J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2018 Week 10

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Alabama 9-0 30 73.96 1
2 Michigan 8-1 9 70.49 7.1% 4.7% 3
3 Georgia 8-1 12 69.77 1.5% 5.7% 4
4 Clemson 9-0 55 69.13 1.3% 6.5% 2
5 Oklahoma 8-1 22 67.52 3.3% 8.7% 6
6 Notre Dame 9-0 35 67.00 1.1% 9.4% 7
7 LSU 7-2 2 65.39 3.3% 11.6% 5
8 UCF 8-0 112 63.11 4.7% 14.7% 14
9 West Virginia 7-1 54 62.45 1.3% 15.6% 12
10 Ohio St 8-1 58 62.06 0.8% 16.1% 10
11 Kentucky 7-2 16 62.01 0.1% 16.2% 8
12 Penn St 6-3 10 61.19 1.7% 17.3% 9
13 Fresno St 8-1 119 60.66 1.1% 18.0% 15
14 Mississippi St 6-3 20 60.32 0.7% 18.4% 17
15 Utah St 8-1 121 59.92 0.8% 19.0% 22
16 Michigan St 6-3 5 59.76 0.3% 19.2% 23
17 Iowa 6-3 28 59.68 0.2% 19.3% 11
18 Washington St 8-1 93 59.33 0.7% 19.8% 18
19 Missouri 5-4 3 59.22 0.2% 19.9% 38
20 Purdue 5-4 8 59.05 0.4% 20.2% 26
21 Florida 6-3 14 59.01 0.1% 20.2% 13
22 Iowa St 5-3 11 58.53 1.0% 20.9% 19
23 Cincinnati 8-1 114 58.18 0.7% 21.3% 32
24 South Carolina 5-3 1 58.17 0.0% 21.3% 27
25 Syracuse 7-2 78 58.01 0.3% 21.6% 24
26 Army 7-2 52 57.86 0.3% 21.8% 21
27 Texas 6-3 21 57.85 0.0% 21.8% 20
28 NC State 6-2 47 57.69 0.3% 22.0% 30
29 Washington 7-3 49 57.66 0.1% 22.0% 31
30 Auburn 6-3 31 57.60 0.1% 22.1% 37
31 Boston College 7-2 76 57.54 0.1% 22.2% 29
32 Utah 6-3 42 57.36 0.4% 22.4% 16
33 Buffalo 8-1 101 57.23 0.3% 22.6% 28
34 Appalachian St 6-2 94 56.91 0.7% 23.0% 34
35 Texas A&M 5-4 6 56.74 0.4% 23.3% 25
36 UAB 8-1 128 56.04 1.4% 24.2% 45
37 Boise St 7-2 85 56.00 0.1% 24.3% 42
38 Duke 6-3 41 55.93 0.1% 24.4% 47
39 Wisconsin 6-3 60 55.44 1.0% 25.0% 40
40 Texas Tech 5-4 23 55.19 0.5% 25.4% 36
41 Stanford 5-4 15 55.01 0.4% 25.6% 39
42 Northwestern 5-4 7 54.76 0.5% 26.0% 44
43 North Texas 7-2 127 54.40 0.7% 26.4% 48
44 Arizona St 5-4 32 53.60 1.6% 27.5% 56
45 Virginia 6-3 71 53.48 0.2% 27.7% 41
46 Houston 7-2 126 53.31 0.4% 27.9% 33
47 Ga Southern 7-2 109 52.94 0.8% 28.4% 35
48 Mississippi 5-4 29 52.85 0.2% 28.5% 50
49 Pittsburgh 5-4 19 52.83 0.0% 28.6% 57
50 Miami FL 5-4 50 52.75 0.2% 28.7% 43
51 Troy 7-2 116 52.67 0.2% 28.8% 53
52 Maryland 5-4 33 52.08 1.2% 29.6% 46
53 San Diego St 7-2 84 51.72 0.7% 30.1% 55
54 Oregon 6-3 96 51.54 0.4% 30.3% 59
55 Vanderbilt 4-5 13 51.43 0.2% 30.5% 52
56 Temple 5-4 61 51.23 0.4% 30.7% 51
57 Oklahoma St 5-4 62 51.19 0.1% 30.8% 49
58 USC 5-4 36 51.01 0.4% 31.0% 58
59 Ohio 6-3 117 50.27 1.5% 32.0% 77
60 Toledo 5-4 83 49.78 1.0% 32.7% 67
61 TCU 4-5 25 49.69 0.2% 32.8% 66
62 Georgia Tech 5-4 88 49.59 0.2% 32.9% 65
63 Tennessee 4-5 18 49.51 0.2% 33.1% 75
64 Baylor 5-4 46 49.49 0.0% 33.1% 74
65 MTSU 6-3 102 48.99 1.0% 33.8% 68
66 N Illinois 6-3 63 48.80 0.4% 34.0% 72
67 Louisiana Tech 6-3 80 48.76 0.1% 34.1% 60
68 E Michigan 5-5 67 48.42 0.7% 34.5% 73
69 Arizona 5-5 75 48.21 0.4% 34.8% 79
70 BYU 4-5 45 48.09 0.2% 35.0% 70
71 South Florida 7-2 125 48.07 0.1% 35.0% 54
72 Indiana 4-5 27 47.98 0.2% 35.1% 63
73 Colorado 5-4 98 47.94 0.1% 35.2% 64
74 Memphis 5-4 123 47.84 0.2% 35.3% 84
75 Tulane 4-5 57 47.14 1.4% 36.3% 95
76 Nevada 5-4 66 47.12 0.0% 36.3% 80
77 Marshall 5-3 122 47.10 0.0% 36.3% 69
78 Arkansas St 5-4 97 46.72 0.8% 36.8% 88
79 California 5-4 79 46.69 0.1% 36.9% 81
80 Virginia Tech 4-4 69 46.59 0.2% 37.0% 76
81 SMU 4-5 24 46.34 0.5% 37.3% 97
82 Florida Intl 6-3 129 46.34 0.0% 37.3% 62
83 ULL 4-5 56 46.10 0.5% 37.7% 83
84 FL Atlantic 4-5 59 45.99 0.2% 37.8% 96
85 W Michigan 6-4 91 45.98 0.0% 37.8% 71
86 Minnesota 4-5 38 45.93 0.1% 37.9% 61
87 Florida St 4-5 44 45.88 0.1% 38.0% 78
88 Wake Forest 4-5 51 45.80 0.2% 38.1% 82
89 Coastal Car 5-4 77 45.60 0.4% 38.3% 86
90 Kansas St 3-6 26 45.55 0.1% 38.4% 85
91 Nebraska 2-7 17 45.20 0.7% 38.9% 89
92 Air Force 3-6 74 44.68 1.1% 39.6% 93
93 Miami OH 3-6 68 43.86 1.7% 40.7% 87
94 Southern Miss 4-4 118 43.73 0.3% 40.9% 98
95 ULM 5-4 92 43.33 0.8% 41.4% 105
96 Illinois 4-5 72 43.18 0.3% 41.6% 100
97 Akron 4-4 86 43.00 0.4% 41.9% 90
98 Hawaii 6-5 105 42.95 0.1% 41.9% 92
99 UCLA 2-7 4 42.35 1.2% 42.7% 91
100 Wyoming 4-6 73 42.17 0.4% 43.0% 101
101 Liberty 4-4 113 42.07 0.2% 43.1% 94
102 Arkansas 2-7 39 40.36 3.5% 45.4% 104
103 Kansas 3-6 64 40.27 0.2% 45.5% 99
104 New Mexico 3-6 95 39.78 1.0% 46.2% 103
105 Charlotte 4-5 110 39.72 0.1% 46.3% 102
106 Massachusetts 4-6 99 38.87 1.7% 47.4% 107
107 Navy 2-7 48 37.88 2.0% 48.8% 106
108 Tulsa 2-7 87 37.35 1.1% 49.5% 114
109 Oregon St 2-7 43 37.17 0.4% 49.7% 109
110 Louisville 2-7 34 37.08 0.2% 49.9% 111
111 North Carolina 1-7 40 36.60 1.0% 50.5% 108
112 Ball St 3-7 100 36.22 0.8% 51.0% 110
113 East Carolina 2-6 81 34.86 2.8% 52.9% 112
114 South Alabama 2-7 70 34.80 0.1% 52.9% 113
115 Colorado St 3-6 106 34.49 0.6% 53.4% 116
116 Rutgers 1-8 37 34.47 0.0% 53.4% 118
117 Kent 2-7 107 34.29 0.4% 53.6% 121
118 Texas St 3-6 130 34.20 0.2% 53.8% 125
119 UT San Antonio 3-6 108 34.17 0.1% 53.8% 119
120 Georgia St 2-7 89 34.14 0.1% 53.8% 115
121 C Michigan 1-9 65 34.00 0.3% 54.0% 117
122 UNLV 2-7 103 33.57 0.9% 54.6% 122
123 Old Dominion 2-7 111 32.46 2.3% 56.1% 120
124 New Mexico St 3-7 115 32.33 0.3% 56.3% 126
125 San Jose St 1-8 90 31.87 0.9% 56.9% 123
126 Connecticut 1-8 53 30.67 2.4% 58.5% 124
127 WKU 1-8 120 29.40 2.6% 60.2% 127
128 Bowling Green 1-8 82 28.95 0.9% 60.8% 128
129 UTEP 1-8 124 27.46 3.1% 62.9% 130
130 Rice 1-9 104 26.55 5.8% 64.1% 129

Best win: LSU 36-16 vs. Georgia
Worst loss: UTEP 10-30 vs. Northern Arizona

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 SEC 58.31 73.96 40.36
2 Big 12 53.77 67.52 40.27
3 Big 10 53.66 70.49 34.47
4 ACC 51.35 69.13 36.60
5 Pac-12 50.66 59.33 37.17
6 American 46.33 63.11 30.67
7 Mountain West 45.41 60.66 31.87
8 Sun Belt 44.74 56.91 34.14
9 MAC 43.40 57.23 28.95
10 Conference USA 41.51 56.04 26.55

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *