J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2018 Week 7

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Alabama 7-0 45 74.08 1
2 Ohio St 7-0 41 70.70 6.6% 4.6% 4
3 Notre Dame 7-0 15 70.36 0.7% 5.0% 2
4 Oklahoma 5-1 7 70.31 0.1% 5.1% 7
5 Michigan 6-1 14 69.88 0.8% 5.7% 8
6 Clemson 6-0 48 69.55 0.6% 6.1% 5
7 LSU 6-1 11 68.31 2.4% 7.8% 10
8 Georgia 6-1 38 66.95 2.7% 9.6% 3
9 Florida 6-1 30 65.84 2.2% 11.1% 13
10 Kentucky 5-1 33 65.80 0.1% 11.2% 9
11 Texas 6-1 8 65.71 0.2% 11.3% 14
12 Penn St 4-2 16 65.09 1.2% 12.1% 6
13 Iowa 5-1 39 64.83 0.5% 12.5% 18
14 NC State 5-0 96 64.26 1.1% 13.3% 15
15 UCF 6-0 117 64.05 0.4% 13.5% 12
16 Duke 5-1 51 63.26 1.5% 14.6% 17
17 Cincinnati 6-0 122 62.29 1.9% 15.9% 21
18 Appalachian St 4-1 105 61.83 0.9% 16.5% 30
19 West Virginia 5-1 79 61.80 0.0% 16.6% 11
20 Army 4-2 20 61.27 1.0% 17.3% 22
21 Texas A&M 5-2 19 61.17 0.2% 17.4% 27
22 Mississippi St 4-2 32 60.82 0.7% 17.9% 25
23 Utah St 5-1 111 60.53 0.6% 18.3% 28
24 Fresno St 5-1 110 60.45 0.2% 18.4% 26
25 Washington 5-2 44 60.35 0.2% 18.5% 19
26 Michigan St 4-2 10 59.85 1.0% 19.2% 38
27 Wisconsin 4-2 34 59.79 0.1% 19.3% 16
28 Stanford 4-2 13 59.37 0.8% 19.9% 32
29 Utah 4-2 49 59.08 0.6% 20.2% 42
30 Iowa St 3-3 3 58.70 0.7% 20.8% 55
31 Maryland 4-2 26 58.61 0.2% 20.9% 36
32 Texas Tech 4-2 31 58.59 0.0% 20.9% 33
33 Miami FL 5-2 69 58.36 0.4% 21.2% 24
34 Colorado 5-1 101 58.21 0.3% 21.4% 23
35 Washington St 5-1 120 58.10 0.2% 21.6% 35
36 North Texas 6-1 130 57.93 0.3% 21.8% 52
37 Syracuse 4-2 83 57.70 0.5% 22.1% 34
38 Buffalo 6-1 104 57.59 0.2% 22.3% 48
39 Oregon 5-1 116 57.50 0.2% 22.4% 53
40 South Carolina 3-3 4 57.39 0.2% 22.5% 20
41 USC 4-2 12 57.38 0.0% 22.5% 59
42 Mississippi 5-2 56 57.06 0.6% 23.0% 39
43 Boston College 5-2 81 57.02 0.1% 23.0% 51
44 South Florida 6-0 128 56.97 0.1% 23.1% 29
45 Houston 5-1 127 56.80 0.3% 23.3% 46
46 San Diego St 5-1 63 56.37 0.8% 23.9% 49
47 UAB 5-1 125 56.22 0.3% 24.1% 50
48 Purdue 3-3 40 56.04 0.4% 24.4% 63
49 Virginia 4-2 67 55.89 0.3% 24.5% 58
50 Auburn 4-3 47 55.53 0.7% 25.0% 31
51 TCU 3-3 18 55.48 0.1% 25.1% 43
52 Minnesota 3-3 5 55.30 0.4% 25.3% 47
53 Ga Southern 5-1 114 55.03 0.5% 25.7% 37
54 Boise St 4-2 85 55.00 0.1% 25.8% 44
55 Northwestern 3-3 6 54.79 0.4% 26.0% 61
56 Indiana 4-3 9 54.56 0.5% 26.4% 41
57 Arizona St 3-3 28 54.50 0.1% 26.4% 54
58 Missouri 3-3 21 54.12 0.7% 26.9% 40
59 Virginia Tech 4-2 82 53.52 1.2% 27.8% 57
60 Baylor 4-3 37 53.41 0.2% 27.9% 62
61 Oklahoma St 4-3 80 52.80 1.2% 28.7% 45
62 Louisiana Tech 4-2 73 52.60 0.4% 29.0% 79
63 W Michigan 5-2 88 52.18 0.8% 29.6% 65
64 Temple 4-3 92 52.02 0.3% 29.8% 69
65 Troy 5-2 118 51.55 0.9% 30.4% 56
66 Florida Intl 4-2 108 51.52 0.1% 30.5% 66
67 BYU 4-3 53 51.44 0.2% 30.6% 78
68 Vanderbilt 3-4 17 51.37 0.1% 30.7% 60
69 Memphis 4-3 121 51.27 0.2% 30.8% 71
70 Wake Forest 3-3 43 49.81 2.9% 32.8% 73
71 Pittsburgh 3-4 23 49.48 0.7% 33.2% 76
72 Georgia Tech 3-4 64 49.41 0.1% 33.3% 68
73 Tennessee 3-3 42 49.35 0.1% 33.4% 86
74 Kansas St 3-4 35 49.30 0.1% 33.5% 91
75 E Michigan 3-4 54 49.21 0.2% 33.6% 88
76 Hawaii 6-2 129 49.20 0.0% 33.6% 64
77 N Illinois 4-3 46 48.81 0.8% 34.1% 90
78 Marshall 4-2 112 48.80 0.0% 34.1% 85
79 FL Atlantic 3-3 65 48.80 0.0% 34.1% 77
80 Arkansas St 3-3 52 48.19 1.2% 34.9% 72
81 Toledo 3-3 97 48.17 0.0% 35.0% 74
82 Miami OH 3-4 72 47.86 0.6% 35.4% 92
83 Tulane 2-4 25 47.65 0.4% 35.7% 83
84 MTSU 3-3 59 47.37 0.5% 36.1% 75
85 ULL 3-3 94 47.35 0.0% 36.1% 93
86 Florida St 3-3 77 47.34 0.0% 36.1% 82
87 Liberty 3-3 68 47.30 0.1% 36.1% 96
88 Arizona 3-4 75 46.38 1.8% 37.4% 81
89 UCLA 1-5 1 46.26 0.2% 37.6% 101
90 Air Force 2-4 91 46.09 0.3% 37.8% 89
91 New Mexico 3-3 123 45.92 0.3% 38.0% 80
92 Ohio 3-3 99 45.79 0.3% 38.2% 84
93 Illinois 3-3 90 45.75 0.1% 38.2% 70
94 Coastal Car 3-3 84 45.15 1.2% 39.1% 67
95 Akron 2-3 58 44.64 1.0% 39.7% 94
96 Ball St 3-4 106 43.50 2.2% 41.3% 97
97 California 3-3 103 43.36 0.3% 41.5% 87
98 Southern Miss 2-3 119 43.13 0.5% 41.8% 95
99 Nevada 3-4 86 42.94 0.4% 42.0% 98
100 SMU 2-4 27 42.67 0.5% 42.4% 100
101 Charlotte 3-3 115 41.97 1.4% 43.3% 114
102 Kansas 2-4 98 41.82 0.3% 43.5% 99
103 Tulsa 1-5 36 41.46 0.7% 44.0% 106
104 Nebraska 0-6 2 41.33 0.2% 44.2% 102
105 Arkansas 1-6 22 40.94 0.8% 44.7% 108
106 ULM 3-4 87 40.35 1.1% 45.5% 123
107 Colorado St 3-4 95 40.35 0.0% 45.5% 115
108 Navy 2-4 100 40.06 0.6% 45.9% 104
109 Louisville 2-5 55 39.72 0.7% 46.4% 105
110 Massachusetts 2-5 70 39.50 0.4% 46.7% 109
111 Georgia St 2-4 71 39.38 0.2% 46.8% 111
112 Wyoming 2-5 66 39.37 0.0% 46.8% 103
113 UNLV 2-4 107 38.91 0.9% 47.5% 107
114 South Alabama 2-5 74 38.90 0.0% 47.5% 124
115 East Carolina 2-4 102 38.48 0.8% 48.1% 110
116 C Michigan 1-6 57 38.25 0.5% 48.4% 116
117 UT San Antonio 3-4 113 37.85 0.8% 48.9% 113
118 North Carolina 1-4 60 37.42 0.8% 49.5% 118
119 Oregon St 1-5 50 37.28 0.3% 49.7% 117
120 Rutgers 1-6 29 36.45 1.6% 50.8% 120
121 Old Dominion 1-6 76 36.28 0.3% 51.0% 121
122 Kent 1-6 78 35.29 1.9% 52.4% 112
123 New Mexico St 2-5 89 34.77 1.0% 53.1% 122
124 Connecticut 1-5 24 34.48 0.6% 53.5% 125
125 WKU 1-5 109 34.26 0.4% 53.8% 119
126 Bowling Green 1-6 62 33.36 1.7% 55.0% 126
127 Texas St 1-5 126 32.21 2.3% 56.5% 129
128 San Jose St 0-6 61 31.46 1.5% 57.5% 128
129 Rice 1-6 93 30.05 2.7% 59.4% 127
130 UTEP 0-6 124 25.08 13.9% 66.1% 130

Best win: LSU 36-16 vs. Georgia
Worst loss: UTEP 10-30 vs. Northern Arizona

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 SEC 59.20 74.08 40.94
2 Big 12 56.79 70.31 41.82
3 Big 10 56.64 70.70 36.45
4 ACC 53.77 69.55 37.42
5 Pac-12 53.15 60.35 37.28
6 American 49.02 64.05 34.48
7 Mountain West 47.22 60.53 31.46
8 Sun Belt 45.99 61.83 32.21
9 MAC 45.39 57.59 33.36
10 Conference USA 43.70 57.93 25.08

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *