J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2019 Week 6

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Ohio St 6-0 7 77.76 1
2 Alabama 5-0 56 71.42 12.6% 8.1% 3
3 Wisconsin 5-0 44 70.99 0.9% 8.7% 4
4 Clemson 5-0 38 68.60 4.8% 11.8% 5
5 Auburn 5-1 2 68.09 1.0% 12.4% 2
6 LSU 5-0 86 67.55 1.1% 13.1% 11
7 Penn St 5-0 88 67.10 0.9% 13.7% 7
8 Oklahoma 5-0 111 66.55 1.1% 14.4% 10
9 Georgia 5-0 102 65.60 1.9% 15.6% 6
10 SMU 6-0 52 65.12 1.0% 16.2% 8
11 Notre Dame 4-1 29 64.76 0.7% 16.7% 12
12 Texas 4-1 17 64.54 0.4% 17.0% 14
13 Memphis 5-0 101 63.31 2.4% 18.6% 21
14 Florida 6-0 106 62.79 1.0% 19.3% 27
15 Baylor 5-0 104 62.48 0.6% 19.6% 30
16 Michigan St 4-2 4 62.41 0.1% 19.7% 9
17 Iowa 4-1 28 62.35 0.1% 19.8% 13
18 Oregon 4-1 49 62.34 0.0% 19.8% 22
19 Cincinnati 4-1 11 62.27 0.1% 19.9% 18
20 Michigan 4-1 14 61.99 0.6% 20.3% 31
21 Appalachian St 4-0 105 61.97 0.0% 20.3% 19
22 Boise St 5-0 100 61.65 0.6% 20.7% 16
23 Missouri 4-1 84 61.28 0.7% 21.2% 25
24 Wake Forest 5-0 89 60.41 1.7% 22.3% 20
25 UCF 4-2 79 58.81 3.2% 24.4% 26
26 Louisiana 4-1 90 58.46 0.7% 24.8% 34
27 Washington 4-2 51 58.44 0.0% 24.8% 15
28 Tulane 4-1 67 58.43 0.0% 24.8% 38
29 Arizona St 4-1 50 58.40 0.1% 24.9% 23
30 Mississippi St 3-2 6 57.78 1.2% 25.7% 28
31 Virginia 4-1 71 57.76 0.1% 25.7% 35
32 Navy 3-1 80 57.75 0.0% 25.7% 48
33 Utah 4-1 110 57.69 0.1% 25.8% 33
34 Oklahoma St 4-2 40 57.51 0.4% 26.0% 17
35 Iowa St 3-2 30 57.45 0.1% 26.1% 52
36 Arizona 4-1 77 56.15 2.6% 27.8% 51
37 Florida St 3-2 15 56.01 0.3% 28.0% 40
38 Hawaii 4-1 74 55.83 0.4% 28.2% 43
39 Minnesota 5-0 125 55.77 0.1% 28.3% 53
40 USC 3-2 20 55.66 0.2% 28.4% 41
41 Maryland 3-2 64 55.17 1.0% 29.1% 55
42 Wyoming 4-1 94 55.03 0.3% 29.2% 45
43 Texas A&M 3-2 32 54.76 0.5% 29.6% 44
44 North Carolina 3-3 10 54.69 0.2% 29.7% 46
45 Duke 3-2 55 54.52 0.3% 29.9% 39
46 Colorado 3-2 21 54.40 0.2% 30.0% 29
47 TCU 3-2 69 54.12 0.6% 30.4% 24
48 Air Force 3-2 36 54.05 0.1% 30.5% 32
49 California 4-2 27 53.62 0.9% 31.0% 37
50 Nebraska 4-2 42 53.44 0.4% 31.3% 47
51 Indiana 3-2 53 52.90 1.1% 32.0% 49
52 Temple 4-1 124 52.75 0.3% 32.2% 59
53 Syracuse 3-2 34 52.60 0.3% 32.4% 56
54 Kansas St 3-2 61 52.52 0.1% 32.5% 36
55 Pittsburgh 4-2 25 52.38 0.3% 32.6% 64
56 Toledo 4-1 115 52.30 0.2% 32.7% 65
57 Utah St 3-2 48 52.17 0.3% 32.9% 42
58 FL Atlantic 3-2 33 51.91 0.5% 33.2% 57
59 Army 3-2 85 51.61 0.6% 33.6% 50
60 Texas Tech 3-2 63 51.49 0.2% 33.8% 82
61 Louisville 3-2 54 51.17 0.6% 34.2% 70
62 San Diego St 4-1 128 51.03 0.3% 34.4% 62
63 Tulsa 2-3 1 50.69 0.7% 34.8% 54
64 Stanford 3-3 8 50.46 0.5% 35.1% 84
65 Louisiana Tech 4-1 121 50.18 0.6% 35.5% 68
66 Mississippi 3-3 39 50.01 0.3% 35.7% 76
67 South Carolina 2-3 18 49.86 0.3% 35.9% 67
68 Kentucky 2-3 13 49.62 0.5% 36.2% 66
69 West Virginia 3-2 45 49.62 0.0% 36.2% 58
70 W Michigan 3-3 58 49.26 0.7% 36.7% 61
71 NC State 3-2 96 48.97 0.6% 37.0% 71
72 Washington St 3-2 117 48.88 0.2% 37.1% 69
73 UAB 4-1 130 48.35 1.1% 37.8% 92
74 Liberty 4-2 113 48.12 0.5% 38.1% 74
75 Miami FL 2-3 65 47.69 0.8% 38.7% 63
76 Southern Miss 3-2 81 47.62 0.1% 38.8% 73
77 Oregon St 2-3 73 47.60 0.0% 38.8% 96
78 Houston 2-3 41 47.52 0.2% 38.9% 79
79 Boston College 3-3 87 47.10 0.8% 39.4% 72
80 Miami OH 2-3 12 47.07 0.0% 39.5% 75
81 Coastal Car 3-2 127 46.45 1.3% 40.3% 77
82 Fresno St 2-2 108 46.36 0.2% 40.4% 83
83 Arkansas St 3-3 72 46.15 0.4% 40.6% 60
84 San Jose St 3-2 107 45.78 0.7% 41.1% 95
85 C Michigan 3-3 91 45.42 0.7% 41.6% 102
86 BYU 2-3 16 45.08 0.7% 42.0% 86
87 Virginia Tech 3-2 114 44.92 0.3% 42.2% 103
88 Northwestern 1-4 9 44.72 0.4% 42.5% 88
89 ULM 2-3 57 44.63 0.2% 42.6% 87
90 Georgia St 3-2 120 44.60 0.1% 42.6% 112
91 North Texas 2-3 76 44.58 0.0% 42.7% 89
92 WKU 3-2 126 44.46 0.2% 42.8% 113
93 South Florida 2-3 78 43.93 1.0% 43.5% 106
94 Kent 2-3 24 43.24 1.4% 44.4% 85
95 MTSU 2-3 31 43.23 0.0% 44.4% 114
96 Marshall 2-3 62 43.16 0.1% 44.5% 80
97 Charlotte 2-3 75 42.90 0.5% 44.8% 97
98 Buffalo 2-4 60 42.85 0.1% 44.9% 93
99 Ga Southern 2-3 46 42.70 0.3% 45.1% 107
100 Texas St 2-3 37 42.70 0.0% 45.1% 99
101 Illinois 2-3 112 42.59 0.2% 45.2% 81
102 Kansas 2-4 47 42.56 0.1% 45.3% 90
103 Nevada 3-2 95 42.30 0.5% 45.6% 100
104 Arkansas 2-3 103 42.20 0.2% 45.7% 101
105 Ohio 2-3 83 42.15 0.1% 45.8% 108
106 E Michigan 3-2 109 42.12 0.1% 45.8% 78
107 UCLA 1-5 5 41.95 0.3% 46.0% 94
108 Troy 2-3 119 41.91 0.1% 46.1% 91
109 Ball St 2-3 97 41.71 0.4% 46.4% 111
110 Purdue 1-4 22 41.50 0.4% 46.6% 98
111 East Carolina 3-3 122 40.52 1.9% 47.9% 104
112 Florida Intl 2-3 123 40.16 0.7% 48.3% 120
113 Tennessee 1-4 43 39.47 1.4% 49.2% 116
114 New Mexico 2-3 92 38.30 2.3% 50.7% 105
115 Rice 0-6 3 37.90 0.8% 51.3% 110
116 UT San Antonio 2-3 99 37.83 0.1% 51.4% 122
117 Vanderbilt 1-4 19 36.74 2.2% 52.8% 109
118 Georgia Tech 1-4 35 36.21 1.1% 53.4% 118
119 Rutgers 1-4 26 36.16 0.1% 53.5% 115
120 Colorado St 1-5 70 35.77 0.8% 54.0% 117
121 South Alabama 1-5 68 34.96 1.6% 55.0% 124
122 UNLV 1-4 66 34.32 1.3% 55.9% 121
123 N Illinois 1-4 93 33.92 0.8% 56.4% 119
124 Old Dominion 1-4 98 33.27 1.3% 57.2% 123
125 Bowling Green 1-4 59 32.84 0.9% 57.8% 126
126 New Mexico St 0-6 23 31.75 2.2% 59.2% 127
127 Connecticut 1-4 82 30.86 1.8% 60.3% 125
128 UTEP 1-4 116 28.97 3.8% 62.7% 128
129 Akron 0-5 118 22.93 12.0% 70.5% 130
130 Massachusetts 1-5 129 21.95 2.0% 71.8% 129

Best win: Ohio St. 42-0 vs. Cincinnati
Worst loss: Massachusetts 45-20 vs. Southern Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 56.06 77.76 36.16
2 Big 12 55.88 66.55 42.56
3 SEC 55.51 71.42 36.74
4 Pac-12 53.80 62.34 41.95
5 American 52.66 65.12 30.86
6 ACC 52.36 68.60 36.21
7 Mountain West 47.72 61.65 34.32
8 Sun Belt 46.45 61.97 34.96
9 Conference USA 42.47 51.91 28.97
10 MAC 41.32 52.30 22.93

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *