J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2018 Week 8

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Alabama 8-0 41 74.10 1
2 Clemson 7-0 36 70.64 6.8% 4.7% 6
3 Michigan 7-1 8 70.40 0.5% 5.0% 5
4 Oklahoma 6-1 12 69.59 1.6% 6.1% 4
5 Notre Dame 7-0 21 69.30 0.6% 6.5% 3
6 LSU 7-1 7 69.05 0.5% 6.8% 7
7 Georgia 6-1 27 67.42 3.2% 9.0% 8
8 Iowa 6-1 42 65.34 4.1% 11.8% 13
9 Florida 6-1 28 65.15 0.4% 12.1% 9
10 Kentucky 6-1 31 65.06 0.2% 12.2% 10
11 Ohio St 7-1 54 63.94 2.2% 13.7% 2
12 Texas 6-1 22 63.46 1.0% 14.4% 11
13 Penn St 5-2 26 63.13 0.6% 14.8% 12
14 UCF 7-0 125 62.81 0.6% 15.2% 15
15 Washington 6-2 37 61.63 2.3% 16.8% 25
16 Texas A&M 5-2 13 61.48 0.3% 17.0% 21
17 Appalachian St 5-1 105 61.10 0.8% 17.5% 18
18 NC State 5-1 45 61.03 0.1% 17.6% 14
19 Wisconsin 5-2 35 61.02 0.0% 17.7% 27
20 West Virginia 5-1 79 60.93 0.2% 17.8% 19
21 Fresno St 6-1 110 60.88 0.1% 17.8% 24
22 Utah 5-2 34 60.85 0.1% 17.9% 29
23 Purdue 4-3 17 60.80 0.1% 17.9% 48
24 Washington St 6-1 108 59.53 2.5% 19.7% 35
25 Stanford 5-2 20 59.24 0.6% 20.0% 28
26 Army 5-2 29 59.22 0.0% 20.1% 20
27 Duke 5-2 43 58.91 0.6% 20.5% 16
28 Miami FL 5-2 60 58.89 0.0% 20.5% 33
29 Utah St 6-1 121 58.88 0.0% 20.5% 23
30 Mississippi St 4-3 14 58.59 0.6% 20.9% 22
31 Texas Tech 5-2 56 58.42 0.3% 21.2% 32
32 Cincinnati 6-1 112 58.29 0.3% 21.3% 17
33 Buffalo 7-1 100 58.18 0.2% 21.5% 38
34 Virginia 5-2 52 58.17 0.0% 21.5% 49
35 South Carolina 3-3 1 57.92 0.5% 21.8% 40
36 Auburn 5-3 33 57.89 0.0% 21.9% 50
37 Iowa St 3-3 3 57.82 0.2% 22.0% 30
38 Missouri 4-3 16 57.25 1.1% 22.7% 58
39 UAB 6-1 119 57.05 0.4% 23.0% 47
40 Syracuse 5-2 88 56.94 0.2% 23.2% 37
41 Michigan St 4-3 6 56.80 0.3% 23.3% 26
42 Boston College 5-2 80 56.53 0.5% 23.7% 43
43 Houston 6-1 129 56.10 0.9% 24.3% 45
44 Boise St 5-2 94 56.05 0.1% 24.4% 54
45 North Texas 6-2 117 55.83 0.4% 24.7% 36
46 Colorado 5-2 81 55.36 0.9% 25.3% 34
47 Oregon 5-2 96 55.02 0.7% 25.8% 39
48 South Florida 7-0 130 54.96 0.1% 25.8% 44
49 Mississippi 5-3 38 54.83 0.3% 26.0% 42
50 Maryland 4-3 23 54.82 0.0% 26.0% 31
51 San Diego St 6-1 85 54.58 0.5% 26.3% 46
52 Ga Southern 6-1 126 54.43 0.3% 26.5% 53
53 USC 4-3 10 54.15 0.6% 26.9% 41
54 Northwestern 4-3 18 53.90 0.5% 27.3% 55
55 Temple 5-3 82 53.35 1.1% 28.0% 64
56 Virginia Tech 4-2 78 53.23 0.2% 28.2% 59
57 Troy 6-2 118 52.84 0.8% 28.7% 65
58 TCU 3-4 9 52.76 0.2% 28.8% 51
59 W Michigan 6-2 98 52.61 0.3% 29.0% 63
60 Indiana 4-4 11 52.56 0.1% 29.1% 56
61 Oklahoma St 4-3 84 51.92 1.3% 29.9% 61
62 Baylor 4-3 57 51.63 0.6% 30.3% 60
63 Arizona St 3-4 30 51.39 0.5% 30.6% 57
64 Vanderbilt 3-5 5 51.30 0.2% 30.8% 68
65 Florida Intl 5-2 122 51.28 0.0% 30.8% 66
66 E Michigan 4-4 59 51.18 0.2% 30.9% 75
67 BYU 4-3 53 51.04 0.3% 31.1% 67
68 Marshall 5-2 111 50.91 0.3% 31.3% 78
69 Louisiana Tech 5-2 104 50.44 0.9% 31.9% 62
70 Florida St 4-3 72 50.06 0.8% 32.4% 86
71 Minnesota 3-4 19 49.28 1.6% 33.5% 52
72 Tennessee 3-4 15 49.07 0.4% 33.8% 73
73 N Illinois 4-3 40 49.00 0.1% 33.9% 77
74 Arkansas St 4-3 75 48.75 0.5% 34.2% 80
75 Pittsburgh 3-4 24 48.75 0.0% 34.2% 71
76 MTSU 4-3 65 48.43 0.6% 34.6% 84
77 Georgia Tech 3-4 71 48.21 0.4% 34.9% 72
78 Kansas St 3-4 48 47.87 0.7% 35.4% 74
79 Memphis 4-4 116 47.59 0.5% 35.8% 69
80 Toledo 3-4 67 47.07 1.0% 36.5% 81
81 Coastal Car 4-3 91 46.83 0.5% 36.8% 94
82 Ohio 4-3 115 46.80 0.1% 36.8% 92
83 UCLA 2-5 4 46.78 0.0% 36.9% 89
84 Miami OH 3-5 66 46.68 0.2% 37.0% 82
85 ULL 3-4 68 46.25 0.9% 37.6% 85
86 Air Force 3-4 103 46.17 0.2% 37.7% 90
87 Wake Forest 3-4 51 46.07 0.2% 37.8% 70
88 Nebraska 1-6 2 46.01 0.1% 37.9% 104
89 Hawaii 6-3 127 45.94 0.1% 38.0% 76
90 FL Atlantic 3-4 58 45.82 0.2% 38.2% 79
91 Liberty 4-3 102 45.71 0.2% 38.3% 87
92 California 4-3 113 45.41 0.6% 38.7% 97
93 Nevada 4-4 86 45.40 0.0% 38.7% 99
94 Arizona 3-5 77 44.89 1.0% 39.4% 88
95 Southern Miss 3-3 124 44.69 0.4% 39.7% 98
96 Akron 3-3 83 44.25 0.9% 40.3% 95
97 Illinois 3-4 64 44.15 0.2% 40.4% 93
98 New Mexico 3-4 107 43.70 0.9% 41.0% 91
99 SMU 3-4 44 43.59 0.2% 41.2% 100
100 Tulane 2-5 55 43.38 0.4% 41.5% 83
101 Arkansas 2-6 32 43.02 0.7% 41.9% 105
102 ULM 4-4 99 41.01 4.0% 44.7% 106
103 Ball St 3-5 101 40.89 0.2% 44.8% 96
104 Charlotte 3-4 109 40.43 0.9% 45.4% 101
105 Wyoming 2-6 47 39.85 1.2% 46.2% 112
106 Louisville 2-5 49 39.82 0.0% 46.3% 109
107 Kansas 2-5 90 39.72 0.2% 46.4% 102
108 Navy 2-5 92 39.00 1.4% 47.4% 108
109 North Carolina 1-5 39 38.84 0.3% 47.6% 118
110 Colorado St 3-5 87 38.54 0.6% 48.0% 107
111 East Carolina 2-5 74 38.41 0.3% 48.2% 115
112 Tulsa 1-6 50 38.28 0.3% 48.3% 103
113 Massachusetts 2-6 69 37.85 0.8% 48.9% 110
114 Georgia St 2-5 73 37.33 1.0% 49.6% 111
115 UNLV 2-5 106 37.29 0.1% 49.7% 113
116 South Alabama 2-6 76 36.81 0.9% 50.3% 114
117 Old Dominion 2-6 97 36.78 0.1% 50.4% 121
118 C Michigan 1-7 61 36.29 1.0% 51.0% 116
119 UT San Antonio 3-5 120 35.47 1.6% 52.1% 117
120 Rutgers 1-7 46 35.27 0.4% 52.4% 120
121 Kent 1-7 89 34.41 1.7% 53.6% 122
122 Connecticut 1-6 25 34.09 0.6% 54.0% 124
123 Oregon St 1-6 63 33.98 0.2% 54.1% 119
124 New Mexico St 2-6 93 33.26 1.4% 55.1% 123
125 WKU 1-6 114 33.17 0.2% 55.2% 125
126 San Jose St 0-7 62 32.08 2.2% 56.7% 128
127 Bowling Green 1-7 70 30.99 2.2% 58.2% 126
128 Texas St 1-6 128 30.72 0.5% 58.5% 127
129 Rice 1-7 95 29.17 3.1% 60.6% 129
130 UTEP 0-7 123 25.59 10.7% 65.5% 130

Best win: LSU 36-16 vs. Georgia
Worst loss: UTEP 10-30 vs. Northern Arizona

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 SEC 59.44 74.10 43.02
2 Big 10 55.53 70.40 35.27
3 Big 12 55.41 69.59 39.72
4 ACC 53.29 70.64 38.84
5 Pac-12 52.35 61.63 33.98
6 American 47.49 62.81 34.09
7 Mountain West 46.61 60.88 32.08
8 Sun Belt 45.61 61.10 30.72
9 MAC 44.86 58.18 30.99
10 Conference USA 43.22 57.05 25.59

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *