J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2018 Week 11

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Alabama 10-0 22 74.32 1
2 Clemson 10-0 49 69.52 9.9% 6.5% 4
3 Georgia 9-1 13 69.46 0.1% 6.5% 3
4 Michigan 9-1 20 68.96 1.0% 7.2% 2
5 Notre Dame 10-0 40 67.03 4.0% 9.8% 6
6 Oklahoma 9-1 30 66.07 2.0% 11.1% 5
7 Ohio St 9-1 47 63.45 5.4% 14.6% 10
8 LSU 8-2 9 63.43 0.0% 14.7% 7
9 West Virginia 8-1 58 63.18 0.5% 15.0% 9
10 UCF 9-0 115 62.75 0.9% 15.6% 8
11 Penn St 7-3 6 61.55 2.5% 17.2% 12
12 Washington St 9-1 90 60.10 3.0% 19.1% 18
13 Utah St 9-1 126 59.72 0.8% 19.7% 15
14 Fresno St 8-2 105 58.92 1.6% 20.7% 13
15 Cincinnati 9-1 111 58.87 0.1% 20.8% 23
16 Florida 7-3 14 58.80 0.1% 20.9% 21
17 Missouri 6-4 4 58.53 0.6% 21.2% 19
18 Mississippi St 6-4 7 58.42 0.2% 21.4% 14
19 Iowa St 6-3 15 58.37 0.1% 21.5% 22
20 Syracuse 8-2 87 58.33 0.1% 21.5% 25
21 Kentucky 7-3 18 58.13 0.4% 21.8% 11
22 Texas 7-3 26 57.90 0.5% 22.1% 27
23 Utah 7-3 42 57.87 0.0% 22.1% 32
24 Iowa 6-4 28 57.79 0.2% 22.2% 17
25 Boise St 8-2 65 57.55 0.5% 22.6% 37
26 Washington 7-3 48 57.37 0.4% 22.8% 29
27 Buffalo 9-1 118 57.08 0.6% 23.2% 33
28 Texas A&M 6-4 8 57.07 0.0% 23.2% 35
29 Michigan St 6-4 2 57.00 0.2% 23.3% 16
30 Army 8-2 68 56.91 0.2% 23.4% 26
31 Appalachian St 7-2 110 56.74 0.3% 23.7% 34
32 Auburn 6-4 19 56.08 1.4% 24.5% 30
33 South Carolina 5-4 1 55.94 0.3% 24.7% 24
34 Boston College 7-3 57 55.54 0.8% 25.3% 31
35 Duke 7-3 56 55.27 0.6% 25.6% 38
36 NC State 6-3 45 55.21 0.1% 25.7% 28
37 Stanford 6-4 29 55.15 0.1% 25.8% 41
38 UAB 9-1 129 55.11 0.1% 25.8% 36
39 Purdue 5-5 10 55.05 0.1% 25.9% 20
40 Northwestern 6-4 5 55.01 0.1% 26.0% 42
41 Pittsburgh 6-4 17 54.45 1.2% 26.7% 49
42 Troy 8-2 112 54.17 0.6% 27.1% 51
43 Virginia 7-3 78 54.04 0.3% 27.3% 45
44 Wisconsin 6-4 53 53.74 0.6% 27.7% 39
45 Texas Tech 5-5 23 53.15 1.2% 28.5% 40
46 Arizona St 6-4 50 52.61 1.1% 29.2% 44
47 Temple 6-4 60 52.39 0.5% 29.5% 56
48 Tennessee 5-5 12 51.73 1.4% 30.4% 63
49 North Texas 7-3 128 51.25 1.0% 31.0% 43
50 Houston 7-3 124 51.18 0.2% 31.1% 46
51 Oklahoma St 5-5 46 51.14 0.1% 31.2% 57
52 Ga Southern 7-3 97 51.08 0.1% 31.3% 47
53 Georgia Tech 6-4 80 50.95 0.3% 31.4% 62
54 Oregon 6-4 77 50.86 0.2% 31.6% 54
55 Miami FL 5-5 52 50.72 0.3% 31.8% 50
56 Mississippi 5-5 32 50.62 0.2% 31.9% 48
57 Maryland 5-5 36 50.59 0.1% 31.9% 52
58 N Illinois 7-3 62 50.24 0.7% 32.4% 66
59 Vanderbilt 4-6 11 50.19 0.1% 32.5% 55
60 USC 5-5 38 49.81 0.8% 33.0% 58
61 MTSU 7-3 116 49.39 0.9% 33.5% 65
62 San Diego St 7-3 92 49.36 0.1% 33.6% 53
63 Indiana 5-5 25 49.23 0.3% 33.8% 72
64 BYU 5-5 54 49.19 0.1% 33.8% 70
65 Ohio 6-4 119 49.03 0.3% 34.0% 59
66 Memphis 6-4 125 48.86 0.3% 34.3% 74
67 Minnesota 5-5 35 48.84 0.0% 34.3% 86
68 E Michigan 6-5 84 48.77 0.1% 34.4% 68
69 Marshall 6-3 122 48.77 0.0% 34.4% 77
70 Arkansas St 6-4 94 48.53 0.5% 34.7% 78
71 TCU 4-6 16 47.99 1.1% 35.4% 61
72 Baylor 5-5 41 47.98 0.0% 35.5% 64
73 Nevada 6-4 86 47.82 0.3% 35.7% 76
74 Arizona 5-5 73 47.81 0.0% 35.7% 69
75 Louisiana Tech 7-3 114 47.79 0.0% 35.7% 67
76 California 6-4 76 47.75 0.1% 35.8% 79
77 Florida Intl 7-3 130 47.74 0.0% 35.8% 82
78 Wake Forest 5-5 44 47.50 0.5% 36.1% 88
79 Toledo 5-5 81 47.46 0.1% 36.2% 60
80 Tulane 5-5 63 47.41 0.1% 36.2% 75
81 FL Atlantic 5-5 70 47.00 0.8% 36.8% 84
82 South Florida 7-3 120 46.80 0.4% 37.0% 71
83 ULL 5-5 66 46.66 0.3% 37.2% 83
84 Nebraska 3-7 21 46.55 0.2% 37.4% 91
85 Colorado 5-5 82 46.43 0.2% 37.5% 73
86 Air Force 4-6 74 46.32 0.2% 37.7% 92
87 SMU 5-5 51 45.96 0.7% 38.2% 81
88 W Michigan 6-4 91 45.61 0.7% 38.6% 85
89 Miami OH 4-6 61 45.55 0.1% 38.7% 93
90 Kansas St 4-6 43 45.39 0.3% 38.9% 90
91 Florida St 4-6 31 45.16 0.5% 39.2% 87
92 Virginia Tech 4-5 59 44.89 0.5% 39.6% 80
93 ULM 6-4 109 44.25 1.3% 40.5% 95
94 Coastal Car 5-5 71 43.35 1.9% 41.7% 89
95 Southern Miss 4-5 113 43.29 0.1% 41.8% 94
96 Hawaii 6-5 107 42.75 1.1% 42.5% 98
97 Wyoming 4-6 67 41.93 1.7% 43.6% 100
98 UCLA 2-8 3 41.84 0.2% 43.7% 99
99 Akron 4-5 83 41.32 1.1% 44.4% 97
100 Illinois 4-6 72 40.99 0.7% 44.8% 96
101 Liberty 4-5 106 40.64 0.7% 45.3% 101
102 Arkansas 2-8 37 40.15 1.0% 46.0% 102
103 Kansas 3-7 69 39.06 2.2% 47.4% 103
104 Charlotte 4-6 99 38.85 0.4% 47.7% 105
105 Navy 2-8 33 38.61 0.5% 48.0% 107
106 New Mexico 3-7 95 37.87 1.5% 49.1% 104
107 Massachusetts 4-7 98 37.15 1.5% 50.0% 106
108 North Carolina 1-8 34 37.11 0.1% 50.1% 111
109 Louisville 2-8 27 36.81 0.6% 50.5% 110
110 Oregon St 2-8 39 36.46 0.7% 50.9% 109
111 Tulsa 2-8 85 36.18 0.6% 51.3% 108
112 UNLV 3-7 96 35.99 0.4% 51.6% 122
113 Ball St 3-7 100 35.90 0.2% 51.7% 112
114 Old Dominion 3-7 101 35.37 1.1% 52.4% 123
115 East Carolina 2-7 79 34.97 0.8% 52.9% 113
116 Rutgers 1-9 24 34.83 0.3% 53.1% 116
117 Texas St 3-7 127 33.73 2.3% 54.6% 118
118 Kent 2-8 93 33.73 0.0% 54.6% 117
119 South Alabama 2-8 64 33.55 0.4% 54.9% 114
120 Georgia St 2-8 88 33.53 0.0% 54.9% 120
121 Colorado St 3-7 103 33.13 0.8% 55.4% 115
122 UT San Antonio 3-7 108 32.62 1.0% 56.1% 119
123 New Mexico St 3-7 121 32.09 1.1% 56.8% 124
124 San Jose St 1-9 75 31.82 0.6% 57.2% 125
125 C Michigan 1-10 89 31.68 0.3% 57.4% 121
126 Bowling Green 2-8 102 30.73 1.9% 58.7% 128
127 Connecticut 1-9 55 30.37 0.7% 59.1% 126
128 WKU 1-9 117 29.43 1.9% 60.4% 127
129 UTEP 1-9 123 27.52 3.9% 63.0% 129
130 Rice 1-10 104 26.36 8.3% 64.5% 130

Best win: LSU 36-16 vs. Georgia
Worst loss: UTEP 10-30 vs. Northern Arizona

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 SEC 57.35 74.32 40.15
2 Big 10 53.11 68.96 34.83
3 Big 12 53.02 66.07 39.06
4 ACC 51.11 69.52 36.81
5 Pac-12 50.34 60.10 36.46
6 American 46.20 62.75 30.37
7 Mountain West 45.27 59.72 31.82
8 Sun Belt 44.56 56.74 33.53
9 MAC 43.09 57.08 30.73
10 Conference USA 41.46 55.11 26.36

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *