J-Train Computer Rankings, 2016 Week 6

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are now included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Michigan 6-0 12 18.331 1
2 Ohio St 5-0 42 16.918 7.7% 7.7% 2
3 Alabama 6-0 34 16.537 2.1% 9.8% 4
4 Clemson 6-0 20 15.674 4.7% 14.5% 5
5 Texas A&M 6-0 33 15.176 2.7% 17.2% 6
6 Washington 6-0 104 14.177 5.4% 22.7% 7
7 Boise St 5-0 79 13.087 5.9% 28.6% 12
8 Tennessee 5-1 1 12.871 1.2% 29.8% 3
9 Nebraska 5-0 96 12.710 0.9% 30.7% 11
10 W Michigan 6-0 109 12.267 2.4% 33.1% 10
11 West Virginia 4-0 81 11.004 6.9% 40.0% 16
12 Louisville 4-1 41 11.003 0.0% 40.0% 15
13 Baylor 5-0 127 10.089 5.0% 45.0% 17
14 Houston 5-1 77 9.967 0.7% 45.6% 8
15 Wisconsin 4-1 15 9.926 0.2% 45.8% 18
16 Virginia Tech 4-1 55 9.531 2.2% 48.0% 23
17 Miami FL 4-1 87 9.280 1.4% 49.4% 9
18 Troy 4-1 69 8.800 2.6% 52.0% 21
19 Florida 4-1 58 8.694 0.6% 52.6% 20
20 NC State 4-1 84 8.140 3.0% 55.6% 25
21 South Florida 5-1 110 7.733 2.2% 57.8% 26
22 Navy 4-1 37 7.486 1.3% 59.2% 36
23 Arizona St 5-1 61 7.401 0.5% 59.6% 29
24 Wake Forest 5-1 68 7.382 0.1% 59.7% 28
25 Maryland 4-1 89 7.317 0.4% 60.1% 13
26 Air Force 4-1 94 7.021 1.6% 61.7% 14
27 Toledo 4-1 122 6.747 1.5% 63.2% 49
28 Auburn 4-2 19 6.689 0.3% 63.5% 39
29 Florida St 4-2 7 6.608 0.4% 64.0% 37
30 Penn St 4-2 5 6.516 0.5% 64.5% 47
31 Utah 5-1 106 6.479 0.2% 64.7% 34
32 Mississippi 3-2 8 6.084 2.2% 66.8% 33
33 Memphis 4-1 116 5.846 1.3% 68.1% 42
34 Colorado 4-2 43 5.434 2.3% 70.4% 22
35 San Diego St 4-1 119 4.810 3.4% 73.8% 52
36 Arkansas 4-2 18 4.653 0.9% 74.6% 24
37 Stanford 3-2 3 4.578 0.4% 75.0% 19
38 Washington St 3-2 51 4.544 0.2% 75.2% 66
39 Appalachian St 3-2 6 4.476 0.4% 75.6% 41
40 Tulsa 4-1 115 4.444 0.2% 75.8% 45
41 MTSU 4-1 123 4.433 0.1% 75.8% 40
42 Wyoming 4-2 54 3.902 2.9% 78.7% 60
43 Oklahoma St 4-2 73 3.867 0.2% 78.9% 53
44 Oklahoma 3-2 11 3.712 0.8% 79.7% 55
45 Pittsburgh 4-2 65 3.560 0.8% 80.6% 57
46 LSU 3-2 45 3.467 0.5% 81.1% 50
47 North Carolina 4-2 40 3.410 0.3% 81.4% 27
48 UCF 3-2 49 3.155 1.4% 82.8% 48
49 Indiana 3-2 21 3.003 0.8% 83.6% 31
50 Georgia 4-2 38 2.993 0.1% 83.7% 58
51 Kansas St 3-2 66 2.955 0.2% 83.9% 61
52 USC 3-3 2 2.901 0.3% 84.2% 64
53 Old Dominion 4-2 103 2.476 2.3% 86.5% 70
54 Texas Tech 3-2 86 2.285 1.0% 87.5% 32
55 TCU 4-2 112 2.235 0.3% 87.8% 56
56 UCLA 3-3 10 2.224 0.1% 87.9% 38
57 C Michigan 4-2 76 2.044 1.0% 88.9% 62
58 BYU 3-3 9 1.981 0.3% 89.2% 74
59 Minnesota 3-2 78 1.674 1.7% 90.9% 43
60 Southern Miss 4-2 121 1.509 0.9% 91.8% 30
61 Akron 4-2 113 1.265 1.3% 93.1% 72
62 Iowa 4-2 125 1.190 0.4% 93.5% 76
63 Tulane 3-2 88 0.947 1.3% 94.8% 65
64 E Michigan 4-2 102 0.938 0.0% 94.9% 54
65 California 3-3 25 0.878 0.3% 95.2% 51
66 Ohio 4-2 124 0.629 1.4% 96.6% 67
67 Georgia Tech 3-3 27 0.551 0.4% 97.0% 46
68 Ga Southern 3-2 108 0.094 2.5% 99.5% 35
69 Temple 3-3 82 -0.685 4.2% 103.7% 59
70 Kentucky 3-3 22 -0.732 0.3% 104.0% 83
71 South Alabama 3-2 97 -0.906 0.9% 104.9% 73
72 Army 3-2 128 -0.954 0.3% 105.2% 44
73 Louisiana Tech 3-3 91 -1.293 1.8% 107.1% 85
74 Northwestern 2-3 24 -1.360 0.4% 107.4% 82
75 Boston College 3-3 75 -1.525 0.9% 108.3% 63
76 Missouri 2-3 35 -1.640 0.6% 108.9% 78
77 Purdue 3-2 107 -1.930 1.6% 110.5% 88
78 Colorado St 3-3 71 -2.407 2.6% 113.1% 95
79 WKU 3-3 117 -2.526 0.7% 113.8% 71
80 Connecticut 3-3 70 -2.645 0.6% 114.4% 96
81 Duke 3-3 92 -2.791 0.8% 115.2% 101
82 Cincinnati 3-3 83 -2.834 0.2% 115.5% 69
83 Mississippi St 2-3 57 -3.146 1.7% 117.2% 68
84 Oregon 2-4 13 -3.153 0.0% 117.2% 81
85 UT San Antonio 2-3 56 -3.221 0.4% 117.6% 111
86 Oregon St 2-3 28 -3.518 1.6% 119.2% 105
87 Hawaii 3-3 90 -3.643 0.7% 119.9% 99
88 Ball St 3-3 120 -3.719 0.4% 120.3% 84
89 Rutgers 2-4 4 -3.941 1.2% 121.5% 87
90 Texas 2-3 63 -4.181 1.3% 122.8% 77
91 Idaho 3-3 47 -4.215 0.2% 123.0% 104
92 Michigan St 2-3 52 -4.259 0.2% 123.2% 75
93 Arizona 2-4 30 -4.269 0.1% 123.3% 86
94 North Texas 3-3 114 -4.444 1.0% 124.2% 106
95 Vanderbilt 2-4 29 -4.735 1.6% 125.8% 80
96 Notre Dame 2-4 74 -4.768 0.2% 126.0% 90
97 ULL 2-3 67 -4.901 0.7% 126.7% 94
98 East Carolina 2-4 26 -5.307 2.2% 129.0% 91
99 Utah St 2-4 53 -5.504 1.1% 130.0% 92
100 Virginia 2-3 105 -5.701 1.1% 131.1% 103
101 South Carolina 2-4 32 -5.802 0.5% 131.6% 89
102 New Mexico 2-3 111 -6.035 1.3% 132.9% 93
103 SMU 2-4 44 -6.380 1.9% 134.8% 100
104 Syracuse 2-4 36 -6.390 0.1% 134.9% 97
105 Texas St 2-3 60 -6.466 0.4% 135.3% 79
106 Nevada 3-3 126 -6.760 1.6% 136.9% 110
107 Kent 2-4 98 -6.892 0.7% 137.6% 117
108 UNLV 2-4 95 -6.953 0.3% 137.9% 98
109 New Mexico St 2-3 85 -7.855 4.9% 142.9% 107
110 Illinois 1-4 17 -7.886 0.2% 143.0% 102
111 Georgia St 1-4 14 -7.951 0.4% 143.4% 123
112 Charlotte 2-4 72 -8.576 3.4% 146.8% 119
113 Florida Intl 2-4 99 -9.318 4.0% 150.8% 120
114 N Illinois 1-5 23 -9.766 2.4% 153.3% 115
115 Kansas 1-4 50 -9.845 0.4% 153.7% 112
116 ULM 1-4 62 -10.295 2.5% 156.2% 109
117 Marshall 1-4 46 -10.638 1.9% 158.0% 108
118 Bowling Green 1-5 16 -10.662 0.1% 158.2% 114
119 Iowa St 1-5 64 -10.693 0.2% 158.3% 118
120 Massachusetts 1-5 39 -11.183 2.7% 161.0% 113
121 Fresno St 1-5 48 -11.240 0.3% 161.3% 116
122 Arkansas St 1-4 59 -11.817 3.1% 164.5% 128
123 FL Atlantic 1-5 100 -12.571 4.1% 168.6% 121
124 San Jose St 1-5 101 -13.491 5.0% 173.6% 125
125 UTEP 1-5 93 -14.185 3.8% 177.4% 122
126 Buffalo 1-4 118 -14.793 3.3% 180.7% 124
127 Rice 0-5 31 -16.041 6.8% 187.5% 126
128 Miami OH 0-6 80 -16.680 3.5% 191.0% 127

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 SEC 4.365 16.537 -5.802
2 ACC 4.195 15.674 -6.390
3 Big 10 4.158 18.331 -7.886
4 Pac-12 3.140 14.177 -4.269
5 American 1.811 9.967 -6.380
6 Big 12 1.143 11.004 -10.693
7 Mountain West -2.268 13.087 -13.491
8 MAC -3.218 12.267 -16.680
9 Sun Belt -3.730 8.800 -11.817
10 Conference USA -5.723 4.433 -16.041

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the number one team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *