J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2019 Week 4

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Ohio St 4-0 24 76.75 1
2 Wisconsin 3-0 29 74.86 3.7% 2.5% 2
3 Clemson 4-0 31 73.26 3.1% 4.5% 5
4 Auburn 4-0 15 72.68 1.1% 5.3% 6
5 Alabama 4-0 60 71.75 1.8% 6.5% 4
6 SMU 4-0 28 68.04 7.2% 11.3% 12
7 Mississippi St 3-1 3 67.79 0.5% 11.7% 16
8 Georgia 4-0 91 66.67 2.2% 13.1% 20
9 Iowa 3-0 45 66.16 1.0% 13.8% 14
10 LSU 4-0 101 65.99 0.3% 14.0% 8
11 Texas 3-1 18 65.79 0.4% 14.3% 21
12 Michigan St 3-1 26 65.72 0.1% 14.4% 11
13 Kansas St 3-0 98 65.51 0.4% 14.7% 13
14 Penn St 3-0 100 65.41 0.2% 14.8% 26
15 Boise St 4-0 57 64.35 2.0% 16.2% 30
16 Florida 4-0 85 64.20 0.3% 16.4% 17
17 Oklahoma 3-0 121 63.88 0.6% 16.8% 22
18 Notre Dame 2-1 22 63.42 0.9% 17.4% 3
19 Washington 3-1 52 63.28 0.3% 17.5% 39
20 Virginia 4-0 97 63.07 0.4% 17.8% 25
21 Wake Forest 4-0 84 62.97 0.2% 18.0% 10
22 Oregon 3-1 49 62.12 1.6% 19.1% 37
23 California 4-0 48 61.73 0.7% 19.6% 42
24 Appalachian St 3-0 102 61.61 0.2% 19.7% 32
25 Oklahoma St 3-1 50 60.94 1.3% 20.6% 18
26 Memphis 3-0 120 60.75 0.3% 20.8% 24
27 Navy 2-0 129 60.68 0.2% 20.9% 35
28 UCF 3-1 95 60.54 0.3% 21.1% 7
29 Colorado 3-1 20 60.44 0.2% 21.2% 36
30 USC 3-1 32 60.20 0.5% 21.6% 40
31 Missouri 3-1 83 60.04 0.3% 21.8% 46
32 Louisiana 3-1 69 60.01 0.1% 21.8% 50
33 Nebraska 3-1 39 59.78 0.4% 22.1% 34
34 Baylor 3-0 128 59.35 0.8% 22.7% 27
35 Arizona St 3-1 37 59.24 0.2% 22.8% 28
36 Cincinnati 2-1 14 58.94 0.6% 23.2% 45
37 Michigan 2-1 10 58.80 0.3% 23.4% 9
38 Maryland 2-1 96 58.68 0.2% 23.6% 38
39 Kentucky 2-2 4 58.49 0.4% 23.8% 15
40 TCU 2-1 70 58.28 0.4% 24.1% 33
41 Utah 3-1 93 57.63 1.3% 24.9% 19
42 Air Force 2-1 36 57.06 1.1% 25.7% 23
43 Utah St 2-1 65 56.80 0.5% 26.0% 59
44 Texas A&M 2-2 23 56.68 0.2% 26.2% 47
45 Indiana 3-1 80 56.33 0.7% 26.6% 55
46 Tulane 3-1 88 56.05 0.5% 27.0% 52
47 North Carolina 2-2 11 54.72 2.6% 28.7% 44
48 Iowa St 2-1 87 54.70 0.0% 28.7% 88
49 Pittsburgh 2-2 5 54.62 0.2% 28.8% 73
50 Syracuse 2-2 6 54.60 0.0% 28.9% 84
51 Army 3-1 112 54.51 0.2% 29.0% 41
52 NC State 3-1 113 53.91 1.2% 29.8% 69
53 Wyoming 3-1 78 53.84 0.1% 29.8% 48
54 Florida St 2-2 19 53.73 0.2% 30.0% 70
55 Washington St 3-1 122 53.52 0.4% 30.3% 31
56 West Virginia 3-1 54 53.51 0.0% 30.3% 75
57 Tulsa 2-2 8 53.35 0.3% 30.5% 76
58 Duke 2-1 77 53.30 0.1% 30.6% 56
59 UAB 3-0 130 53.29 0.0% 30.6% 82
60 Arizona 2-1 99 53.02 0.5% 30.9% 62
61 Hawaii 3-1 62 52.86 0.3% 31.1% 60
62 Miami FL 2-2 43 52.72 0.3% 31.3% 66
63 Marshall 2-1 92 51.97 1.4% 32.3% 64
64 San Diego St 3-1 109 51.94 0.1% 32.3% 54
65 Coastal Car 3-1 123 51.80 0.3% 32.5% 58
66 Boston College 3-1 106 51.74 0.1% 32.6% 80
67 Minnesota 3-0 124 51.40 0.6% 33.0% 65
68 E Michigan 3-1 63 51.37 0.1% 33.1% 43
69 North Texas 2-2 44 51.30 0.1% 33.2% 94
70 Illinois 2-2 73 51.07 0.4% 33.5% 49
71 Temple 2-1 94 50.59 0.9% 34.1% 29
72 Mississippi 2-2 46 50.49 0.2% 34.2% 57
73 Louisiana Tech 3-1 110 50.25 0.5% 34.5% 78
74 Southern Miss 2-2 21 49.96 0.5% 34.9% 67
75 Troy 2-1 127 49.87 0.2% 35.0% 91
76 Texas Tech 2-1 125 49.71 0.3% 35.2% 68
77 Kansas 2-2 72 49.63 0.2% 35.3% 63
78 BYU 2-2 13 49.53 0.2% 35.5% 51
79 Arkansas St 2-2 38 49.49 0.1% 35.5% 74
80 Toledo 2-1 115 49.33 0.3% 35.7% 79
81 FL Atlantic 2-2 30 49.29 0.1% 35.8% 72
82 W Michigan 2-2 64 48.63 1.3% 36.6% 53
83 Liberty 2-2 59 48.04 1.1% 37.4% 107
84 Buffalo 2-2 53 47.71 0.6% 37.8% 120
85 C Michigan 2-2 71 47.51 0.4% 38.1% 71
86 Nevada 3-1 104 47.39 0.2% 38.3% 98
87 Louisville 2-2 90 47.35 0.1% 38.3% 61
88 San Jose St 2-1 111 47.32 0.0% 38.3% 115
89 Virginia Tech 2-1 119 47.19 0.3% 38.5% 90
90 Charlotte 2-2 76 46.89 0.6% 38.9% 83
91 Kent 2-2 41 46.03 1.7% 40.0% 113
92 South Carolina 1-3 25 45.42 1.2% 40.8% 77
93 Oregon St 1-2 68 45.39 0.1% 40.9% 89
94 UCLA 1-3 7 45.31 0.2% 41.0% 119
95 Purdue 1-2 40 45.21 0.2% 41.1% 95
96 Stanford 1-3 9 44.82 0.8% 41.6% 81
97 Fresno St 1-2 75 44.36 0.9% 42.2% 103
98 Northwestern 1-2 33 44.22 0.3% 42.4% 86
99 Miami OH 1-3 12 43.60 1.2% 43.2% 101
100 Arkansas 2-2 114 43.52 0.2% 43.3% 85
101 South Florida 1-2 66 43.33 0.3% 43.5% 99
102 Houston 1-3 35 43.18 0.3% 43.7% 93
103 New Mexico 2-1 107 42.82 0.7% 44.2% 100
104 Ohio 1-3 42 42.37 0.9% 44.8% 102
105 Rutgers 1-2 51 41.87 1.0% 45.4% 92
106 East Carolina 2-2 116 41.61 0.5% 45.8% 117
107 ULM 1-2 86 41.56 0.1% 45.9% 87
108 Texas St 1-3 17 41.45 0.2% 46.0% 121
109 Ga Southern 1-2 56 40.91 1.1% 46.7% 111
110 Ball St 1-3 67 40.87 0.1% 46.7% 105
111 Rice 0-4 1 40.73 0.3% 46.9% 109
112 Tennessee 1-3 81 40.41 0.6% 47.3% 97
113 Georgia Tech 1-2 58 40.03 0.7% 47.8% 114
114 Georgia St 2-2 118 39.86 0.3% 48.1% 96
115 MTSU 1-2 74 39.52 0.7% 48.5% 106
116 N Illinois 1-2 55 39.44 0.2% 48.6% 110
117 South Alabama 1-3 34 38.93 1.0% 49.3% 104
118 Old Dominion 1-2 79 38.09 1.6% 50.4% 125
119 Colorado St 1-3 82 37.93 0.3% 50.6% 118
120 UT San Antonio 1-3 47 36.53 2.7% 52.4% 108
121 Vanderbilt 0-3 2 36.44 0.2% 52.5% 127
122 UNLV 1-2 117 36.19 0.5% 52.8% 122
123 Connecticut 1-2 89 36.17 0.0% 52.9% 112
124 Bowling Green 1-3 61 35.68 0.9% 53.5% 116
125 Florida Intl 1-3 105 34.65 2.0% 54.9% 124
126 New Mexico St 0-4 16 34.16 0.9% 55.5% 123
127 WKU 1-2 126 32.44 3.3% 57.7% 126
128 UTEP 1-2 108 31.77 1.3% 58.6% 128
129 Akron 0-4 27 30.18 3.1% 60.7% 129
130 Massachusetts 0-4 103 20.78 22.5% 72.9% 130

Best win: Ohio St. 42-0 vs. Cincinnati
Worst loss: Massachusetts 45-20 vs. Southern Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 58.30 76.75 41.87
2 Big 12 58.13 65.79 49.63
3 SEC 57.18 72.68 36.44
4 Pac-12 55.56 63.28 44.82
5 ACC 54.51 73.26 40.03
6 American 52.77 68.04 36.17
7 Mountain West 49.41 64.35 36.19
8 Sun Belt 47.55 61.61 38.93
9 MAC 43.56 51.37 30.18
10 Conference USA 43.33 53.29 31.77

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *