J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2017 Week 10

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

This week’s full rankings:

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Notre Dame 8-1 6 73.49 1
2 Alabama 9-0 43 72.23 2.5% 1.7% 3
3 Georgia 9-0 37 71.76 0.9% 2.4% 4
4 Penn St 7-2 5 69.94 3.6% 4.8% 2
5 Clemson 8-1 13 69.88 0.1% 4.9% 6
6 Wisconsin 9-0 54 69.87 0.0% 4.9% 7
7 UCF 8-0 84 68.44 2.9% 6.9% 8
8 Ohio St 7-2 9 66.91 3.1% 8.9% 5
9 Miami FL 8-0 52 66.21 1.4% 9.9% 13
10 TCU 8-1 58 65.91 0.6% 10.3% 9
11 Washington 8-1 86 65.85 0.1% 10.4% 10
12 Oklahoma 8-1 47 65.05 1.6% 11.5% 11
13 Iowa 6-3 4 64.28 1.6% 12.5% 21
14 USC 8-2 15 64.13 0.3% 12.7% 15
15 Michigan 7-2 22 63.95 0.3% 13.0% 14
16 Michigan St 7-2 2 63.77 0.4% 13.2% 20
17 Auburn 7-2 64 62.96 1.6% 14.3% 19
18 Oklahoma St 7-2 40 62.29 1.4% 15.2% 12
19 Mississippi St 7-2 57 61.42 1.7% 16.4% 17
20 Virginia Tech 7-2 65 61.14 0.6% 16.8% 16
21 NC State 6-3 17 60.09 2.1% 18.2% 22
22 Boise St 7-2 67 59.90 0.4% 18.5% 23
23 Iowa St 6-3 34 59.75 0.3% 18.7% 18
24 Memphis 8-1 83 59.40 0.7% 19.2% 25
25 Washington St 8-2 62 59.11 0.6% 19.6% 26
26 Northwestern 6-3 12 59.06 0.1% 19.6% 29
27 Toledo 8-1 105 58.82 0.5% 20.0% 33
28 South Florida 8-1 124 57.88 1.9% 21.2% 30
29 Stanford 6-3 46 57.81 0.1% 21.3% 24
30 South Carolina 6-3 23 57.36 0.9% 21.9% 28
31 Boston College 5-4 3 56.80 1.1% 22.7% 36
32 LSU 6-3 33 56.65 0.3% 22.9% 32
33 San Diego St 8-2 92 56.22 0.8% 23.5% 35
34 Wake Forest 5-4 20 56.16 0.1% 23.6% 37
35 Georgia Tech 4-4 36 55.70 0.9% 24.2% 31
36 Arizona 6-3 69 55.61 0.2% 24.3% 34
37 SMU 6-3 63 55.39 0.4% 24.6% 39
38 West Virginia 6-3 70 55.09 0.6% 25.0% 45
39 Purdue 4-5 19 55.02 0.1% 25.1% 46
40 FL Atlantic 6-3 88 54.76 0.5% 25.5% 43
41 Navy 5-3 42 54.68 0.2% 25.6% 27
42 Texas 4-5 18 54.46 0.4% 25.9% 38
43 Houston 6-3 68 54.34 0.2% 26.0% 42
44 Arizona St 5-4 16 54.07 0.6% 26.4% 54
45 Fresno St 6-3 94 53.12 1.9% 27.7% 48
46 Louisville 5-4 49 52.86 0.5% 28.1% 52
47 Texas A&M 5-4 31 52.66 0.4% 28.3% 40
48 Kentucky 6-3 66 52.64 0.0% 28.4% 41
49 Army 7-2 115 52.48 0.3% 28.6% 60
50 N Illinois 6-3 93 52.48 0.0% 28.6% 44
51 Florida St 3-5 1 52.36 0.2% 28.7% 62
52 Oregon 5-5 30 52.19 0.3% 29.0% 47
53 Ohio 7-2 125 52.00 0.4% 29.2% 65
54 Syracuse 4-5 26 51.80 0.4% 29.5% 55
55 Nebraska 4-5 10 51.77 0.1% 29.6% 50
56 Marshall 6-3 109 51.73 0.1% 29.6% 49
57 Virginia 6-3 77 51.70 0.1% 29.6% 69
58 Utah 5-4 76 51.53 0.3% 29.9% 71
59 Troy 7-2 117 51.23 0.6% 30.3% 59
60 Minnesota 4-5 32 51.16 0.1% 30.4% 57
61 Wyoming 6-3 98 50.81 0.7% 30.9% 68
62 Arkansas St 5-2 127 50.52 0.6% 31.3% 66
63 Maryland 4-5 11 50.25 0.5% 31.6% 56
64 California 5-5 51 50.03 0.5% 31.9% 70
65 Kansas St 5-4 95 50.00 0.1% 32.0% 78
66 Texas Tech 4-5 38 49.79 0.4% 32.3% 58
67 Florida 3-5 7 49.53 0.5% 32.6% 53
68 Missouri 4-5 48 49.50 0.0% 32.6% 88
69 North Texas 6-3 85 49.41 0.2% 32.8% 73
70 Indiana 3-6 14 49.35 0.1% 32.8% 67
71 UCLA 4-5 21 49.31 0.1% 32.9% 51
72 Duke 4-5 56 49.18 0.2% 33.1% 76
73 Tennessee 4-5 28 49.13 0.1% 33.1% 79
74 Rutgers 4-5 27 48.88 0.5% 33.5% 83
75 Colorado 5-5 73 48.79 0.2% 33.6% 61
76 Colorado St 6-4 104 48.76 0.1% 33.6% 64
77 W Michigan 5-4 97 48.76 0.0% 33.6% 63
78 Mississippi 4-5 45 48.54 0.4% 33.9% 87
79 Florida Intl 6-2 111 48.49 0.1% 34.0% 80
80 Vanderbilt 4-5 35 48.44 0.1% 34.1% 86
81 Pittsburgh 4-5 39 48.19 0.5% 34.4% 72
82 Akron 5-4 74 47.73 0.9% 35.0% 77
83 Utah St 5-5 89 47.53 0.4% 35.3% 90
84 E Michigan 3-6 72 46.70 1.7% 36.5% 91
85 UT San Antonio 5-3 130 46.47 0.4% 36.8% 74
86 Air Force 4-5 79 45.94 1.1% 37.5% 75
87 Arkansas 4-5 44 45.84 0.2% 37.6% 89
88 Tulane 3-6 50 45.81 0.1% 37.7% 82
89 Temple 4-5 71 45.57 0.5% 38.0% 103
90 Louisiana Tech 4-5 106 45.48 0.2% 38.1% 85
91 Appalachian St 5-4 119 45.11 0.7% 38.6% 84
92 Southern Miss 5-4 112 45.10 0.0% 38.6% 81
93 UAB 6-3 129 45.00 0.2% 38.8% 93
94 C Michigan 5-4 101 44.98 0.0% 38.8% 96
95 MTSU 4-5 91 44.03 1.9% 40.1% 100
96 Buffalo 3-6 96 43.79 0.5% 40.4% 92
97 UNLV 4-5 103 43.47 0.6% 40.8% 97
98 Cincinnati 3-6 29 43.23 0.5% 41.2% 102
99 Georgia St 5-3 126 42.21 2.0% 42.6% 99
100 Tulsa 2-8 41 42.16 0.1% 42.6% 94
101 North Carolina 1-8 8 41.78 0.8% 43.1% 104
102 Miami OH 3-6 99 41.74 0.1% 43.2% 98
103 WKU 5-4 128 41.15 1.2% 44.0% 95
104 New Mexico 3-6 90 40.80 0.7% 44.5% 101
105 Illinois 2-7 24 40.51 0.6% 44.9% 105
106 New Mexico St 4-5 118 40.31 0.4% 45.1% 107
107 ULM 4-5 120 39.97 0.7% 45.6% 108
108 South Alabama 3-6 107 39.20 1.6% 46.7% 106
109 Connecticut 3-6 80 38.30 1.8% 47.9% 110
110 Idaho 3-6 113 38.13 0.3% 48.1% 111
111 BYU 2-8 60 37.91 0.4% 48.4% 112
112 ULL 4-4 123 37.72 0.4% 48.7% 115
113 Nevada 1-8 53 37.32 0.8% 49.2% 109
114 Baylor 1-8 59 37.18 0.3% 49.4% 119
115 Old Dominion 3-6 108 36.42 1.5% 50.4% 116
116 Oregon St 1-8 25 36.40 0.0% 50.5% 113
117 Massachusetts 2-7 114 36.05 0.7% 50.9% 120
118 Bowling Green 2-7 82 36.04 0.0% 51.0% 123
119 Hawaii 3-6 116 35.66 0.8% 51.5% 114
120 East Carolina 2-7 55 34.97 1.4% 52.4% 118
121 Kent 2-7 75 33.00 4.0% 55.1% 117
122 Ball St 2-7 102 32.90 0.2% 55.2% 121
123 Kansas 1-8 61 32.51 0.8% 55.8% 122
124 Rice 1-8 78 31.08 2.9% 57.7% 124
125 Texas St 2-7 121 30.12 1.9% 59.0% 125
126 Charlotte 1-8 110 29.45 1.3% 59.9% 126
127 San Jose St 1-9 87 28.98 0.9% 60.6% 127
128 Coastal Car 1-8 122 28.38 1.2% 61.4% 129
129 UTEP 0-9 81 27.01 2.7% 63.2% 128
130 Ga Southern 0-8 100 26.34 5.3% 64.2% 130

Best win: Iowa 55-24 vs. Ohio St.
Worst loss: Coastal Carolina 10-52 vs. Western Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 57.48 69.94 40.51
2 SEC 55.62 72.23 45.84
3 ACC 55.27 69.88 41.78
4 Pac-12 53.74 65.85 36.40
5 Big 12 53.20 65.91 32.51
6 American 50.02 68.44 34.97
7 Mountain West 45.71 59.90 28.98
8 MAC 44.91 58.82 32.90
9 Conference USA 42.54 54.76 27.01
10 Sun Belt 39.10 51.23 26.34

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *