J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2017 Week 11

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

This week’s full rankings:

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Alabama 10-0 33 72.97 2
2 Wisconsin 10-0 44 71.82 2.3% 1.6% 6
3 Clemson 9-1 9 71.40 0.8% 2.2% 5
4 Notre Dame 8-2 5 71.35 0.1% 2.2% 1
5 Penn St 8-2 10 70.33 2.0% 3.6% 4
6 Miami FL 9-0 32 69.54 1.6% 4.7% 9
7 Georgia 9-1 26 69.08 0.9% 5.3% 3
8 Ohio St 8-2 8 68.98 0.2% 5.5% 8
9 UCF 9-0 95 67.65 2.6% 7.3% 7
10 Oklahoma 9-1 36 67.21 0.9% 7.9% 12
11 Auburn 8-2 40 66.67 1.1% 8.6% 17
12 Michigan 8-2 25 64.94 3.4% 11.0% 15
13 USC 9-2 17 64.82 0.2% 11.2% 14
14 Washington 8-2 73 64.01 1.6% 12.3% 11
15 TCU 8-2 49 63.95 0.1% 12.4% 10
16 Oklahoma St 8-2 38 63.61 0.7% 12.8% 18
17 Iowa 6-4 3 63.29 0.6% 13.3% 13
18 Michigan St 7-3 2 62.17 2.2% 14.8% 16
19 Mississippi St 7-3 28 62.07 0.2% 14.9% 19
20 NC State 7-3 15 61.23 1.7% 16.1% 21
21 Boise St 8-2 70 60.82 0.8% 16.7% 22
22 Virginia Tech 7-3 52 60.61 0.4% 16.9% 20
23 Washington St 9-2 59 60.52 0.2% 17.1% 25
24 Northwestern 7-3 14 60.31 0.4% 17.3% 26
25 Stanford 7-3 34 60.20 0.2% 17.5% 29
26 Memphis 8-1 82 60.02 0.4% 17.7% 24
27 LSU 7-3 41 58.76 2.5% 19.5% 32
28 Iowa St 6-4 30 58.74 0.0% 19.5% 23
29 Wake Forest 6-4 19 58.55 0.4% 19.8% 34
30 Georgia Tech 5-4 24 58.35 0.4% 20.0% 35
31 South Carolina 7-3 27 58.33 0.0% 20.1% 30
32 South Florida 8-1 124 58.07 0.5% 20.4% 28
33 FL Atlantic 7-3 81 57.07 2.0% 21.8% 40
34 Boston College 5-5 4 56.89 0.4% 22.0% 31
35 Toledo 8-2 94 56.58 0.6% 22.5% 27
36 Arizona 7-3 80 56.57 0.0% 22.5% 36
37 San Diego St 8-2 92 56.22 0.7% 23.0% 33
38 Navy 6-3 45 56.15 0.1% 23.1% 41
39 West Virginia 7-3 76 55.79 0.7% 23.6% 38
40 Louisville 6-4 47 55.54 0.5% 23.9% 46
41 Ohio 8-2 115 55.23 0.6% 24.3% 53
42 Purdue 4-6 12 55.02 0.4% 24.6% 39
43 Houston 6-3 72 54.78 0.5% 24.9% 43
44 Kentucky 7-3 71 54.75 0.1% 25.0% 48
45 Texas A&M 6-4 48 54.72 0.1% 25.0% 47
46 Texas 5-5 43 54.45 0.5% 25.4% 42
47 SMU 6-4 65 54.10 0.7% 25.9% 37
48 Army 8-2 112 53.79 0.6% 26.3% 49
49 Minnesota 5-5 46 53.60 0.4% 26.6% 60
50 Florida St 3-6 1 53.26 0.7% 27.0% 51
51 Fresno St 7-3 104 53.18 0.2% 27.1% 45
52 N Illinois 7-3 109 52.93 0.5% 27.5% 50
53 Marshall 7-3 108 52.80 0.3% 27.6% 56
54 Arizona St 5-5 16 52.78 0.0% 27.7% 44
55 Oregon 5-5 37 52.62 0.3% 27.9% 52
56 Missouri 5-5 54 52.31 0.6% 28.3% 68
57 Wyoming 7-3 99 52.22 0.2% 28.4% 61
58 Troy 8-2 121 51.78 0.9% 29.0% 59
59 UCLA 5-5 20 51.59 0.4% 29.3% 71
60 Utah 5-5 64 51.57 0.0% 29.3% 58
61 Syracuse 4-6 18 51.45 0.2% 29.5% 54
62 Mississippi 5-5 56 50.82 1.2% 30.4% 78
63 Virginia 6-4 68 50.82 0.0% 30.4% 57
64 Texas Tech 5-5 58 50.80 0.0% 30.4% 66
65 California 5-5 53 50.76 0.1% 30.4% 64
66 Indiana 4-6 23 50.57 0.4% 30.7% 70
67 Maryland 4-6 6 50.26 0.6% 31.1% 63
68 North Texas 7-3 101 50.12 0.3% 31.3% 69
69 Nebraska 4-6 13 49.93 0.4% 31.6% 55
70 W Michigan 6-4 106 49.72 0.4% 31.9% 77
71 Florida 3-6 7 49.44 0.6% 32.2% 67
72 Kansas St 5-5 88 49.39 0.1% 32.3% 65
73 Duke 4-6 55 49.01 0.8% 32.8% 72
74 Colorado St 6-5 89 48.87 0.3% 33.0% 76
75 Colorado 5-6 63 48.80 0.1% 33.1% 75
76 Rutgers 4-6 21 48.48 0.6% 33.6% 74
77 Utah St 5-5 87 48.09 0.8% 34.1% 83
78 Tennessee 4-6 29 47.75 0.7% 34.6% 73
79 Arkansas St 5-3 128 47.54 0.4% 34.9% 62
80 Temple 5-5 78 47.47 0.1% 34.9% 89
81 Pittsburgh 4-6 51 47.34 0.3% 35.1% 81
82 C Michigan 6-4 100 47.21 0.3% 35.3% 94
83 Vanderbilt 4-6 42 47.13 0.1% 35.4% 80
84 Tulane 4-6 69 46.66 0.9% 36.1% 88
85 UAB 7-3 129 46.27 0.8% 36.6% 93
86 Florida Intl 6-3 114 46.14 0.2% 36.8% 79
87 Akron 5-5 83 45.92 0.4% 37.1% 82
88 Appalachian St 6-4 126 45.79 0.3% 37.2% 91
89 Arkansas 4-6 35 45.71 0.2% 37.4% 87
90 Buffalo 4-6 97 45.58 0.3% 37.5% 96
91 E Michigan 3-7 74 45.54 0.1% 37.6% 84
92 Southern Miss 6-4 119 45.53 0.0% 37.6% 92
93 Air Force 4-6 75 45.10 0.9% 38.2% 86
94 UT San Antonio 5-4 130 45.00 0.2% 38.3% 85
95 Louisiana Tech 4-6 91 44.98 0.0% 38.4% 90
96 MTSU 5-5 102 44.91 0.1% 38.5% 95
97 Miami OH 4-6 93 44.38 1.1% 39.2% 102
98 North Carolina 2-8 11 44.33 0.1% 39.2% 101
99 Georgia St 6-3 127 42.63 3.4% 41.6% 99
100 Cincinnati 3-7 39 42.63 0.0% 41.6% 98
101 Tulsa 2-8 50 42.28 0.7% 42.1% 100
102 UNLV 4-6 107 41.87 0.8% 42.6% 97
103 South Alabama 4-6 105 41.64 0.4% 42.9% 108
104 WKU 5-5 125 41.10 1.1% 43.7% 103
105 ULM 4-5 120 40.36 1.5% 44.7% 107
106 BYU 3-8 67 40.34 0.1% 44.7% 111
107 Illinois 2-8 31 40.10 0.5% 45.0% 105
108 New Mexico 3-7 84 39.92 0.4% 45.3% 104
109 New Mexico St 4-5 122 39.92 0.0% 45.3% 106
110 Old Dominion 4-6 103 39.52 0.8% 45.8% 115
111 Nevada 2-8 77 39.31 0.4% 46.1% 113
112 Connecticut 3-7 62 39.27 0.1% 46.2% 109
113 Idaho 3-6 113 38.65 1.2% 47.0% 110
114 Massachusetts 3-7 116 37.91 1.5% 48.0% 117
115 Baylor 1-9 61 37.05 1.7% 49.2% 114
116 Oregon St 1-9 22 36.95 0.2% 49.4% 116
117 ULL 4-5 118 36.90 0.1% 49.4% 112
118 Hawaii 3-7 110 36.24 1.3% 50.3% 119
119 Bowling Green 2-8 85 36.03 0.4% 50.6% 118
120 East Carolina 2-8 60 35.38 1.3% 51.5% 120
121 Kent 2-8 66 33.68 3.4% 53.8% 121
122 Kansas 1-9 57 33.21 1.0% 54.5% 123
123 Ball St 2-8 98 32.29 1.8% 55.7% 122
124 Rice 1-9 86 31.13 2.3% 57.3% 124
125 Texas St 2-8 123 30.39 1.5% 58.4% 125
126 Charlotte 1-9 111 29.39 2.0% 59.7% 126
127 Coastal Car 1-9 117 28.63 1.5% 60.8% 128
128 San Jose St 1-10 90 27.99 1.3% 61.6% 127
129 UTEP 0-10 79 27.32 1.3% 62.6% 129
130 Ga Southern 0-9 96 26.70 3.8% 63.4% 130

Best win: Miami 41-8 vs. Notre Dame
Worst loss: Coastal Carolina 10-52 vs. Western Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 57.84 71.82 40.10
2 SEC 56.47 72.97 45.71
3 ACC 56.31 71.40 44.33
4 Pac-12 54.27 64.82 36.95
5 Big 12 53.42 67.21 33.21
6 American 50.37 67.65 35.38
7 Mountain West 45.82 60.82 27.99
8 MAC 45.42 56.58 32.29
9 Conference USA 42.95 57.07 27.32
10 Sun Belt 39.24 51.78 26.70

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *