J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2017 Week 12

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

This week’s full rankings:

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Wisconsin 11-0 22 73.00 2
2 Alabama 11-0 64 71.11 3.8% 2.6% 1
3 Notre Dame 9-2 3 70.97 0.3% 2.8% 4
4 Penn St 9-2 10 69.93 2.1% 4.2% 5
5 Georgia 10-1 27 69.70 0.4% 4.5% 7
6 Clemson 10-1 30 69.44 0.5% 4.9% 3
7 Miami FL 10-0 33 69.39 0.1% 4.9% 6
8 Ohio St 9-2 15 68.34 2.1% 6.4% 8
9 UCF 10-0 93 67.46 1.8% 7.6% 9
10 Auburn 9-2 42 66.77 1.4% 8.5% 11
11 Oklahoma 10-1 56 66.43 0.7% 9.0% 10
12 USC 10-2 20 64.39 4.1% 11.8% 13
13 TCU 9-2 53 64.28 0.2% 11.9% 15
14 Washington 9-2 73 63.71 1.1% 12.7% 14
15 Michigan 8-3 14 63.56 0.3% 12.9% 12
16 Michigan St 8-3 2 62.12 2.9% 14.9% 18
17 Northwestern 8-3 12 61.90 0.4% 15.2% 24
18 Mississippi St 8-3 32 61.89 0.0% 15.2% 19
19 Boise St 9-2 76 61.27 1.2% 16.1% 21
20 Iowa 6-5 1 61.17 0.2% 16.2% 17
21 Memphis 9-1 79 61.16 0.0% 16.2% 26
22 Oklahoma St 8-3 40 60.84 0.7% 16.7% 16
23 Virginia Tech 8-3 58 60.50 0.7% 17.1% 22
24 Washington St 9-2 65 60.28 0.4% 17.4% 23
25 Stanford 8-3 35 60.23 0.1% 17.5% 25
26 Wake Forest 7-4 16 59.38 1.7% 18.7% 29
27 NC State 7-4 13 59.28 0.2% 18.8% 20
28 LSU 8-3 45 59.21 0.1% 18.9% 27
29 FL Atlantic 8-3 83 57.97 2.5% 20.6% 33
30 Iowa St 7-4 51 57.95 0.0% 20.6% 28
31 South Florida 9-1 125 57.69 0.5% 21.0% 32
32 South Carolina 8-3 59 57.48 0.4% 21.3% 31
33 Boston College 6-5 7 57.23 0.5% 21.6% 34
34 Louisville 7-4 47 57.16 0.1% 21.7% 40
35 Toledo 9-2 99 56.89 0.5% 22.1% 35
36 Purdue 5-6 8 56.82 0.1% 22.2% 42
37 San Diego St 9-2 94 56.67 0.3% 22.4% 37
38 Texas 6-5 38 55.85 1.6% 23.5% 46
39 Navy 6-4 23 55.73 0.2% 23.7% 38
40 Texas A&M 7-4 49 55.46 0.5% 24.0% 45
41 Georgia Tech 5-5 29 55.33 0.2% 24.2% 30
42 Oregon 6-5 34 54.44 1.8% 25.4% 55
43 West Virginia 7-4 71 54.11 0.6% 25.9% 39
44 Arizona 7-4 80 54.04 0.2% 26.0% 36
45 Fresno St 8-3 98 53.86 0.4% 26.2% 51
46 Ohio 8-3 115 53.78 0.2% 26.3% 41
47 Kentucky 7-4 54 53.77 0.0% 26.3% 44
48 Missouri 6-5 61 53.72 0.1% 26.4% 56
49 N Illinois 8-3 100 53.62 0.2% 26.5% 52
50 Florida St 4-6 5 53.22 0.8% 27.1% 50
51 Arizona St 6-5 31 52.99 0.5% 27.4% 54
52 Houston 6-4 77 52.72 0.5% 27.8% 43
53 Indiana 5-6 24 52.69 0.1% 27.8% 66
54 Army 8-3 103 52.68 0.0% 27.8% 48
55 SMU 6-5 63 52.40 0.5% 28.2% 47
56 Troy 8-2 120 51.98 0.8% 28.8% 58
57 Minnesota 5-6 36 51.68 0.6% 29.2% 49
58 Duke 5-6 48 51.57 0.2% 29.4% 73
59 UCLA 5-6 11 51.51 0.1% 29.4% 59
60 Utah 5-6 52 51.47 0.1% 29.5% 60
61 Kansas St 6-5 81 51.13 0.7% 30.0% 72
62 Wyoming 7-4 90 51.07 0.1% 30.0% 57
63 Florida 4-6 9 51.06 0.0% 30.1% 71
64 North Texas 8-3 91 51.06 0.0% 30.1% 68
65 Virginia 6-5 43 50.93 0.3% 30.2% 63
66 Marshall 7-4 113 50.59 0.7% 30.7% 53
67 California 5-6 41 50.32 0.5% 31.1% 65
68 Nebraska 4-7 6 50.29 0.1% 31.1% 69
69 Maryland 4-7 4 49.80 1.0% 31.8% 67
70 Texas Tech 5-6 50 49.50 0.6% 32.2% 64
71 Mississippi 5-6 60 49.44 0.1% 32.3% 62
72 Utah St 6-5 89 49.31 0.3% 32.5% 77
73 Syracuse 4-7 18 49.20 0.2% 32.6% 61
74 W Michigan 6-5 97 48.92 0.6% 33.0% 70
75 Colorado St 7-5 102 48.80 0.2% 33.2% 74
76 Colorado 5-6 67 48.41 0.8% 33.7% 75
77 Arkansas St 6-3 130 48.27 0.3% 33.9% 79
78 Tulane 5-6 69 47.78 1.0% 34.6% 84
79 C Michigan 7-4 108 47.50 0.6% 34.9% 82
80 Akron 6-5 82 47.27 0.5% 35.2% 87
81 Temple 5-6 66 46.80 0.9% 35.9% 80
82 Tennessee 4-7 21 46.79 0.0% 35.9% 78
83 Pittsburgh 4-7 46 46.67 0.2% 36.1% 81
84 Rutgers 4-7 19 46.56 0.2% 36.2% 76
85 Appalachian St 6-4 123 46.40 0.3% 36.4% 88
86 UT San Antonio 6-4 128 46.33 0.1% 36.5% 94
87 Southern Miss 7-4 124 46.29 0.1% 36.6% 92
88 Buffalo 5-6 107 45.94 0.7% 37.1% 90
89 E Michigan 4-7 84 45.79 0.3% 37.3% 91
90 Arkansas 4-7 25 45.69 0.2% 37.4% 89
91 Vanderbilt 4-7 37 45.44 0.5% 37.8% 83
92 North Carolina 3-8 28 45.26 0.4% 38.0% 98
93 Louisiana Tech 5-6 104 45.18 0.2% 38.1% 95
94 UAB 7-4 127 44.74 0.9% 38.7% 85
95 Florida Intl 6-4 105 44.69 0.1% 38.8% 86
96 Air Force 4-7 68 44.14 1.1% 39.5% 93
97 Miami OH 4-7 96 43.08 2.1% 41.0% 97
98 Georgia St 6-3 129 42.85 0.5% 41.3% 99
99 MTSU 5-6 112 42.78 0.2% 41.4% 96
100 UNLV 5-6 109 42.45 0.6% 41.8% 102
101 Tulsa 2-9 44 42.06 0.8% 42.4% 101
102 WKU 6-5 126 41.90 0.3% 42.6% 104
103 ULM 4-6 106 40.71 2.4% 44.2% 105
104 Illinois 2-9 17 40.27 0.9% 44.8% 107
105 Old Dominion 5-6 110 39.86 0.8% 45.4% 110
106 BYU 3-9 70 39.77 0.2% 45.5% 106
107 Cincinnati 3-8 62 39.63 0.3% 45.7% 100
108 Massachusetts 4-7 117 39.61 0.0% 45.7% 114
109 New Mexico 3-8 86 39.23 0.8% 46.3% 108
110 Nevada 2-9 72 39.06 0.3% 46.5% 111
111 Connecticut 3-8 57 39.02 0.1% 46.5% 112
112 New Mexico St 4-6 121 38.56 0.9% 47.2% 109
113 ULL 5-5 122 38.51 0.1% 47.2% 117
114 South Alabama 4-7 114 38.31 0.4% 47.5% 103
115 East Carolina 3-8 75 37.53 1.6% 48.6% 120
116 Baylor 1-10 55 37.53 0.0% 48.6% 115
117 Idaho 3-7 116 36.82 1.4% 49.6% 113
118 Oregon St 1-10 26 36.13 1.4% 50.5% 116
119 Bowling Green 2-9 78 35.63 1.0% 51.2% 119
120 Hawaii 3-8 101 35.39 0.5% 51.5% 118
121 Kansas 1-10 39 33.80 3.2% 53.7% 122
122 Kent 2-9 74 32.68 2.2% 55.2% 121
123 Ball St 2-9 92 31.96 1.4% 56.2% 123
124 Ga Southern 1-9 95 30.91 2.1% 57.7% 130
125 Coastal Car 2-9 119 30.86 0.1% 57.7% 127
126 Rice 1-10 88 30.67 0.4% 58.0% 124
127 Texas St 2-9 118 30.51 0.3% 58.2% 125
128 Charlotte 1-10 111 28.37 4.3% 61.1% 126
129 San Jose St 1-11 87 28.01 0.7% 61.6% 128
130 UTEP 0-11 85 26.71 7.6% 63.4% 129

Best win: Miami 41-8 vs. Notre Dame
Worst loss: Coastal Carolina 10-52 vs. Western Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 57.72 73.00 40.27
2 SEC 56.25 71.11 45.44
3 ACC 56.04 69.44 45.26
4 Pac-12 53.99 64.39 36.13
5 Big 12 53.14 66.43 33.80
6 American 50.00 67.46 37.53
7 Mountain West 45.77 61.27 28.01
8 MAC 45.26 56.89 31.96
9 Conference USA 42.65 57.97 26.71
10 Sun Belt 39.56 51.98 30.51

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *