J-Train Computer Rankings, 2016 Final

ShareShare on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Email this to someone

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Alabama 14-1 1 72.73 1
2 Clemson 14-1 3 69.56 6.6% 4.4% 5
3 Ohio St 11-2 2 67.12 5.1% 7.7% 2
4 Washington 12-2 32 66.07 2.2% 9.2% 4
5 Michigan 10-3 14 65.71 0.8% 9.7% 3
6 Oklahoma 11-2 29 63.10 5.4% 13.2% 10
7 USC 10-3 5 62.91 0.4% 13.5% 8
8 Penn St 11-3 11 62.78 0.3% 13.7% 6
9 Florida St 10-3 4 62.76 0.0% 13.7% 12
10 Wisconsin 11-3 9 62.74 0.1% 13.7% 7
11 LSU 8-4 6 61.47 2.6% 15.5% 14
12 W Michigan 13-1 114 60.05 3.0% 17.4% 11
13 Stanford 10-3 24 59.44 1.3% 18.3% 15
14 Miami FL 9-4 47 59.42 0.1% 18.3% 20
15 Louisville 9-4 45 59.24 0.4% 18.5% 13
16 Colorado 10-4 15 59.04 0.4% 18.8% 9
17 Auburn 8-5 8 58.49 1.1% 19.6% 16
18 Florida 9-4 13 58.48 0.0% 19.6% 26
19 Tennessee 9-4 17 58.43 0.1% 19.7% 22
20 Oklahoma St 10-3 61 58.20 0.5% 20.0% 30
21 WKU 11-3 96 57.15 2.2% 21.4% 28
22 Virginia Tech 10-4 49 57.13 0.0% 21.4% 32
23 South Florida 11-2 87 57.08 0.1% 21.5% 19
24 West Virginia 10-3 53 56.43 1.4% 22.4% 24
25 Boise St 10-3 72 56.16 0.6% 22.8% 17
26 Appalachian St 10-3 84 56.01 0.3% 23.0% 35
27 Texas A&M 8-5 28 55.94 0.2% 23.1% 23
28 Nebraska 9-4 37 55.46 1.0% 23.7% 18
29 Minnesota 9-4 57 55.46 0.0% 23.7% 31
30 Washington St 8-5 41 55.36 0.2% 23.9% 21
31 Kansas St 9-4 63 55.17 0.4% 24.1% 39
32 Georgia Tech 9-4 40 54.75 0.9% 24.7% 43
33 Pittsburgh 8-5 31 54.74 0.0% 24.7% 33
34 Utah 9-4 59 54.70 0.1% 24.8% 34
35 Temple 10-4 90 54.62 0.2% 24.9% 25
36 Tulsa 10-3 95 54.61 0.0% 24.9% 36
37 BYU 9-4 78 54.02 1.2% 25.7% 37
38 Houston 9-4 77 53.99 0.1% 25.8% 27
39 San Diego St 11-3 118 53.87 0.3% 25.9% 44
40 North Carolina 8-5 54 53.86 0.0% 26.0% 40
41 Iowa 8-5 48 53.68 0.4% 26.2% 29
42 NC State 7-6 26 53.38 0.6% 26.6% 51
43 Troy 10-3 109 53.05 0.7% 27.1% 47
44 Toledo 9-4 104 52.92 0.3% 27.2% 38
45 Northwestern 7-6 34 52.61 0.6% 27.7% 45
46 Air Force 10-3 108 52.52 0.2% 27.8% 46
47 Georgia 8-5 44 51.98 1.1% 28.5% 50
48 Navy 9-5 70 51.37 1.3% 29.4% 42
49 Memphis 8-5 73 50.88 1.0% 30.0% 41
50 Arkansas 7-6 23 50.71 0.4% 30.3% 48
51 Old Dominion 10-3 124 50.67 0.1% 30.3% 55
52 Louisiana Tech 9-5 110 50.05 1.3% 31.2% 57
53 Kentucky 7-6 33 49.81 0.5% 31.5% 52
54 Mississippi 5-7 7 49.71 0.2% 31.7% 56
55 Baylor 7-6 67 49.69 0.0% 31.7% 67
56 Colorado St 7-6 71 49.38 0.7% 32.1% 49
57 Wyoming 8-6 69 49.17 0.4% 32.4% 54
58 Vanderbilt 6-7 27 48.83 0.7% 32.9% 53
59 Wake Forest 7-6 51 48.49 0.7% 33.3% 72
60 Mississippi St 6-7 43 48.47 0.1% 33.4% 61
61 TCU 6-7 60 48.26 0.4% 33.6% 62
62 New Mexico 9-4 117 47.95 0.7% 34.1% 64
63 Notre Dame 4-8 30 47.93 0.0% 34.1% 65
64 Idaho 9-4 98 47.67 0.6% 34.5% 70
65 Boston College 7-6 64 47.65 0.0% 34.5% 77
66 Indiana 6-7 39 47.64 0.0% 34.5% 60
67 California 5-7 12 47.62 0.0% 34.5% 63
68 Arkansas St 8-5 120 46.75 1.8% 35.7% 79
69 Maryland 6-7 52 46.75 0.0% 35.7% 58
70 Texas 5-7 50 46.63 0.2% 35.9% 74
71 UCLA 4-8 19 46.48 0.3% 36.1% 66
72 Texas Tech 5-7 62 46.36 0.3% 36.3% 76
73 UCF 6-7 76 46.27 0.2% 36.4% 59
74 Army 8-5 125 45.88 0.8% 36.9% 78
75 South Carolina 6-7 42 45.77 0.2% 37.1% 75
76 Oregon 4-8 21 45.53 0.5% 37.4% 69
77 Oregon St 4-8 20 45.50 0.1% 37.4% 68
78 Ohio 8-6 119 45.28 0.5% 37.7% 73
79 Southern Miss 7-6 112 44.55 1.5% 38.7% 85
80 Arizona St 5-7 38 44.34 0.4% 39.0% 80
81 MTSU 8-5 126 44.24 0.2% 39.2% 71
82 Missouri 4-8 36 44.19 0.1% 39.2% 83
83 E Michigan 7-6 97 43.59 1.3% 40.1% 81
84 Michigan St 3-9 22 43.59 0.0% 40.1% 82
85 Duke 4-8 35 43.40 0.4% 40.3% 88
86 UT San Antonio 6-7 106 43.07 0.7% 40.8% 84
87 Syracuse 4-8 16 42.68 0.8% 41.3% 91
88 SMU 5-7 68 42.56 0.2% 41.5% 86
89 Ga Southern 5-7 82 42.06 1.1% 42.2% 92
90 N Illinois 5-7 94 41.92 0.3% 42.4% 89
91 Hawaii 7-7 92 41.49 0.9% 43.0% 100
92 C Michigan 6-7 91 41.40 0.2% 43.1% 87
93 ULL 6-7 111 41.35 0.1% 43.2% 90
94 Arizona 3-9 18 41.10 0.5% 43.5% 93
95 Iowa St 3-9 58 40.49 1.3% 44.3% 101
96 South Alabama 6-7 113 40.43 0.1% 44.4% 95
97 Miami OH 6-7 123 40.34 0.2% 44.5% 94
98 Utah St 3-9 65 39.92 0.9% 45.1% 98
99 Akron 5-7 105 39.58 0.7% 45.6% 99
100 Tulane 4-8 80 39.48 0.2% 45.7% 96
101 Illinois 3-9 25 39.43 0.1% 45.8% 97
102 Cincinnati 4-8 75 38.81 1.3% 46.6% 102
103 Rutgers 2-10 10 38.15 1.4% 47.6% 103
104 North Texas 5-8 102 37.71 0.9% 48.2% 105
105 Purdue 3-9 55 37.36 0.7% 48.6% 104
106 Ball St 4-8 122 36.77 1.2% 49.4% 106
107 East Carolina 3-9 66 36.77 0.0% 49.4% 107
108 ULM 4-8 83 36.61 0.3% 49.7% 113
109 San Jose St 4-8 85 36.61 0.0% 49.7% 111
110 UNLV 4-8 101 36.60 0.0% 49.7% 109
111 Nevada 5-7 128 36.36 0.5% 50.0% 112
112 Virginia 2-10 56 36.24 0.3% 50.2% 115
113 Georgia St 3-9 88 36.12 0.3% 50.3% 116
114 Bowling Green 4-8 100 36.06 0.1% 50.4% 108
115 Kent 3-9 93 35.89 0.4% 50.7% 110
116 Charlotte 4-8 115 35.49 0.8% 51.2% 114
117 Kansas 2-10 46 35.00 1.0% 51.9% 118
118 Florida Intl 4-8 107 34.48 1.1% 52.6% 117
119 New Mexico St 3-9 79 34.22 0.6% 53.0% 120
120 Marshall 3-9 99 33.78 0.9% 53.6% 121
121 UTEP 4-8 127 33.66 0.3% 53.7% 122
122 Massachusetts 2-10 74 33.62 0.1% 53.8% 123
123 Connecticut 3-9 86 33.44 0.4% 54.0% 119
124 Rice 3-9 103 33.13 0.6% 54.5% 124
125 FL Atlantic 3-9 116 32.63 1.0% 55.1% 125
126 Fresno St 1-11 81 30.95 3.5% 57.4% 126
127 Texas St 2-10 89 28.70 4.7% 60.5% 127
128 Buffalo 2-10 121 27.78 1.9% 61.8% 128

Best win: Clemson 31-0 vs. Ohio St.
Worst loss: Akron 20-41 vs. Buffalo

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 SEC 53.93 72.73 44.19
2 ACC 53.09 69.56 36.24
3 Pac-12 52.34 66.07 41.10
4 Big 10 52.03 67.12 37.36
5 Big 12 49.93 63.10 35.00
6 American 46.66 57.08 33.44
7 Mountain West 44.25 56.16 30.95
8 Sun Belt 42.09 56.01 28.70
9 MAC 41.80 60.05 27.78
10 Conference USA 40.82 57.15 32.63

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

ShareShare on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Email this to someone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *