J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2018 Week 9

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Alabama 8-0 55 73.41 1
2 Clemson 8-0 34 71.74 3.3% 2.3% 2
3 Michigan 7-1 9 70.48 2.5% 4.0% 3
4 Georgia 7-1 16 69.93 1.1% 4.7% 7
5 LSU 7-1 6 69.39 1.1% 5.5% 6
6 Oklahoma 7-1 25 69.26 0.3% 5.7% 4
7 Notre Dame 8-0 32 68.39 1.7% 6.8% 5
8 Kentucky 7-1 28 65.19 6.3% 11.2% 10
9 Penn St 6-2 20 64.63 1.1% 12.0% 13
10 Ohio St 7-1 51 64.48 0.3% 12.2% 11
11 Iowa 6-2 26 63.67 1.6% 13.3% 8
12 West Virginia 6-1 73 63.38 0.6% 13.7% 20
13 Florida 6-2 15 63.33 0.1% 13.7% 9
14 UCF 7-0 124 62.85 0.9% 14.4% 14
15 Fresno St 7-1 107 62.65 0.4% 14.7% 21
16 Utah 6-2 48 61.91 1.5% 15.7% 22
17 Mississippi St 5-3 11 60.95 1.9% 17.0% 30
18 Washington St 7-1 94 60.91 0.1% 17.0% 24
19 Iowa St 4-3 1 60.33 1.1% 17.8% 37
20 Texas 6-2 27 60.25 0.2% 17.9% 12
21 Army 6-2 37 60.19 0.1% 18.0% 26
22 Utah St 7-1 122 59.67 1.0% 18.7% 29
23 Michigan St 5-3 4 59.50 0.3% 18.9% 41
24 Syracuse 6-2 72 59.06 0.9% 19.5% 40
25 Texas A&M 5-3 8 59.02 0.1% 19.6% 16
26 Purdue 4-4 12 58.83 0.4% 19.9% 23
27 South Carolina 4-3 3 58.68 0.3% 20.1% 35
28 Buffalo 7-1 100 58.66 0.0% 20.1% 33
29 Boston College 6-2 74 58.47 0.4% 20.4% 42
30 NC State 5-2 30 58.47 0.0% 20.4% 18
31 Washington 6-3 53 58.42 0.1% 20.4% 15
32 Cincinnati 7-1 111 58.36 0.1% 20.5% 32
33 Houston 7-1 123 58.34 0.0% 20.5% 43
34 Appalachian St 5-2 88 57.82 1.0% 21.2% 17
35 Ga Southern 7-1 110 57.54 0.6% 21.6% 52
36 Texas Tech 5-3 31 57.51 0.1% 21.7% 31
37 Auburn 5-3 40 57.50 0.0% 21.7% 36
38 Missouri 4-4 5 57.45 0.1% 21.7% 38
39 Stanford 5-3 19 57.42 0.1% 21.8% 25
40 Wisconsin 5-3 41 57.22 0.4% 22.0% 19
41 Virginia 6-2 77 57.10 0.2% 22.2% 34
42 Boise St 6-2 92 56.96 0.3% 22.4% 44
43 Miami FL 5-3 44 56.81 0.3% 22.6% 28
44 Northwestern 5-3 14 56.65 0.3% 22.8% 54
45 UAB 7-1 127 56.40 0.5% 23.2% 39
46 Maryland 5-3 33 56.12 0.6% 23.5% 50
47 Duke 5-3 43 56.09 0.1% 23.6% 27
48 North Texas 7-2 128 55.18 1.8% 24.8% 45
49 Oklahoma St 5-3 59 54.69 1.0% 25.5% 61
50 Mississippi 5-3 47 54.49 0.4% 25.8% 49
51 Temple 5-3 81 53.63 1.7% 26.9% 55
52 Vanderbilt 4-5 10 53.07 1.1% 27.7% 64
53 Troy 6-2 117 52.75 0.6% 28.1% 57
54 South Florida 7-1 126 52.45 0.6% 28.6% 48
55 San Diego St 6-2 85 52.38 0.1% 28.7% 51
56 Arizona St 4-4 36 52.33 0.1% 28.7% 63
57 Pittsburgh 4-4 17 52.24 0.2% 28.8% 75
58 USC 4-4 18 52.03 0.4% 29.1% 53
59 Oregon 5-3 91 51.57 0.9% 29.7% 47
60 Louisiana Tech 6-2 108 51.55 0.0% 29.8% 69
61 Minnesota 4-4 23 51.46 0.2% 29.9% 71
62 Florida Intl 6-2 129 51.42 0.1% 29.9% 65
63 Indiana 4-5 13 51.05 0.7% 30.5% 60
64 Colorado 5-3 103 51.00 0.1% 30.5% 46
65 Georgia Tech 4-4 76 50.76 0.5% 30.9% 77
66 TCU 3-5 22 50.57 0.4% 31.1% 58
67 Toledo 4-4 67 50.45 0.2% 31.3% 80
68 MTSU 5-3 82 50.30 0.3% 31.5% 76
69 Marshall 5-2 119 50.11 0.4% 31.7% 68
70 BYU 4-4 56 49.95 0.3% 32.0% 67
71 W Michigan 6-3 96 49.81 0.3% 32.1% 59
72 N Illinois 5-3 50 49.77 0.1% 32.2% 73
73 E Michigan 4-5 52 49.56 0.4% 32.5% 66
74 Baylor 4-4 46 49.40 0.3% 32.7% 62
75 Tennessee 3-5 7 49.34 0.1% 32.8% 72
76 Virginia Tech 4-3 84 49.11 0.5% 33.1% 56
77 Ohio 5-3 118 49.06 0.1% 33.2% 82
78 Florida St 4-4 49 49.03 0.1% 33.2% 70
79 Arizona 4-5 64 48.87 0.3% 33.4% 94
80 Nevada 5-4 65 48.51 0.7% 33.9% 93
81 California 5-3 98 48.45 0.1% 34.0% 92
82 Wake Forest 4-4 62 48.27 0.4% 34.2% 87
83 ULL 4-4 75 47.84 0.9% 34.8% 85
84 Memphis 4-4 115 47.65 0.4% 35.1% 79
85 Kansas St 3-5 24 47.55 0.2% 35.2% 78
86 Coastal Car 5-3 99 47.31 0.5% 35.6% 81
87 Miami OH 3-5 69 46.79 1.0% 36.3% 84
88 Arkansas St 4-4 86 46.57 0.4% 36.6% 74
89 Nebraska 2-6 21 46.47 0.2% 36.7% 88
90 Akron 4-3 93 46.02 0.9% 37.3% 96
91 UCLA 2-6 2 45.86 0.3% 37.5% 83
92 Hawaii 6-4 112 45.55 0.6% 37.9% 89
93 Air Force 3-5 95 45.17 0.8% 38.5% 86
94 Liberty 4-3 109 45.03 0.3% 38.7% 91
95 Tulane 3-5 68 44.77 0.5% 39.0% 100
96 FL Atlantic 3-5 57 44.51 0.5% 39.4% 90
97 SMU 3-5 35 43.73 1.5% 40.4% 99
98 Southern Miss 3-4 125 42.67 2.1% 41.9% 95
99 Kansas 3-5 79 42.37 0.6% 42.3% 107
100 Illinois 3-5 63 42.05 0.7% 42.7% 97
101 Wyoming 3-6 58 42.04 0.0% 42.7% 105
102 Charlotte 4-4 114 41.59 0.9% 43.3% 104
103 New Mexico 3-5 104 41.43 0.3% 43.6% 98
104 Arkansas 2-7 42 41.35 0.2% 43.7% 101
105 ULM 4-4 105 40.62 1.4% 44.7% 102
106 Navy 2-6 60 39.88 1.5% 45.7% 108
107 Massachusetts 3-6 83 39.57 0.6% 46.1% 113
108 North Carolina 1-6 29 39.36 0.4% 46.4% 109
109 Oregon St 2-6 45 39.28 0.2% 46.5% 123
110 Ball St 3-6 106 38.57 1.4% 47.5% 103
111 Louisville 2-6 54 38.38 0.4% 47.7% 106
112 East Carolina 2-5 78 38.22 0.3% 47.9% 111
113 South Alabama 2-6 70 37.49 1.4% 48.9% 116
114 Tulsa 1-7 66 36.73 1.5% 50.0% 112
115 Georgia St 2-6 87 36.47 0.5% 50.3% 114
116 Colorado St 3-6 101 36.30 0.3% 50.5% 110
117 C Michigan 1-8 61 36.09 0.4% 50.8% 118
118 Rutgers 1-7 38 35.99 0.2% 51.0% 120
119 UT San Antonio 3-5 120 35.38 1.2% 51.8% 119
120 Old Dominion 2-7 102 34.80 1.1% 52.6% 117
121 Kent 1-7 89 34.45 0.7% 53.1% 121
122 UNLV 2-6 121 34.18 0.5% 53.4% 115
123 San Jose St 1-7 90 34.15 0.0% 53.5% 126
124 Connecticut 1-7 39 33.61 1.1% 54.2% 122
125 Texas St 2-6 130 33.36 0.5% 54.5% 128
126 New Mexico St 2-7 97 32.60 1.5% 55.6% 124
127 WKU 1-7 116 31.71 1.8% 56.8% 125
128 Bowling Green 1-7 71 31.34 0.7% 57.3% 127
129 Rice 1-8 80 29.68 3.3% 59.6% 129
130 UTEP 0-8 113 26.34 10.6% 64.1% 130

Best win: LSU 36-16 vs. Georgia
Worst loss: UTEP 10-30 vs. Northern Arizona

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 SEC 59.51 73.41 41.35
2 Big 10 55.62 70.48 35.99
3 Big 12 55.53 69.26 42.37
4 ACC 53.21 71.74 38.38
5 Pac-12 52.34 61.91 39.28
6 American 47.52 62.85 33.61
7 Mountain West 46.58 62.65 34.15
8 Sun Belt 45.78 57.82 33.36
9 MAC 45.05 58.66 31.34
10 Conference USA 42.97 56.40 26.34

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *