J-Train Computer Rankings, 2016 Pre-Bowls

ShareShare on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Email this to someone

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Alabama 13-0 16 72.79 1
2 Ohio St 11-1 1 69.63 6.6% 4.3% 2
3 Michigan 10-2 9 67.84 3.8% 6.8% 3
4 Washington 12-1 43 67.53 0.6% 7.2% 4
5 Clemson 12-1 27 66.01 3.2% 9.3% 5
6 Penn St 11-2 6 64.66 2.8% 11.2% 6
7 Wisconsin 10-3 5 62.54 4.4% 14.1% 7
8 USC 9-3 4 62.51 0.1% 14.1% 8
9 Colorado 10-3 15 61.54 2.0% 15.5% 9
10 Oklahoma 10-2 40 61.45 0.2% 15.6% 10
11 W Michigan 13-0 118 61.31 0.3% 15.8% 11
12 Florida St 9-3 20 60.61 1.5% 16.7% 12
13 Louisville 9-3 59 59.81 1.7% 17.8% 13
14 LSU 7-4 7 59.72 0.2% 18.0% 14
15 Stanford 9-3 22 59.42 0.6% 18.4% 15
16 Auburn 8-4 18 59.24 0.4% 18.6% 16
17 Boise St 10-2 73 58.49 1.6% 19.7% 17
18 Nebraska 9-3 30 57.45 2.2% 21.1% 19
19 South Florida 10-2 83 57.33 0.2% 21.2% 18
20 Miami FL 8-4 57 57.01 0.7% 21.7% 20
21 Washington St 8-4 35 56.91 0.2% 21.8% 22
22 Tennessee 8-4 21 56.91 0.0% 21.8% 23
23 Texas A&M 8-4 34 56.86 0.1% 21.9% 25
24 West Virginia 10-2 66 56.86 0.0% 21.9% 24
25 Temple 10-3 85 56.83 0.1% 21.9% 21
26 Florida 8-4 19 56.59 0.5% 22.3% 26
27 Houston 9-3 78 56.28 0.6% 22.7% 27
28 WKU 10-3 103 55.96 0.7% 23.1% 28
29 Iowa 8-4 44 55.73 0.5% 23.4% 29
30 Oklahoma St 9-3 64 55.61 0.2% 23.6% 30
31 Minnesota 8-4 46 55.39 0.5% 23.9% 31
32 Virginia Tech 9-4 52 55.21 0.4% 24.2% 32
33 Pittsburgh 8-4 45 54.95 0.6% 24.5% 33
34 Utah 8-4 47 54.91 0.1% 24.6% 34
35 Appalachian St 9-3 96 54.65 0.6% 24.9% 36
36 Tulsa 9-3 84 54.48 0.4% 25.2% 35
37 BYU 8-4 76 53.95 1.1% 25.9% 38
38 Toledo 9-3 107 53.80 0.3% 26.1% 39
39 Kansas St 8-4 71 53.30 1.0% 26.8% 40
40 North Carolina 8-4 67 53.17 0.3% 27.0% 41
41 Memphis 8-4 74 52.67 1.1% 27.6% 42
42 Navy 9-4 65 52.64 0.1% 27.7% 37
43 Georgia Tech 8-4 48 52.58 0.1% 27.8% 43
44 San Diego St 10-3 122 52.26 0.7% 28.2% 44
45 Northwestern 6-6 24 52.03 0.5% 28.5% 45
46 Air Force 9-3 101 51.79 0.5% 28.9% 46
47 Troy 9-3 116 51.70 0.2% 29.0% 47
48 Arkansas 7-5 28 51.28 0.9% 29.6% 48
49 Colorado St 7-5 68 51.08 0.4% 29.8% 49
50 Georgia 7-5 41 50.76 0.7% 30.3% 50
51 NC State 6-6 37 50.69 0.1% 30.4% 51
52 Kentucky 7-5 38 50.54 0.3% 30.6% 52
53 Vanderbilt 6-6 33 49.85 1.5% 31.5% 53
54 Wyoming 8-5 72 49.75 0.2% 31.7% 54
55 Old Dominion 9-3 126 49.68 0.1% 31.8% 55
56 Mississippi 5-7 3 49.62 0.1% 31.8% 56
57 Louisiana Tech 8-5 113 48.89 1.5% 32.8% 57
58 Maryland 6-6 32 48.81 0.2% 32.9% 58
59 UCF 6-6 70 48.68 0.3% 33.1% 59
60 Indiana 6-6 29 48.62 0.1% 33.2% 60
61 Mississippi St 5-7 26 48.39 0.5% 33.5% 61
62 TCU 6-6 62 48.29 0.2% 33.7% 62
63 California 5-7 10 47.61 1.4% 34.6% 63
64 New Mexico 8-4 112 47.55 0.1% 34.7% 64
65 Notre Dame 4-8 36 47.14 0.9% 35.2% 65
66 UCLA 4-8 11 46.91 0.5% 35.6% 66
67 Baylor 6-6 77 46.76 0.3% 35.8% 67
68 Oregon St 4-8 8 46.18 1.2% 36.6% 68
69 Oregon 4-8 13 46.08 0.2% 36.7% 69
70 Idaho 8-4 104 46.03 0.1% 36.8% 70
71 MTSU 8-4 125 45.98 0.1% 36.8% 71
72 Wake Forest 6-6 60 45.85 0.3% 37.0% 73
73 Ohio 8-5 119 45.84 0.0% 37.0% 72
74 Texas 5-7 53 45.63 0.4% 37.3% 74
75 South Carolina 6-6 50 45.50 0.3% 37.5% 75
76 Texas Tech 5-7 61 45.40 0.2% 37.6% 76
77 Boston College 6-6 69 45.37 0.1% 37.7% 77
78 Army 7-5 124 45.12 0.5% 38.0% 84
79 Arkansas St 7-5 120 44.96 0.3% 38.2% 78
80 Arizona St 5-7 25 44.77 0.4% 38.5% 79
81 E Michigan 7-5 98 44.39 0.8% 39.0% 80
82 Michigan St 3-9 12 44.28 0.2% 39.2% 81
83 Missouri 4-8 31 44.05 0.5% 39.5% 82
84 UT San Antonio 6-6 108 43.51 1.1% 40.2% 83
85 Southern Miss 6-6 109 43.20 0.6% 40.7% 86
86 SMU 5-7 54 42.95 0.5% 41.0% 85
87 C Michigan 6-6 99 42.52 0.9% 41.6% 87
88 Duke 4-8 42 42.44 0.2% 41.7% 88
89 N Illinois 5-7 90 42.26 0.4% 42.0% 89
90 ULL 6-6 111 41.78 1.0% 42.6% 90
91 Syracuse 4-8 23 41.51 0.6% 43.0% 92
92 Ga Southern 5-7 87 41.51 0.0% 43.0% 91
93 Arizona 3-9 14 41.45 0.1% 43.1% 93
94 Miami OH 6-6 121 40.79 1.4% 44.0% 94
95 South Alabama 6-6 123 40.58 0.4% 44.2% 95
96 Tulane 4-8 75 40.03 1.2% 45.0% 96
97 Illinois 3-9 17 40.02 0.0% 45.0% 97
98 Utah St 3-9 56 39.82 0.4% 45.3% 98
99 Akron 5-7 95 39.78 0.1% 45.4% 100
100 Hawaii 6-7 93 39.77 0.0% 45.4% 99
101 Iowa St 3-9 55 39.72 0.1% 45.4% 101
102 Cincinnati 4-8 63 39.57 0.3% 45.6% 102
103 Rutgers 2-10 2 39.17 0.8% 46.2% 103
104 Purdue 3-9 39 38.02 2.4% 47.8% 104
105 North Texas 5-7 106 37.73 0.6% 48.2% 105
106 Ball St 4-8 114 37.12 1.3% 49.0% 107
107 East Carolina 3-9 58 36.93 0.4% 49.3% 106
108 Bowling Green 4-8 91 36.78 0.3% 49.5% 108
109 UNLV 4-8 97 36.60 0.4% 49.7% 109
110 Kent 3-9 88 36.36 0.5% 50.0% 111
111 San Jose St 4-8 86 36.32 0.1% 50.1% 110
112 Nevada 5-7 128 36.04 0.6% 50.5% 112
113 ULM 4-8 89 36.03 0.0% 50.5% 113
114 Charlotte 4-8 110 35.63 0.8% 51.1% 114
115 Virginia 2-10 51 35.59 0.1% 51.1% 115
116 Georgia St 3-9 94 35.46 0.3% 51.3% 116
117 Florida Intl 4-8 102 34.60 1.8% 52.5% 117
118 Kansas 2-10 49 34.26 0.7% 52.9% 118
119 Connecticut 3-9 80 33.85 0.9% 53.5% 119
120 New Mexico St 3-9 81 33.73 0.2% 53.7% 120
121 Marshall 3-9 100 33.66 0.1% 53.8% 121
122 UTEP 4-8 127 33.14 1.1% 54.5% 122
123 Massachusetts 2-10 79 32.87 0.6% 54.8% 123
124 Rice 3-9 105 32.49 0.8% 55.4% 124
125 FL Atlantic 3-9 115 32.17 0.7% 55.8% 125
126 Fresno St 1-11 82 30.88 2.7% 57.6% 126
127 Texas St 2-10 92 28.35 5.3% 61.1% 127
128 Buffalo 2-10 117 27.81 1.1% 61.8% 128

Best win: Michigan 49-10 vs. Penn St.
Worst loss: Akron 20-41 vs. Buffalo

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 SEC 53.72 72.79 44.05
2 Big 10 53.16 69.63 38.02
3 Pac-12 52.98 67.53 41.45
4 ACC 51.49 66.01 35.59
5 Big 12 48.73 61.45 34.26
6 American 47.69 57.33 33.85
7 Mountain West 44.19 58.49 30.88
8 MAC 42.40 61.31 27.81
9 Sun Belt 41.34 54.65 28.35
10 Conference USA 40.51 55.96 32.17

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

ShareShare on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Email this to someone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *