J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2019 Week 5

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Ohio St 5-0 10 77.29 1
2 Auburn 5-0 6 73.16 8.3% 5.4% 4
3 Alabama 5-0 51 71.14 4.0% 8.0% 5
4 Wisconsin 4-0 53 68.96 4.3% 10.8% 2
5 Clemson 5-0 36 68.42 1.1% 11.5% 3
6 Georgia 4-0 70 67.14 2.6% 13.1% 8
7 Penn St 4-0 90 66.41 1.5% 14.1% 14
8 SMU 5-0 44 66.23 0.4% 14.3% 6
9 Michigan St 4-1 19 65.83 0.8% 14.8% 12
10 Oklahoma 4-0 113 65.65 0.4% 15.1% 17
11 LSU 4-0 98 65.49 0.3% 15.3% 10
12 Notre Dame 3-1 12 65.39 0.2% 15.4% 18
13 Iowa 4-0 71 65.29 0.2% 15.5% 9
14 Texas 3-1 8 64.75 1.1% 16.2% 11
15 Washington 4-1 48 63.56 2.4% 17.8% 19
16 Boise St 4-0 56 63.35 0.4% 18.0% 15
17 Oklahoma St 4-1 37 62.30 2.1% 19.4% 25
18 Cincinnati 3-1 9 62.14 0.3% 19.6% 36
19 Appalachian St 4-0 94 62.07 0.1% 19.7% 24
20 Wake Forest 5-0 77 61.17 1.8% 20.9% 21
21 Memphis 4-0 115 61.13 0.1% 20.9% 26
22 Oregon 3-1 55 60.72 0.8% 21.4% 22
23 Arizona St 4-1 27 60.32 0.8% 22.0% 35
24 TCU 3-1 78 59.96 0.7% 22.4% 40
25 Missouri 3-1 68 59.92 0.1% 22.5% 31
26 UCF 4-1 106 59.91 0.0% 22.5% 28
27 Florida 5-0 126 59.38 1.1% 23.2% 16
28 Mississippi St 3-2 3 59.25 0.3% 23.3% 7
29 Colorado 3-1 18 58.80 0.9% 23.9% 29
30 Baylor 4-0 125 58.65 0.3% 24.1% 34
31 Michigan 3-1 26 58.64 0.0% 24.1% 37
32 Air Force 3-1 46 58.16 1.0% 24.8% 42
33 Utah 4-1 101 57.85 0.6% 25.2% 41
34 Louisiana 4-1 96 57.77 0.2% 25.3% 32
35 Virginia 4-1 60 57.55 0.4% 25.5% 20
36 Kansas St 3-1 73 57.07 1.0% 26.2% 13
37 California 4-1 41 56.34 1.5% 27.1% 23
38 Tulane 3-1 69 56.33 0.0% 27.1% 46
39 Duke 3-1 82 56.17 0.3% 27.3% 58
40 Florida St 3-2 17 55.84 0.7% 27.8% 54
41 USC 3-2 21 55.56 0.6% 28.1% 30
42 Utah St 3-1 87 55.56 0.0% 28.1% 43
43 Hawaii 4-1 66 55.43 0.2% 28.3% 61
44 Texas A&M 3-2 29 55.37 0.1% 28.4% 44
45 Wyoming 4-1 89 54.95 0.8% 28.9% 53
46 North Carolina 2-3 1 54.33 1.2% 29.7% 47
47 Nebraska 3-2 25 54.06 0.5% 30.1% 33
48 Navy 2-1 102 53.73 0.7% 30.5% 27
49 Indiana 3-2 40 53.40 0.7% 30.9% 45
50 Army 3-1 118 53.04 0.7% 31.4% 51
51 Arizona 3-1 92 52.97 0.2% 31.5% 60
52 Iowa St 2-2 39 52.90 0.1% 31.6% 48
53 Minnesota 4-0 123 52.67 0.5% 31.9% 67
54 Tulsa 2-2 4 52.41 0.5% 32.2% 57
55 Maryland 2-2 38 52.35 0.1% 32.3% 38
56 Syracuse 3-2 34 52.32 0.1% 32.3% 50
57 FL Atlantic 3-2 33 51.65 1.3% 33.2% 81
58 West Virginia 3-1 79 50.91 1.5% 34.1% 56
59 Temple 3-1 120 50.65 0.5% 34.5% 71
60 Arkansas St 3-2 49 50.55 0.2% 34.6% 79
61 W Michigan 3-2 74 50.48 0.2% 34.7% 82
62 San Diego St 3-1 122 50.13 0.7% 35.1% 64
63 Miami FL 2-2 72 49.97 0.3% 35.3% 62
64 Pittsburgh 3-2 30 49.76 0.4% 35.6% 49
65 Toledo 3-1 119 49.75 0.0% 35.6% 80
66 Kentucky 2-3 13 49.70 0.1% 35.7% 39
67 South Carolina 2-3 20 49.63 0.1% 35.8% 92
68 Louisiana Tech 4-1 117 49.58 0.1% 35.8% 73
69 Washington St 3-2 108 48.92 1.3% 36.7% 55
70 Louisville 2-2 57 48.72 0.4% 37.0% 87
71 NC State 3-2 95 48.71 0.0% 37.0% 52
72 Boston College 3-2 103 48.22 1.0% 37.6% 66
73 Southern Miss 3-2 65 48.10 0.2% 37.8% 74
74 Liberty 3-2 84 47.93 0.3% 38.0% 83
75 Miami OH 2-3 7 47.68 0.5% 38.3% 99
76 Mississippi 2-3 24 47.60 0.2% 38.4% 72
77 Coastal Car 3-2 111 47.56 0.1% 38.5% 65
78 E Michigan 3-1 100 47.39 0.3% 38.7% 68
79 Houston 2-3 43 47.07 0.6% 39.1% 102
80 Marshall 2-2 50 46.60 0.9% 39.7% 63
81 Illinois 2-2 116 46.35 0.5% 40.0% 70
82 Texas Tech 2-2 88 45.63 1.4% 41.0% 76
83 Fresno St 2-2 109 45.56 0.1% 41.1% 97
84 Stanford 2-3 15 45.37 0.4% 41.3% 96
85 Kent 2-2 45 45.29 0.2% 41.4% 91
86 BYU 2-3 14 45.23 0.1% 41.5% 78
87 ULM 2-2 104 44.74 1.0% 42.1% 107
88 Northwestern 1-3 11 44.63 0.2% 42.3% 98
89 North Texas 2-3 64 44.52 0.2% 42.4% 69
90 Kansas 2-3 54 44.35 0.3% 42.6% 77
91 Troy 2-2 128 44.28 0.1% 42.7% 75
92 UAB 3-1 130 44.05 0.5% 43.0% 59
93 Buffalo 2-3 47 43.88 0.3% 43.2% 84
94 UCLA 1-4 5 43.85 0.1% 43.3% 94
95 San Jose St 2-2 80 43.73 0.2% 43.4% 88
96 Oregon St 1-3 52 43.49 0.5% 43.7% 93
97 Charlotte 2-3 61 42.98 1.0% 44.4% 90
98 Purdue 1-3 32 42.68 0.6% 44.8% 95
99 Texas St 2-3 42 42.13 1.1% 45.5% 108
100 Nevada 3-2 91 42.07 0.1% 45.6% 86
101 Arkansas 2-3 105 41.73 0.7% 46.0% 100
102 C Michigan 2-3 86 41.31 0.8% 46.5% 85
103 Virginia Tech 2-2 110 41.25 0.1% 46.6% 89
104 East Carolina 3-2 127 40.80 0.9% 47.2% 106
105 New Mexico 2-2 97 40.15 1.3% 48.0% 103
106 South Florida 1-3 35 40.14 0.0% 48.1% 101
107 Ga Southern 1-3 28 40.06 0.2% 48.2% 109
108 Ohio 1-3 75 39.42 1.3% 49.0% 104
109 Vanderbilt 1-3 16 39.28 0.3% 49.2% 121
110 Rice 0-5 2 39.18 0.2% 49.3% 111
111 Ball St 1-3 76 39.17 0.0% 49.3% 110
112 Georgia St 2-2 121 39.13 0.1% 49.4% 114
113 WKU 2-2 124 38.98 0.3% 49.6% 127
114 MTSU 1-3 23 38.98 0.0% 49.6% 115
115 Rutgers 1-3 31 38.09 1.8% 50.7% 105
116 Tennessee 1-3 99 37.91 0.4% 51.0% 112
117 Colorado St 1-4 58 37.07 1.7% 52.0% 119
118 Georgia Tech 1-3 62 35.48 3.2% 54.1% 113
119 N Illinois 1-3 83 35.43 0.1% 54.2% 116
120 Florida Intl 1-3 93 35.13 0.6% 54.6% 125
121 UNLV 1-3 85 34.44 1.4% 55.4% 122
122 UT San Antonio 1-3 67 34.25 0.4% 55.7% 120
123 Old Dominion 1-3 107 34.21 0.1% 55.7% 118
124 South Alabama 1-4 63 34.18 0.1% 55.8% 117
125 Connecticut 1-3 59 33.73 0.9% 56.4% 123
126 Bowling Green 1-3 81 33.21 1.0% 57.0% 124
127 New Mexico St 0-5 22 31.05 4.3% 59.8% 126
128 UTEP 1-3 114 28.78 4.5% 62.8% 128
129 Massachusetts 1-4 129 22.98 11.6% 70.3% 130
130 Akron 0-5 112 22.55 17.0% 70.8% 129

Best win: Ohio St. 42-0 vs. Cincinnati
Worst loss: Massachusetts 45-20 vs. Southern Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 12 56.22 65.65 44.35
2 Big 10 56.19 77.29 38.09
3 SEC 55.48 73.16 37.91
4 Pac-12 53.98 63.56 43.49
5 American 52.02 66.23 33.73
6 ACC 51.99 68.42 35.48
7 Mountain West 48.38 63.35 34.44
8 Sun Belt 46.25 62.07 34.18
9 MAC 41.30 50.48 22.55
10 Conference USA 41.21 51.65 28.78

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *