J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2018 Week 6

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Alabama 6-0 57 73.72 1
2 Notre Dame 6-0 7 72.38 2.6% 1.8% 2
3 Georgia 6-0 51 72.26 0.2% 2.0% 6
4 Ohio St 6-0 32 71.78 0.9% 2.6% 4
5 Clemson 6-0 42 70.20 3.1% 4.8% 9
6 Penn St 4-1 12 70.01 0.4% 5.0% 7
7 Oklahoma 5-1 9 69.47 1.0% 5.8% 3
8 Michigan 5-1 14 68.35 2.2% 7.3% 11
9 Kentucky 5-1 28 66.24 4.1% 10.1% 8
10 LSU 5-1 19 65.88 0.7% 10.6% 5
11 West Virginia 5-0 101 65.85 0.1% 10.7% 10
12 UCF 5-0 123 65.29 1.1% 11.4% 13
13 Florida 5-1 38 64.83 0.9% 12.1% 28
14 Texas 5-1 11 64.67 0.3% 12.3% 21
15 NC State 5-0 99 63.64 2.0% 13.7% 12
16 Wisconsin 4-1 63 63.35 0.6% 14.1% 16
17 Duke 4-1 45 62.62 1.4% 15.1% 23
18 Iowa 4-1 52 62.42 0.4% 15.3% 42
19 Washington 5-1 66 62.26 0.3% 15.5% 14
20 South Carolina 3-2 2 62.17 0.2% 15.7% 31
21 Cincinnati 6-0 119 61.93 0.5% 16.0% 29
22 Army 3-2 6 61.29 1.2% 16.9% 20
23 Colorado 5-0 120 61.16 0.3% 17.0% 37
24 Miami FL 5-1 82 60.72 0.9% 17.6% 19
25 Mississippi St 4-2 34 60.62 0.2% 17.8% 46
26 Fresno St 4-1 105 60.06 1.1% 18.5% 34
27 Texas A&M 4-2 25 59.79 0.5% 18.9% 48
28 Utah St 4-1 110 59.64 0.3% 19.1% 51
29 South Florida 5-0 116 59.60 0.1% 19.2% 33
30 Appalachian St 3-1 111 59.33 0.5% 19.5% 32
31 Auburn 4-2 44 58.82 1.0% 20.2% 15
32 Stanford 4-2 15 58.72 0.2% 20.3% 17
33 Texas Tech 3-2 23 58.63 0.2% 20.5% 35
34 Syracuse 4-2 80 58.08 1.1% 21.2% 22
35 Washington St 5-1 117 57.66 0.8% 21.8% 44
36 Maryland 3-2 8 57.62 0.1% 21.8% 30
37 Ga Southern 4-1 98 57.37 0.5% 22.2% 50
38 Michigan St 3-2 17 57.30 0.1% 22.3% 18
39 Mississippi 4-2 46 57.28 0.0% 22.3% 47
40 Missouri 3-2 36 56.99 0.6% 22.7% 41
41 Indiana 4-2 18 56.79 0.4% 23.0% 26
42 Utah 3-2 43 56.70 0.2% 23.1% 71
43 TCU 3-2 27 56.67 0.1% 23.1% 54
44 Boise St 3-2 60 56.51 0.3% 23.3% 24
45 Oklahoma St 4-2 89 56.31 0.4% 23.6% 27
46 Houston 4-1 121 56.15 0.3% 23.8% 53
47 Minnesota 3-2 21 56.08 0.1% 23.9% 36
48 Buffalo 5-1 108 56.00 0.2% 24.0% 45
49 San Diego St 4-1 61 56.00 0.0% 24.0% 58
50 UAB 4-1 112 55.89 0.2% 24.2% 65
51 Boston College 4-2 76 55.88 0.0% 24.2% 43
52 North Texas 5-1 127 55.73 0.3% 24.4% 25
53 Oregon 4-1 125 55.41 0.6% 24.8% 38
54 Arizona St 3-3 22 55.14 0.5% 25.2% 39
55 Iowa St 2-3 4 55.11 0.1% 25.2% 68
56 Troy 5-1 115 54.95 0.3% 25.5% 56
57 Virginia Tech 3-2 56 54.90 0.1% 25.5% 40
58 Virginia 3-2 79 54.44 0.9% 26.2% 52
59 USC 3-2 13 54.43 0.0% 26.2% 55
60 Vanderbilt 3-3 10 54.32 0.2% 26.3% 57
61 Northwestern 2-3 5 54.11 0.4% 26.6% 76
62 Baylor 4-2 73 53.60 1.0% 27.3% 62
63 Purdue 2-3 33 53.05 1.1% 28.0% 63
64 Hawaii 6-1 126 52.17 1.7% 29.2% 59
65 W Michigan 4-2 75 51.87 0.6% 29.6% 72
66 Florida Intl 3-2 103 51.28 1.1% 30.4% 60
67 Coastal Car 3-2 59 51.28 0.0% 30.4% 74
68 Georgia Tech 3-3 83 51.07 0.4% 30.7% 86
69 Temple 3-3 88 51.04 0.1% 30.8% 78
70 Illinois 3-2 85 50.82 0.4% 31.1% 81
71 Memphis 4-2 129 50.72 0.2% 31.2% 70
72 Arkansas St 3-2 74 50.65 0.1% 31.3% 69
73 Wake Forest 3-3 40 50.31 0.6% 31.8% 61
74 Toledo 3-2 96 50.17 0.3% 31.9% 77
75 MTSU 3-2 47 49.99 0.3% 32.2% 93
76 Pittsburgh 3-3 31 49.82 0.3% 32.4% 95
77 FL Atlantic 3-3 58 49.62 0.4% 32.7% 90
78 BYU 3-3 35 49.62 0.0% 32.7% 64
79 Louisiana Tech 3-2 69 49.41 0.4% 33.0% 49
80 New Mexico 3-2 114 49.33 0.2% 33.1% 89
81 Arizona 3-3 93 48.29 2.0% 34.5% 87
82 Florida St 3-3 70 47.93 0.7% 35.0% 80
83 Tulane 2-4 20 47.86 0.1% 35.1% 79
84 Ohio 3-2 102 47.56 0.6% 35.5% 83
85 Marshall 3-2 97 47.25 0.6% 35.9% 73
86 Tennessee 2-3 37 47.21 0.1% 36.0% 91
87 California 3-2 109 47.02 0.4% 36.2% 67
88 E Michigan 2-4 64 46.82 0.4% 36.5% 85
89 Air Force 2-3 104 46.80 0.0% 36.5% 106
90 N Illinois 3-3 50 46.69 0.2% 36.7% 101
91 Kansas St 2-4 29 46.04 1.3% 37.6% 92
92 Miami OH 2-4 53 45.77 0.5% 37.9% 104
93 ULL 2-3 67 45.38 0.8% 38.5% 102
94 Akron 2-2 94 45.33 0.1% 38.5% 75
95 Southern Miss 2-2 128 45.08 0.5% 38.8% 82
96 Liberty 2-3 65 44.72 0.7% 39.3% 66
97 Ball St 2-4 84 44.01 1.4% 40.3% 84
98 Nevada 3-3 90 43.82 0.4% 40.6% 98
99 Kansas 2-4 86 43.17 1.3% 41.4% 96
100 SMU 2-4 24 42.78 0.7% 42.0% 99
101 UCLA 0-5 1 42.75 0.1% 42.0% 109
102 Nebraska 0-5 3 41.89 1.7% 43.2% 110
103 Wyoming 2-4 71 41.08 1.6% 44.3% 105
104 Navy 2-3 106 41.05 0.1% 44.3% 88
105 Louisville 2-4 62 40.93 0.2% 44.5% 97
106 Tulsa 1-4 48 40.27 1.3% 45.4% 112
107 UNLV 2-3 118 40.05 0.4% 45.7% 100
108 Arkansas 1-5 26 40.00 0.1% 45.7% 117
109 Massachusetts 2-5 68 39.85 0.3% 45.9% 108
110 East Carolina 2-3 113 39.80 0.1% 46.0% 94
111 Georgia St 2-4 77 39.22 1.1% 46.8% 111
112 Kent 1-5 54 38.66 1.1% 47.6% 120
113 UT San Antonio 3-3 124 38.57 0.2% 47.7% 123
114 Charlotte 2-3 107 38.40 0.3% 47.9% 116
115 Colorado St 2-4 92 38.28 0.2% 48.1% 124
116 C Michigan 1-5 55 38.05 0.5% 48.4% 118
117 Oregon St 1-5 41 38.00 0.1% 48.4% 119
118 North Carolina 1-3 49 37.77 0.5% 48.8% 113
119 WKU 1-4 100 37.59 0.4% 49.0% 115
120 Rutgers 1-5 30 37.52 0.1% 49.1% 107
121 Old Dominion 1-5 81 37.35 0.3% 49.3% 103
122 New Mexico St 2-4 87 36.78 1.1% 50.1% 128
123 ULM 2-4 78 36.41 0.7% 50.6% 121
124 South Alabama 1-5 39 36.15 0.5% 51.0% 114
125 Connecticut 1-5 16 34.96 2.3% 52.6% 122
126 Bowling Green 1-5 72 32.42 4.9% 56.0% 127
127 Rice 1-5 95 30.78 3.2% 58.2% 125
128 San Jose St 0-5 91 30.65 0.3% 58.4% 126
129 Texas St 1-4 130 29.14 2.9% 60.5% 129
130 UTEP 0-6 122 25.10 11.0% 66.0% 130

Best win: Georgia 41-17 vs. South Carolina
Worst loss: UTEP 10-30 vs. Northern Arizona

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 SEC 60.01 73.72 40.00
2 Big 10 57.22 71.78 37.52
3 Big 12 56.95 69.47 43.17
4 ACC 54.16 70.20 37.77
5 Pac-12 53.13 62.26 38.00
6 American 49.29 65.29 34.96
7 Mountain West 47.87 60.06 30.65
8 Sun Belt 45.99 59.33 29.14
9 MAC 45.28 56.00 32.42
10 Conference USA 43.72 55.89 25.10

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *