J-Train Computer Rankings, 2016 Week 11

Leave a reply

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk	Team	Record	SOS	Rating	% Bhnd	% Bhnd 1st	Prev
1	Alabama	10-0	3	73.88	–	–	1
2	Ohio St	9-1	13	69.61	9.0%	5.8%	3
3	Michigan	9-1	24	68.60	2.1%	7.2%	2
4	Clemson	9-1	19	65.44	6.6%	11.4%	4
5	Louisville	9-1	57	65.07	0.8%	11.9%	6
6	Washington	9-1	60	63.93	2.4%	13.5%	5
7	Wisconsin	8-2	8	62.67	2.7%	15.2%	10
8	Penn St	8-2	7	62.37	0.6%	15.6%	8
9	W Michigan	10-0	116	61.56	1.7%	16.7%	9
10	USC	7-3	2	61.09	1.0%	17.3%	14
11	Colorado	8-2	34	60.99	0.2%	17.4%	11
12	Auburn	7-3	18	60.36	1.3%	18.3%	7
13	LSU	6-3	16	60.20	0.3%	18.5%	15
14	Boise St	9-1	73	59.96	0.5%	18.8%	13
15	Washington St	8-2	59	59.44	1.1%	19.5%	16
16	Florida St	7-3	12	58.98	1.0%	20.2%	17
17	Texas A&M	7-3	22	58.77	0.4%	20.5%	12
18	Nebraska	8-2	30	58.67	0.2%	20.6%	18
19	Oklahoma	8-2	45	58.51	0.3%	20.8%	24
20	Stanford	7-3	9	58.22	0.6%	21.2%	22
21	Tennessee	7-3	15	58.10	0.3%	21.4%	19
22	West Virginia	8-1	77	57.98	0.2%	21.5%	20
23	Florida	7-2	62	57.31	1.4%	22.4%	23
24	Troy	8-1	108	56.83	1.0%	23.1%	25
25	Utah	8-2	56	56.60	0.5%	23.4%	30
26	South Florida	8-2	88	56.01	1.2%	24.2%	29
27	Houston	8-2	94	55.93	0.2%	24.3%	28
28	Oklahoma St	8-2	85	55.47	1.0%	24.9%	31
29	Miami FL	6-4	52	54.89	1.2%	25.7%	37
30	Virginia Tech	7-3	55	54.71	0.4%	25.9%	21
31	San Diego St	9-1	128	54.69	0.0%	26.0%	36
32	North Carolina	7-3	48	54.40	0.6%	26.4%	26
33	Toledo	8-2	119	54.32	0.2%	26.5%	38
34	Appalachian St	7-3	78	54.15	0.4%	26.7%	33
35	WKU	8-3	104	54.14	0.0%	26.7%	41
36	Temple	7-3	81	54.11	0.1%	26.8%	35
37	Mississippi	5-5	4	53.94	0.4%	27.0%	40
38	Minnesota	7-3	71	53.83	0.2%	27.1%	27
39	Tulsa	7-3	86	53.50	0.7%	27.6%	34
40	Navy	7-2	58	53.49	0.0%	27.6%	43
41	BYU	6-4	46	53.24	0.5%	27.9%	42
42	Arkansas	6-4	6	52.76	1.0%	28.6%	32
43	Pittsburgh	6-4	25	52.75	0.0%	28.6%	48
44	Northwestern	5-5	21	52.32	0.9%	29.2%	46
45	Louisiana Tech	8-3	122	51.97	0.7%	29.7%	45
46	Iowa	6-4	38	51.77	0.4%	29.9%	54
47	Wyoming	7-3	91	51.35	0.9%	30.5%	39
48	UCF	6-4	87	51.23	0.2%	30.7%	47
49	NC State	5-5	35	50.76	1.0%	31.3%	52
50	Georgia Tech	6-4	36	50.71	0.1%	31.4%	55
51	Baylor	6-3	102	50.53	0.4%	31.6%	44
52	Georgia	6-4	32	50.23	0.6%	32.0%	65
53	UCLA	4-6	14	49.89	0.7%	32.5%	62
54	Air Force	7-3	110	49.88	0.0%	32.5%	53
55	TCU	5-4	75	49.87	0.0%	32.5%	50
56	Memphis	6-4	82	49.80	0.2%	32.6%	49
57	Kansas St	5-4	53	49.59	0.4%	32.9%	59
58	Old Dominion	7-3	111	49.20	0.8%	33.4%	67
59	Texas	5-5	37	49.00	0.4%	33.7%	58
60	Maryland	5-5	27	48.48	1.1%	34.4%	51
61	Indiana	5-5	31	48.31	0.4%	34.6%	57
62	Notre Dame	4-6	49	47.68	1.3%	35.5%	75
63	Kentucky	5-5	28	47.64	0.1%	35.5%	60
64	Wake Forest	6-4	70	47.55	0.2%	35.6%	61
65	Mississippi St	4-6	23	47.49	0.1%	35.7%	64
66	Arizona St	5-5	26	47.38	0.2%	35.9%	56
67	Colorado St	5-5	69	47.12	0.5%	36.2%	63
68	Ohio	7-3	127	46.87	0.5%	36.6%	72
69	New Mexico	7-3	125	46.64	0.5%	36.9%	74
70	Texas Tech	4-6	43	46.45	0.4%	37.1%	73
71	California	4-6	11	46.22	0.5%	37.4%	66
72	Oregon	3-7	10	45.59	1.3%	38.3%	68
73	South Carolina	5-5	42	45.50	0.2%	38.4%	71
74	E Michigan	6-4	96	44.94	1.2%	39.2%	82
75	Duke	4-6	44	44.71	0.5%	39.5%	86
76	Vanderbilt	4-6	40	44.59	0.2%	39.6%	70
77	SMU	5-5	66	44.52	0.1%	39.7%	83
78	Idaho	6-4	89	44.46	0.1%	39.8%	85
79	MTSU	6-4	117	44.14	0.7%	40.2%	69
80	Michigan St	3-7	33	43.19	2.0%	41.5%	94
81	Boston College	4-6	47	43.18	0.0%	41.5%	76
82	Syracuse	4-6	29	42.97	0.4%	41.8%	77
83	Southern Miss	5-5	106	42.91	0.1%	41.9%	81
84	Arkansas St	5-4	114	42.88	0.1%	42.0%	91
85	Oregon St	2-8	1	42.54	0.7%	42.4%	80
86	UT San Antonio	5-5	112	42.53	0.0%	42.4%	78
87	Missouri	3-7	39	42.42	0.2%	42.6%	96
88	C Michigan	5-5	97	42.30	0.2%	42.8%	90
89	Army	5-5	121	42.19	0.2%	42.9%	79
90	Illinois	3-7	20	41.47	1.5%	43.9%	84
91	Utah St	3-7	50	41.03	0.9%	44.5%	92
92	Ga Southern	4-6	92	40.92	0.2%	44.6%	88
93	Akron	5-6	98	40.59	0.7%	45.1%	87
94	Arizona	2-8	5	40.31	0.6%	45.4%	97
95	Cincinnati	4-6	79	40.14	0.3%	45.7%	93
96	Miami OH	5-6	115	40.07	0.2%	45.8%	103
97	South Alabama	4-5	103	39.82	0.5%	46.1%	98
98	N Illinois	3-7	83	39.55	0.6%	46.5%	99
99	Kent	3-7	80	39.43	0.2%	46.6%	100
100	Tulane	3-7	68	39.13	0.6%	47.0%	104
101	Rutgers	2-8	17	39.12	0.0%	47.1%	89
102	ULL	4-5	113	39.10	0.0%	47.1%	109
103	UNLV	4-6	105	38.79	0.7%	47.5%	112
104	Hawaii	4-7	74	38.77	0.0%	47.5%	102
105	East Carolina	3-7	61	38.51	0.5%	47.9%	95
106	North Texas	4-6	99	38.38	0.3%	48.1%	101
107	Ball St	4-6	120	37.87	1.1%	48.7%	105
108	ULM	4-6	101	37.60	0.6%	49.1%	113
109	Charlotte	4-6	109	37.47	0.3%	49.3%	106
110	Purdue	3-7	54	37.00	1.0%	49.9%	107
111	Virginia	2-8	51	36.99	0.0%	49.9%	108
112	Connecticut	3-7	67	36.84	0.3%	50.1%	110
113	Iowa St	2-8	63	36.67	0.4%	50.4%	114
114	Marshall	3-7	100	36.28	0.8%	50.9%	120
115	San Jose St	3-7	84	35.17	2.3%	52.4%	115
116	Georgia St	2-8	90	35.12	0.1%	52.5%	111
117	Massachusetts	2-8	76	34.11	2.1%	53.8%	116
118	Florida Intl	3-7	95	33.49	1.3%	54.7%	118
119	Bowling Green	2-8	65	33.15	0.7%	55.1%	126
120	FL Atlantic	3-7	124	32.72	0.9%	55.7%	124
121	UTEP	3-7	118	32.47	0.5%	56.0%	117
122	Nevada	3-7	123	32.41	0.1%	56.1%	122
123	New Mexico St	2-7	72	32.07	0.7%	56.6%	119
124	Kansas	1-9	41	31.94	0.3%	56.8%	121
125	Texas St	2-7	93	30.79	2.4%	58.3%	123
126	Fresno St	1-9	64	30.77	0.0%	58.3%	125
127	Rice	2-8	107	30.29	1.0%	59.0%	127
128	Buffalo	2-8	126	27.06	6.8%	63.4%	128

Best win: Michigan 49-10 vs. Penn St.
Worst loss: Akron 20-41 vs. Buffalo

Rk	Conference	Rating	Best Team	Worst Team
1	SEC	53.80	73.88	42.42
2	Pac-12	52.68	63.93	40.31
3	Big 10	52.67	69.61	37.00
4	ACC	51.65	65.44	36.99
5	Big 12	48.60	58.51	31.94
6	American	47.77	56.01	36.84
7	Mountain West	43.88	59.96	30.77
8	MAC	42.31	61.56	27.06
9	Sun Belt	41.25	56.83	30.79
10	Conference USA	40.46	54.14	30.29

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

J-Train Computer Rankings, 2016 Week 10

Leave a reply

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk	Team	Record	SOS	Rating	% Bhnd	% Bhnd 1st	Prev
1	Alabama	9-0	2	73.63	–	–	1
2	Michigan	9-0	25	71.26	5.0%	3.2%	2
3	Ohio St	8-1	15	68.36	6.1%	7.2%	4
4	Clemson	9-0	20	67.63	1.6%	8.1%	3
5	Washington	9-0	74	66.33	2.7%	9.9%	5
6	Louisville	8-1	62	63.86	5.2%	13.3%	7
7	Auburn	7-2	13	63.02	1.8%	14.4%	8
8	Penn St	7-2	6	61.70	2.8%	16.2%	12
9	W Michigan	9-0	110	61.58	0.2%	16.4%	9
10	Wisconsin	7-2	5	61.51	0.1%	16.5%	10
11	Colorado	7-2	22	60.86	1.4%	17.3%	13
12	Texas A&M	7-2	21	60.63	0.5%	17.6%	6
13	Boise St	8-1	57	59.18	3.1%	19.6%	15
14	USC	6-3	8	58.95	0.5%	19.9%	18
15	LSU	5-3	17	58.22	1.6%	20.9%	16
16	Washington St	7-2	60	57.84	0.8%	21.4%	21
17	Florida St	6-3	7	57.77	0.2%	21.5%	22
18	Nebraska	7-2	29	57.70	0.2%	21.6%	14
19	Tennessee	6-3	9	57.35	0.7%	22.1%	17
20	West Virginia	7-1	80	56.96	0.8%	22.6%	20
21	Virginia Tech	7-2	56	56.68	0.6%	23.0%	19
22	Stanford	6-3	10	56.41	0.6%	23.4%	25
23	Florida	6-2	59	56.28	0.3%	23.6%	11
24	Oklahoma	7-2	52	56.12	0.3%	23.8%	24
25	Troy	7-1	115	55.92	0.4%	24.1%	23
26	North Carolina	7-2	44	55.62	0.6%	24.5%	33
27	Minnesota	7-2	75	55.22	0.9%	25.0%	29
28	Houston	7-2	86	55.18	0.1%	25.1%	27
29	South Florida	7-2	85	55.08	0.2%	25.2%	28
30	Utah	7-2	48	55.06	0.1%	25.2%	30
31	Oklahoma St	7-2	87	54.72	0.7%	25.7%	31
32	Arkansas	6-3	12	54.66	0.1%	25.8%	42
33	Appalachian St	7-2	91	54.65	0.0%	25.8%	32
34	Tulsa	7-2	96	54.05	1.3%	26.6%	34
35	Temple	7-3	73	53.82	0.5%	26.9%	35
36	San Diego St	8-1	128	53.80	0.0%	26.9%	36
37	Miami FL	5-4	41	53.60	0.4%	27.2%	45
38	Toledo	7-2	120	53.45	0.3%	27.4%	39
39	Wyoming	7-2	79	53.28	0.4%	27.6%	40
40	Mississippi	4-5	4	52.57	1.5%	28.6%	47
41	WKU	7-3	102	52.55	0.0%	28.6%	38
42	BYU	5-4	27	52.46	0.2%	28.7%	43
43	Navy	6-2	76	51.58	1.9%	29.9%	44
44	Baylor	6-2	118	51.31	0.6%	30.3%	26
45	Louisiana Tech	7-3	119	50.51	1.7%	31.4%	53
46	Northwestern	4-5	19	50.27	0.5%	31.7%	41
47	UCF	5-4	69	50.26	0.0%	31.7%	54
48	Pittsburgh	5-4	38	50.01	0.5%	32.1%	37
49	Memphis	6-3	98	49.78	0.5%	32.4%	62
50	TCU	5-4	72	49.27	1.1%	33.1%	71
51	Maryland	5-4	40	49.25	0.0%	33.1%	51
52	NC State	4-5	28	49.23	0.1%	33.1%	52
53	Air Force	6-3	109	49.04	0.4%	33.4%	65
54	Iowa	5-4	66	48.89	0.3%	33.6%	49
55	Georgia Tech	5-4	37	48.60	0.6%	34.0%	46
56	Arizona St	5-4	31	48.60	0.0%	34.0%	58
57	Indiana	5-4	39	48.55	0.1%	34.1%	60
58	Texas	5-4	54	48.54	0.0%	34.1%	63
59	Kansas St	5-4	63	48.35	0.4%	34.3%	55
60	Kentucky	5-4	33	48.29	0.1%	34.4%	48
61	Wake Forest	6-3	94	48.02	0.6%	34.8%	61
62	UCLA	3-6	11	47.96	0.1%	34.9%	56
63	Colorado St	5-4	68	47.93	0.1%	34.9%	69
64	Mississippi St	4-5	36	47.81	0.3%	35.1%	79
65	Georgia	5-4	35	47.65	0.3%	35.3%	67
66	California	4-5	18	47.59	0.1%	35.4%	57
67	Old Dominion	6-3	113	47.17	0.9%	35.9%	75
68	Oregon	3-6	14	46.76	0.9%	36.5%	59
69	MTSU	6-3	116	46.67	0.2%	36.6%	50
70	Vanderbilt	4-5	32	46.34	0.7%	37.1%	64
71	South Carolina	5-4	42	46.17	0.4%	37.3%	73
72	Ohio	7-3	126	46.08	0.2%	37.4%	76
73	Texas Tech	4-5	51	45.85	0.5%	37.7%	66
74	New Mexico	6-3	124	45.71	0.3%	37.9%	77
75	Notre Dame	3-6	49	44.32	2.9%	39.8%	80
76	Boston College	4-5	47	44.24	0.2%	39.9%	72
77	Syracuse	4-5	26	44.19	0.1%	40.0%	78
78	UT San Antonio	5-4	117	44.17	0.0%	40.0%	91
79	Army	5-4	125	43.78	0.8%	40.5%	70
80	Oregon St	2-7	1	43.73	0.1%	40.6%	81
81	Southern Miss	5-4	112	43.68	0.1%	40.7%	68
82	E Michigan	5-4	95	43.34	0.7%	41.1%	84
83	SMU	4-5	50	42.55	1.7%	42.2%	74
84	Illinois	3-6	23	42.53	0.0%	42.2%	94
85	Idaho	5-4	70	42.41	0.3%	42.4%	98
86	Duke	3-6	45	42.25	0.4%	42.6%	85
87	Akron	5-5	88	42.08	0.4%	42.8%	83
88	Ga Southern	4-5	82	41.80	0.6%	43.2%	86
89	Rutgers	2-7	3	41.70	0.2%	43.4%	88
90	C Michigan	5-5	100	41.56	0.3%	43.6%	82
91	Arkansas St	4-4	103	41.49	0.1%	43.6%	101
92	Utah St	3-6	43	41.09	0.9%	44.2%	92
93	Cincinnati	4-5	78	40.98	0.2%	44.3%	89
94	Michigan St	2-7	24	40.46	1.1%	45.0%	93
95	East Carolina	3-6	53	40.20	0.6%	45.4%	95
96	Missouri	2-7	34	39.98	0.5%	45.7%	87
97	Arizona	2-7	16	39.88	0.2%	45.8%	97
98	South Alabama	4-5	104	39.14	1.6%	46.8%	96
99	N Illinois	3-6	93	39.13	0.0%	46.9%	108
100	Kent	3-6	97	38.99	0.3%	47.0%	102
101	North Texas	4-5	106	38.80	0.4%	47.3%	90
102	Hawaii	4-6	83	38.77	0.1%	47.3%	100
103	Miami OH	4-6	108	38.58	0.4%	47.6%	110
104	Tulane	3-6	81	38.50	0.2%	47.7%	99
105	Ball St	4-5	121	38.39	0.2%	47.9%	103
106	Charlotte	4-5	105	37.75	1.4%	48.7%	112
107	Purdue	3-6	55	37.73	0.0%	48.7%	105
108	Virginia	2-7	61	36.86	1.9%	49.9%	107
109	ULL	3-5	111	36.72	0.3%	50.1%	104
110	Connecticut	3-7	65	36.64	0.2%	50.2%	109
111	Georgia St	2-7	77	36.34	0.6%	50.6%	106
112	UNLV	3-6	114	35.54	1.7%	51.7%	111
113	ULM	3-6	92	35.29	0.5%	52.1%	120
114	Iowa St	1-8	46	34.58	1.5%	53.0%	113
115	San Jose St	3-7	84	34.23	0.7%	53.5%	116
116	Massachusetts	2-8	71	33.62	1.3%	54.3%	114
117	UTEP	3-6	107	33.42	0.4%	54.6%	124
118	Florida Intl	3-7	90	33.13	0.6%	55.0%	118
119	New Mexico St	2-6	64	32.85	0.6%	55.4%	117
120	Marshall	2-7	101	32.26	1.3%	56.2%	115
121	Kansas	1-8	30	32.23	0.1%	56.2%	121
122	Nevada	3-6	127	32.13	0.2%	56.4%	119
123	Texas St	2-6	89	31.59	1.1%	57.1%	123
124	FL Atlantic	2-7	123	30.21	2.9%	59.0%	128
125	Fresno St	1-9	67	30.17	0.1%	59.0%	126
126	Bowling Green	1-8	58	30.02	0.3%	59.2%	125
127	Rice	1-8	99	28.29	3.7%	61.6%	122
128	Buffalo	2-7	122	27.47	1.7%	62.7%	127

Best win: Michigan 49-10 vs. Penn St.
Worst loss: Akron 20-41 vs. Buffalo

Rk	Conference	Rating	Best Team	Worst Team
1	SEC	53.76	73.63	39.98
2	Big 10	52.51	71.26	37.73
3	Pac-12	52.50	66.33	39.88
4	ACC	51.32	67.63	36.86
5	Big 12	47.79	56.96	32.23
6	American	47.39	55.18	36.64
7	Mountain West	43.41	59.18	30.17
8	MAC	41.72	61.58	27.47
9	Sun Belt	40.75	55.92	31.59
10	Conference USA	39.89	52.55	28.29

J-Train Computer Rankings, 2016 Week 9

Leave a reply

I made a minor adjustment to the formula this week. There was nothing I particularly disliked about the results thus far, but there was an aspect of the formula that I hadn’t thought about previously and felt there could be substantial improvement. Because the adjustment affected the symmetric nature of the rating numbers, I normalized them to a 0-100 scale. The Prev column this week reflects the retroactive rankings of last week rather than the published rankings.

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk	Team	Record	SOS	Rating	% Bhnd	% Bhnd 1st	Prev
1	Alabama	8-0	7	73.75	–	–	1
2	Michigan	8-0	24	70.66	6.5%	4.2%	2
3	Clemson	8-0	11	67.67	6.3%	8.2%	3
4	Ohio St	7-1	18	66.60	2.3%	9.7%	4
5	Washington	8-0	77	65.81	1.7%	10.8%	6
6	Texas A&M	7-1	20	63.73	4.4%	13.6%	7
7	Louisville	7-1	56	63.15	1.2%	14.4%	5
8	Auburn	6-2	12	62.40	1.6%	15.4%	11
9	W Michigan	8-0	109	61.82	1.2%	16.2%	8
10	Wisconsin	6-2	2	61.39	0.9%	16.8%	15
11	Florida	6-1	57	60.79	1.3%	17.6%	14
12	Penn St	6-2	4	60.60	0.4%	17.8%	16
13	Colorado	6-2	22	60.33	0.6%	18.2%	17
14	Nebraska	7-1	47	60.01	0.7%	18.6%	10
15	Boise St	7-1	39	59.62	0.8%	19.2%	9
16	LSU	5-2	33	58.70	1.9%	20.4%	19
17	Tennessee	5-3	1	58.35	0.7%	20.9%	13
18	USC	5-3	6	57.89	1.0%	21.5%	23
19	Virginia Tech	6-2	41	57.47	0.9%	22.1%	24
20	West Virginia	6-1	64	57.06	0.9%	22.6%	12
21	Washington St	6-2	43	56.87	0.4%	22.9%	21
22	Florida St	5-3	10	56.73	0.3%	23.1%	20
23	Troy	6-1	102	56.72	0.0%	23.1%	22
24	Oklahoma	6-2	40	55.87	1.8%	24.2%	25
25	Stanford	5-3	8	55.82	0.1%	24.3%	31
26	Baylor	6-1	122	55.71	0.2%	24.5%	18
27	Houston	7-2	83	55.33	0.8%	25.0%	29
28	South Florida	7-2	85	55.11	0.5%	25.3%	32
29	Minnesota	6-2	65	55.03	0.2%	25.4%	34
30	Utah	7-2	48	55.01	0.0%	25.4%	26
31	Oklahoma St	6-2	81	54.83	0.4%	25.7%	37
32	Appalachian St	6-2	73	54.76	0.1%	25.7%	28
33	North Carolina	6-2	49	53.59	2.5%	27.3%	33
34	Tulsa	6-2	86	53.17	0.9%	27.9%	50
35	Temple	6-3	66	53.13	0.1%	28.0%	39
36	San Diego St	7-1	126	52.64	1.0%	28.6%	43
37	Pittsburgh	5-3	38	52.62	0.0%	28.6%	36
38	WKU	6-3	88	52.06	1.2%	29.4%	44
39	Toledo	6-2	121	51.86	0.4%	29.7%	27
40	Wyoming	6-2	78	51.82	0.1%	29.7%	53
41	Northwestern	4-4	23	51.68	0.3%	29.9%	46
42	Arkansas	5-3	16	51.59	0.2%	30.1%	45
43	BYU	4-4	21	51.28	0.7%	30.5%	38
44	Navy	5-2	76	51.24	0.1%	30.5%	30
45	Miami FL	4-4	45	51.16	0.2%	30.6%	35
46	Georgia Tech	5-3	37	51.13	0.1%	30.7%	52
47	Mississippi	3-5	5	51.05	0.2%	30.8%	41
48	Kentucky	5-3	25	50.59	1.0%	31.4%	60
49	Iowa	5-3	87	50.22	0.8%	31.9%	56
50	MTSU	6-2	115	50.19	0.1%	31.9%	47
51	Maryland	5-3	79	49.87	0.7%	32.4%	40
52	NC State	4-4	34	49.74	0.3%	32.6%	42
53	Louisiana Tech	6-3	119	49.60	0.3%	32.7%	59
54	UCF	4-4	54	48.88	1.5%	33.7%	55
55	Kansas St	5-3	80	48.84	0.1%	33.8%	58
56	UCLA	3-5	14	48.65	0.4%	34.0%	57
57	California	4-4	27	48.52	0.3%	34.2%	54
58	Arizona St	5-4	29	48.52	0.0%	34.2%	51
59	Oregon	3-5	15	48.37	0.3%	34.4%	73
60	Indiana	4-4	28	48.22	0.3%	34.6%	65
61	Wake Forest	5-3	75	48.12	0.2%	34.8%	49
62	Memphis	5-3	101	47.44	1.4%	35.7%	48
63	Texas	4-4	42	47.42	0.0%	35.7%	72
64	Vanderbilt	4-4	32	47.40	0.0%	35.7%	67
65	Air Force	5-3	112	47.37	0.1%	35.8%	61
66	Texas Tech	4-4	59	46.90	1.0%	36.4%	70
67	Georgia	4-4	31	46.84	0.1%	36.5%	64
68	Southern Miss	5-3	108	46.75	0.2%	36.6%	71
69	Colorado St	4-4	44	46.56	0.4%	36.9%	66
70	Army	5-3	125	46.23	0.7%	37.3%	81
71	TCU	4-4	82	46.03	0.4%	37.6%	62
72	Boston College	4-4	69	45.79	0.5%	37.9%	90
73	South Carolina	4-4	30	45.47	0.7%	38.3%	95
74	SMU	4-4	46	45.30	0.4%	38.6%	78
75	Old Dominion	5-3	114	45.28	0.0%	38.6%	75
76	Ohio	6-3	124	45.26	0.1%	38.6%	83
77	New Mexico	5-3	120	45.08	0.4%	38.9%	76
78	Syracuse	4-4	36	45.02	0.1%	39.0%	74
79	Mississippi St	3-5	50	44.96	0.1%	39.0%	84
80	Notre Dame	3-5	58	44.45	1.1%	39.7%	89
81	Oregon St	2-6	3	44.21	0.5%	40.1%	82
82	C Michigan	5-4	95	43.99	0.5%	40.4%	69
83	Akron	5-4	99	43.57	0.9%	40.9%	63
84	E Michigan	5-4	98	42.74	1.8%	42.1%	68
85	Duke	3-5	51	42.64	0.2%	42.2%	88
86	Ga Southern	4-4	96	42.58	0.1%	42.3%	80
87	Missouri	2-6	26	42.26	0.7%	42.7%	79
88	Rutgers	2-6	9	42.07	0.4%	43.0%	94
89	Cincinnati	4-4	91	42.04	0.1%	43.0%	86
90	North Texas	4-4	104	41.73	0.6%	43.4%	77
91	UT San Antonio	4-4	118	41.71	0.0%	43.4%	100
92	Utah St	3-5	67	41.65	0.1%	43.5%	85
93	Michigan St	2-6	17	41.54	0.2%	43.7%	103
94	Illinois	2-6	13	41.40	0.3%	43.9%	87
95	East Carolina	3-5	62	41.31	0.2%	44.0%	106
96	South Alabama	4-4	97	41.13	0.4%	44.2%	98
97	Arizona	2-6	19	40.85	0.6%	44.6%	91
98	Idaho	4-4	63	40.73	0.3%	44.8%	96
99	Tulane	3-5	89	40.16	1.2%	45.5%	93
100	Hawaii	4-5	100	39.93	0.5%	45.9%	92
101	Arkansas St	3-4	94	39.25	1.4%	46.8%	109
102	Kent	3-6	92	39.08	0.4%	47.0%	110
103	Ball St	4-4	127	38.88	0.4%	47.3%	99
104	ULL	3-4	111	38.72	0.3%	47.5%	102
105	Purdue	3-5	60	38.27	0.9%	48.1%	101
106	Georgia St	2-6	72	38.13	0.3%	48.3%	104
107	Virginia	2-6	53	37.79	0.7%	48.8%	108
108	N Illinois	2-6	70	37.52	0.6%	49.1%	107
109	Connecticut	3-6	71	37.39	0.3%	49.3%	97
110	Miami OH	3-6	106	36.25	2.4%	50.9%	114
111	UNLV	3-6	116	35.55	1.5%	51.8%	105
112	Charlotte	3-5	113	34.31	2.6%	53.5%	112
113	Iowa St	1-7	61	34.15	0.3%	53.7%	115
114	Massachusetts	2-7	84	33.71	0.9%	54.3%	125
115	Marshall	2-6	103	33.51	0.4%	54.6%	111
116	San Jose St	3-6	105	33.49	0.0%	54.6%	123
117	New Mexico St	2-6	52	33.34	0.3%	54.8%	117
118	Florida Intl	3-6	107	32.89	1.0%	55.4%	116
119	Nevada	3-5	128	32.51	0.8%	55.9%	119
120	ULM	2-6	90	32.48	0.1%	56.0%	113
121	Kansas	1-7	35	31.96	1.1%	56.7%	118
122	Rice	1-7	68	31.33	1.3%	57.5%	120
123	Texas St	2-5	110	31.24	0.2%	57.6%	121
124	UTEP	2-6	93	31.00	0.5%	58.0%	126
125	Bowling Green	1-7	55	30.89	0.2%	58.1%	122
126	Fresno St	1-8	74	30.71	0.4%	58.4%	124
127	Buffalo	2-6	123	28.45	4.8%	61.4%	128
128	FL Atlantic	1-7	117	27.35	2.3%	62.9%	127

Best win: Michigan 49-10 vs. Penn St.
Worst loss: Akron 20-41 vs. Buffalo

Rk	Conference	Rating	Best Team	Worst Team
1	SEC	54.13	73.75	42.26
2	Big 10	52.68	70.66	38.27
3	Pac-12	52.57	65.81	40.85
4	ACC	51.62	67.67	37.79
5	Big 12	47.88	57.06	31.96
6	American	47.54	55.33	37.39
7	Mountain West	43.08	59.62	30.71
8	MAC	41.69	61.82	28.45
9	Sun Belt	40.82	56.72	31.24
10	Conference USA	39.83	52.06	27.35

J-Train Computer Rankings, 2016 Week 8

Leave a reply

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk	Team	Record	SOS	Rating	% Bhnd	% Bhnd 1st	Prev
1	Alabama	8-0	10	18.190	–	–	2
2	Michigan	7-0	19	17.914	1.5%	1.5%	1
3	Clemson	7-0	18	15.891	11.1%	12.6%	4
4	W Michigan	8-0	90	14.068	10.0%	22.7%	7
5	Washington	7-0	118	13.818	1.4%	24.0%	6
6	Boise St	7-0	46	13.462	2.0%	26.0%	9
7	Ohio St	6-1	25	13.191	1.5%	27.5%	3
8	Louisville	6-1	27	13.099	0.5%	28.0%	11
9	Nebraska	7-0	88	12.931	0.9%	28.9%	8
10	West Virginia	6-0	92	12.496	2.4%	31.3%	10
11	Texas A&M	6-1	16	11.732	4.2%	35.5%	5
12	Baylor	6-0	125	11.196	2.9%	38.4%	13
13	Florida	5-1	57	10.089	6.1%	44.5%	14
14	Tennessee	5-2	1	9.385	3.9%	48.4%	15
15	Troy	6-1	96	9.096	1.6%	50.0%	17
16	Auburn	5-2	17	8.957	0.8%	50.8%	20
17	Penn St	5-2	2	8.695	1.4%	52.2%	26
18	Wisconsin	5-2	5	8.451	1.3%	53.5%	21
19	Toledo	6-1	121	8.239	1.2%	54.7%	23
20	Colorado	6-2	31	8.230	0.1%	54.8%	19
21	Utah	7-1	103	7.895	1.8%	56.6%	22
22	Navy	5-1	76	7.670	1.2%	57.8%	25
23	Florida St	5-2	15	7.428	1.3%	59.2%	18
24	Houston	6-2	75	7.011	2.3%	61.5%	12
25	LSU	5-2	54	6.972	0.2%	61.7%	34
26	Washington St	5-2	51	6.838	0.7%	62.4%	28
27	Virginia Tech	5-2	60	6.626	1.2%	63.6%	38
28	Oklahoma	5-2	23	6.403	1.2%	64.8%	27
29	Appalachian St	5-2	37	6.355	0.3%	65.1%	37
30	San Diego St	6-1	126	6.259	0.5%	65.6%	36
31	South Florida	6-2	100	6.131	0.7%	66.3%	16
32	North Carolina	6-2	50	5.909	1.2%	67.5%	33
33	Pittsburgh	5-2	62	5.360	3.0%	70.5%	35
34	Minnesota	5-2	64	5.283	0.4%	71.0%	40
35	Oklahoma St	5-2	95	5.031	1.4%	72.3%	42
36	USC	4-3	4	4.703	1.8%	74.1%	39
37	Maryland	5-2	91	4.614	0.5%	74.6%	46
38	Wyoming	5-2	84	4.443	0.9%	75.6%	45
39	MTSU	5-2	110	4.122	1.8%	77.3%	55
40	Tulsa	5-2	99	4.095	0.2%	77.5%	51
41	Wake Forest	5-2	78	4.011	0.5%	78.0%	41
42	Memphis	5-2	114	3.952	0.3%	78.3%	24
43	Temple	5-3	49	3.718	1.3%	79.6%	59
44	Miami FL	4-3	39	3.578	0.8%	80.3%	29
45	Stanford	4-3	6	3.365	1.2%	81.5%	32
46	WKU	5-3	72	3.249	0.6%	82.1%	66
47	Arkansas	5-3	20	3.030	1.2%	83.3%	30
48	NC State	4-3	33	2.796	1.3%	84.6%	31
49	Northwestern	4-3	35	2.653	0.8%	85.4%	58
50	Arizona St	5-3	40	2.441	1.2%	86.6%	43
51	Georgia Tech	4-3	28	2.345	0.5%	87.1%	52
52	UCF	4-3	63	2.124	1.2%	88.3%	61
53	Iowa	5-3	109	2.122	0.0%	88.3%	48
54	BYU	4-4	12	2.068	0.3%	88.6%	50
55	California	4-3	30	2.014	0.3%	88.9%	60
56	Louisiana Tech	5-3	116	1.861	0.8%	89.8%	65
57	Akron	5-3	80	1.625	1.3%	91.1%	68
58	Air Force	4-3	83	1.318	1.7%	92.8%	47
59	E Michigan	5-3	67	1.278	0.2%	93.0%	54
60	C Michigan	5-3	73	1.245	0.2%	93.2%	49
61	Kansas St	4-3	68	1.212	0.2%	93.3%	67
62	Kentucky	4-3	24	0.946	1.5%	94.8%	70
63	Mississippi	3-4	9	0.933	0.1%	94.9%	44
64	TCU	4-3	87	0.765	0.9%	95.8%	53
65	Georgia	4-3	59	0.396	2.0%	97.8%	64
66	Southern Miss	4-3	105	-0.040	2.4%	100.2%	71
67	Colorado St	4-4	34	-0.331	1.6%	101.8%	78
68	Ohio	5-3	123	-0.586	1.4%	103.2%	73
69	Vanderbilt	4-4	36	-0.619	0.2%	103.4%	79
70	North Texas	4-3	102	-0.648	0.2%	103.6%	92
71	New Mexico	4-3	117	-0.659	0.1%	103.6%	82
72	Old Dominion	4-3	111	-0.662	0.0%	103.6%	56
73	Ga Southern	4-3	112	-0.681	0.1%	103.7%	75
74	Army	4-3	127	-1.040	2.0%	105.7%	63
75	Cincinnati	4-3	113	-1.185	0.8%	106.5%	81
76	Indiana	3-4	21	-1.290	0.6%	107.1%	57
77	UCLA	3-5	11	-1.346	0.3%	107.4%	62
78	Syracuse	4-4	38	-1.497	0.8%	108.2%	85
79	Texas Tech	3-4	43	-1.728	1.3%	109.5%	69
80	SMU	3-4	22	-1.906	1.0%	110.5%	103
81	Texas	3-4	70	-2.584	3.7%	114.2%	76
82	Idaho	4-4	45	-2.915	1.8%	116.0%	72
83	Hawaii	4-4	94	-2.976	0.3%	116.4%	97
84	Utah St	3-4	81	-3.182	1.1%	117.5%	96
85	Tulane	3-4	74	-3.592	2.3%	119.7%	74
86	Duke	3-4	66	-3.645	0.3%	120.0%	88
87	Boston College	3-4	93	-3.781	0.7%	120.8%	77
88	Oregon	2-5	13	-3.986	1.1%	121.9%	80
89	Missouri	2-5	14	-4.148	0.9%	122.8%	86
90	Ball St	4-4	124	-4.159	0.1%	122.9%	83
91	Oregon St	2-5	3	-4.362	1.1%	124.0%	89
92	South Carolina	3-4	71	-4.603	1.3%	125.3%	102
93	Purdue	3-4	65	-4.623	0.1%	125.4%	90
94	South Alabama	3-4	86	-4.636	0.1%	125.5%	93
95	ULL	3-4	98	-4.667	0.2%	125.7%	107
96	Illinois	2-5	8	-4.850	1.0%	126.7%	91
97	UT San Antonio	3-4	119	-4.971	0.7%	127.3%	84
98	Connecticut	3-5	44	-5.011	0.2%	127.6%	87
99	Mississippi St	2-5	41	-5.431	2.3%	129.9%	95
100	Arizona	2-5	26	-5.963	2.9%	132.8%	100
101	Notre Dame	2-5	82	-6.141	1.0%	133.8%	99
102	Rutgers	2-6	7	-6.223	0.5%	134.2%	98
103	UNLV	3-5	101	-6.299	0.4%	134.6%	94
104	Georgia St	2-5	52	-6.772	2.6%	137.2%	113
105	Michigan St	2-5	53	-7.381	3.3%	140.6%	104
106	Arkansas St	2-4	56	-7.423	0.2%	140.8%	108
107	Charlotte	3-5	104	-7.430	0.0%	140.8%	115
108	East Carolina	2-5	48	-7.570	0.8%	141.6%	101
109	N Illinois	2-6	47	-7.733	0.9%	142.5%	116
110	Virginia	2-5	79	-8.189	2.5%	145.0%	106
111	Marshall	2-5	85	-8.561	2.0%	147.1%	109
112	ULM	2-5	77	-8.646	0.5%	147.5%	105
113	Florida Intl	3-5	115	-8.739	0.5%	148.0%	111
114	Kent	2-6	107	-8.837	0.5%	148.6%	112
115	New Mexico St	2-5	58	-9.235	2.2%	150.8%	117
116	Nevada	3-5	128	-9.235	0.0%	150.8%	114
117	Miami OH	2-6	108	-10.125	4.9%	155.7%	124
118	Texas St	2-5	106	-10.417	1.6%	157.3%	110
119	San Jose St	2-6	89	-10.690	1.5%	158.8%	120
120	UTEP	2-5	97	-10.736	0.3%	159.0%	126
121	Iowa St	1-6	61	-11.385	3.6%	162.6%	121
122	Kansas	1-6	32	-11.500	0.6%	163.2%	119
123	Rice	1-6	55	-11.696	1.1%	164.3%	127
124	Fresno St	1-7	42	-12.239	3.0%	167.3%	122
125	Bowling Green	1-7	29	-12.251	0.1%	167.4%	118
126	Massachusetts	1-7	69	-13.139	4.9%	172.2%	123
127	FL Atlantic	1-6	120	-13.825	3.8%	176.0%	125
128	Buffalo	1-6	122	-16.774	16.2%	192.2%	128

Best win: Alabama 49-10 vs. Tennessee
Worst loss: Virginia 20-37 vs. Richmond

Rk	Conference	Rating	Best Team	Worst Team
1	SEC	3.988	18.190	-5.431
2	Big 10	3.678	17.914	-7.381
3	ACC	3.566	15.891	-8.189
4	Pac-12	2.804	13.818	-5.963
5	American	1.286	7.670	-7.570
6	Big 12	0.991	12.496	-11.500
7	Mountain West	-1.677	13.462	-12.239
8	MAC	-2.834	14.068	-16.774
9	Sun Belt	-3.631	9.096	-10.417
10	Conference USA	-4.467	4.122	-13.825

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the number one team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

J-Train Computer Rankings, 2016 Week 7

Leave a reply

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk	Team	Record	SOS	Rating	% Bhnd	% Bhnd 1st	Prev
1	Michigan	6-0	22	17.569	–	–	1
2	Alabama	7-0	21	17.441	0.7%	0.7%	3
3	Ohio St	6-0	38	16.518	5.3%	6.0%	2
4	Clemson	7-0	15	15.926	3.4%	9.4%	4
5	Texas A&M	6-0	37	14.770	6.6%	15.9%	5
6	Washington	6-0	105	14.045	4.1%	20.1%	6
7	W Michigan	7-0	99	13.209	4.8%	24.8%	10
8	Nebraska	6-0	71	13.029	1.0%	25.8%	9
9	Boise St	6-0	77	12.630	2.3%	28.1%	7
10	West Virginia	5-0	90	11.595	5.9%	34.0%	11
11	Louisville	5-1	41	11.577	0.1%	34.1%	12
12	Houston	6-1	70	10.357	6.9%	41.0%	14
13	Baylor	6-0	126	10.043	1.8%	42.8%	13
14	Florida	5-1	74	9.217	4.7%	47.5%	19
15	Tennessee	5-2	1	9.122	0.5%	48.1%	8
16	South Florida	6-1	107	8.584	3.1%	51.1%	21
17	Troy	5-1	93	8.500	0.5%	51.6%	18
18	Florida St	5-2	7	7.917	3.3%	54.9%	29
19	Colorado	5-2	35	7.388	3.0%	57.9%	34
20	Auburn	4-2	14	7.270	0.7%	58.6%	28
21	Wisconsin	4-2	4	7.147	0.7%	59.3%	15
22	Utah	6-1	101	7.013	0.8%	60.1%	31
23	Toledo	5-1	123	6.995	0.1%	60.2%	27
24	Memphis	5-1	117	6.638	2.0%	62.2%	33
25	Navy	4-1	58	6.591	0.3%	62.5%	22
26	Penn St	4-2	6	6.401	1.1%	63.6%	30
27	Oklahoma	4-2	8	6.290	0.6%	64.2%	44
28	Washington St	4-2	42	6.172	0.7%	64.9%	38
29	Miami FL	4-2	60	6.055	0.7%	65.5%	17
30	Arkansas	5-2	19	5.952	0.6%	66.1%	36
31	NC State	4-2	49	5.408	3.1%	69.2%	20
32	Stanford	4-2	9	5.189	1.2%	70.5%	37
33	North Carolina	5-2	32	5.114	0.4%	70.9%	47
34	LSU	4-2	64	5.059	0.3%	71.2%	46
35	Pittsburgh	5-2	66	5.021	0.2%	71.4%	45
36	San Diego St	5-1	124	4.931	0.5%	71.9%	35
37	Appalachian St	4-2	40	4.657	1.6%	73.5%	39
38	Virginia Tech	4-2	69	4.572	0.5%	74.0%	16
39	USC	4-3	2	4.550	0.1%	74.1%	52
40	Minnesota	4-2	59	4.440	0.6%	74.7%	59
41	Wake Forest	5-2	55	4.321	0.7%	75.4%	24
42	Oklahoma St	4-2	67	4.152	1.0%	76.4%	43
43	Arizona St	5-2	47	4.122	0.2%	76.5%	23
44	Mississippi	3-3	5	3.693	2.4%	79.0%	32
45	Wyoming	4-2	61	3.600	0.5%	79.5%	42
46	Maryland	4-2	79	3.137	2.6%	82.1%	25
47	Air Force	4-2	97	3.074	0.4%	82.5%	26
48	Iowa	5-2	119	3.039	0.2%	82.7%	62
49	C Michigan	5-2	88	2.809	1.3%	84.0%	57
50	BYU	4-3	23	2.651	0.9%	84.9%	58
51	Tulsa	4-2	80	2.463	1.1%	86.0%	40
52	Georgia Tech	4-3	29	2.341	0.7%	86.7%	67
53	TCU	4-2	113	2.270	0.4%	87.1%	55
54	E Michigan	5-2	103	2.101	1.0%	88.0%	64
55	MTSU	4-2	115	1.998	0.6%	88.6%	41
56	Old Dominion	4-2	111	1.825	1.0%	89.6%	53
57	Indiana	3-3	13	1.145	3.9%	93.5%	49
58	Northwestern	3-3	30	0.927	1.2%	94.7%	74
59	Temple	4-3	76	0.844	0.5%	95.2%	69
60	California	3-3	28	0.530	1.8%	97.0%	65
61	UCF	3-3	57	0.333	1.1%	98.1%	48
62	UCLA	3-4	10	0.328	0.0%	98.1%	56
63	Army	4-2	128	0.310	0.1%	98.2%	72
64	Georgia	4-3	54	0.190	0.7%	98.9%	50
65	Louisiana Tech	4-3	108	-0.044	1.3%	100.2%	73
66	WKU	4-3	98	-0.050	0.0%	100.3%	79
67	Kansas St	3-3	51	-0.123	0.4%	100.7%	51
68	Akron	4-3	84	-0.534	2.3%	103.0%	61
69	Texas Tech	3-3	65	-0.631	0.5%	103.6%	54
70	Kentucky	3-3	24	-0.945	1.8%	105.4%	70
71	Southern Miss	4-3	110	-1.093	0.8%	106.2%	60
72	Idaho	4-3	52	-1.493	2.3%	108.5%	91
73	Ohio	4-3	122	-1.775	1.6%	110.1%	66
74	Tulane	3-3	82	-1.901	0.7%	110.8%	63
75	Ga Southern	3-3	89	-1.939	0.2%	111.0%	68
76	Texas	3-3	91	-1.990	0.3%	111.3%	90
77	Boston College	3-3	92	-2.137	0.8%	112.2%	75
78	Colorado St	3-4	31	-2.515	2.2%	114.3%	78
79	Vanderbilt	3-4	27	-2.547	0.2%	114.5%	95
80	Oregon	2-4	11	-2.841	1.7%	116.2%	84
81	Cincinnati	3-3	85	-2.858	0.1%	116.3%	82
82	New Mexico	3-3	104	-3.048	1.1%	117.3%	102
83	Ball St	4-3	125	-3.075	0.2%	117.5%	88
84	UT San Antonio	3-3	106	-3.269	1.1%	118.6%	85
85	Syracuse	3-4	33	-3.312	0.2%	118.9%	104
86	Missouri	2-4	17	-3.314	0.0%	118.9%	76
87	Connecticut	3-4	44	-3.798	2.8%	121.6%	80
88	Duke	3-4	63	-3.806	0.0%	121.7%	81
89	Oregon St	2-4	12	-3.960	0.9%	122.5%	86
90	Purdue	3-3	102	-4.415	2.6%	125.1%	77
91	Illinois	2-4	26	-4.461	0.3%	125.4%	110
92	North Texas	3-3	118	-4.531	0.4%	125.8%	94
93	South Alabama	3-3	114	-4.789	1.5%	127.3%	71
94	UNLV	3-4	95	-4.871	0.5%	127.7%	108
95	Mississippi St	2-4	56	-5.151	1.6%	129.3%	83
96	Utah St	2-4	50	-5.465	1.8%	131.1%	99
97	Hawaii	3-4	100	-5.618	0.9%	132.0%	87
98	Rutgers	2-5	3	-5.696	0.4%	132.4%	89
99	Notre Dame	2-5	68	-6.069	2.1%	134.5%	96
100	Arizona	2-5	25	-6.105	0.2%	134.8%	93
101	East Carolina	2-4	45	-6.294	1.1%	135.8%	98
102	South Carolina	2-4	39	-6.303	0.1%	135.9%	101
103	SMU	2-4	46	-6.459	0.9%	136.8%	103
104	Michigan St	2-4	62	-6.655	1.1%	137.9%	92
105	ULM	2-4	73	-7.037	2.2%	140.1%	116
106	Virginia	2-4	83	-7.111	0.4%	140.5%	100
107	ULL	2-4	75	-7.503	2.2%	142.7%	97
108	Arkansas St	2-4	72	-8.182	3.9%	146.6%	122
109	Marshall	2-4	81	-8.219	0.2%	146.8%	117
110	Texas St	2-4	78	-8.544	1.9%	148.6%	105
111	Florida Intl	3-4	121	-8.612	0.4%	149.0%	113
112	Kent	2-5	112	-9.038	2.4%	151.4%	107
113	Georgia St	1-5	20	-9.077	0.2%	151.7%	111
114	Nevada	3-4	127	-9.364	1.6%	153.3%	106
115	Charlotte	2-5	87	-9.640	1.6%	154.9%	112
116	N Illinois	1-6	18	-9.815	1.0%	155.9%	114
117	New Mexico St	2-4	86	-9.924	0.6%	156.5%	109
118	Bowling Green	1-6	16	-10.740	4.6%	161.1%	118
119	Kansas	1-5	36	-10.779	0.2%	161.4%	115
120	San Jose St	2-5	109	-10.953	1.0%	162.3%	124
121	Iowa St	1-6	53	-11.440	2.8%	165.1%	119
122	Fresno St	1-6	43	-11.679	1.4%	166.5%	121
123	Massachusetts	1-6	48	-12.659	5.6%	172.1%	120
124	Miami OH	1-6	96	-13.517	4.9%	176.9%	128
125	FL Atlantic	1-6	116	-14.027	2.9%	179.8%	123
126	UTEP	1-5	94	-14.322	1.7%	181.5%	125
127	Rice	0-6	34	-15.505	6.7%	188.3%	127
128	Buffalo	1-5	120	-15.672	1.0%	189.2%	126

Best win: Alabama 49-10 vs. Tennessee
Worst loss: Virginia 20-37 vs. Richmond

Rk	Conference	Rating	Best Team	Worst Team
1	SEC	3.890	17.441	-6.303
2	Big 10	3.723	17.569	-6.655
3	ACC	3.706	15.926	-7.111
4	Pac-12	3.036	14.045	-6.105
5	American	1.209	10.357	-6.459
6	Big 12	0.939	11.595	-11.440
7	Mountain West	-2.440	12.630	-11.679
8	MAC	-3.254	13.209	-15.672
9	Sun Belt	-4.121	8.500	-9.924
10	Conference USA	-5.807	1.998	-15.505

J-Train Computer Rankings, 2016 Week 6

Leave a reply

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are now included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk	Team	Record	SOS	Rating	% Bhnd	% Bhnd 1st	Prev
1	Michigan	6-0	12	18.331	–	–	1
2	Ohio St	5-0	42	16.918	7.7%	7.7%	2
3	Alabama	6-0	34	16.537	2.1%	9.8%	4
4	Clemson	6-0	20	15.674	4.7%	14.5%	5
5	Texas A&M	6-0	33	15.176	2.7%	17.2%	6
6	Washington	6-0	104	14.177	5.4%	22.7%	7
7	Boise St	5-0	79	13.087	5.9%	28.6%	12
8	Tennessee	5-1	1	12.871	1.2%	29.8%	3
9	Nebraska	5-0	96	12.710	0.9%	30.7%	11
10	W Michigan	6-0	109	12.267	2.4%	33.1%	10
11	West Virginia	4-0	81	11.004	6.9%	40.0%	16
12	Louisville	4-1	41	11.003	0.0%	40.0%	15
13	Baylor	5-0	127	10.089	5.0%	45.0%	17
14	Houston	5-1	77	9.967	0.7%	45.6%	8
15	Wisconsin	4-1	15	9.926	0.2%	45.8%	18
16	Virginia Tech	4-1	55	9.531	2.2%	48.0%	23
17	Miami FL	4-1	87	9.280	1.4%	49.4%	9
18	Troy	4-1	69	8.800	2.6%	52.0%	21
19	Florida	4-1	58	8.694	0.6%	52.6%	20
20	NC State	4-1	84	8.140	3.0%	55.6%	25
21	South Florida	5-1	110	7.733	2.2%	57.8%	26
22	Navy	4-1	37	7.486	1.3%	59.2%	36
23	Arizona St	5-1	61	7.401	0.5%	59.6%	29
24	Wake Forest	5-1	68	7.382	0.1%	59.7%	28
25	Maryland	4-1	89	7.317	0.4%	60.1%	13
26	Air Force	4-1	94	7.021	1.6%	61.7%	14
27	Toledo	4-1	122	6.747	1.5%	63.2%	49
28	Auburn	4-2	19	6.689	0.3%	63.5%	39
29	Florida St	4-2	7	6.608	0.4%	64.0%	37
30	Penn St	4-2	5	6.516	0.5%	64.5%	47
31	Utah	5-1	106	6.479	0.2%	64.7%	34
32	Mississippi	3-2	8	6.084	2.2%	66.8%	33
33	Memphis	4-1	116	5.846	1.3%	68.1%	42
34	Colorado	4-2	43	5.434	2.3%	70.4%	22
35	San Diego St	4-1	119	4.810	3.4%	73.8%	52
36	Arkansas	4-2	18	4.653	0.9%	74.6%	24
37	Stanford	3-2	3	4.578	0.4%	75.0%	19
38	Washington St	3-2	51	4.544	0.2%	75.2%	66
39	Appalachian St	3-2	6	4.476	0.4%	75.6%	41
40	Tulsa	4-1	115	4.444	0.2%	75.8%	45
41	MTSU	4-1	123	4.433	0.1%	75.8%	40
42	Wyoming	4-2	54	3.902	2.9%	78.7%	60
43	Oklahoma St	4-2	73	3.867	0.2%	78.9%	53
44	Oklahoma	3-2	11	3.712	0.8%	79.7%	55
45	Pittsburgh	4-2	65	3.560	0.8%	80.6%	57
46	LSU	3-2	45	3.467	0.5%	81.1%	50
47	North Carolina	4-2	40	3.410	0.3%	81.4%	27
48	UCF	3-2	49	3.155	1.4%	82.8%	48
49	Indiana	3-2	21	3.003	0.8%	83.6%	31
50	Georgia	4-2	38	2.993	0.1%	83.7%	58
51	Kansas St	3-2	66	2.955	0.2%	83.9%	61
52	USC	3-3	2	2.901	0.3%	84.2%	64
53	Old Dominion	4-2	103	2.476	2.3%	86.5%	70
54	Texas Tech	3-2	86	2.285	1.0%	87.5%	32
55	TCU	4-2	112	2.235	0.3%	87.8%	56
56	UCLA	3-3	10	2.224	0.1%	87.9%	38
57	C Michigan	4-2	76	2.044	1.0%	88.9%	62
58	BYU	3-3	9	1.981	0.3%	89.2%	74
59	Minnesota	3-2	78	1.674	1.7%	90.9%	43
60	Southern Miss	4-2	121	1.509	0.9%	91.8%	30
61	Akron	4-2	113	1.265	1.3%	93.1%	72
62	Iowa	4-2	125	1.190	0.4%	93.5%	76
63	Tulane	3-2	88	0.947	1.3%	94.8%	65
64	E Michigan	4-2	102	0.938	0.0%	94.9%	54
65	California	3-3	25	0.878	0.3%	95.2%	51
66	Ohio	4-2	124	0.629	1.4%	96.6%	67
67	Georgia Tech	3-3	27	0.551	0.4%	97.0%	46
68	Ga Southern	3-2	108	0.094	2.5%	99.5%	35
69	Temple	3-3	82	-0.685	4.2%	103.7%	59
70	Kentucky	3-3	22	-0.732	0.3%	104.0%	83
71	South Alabama	3-2	97	-0.906	0.9%	104.9%	73
72	Army	3-2	128	-0.954	0.3%	105.2%	44
73	Louisiana Tech	3-3	91	-1.293	1.8%	107.1%	85
74	Northwestern	2-3	24	-1.360	0.4%	107.4%	82
75	Boston College	3-3	75	-1.525	0.9%	108.3%	63
76	Missouri	2-3	35	-1.640	0.6%	108.9%	78
77	Purdue	3-2	107	-1.930	1.6%	110.5%	88
78	Colorado St	3-3	71	-2.407	2.6%	113.1%	95
79	WKU	3-3	117	-2.526	0.7%	113.8%	71
80	Connecticut	3-3	70	-2.645	0.6%	114.4%	96
81	Duke	3-3	92	-2.791	0.8%	115.2%	101
82	Cincinnati	3-3	83	-2.834	0.2%	115.5%	69
83	Mississippi St	2-3	57	-3.146	1.7%	117.2%	68
84	Oregon	2-4	13	-3.153	0.0%	117.2%	81
85	UT San Antonio	2-3	56	-3.221	0.4%	117.6%	111
86	Oregon St	2-3	28	-3.518	1.6%	119.2%	105
87	Hawaii	3-3	90	-3.643	0.7%	119.9%	99
88	Ball St	3-3	120	-3.719	0.4%	120.3%	84
89	Rutgers	2-4	4	-3.941	1.2%	121.5%	87
90	Texas	2-3	63	-4.181	1.3%	122.8%	77
91	Idaho	3-3	47	-4.215	0.2%	123.0%	104
92	Michigan St	2-3	52	-4.259	0.2%	123.2%	75
93	Arizona	2-4	30	-4.269	0.1%	123.3%	86
94	North Texas	3-3	114	-4.444	1.0%	124.2%	106
95	Vanderbilt	2-4	29	-4.735	1.6%	125.8%	80
96	Notre Dame	2-4	74	-4.768	0.2%	126.0%	90
97	ULL	2-3	67	-4.901	0.7%	126.7%	94
98	East Carolina	2-4	26	-5.307	2.2%	129.0%	91
99	Utah St	2-4	53	-5.504	1.1%	130.0%	92
100	Virginia	2-3	105	-5.701	1.1%	131.1%	103
101	South Carolina	2-4	32	-5.802	0.5%	131.6%	89
102	New Mexico	2-3	111	-6.035	1.3%	132.9%	93
103	SMU	2-4	44	-6.380	1.9%	134.8%	100
104	Syracuse	2-4	36	-6.390	0.1%	134.9%	97
105	Texas St	2-3	60	-6.466	0.4%	135.3%	79
106	Nevada	3-3	126	-6.760	1.6%	136.9%	110
107	Kent	2-4	98	-6.892	0.7%	137.6%	117
108	UNLV	2-4	95	-6.953	0.3%	137.9%	98
109	New Mexico St	2-3	85	-7.855	4.9%	142.9%	107
110	Illinois	1-4	17	-7.886	0.2%	143.0%	102
111	Georgia St	1-4	14	-7.951	0.4%	143.4%	123
112	Charlotte	2-4	72	-8.576	3.4%	146.8%	119
113	Florida Intl	2-4	99	-9.318	4.0%	150.8%	120
114	N Illinois	1-5	23	-9.766	2.4%	153.3%	115
115	Kansas	1-4	50	-9.845	0.4%	153.7%	112
116	ULM	1-4	62	-10.295	2.5%	156.2%	109
117	Marshall	1-4	46	-10.638	1.9%	158.0%	108
118	Bowling Green	1-5	16	-10.662	0.1%	158.2%	114
119	Iowa St	1-5	64	-10.693	0.2%	158.3%	118
120	Massachusetts	1-5	39	-11.183	2.7%	161.0%	113
121	Fresno St	1-5	48	-11.240	0.3%	161.3%	116
122	Arkansas St	1-4	59	-11.817	3.1%	164.5%	128
123	FL Atlantic	1-5	100	-12.571	4.1%	168.6%	121
124	San Jose St	1-5	101	-13.491	5.0%	173.6%	125
125	UTEP	1-5	93	-14.185	3.8%	177.4%	122
126	Buffalo	1-4	118	-14.793	3.3%	180.7%	124
127	Rice	0-5	31	-16.041	6.8%	187.5%	126
128	Miami OH	0-6	80	-16.680	3.5%	191.0%	127

Rk	Conference	Rating	Best Team	Worst Team
1	SEC	4.365	16.537	-5.802
2	ACC	4.195	15.674	-6.390
3	Big 10	4.158	18.331	-7.886
4	Pac-12	3.140	14.177	-4.269
5	American	1.811	9.967	-6.380
6	Big 12	1.143	11.004	-10.693
7	Mountain West	-2.268	13.087	-13.491
8	MAC	-3.218	12.267	-16.680
9	Sun Belt	-3.730	8.800	-11.817
10	Conference USA	-5.723	4.433	-16.041