: Massachusetts 45-20 vs. Southern Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 55.68 76.83 37.58
2 SEC 55.03 70.87 38.50
3 Big 12 53.91 65.26 41.27
4 Pac-12 52.79 66.99 43.06
5 American 52.37 65.01 33.47
6 ACC 51.28 70.11 39.57
7 Mountain West 48.53 62.75 34.99
8 Sun Belt 48.21 63.40 37.18
9 Conference USA 44.68 58.04 27.43
10 MAC 44.34 51.60 25.32

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *