J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2022 Week 4

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Ohio St 4-0 24 72.97 2
2 USC 4-0 13 71.37 3.1% 2.2% 1
3 Alabama 4-0 39 70.65 1.4% 3.2% 5
4 Penn St 4-0 29 70.01 1.2% 4.1% 4
5 Georgia 4-0 77 68.99 2.0% 5.5% 6
6 Kansas 4-0 49 67.47 3.0% 7.5% 18
7 Tennessee 4-0 53 67.14 0.6% 8.0% 3
8 Syracuse 4-0 23 67.14 0.0% 8.0% 7
9 James Madison 3-0 73 66.58 1.1% 8.8% 12
10 Washington 4-0 87 65.70 1.7% 10.0% 9
11 LSU 3-1 28 65.40 0.6% 10.4% 24
12 Florida St 4-0 51 64.85 1.1% 11.1% 21
13 Mississippi 4-0 105 64.14 1.4% 12.1% 17
14 Mississippi St 3-1 17 63.74 0.8% 12.6% 25
15 Minnesota 4-0 126 63.43 0.6% 13.1% 38
16 NC State 4-0 90 63.29 0.3% 13.3% 15
17 Clemson 4-0 107 62.80 0.9% 13.9% 31
18 Texas 2-2 6 62.75 0.1% 14.0% 11
19 Michigan 4-0 125 61.87 1.7% 15.2% 13
20 BYU 3-1 55 61.52 0.7% 15.7% 39
21 Kentucky 4-0 109 61.44 0.2% 15.8% 20
22 Oklahoma 3-1 58 61.39 0.1% 15.9% 8
23 UCLA 4-0 116 60.84 1.1% 16.6% 29
24 Illinois 3-1 121 60.58 0.5% 17.0% 10
25 Kansas St 3-1 43 60.35 0.4% 17.3% 36
26 Oregon 3-1 14 60.26 0.2% 17.4% 37
27 TCU 3-0 123 60.19 0.1% 17.5% 43
28 Baylor 3-1 59 59.87 0.6% 18.0% 58
29 Cincinnati 3-1 71 59.86 0.0% 18.0% 52
30 Wake Forest 3-1 34 59.61 0.5% 18.3% 14
31 Oklahoma St 3-0 127 59.51 0.2% 18.5% 28
32 Oregon St 3-1 46 59.51 0.0% 18.5% 19
33 Texas Tech 3-1 16 58.96 1.1% 19.2% 67
34 Liberty 3-1 20 58.96 0.0% 19.2% 32
35 Louisville 2-2 2 58.36 1.2% 20.0% 61
36 Arkansas 3-1 47 58.24 0.2% 20.2% 33
37 South Alabama 3-1 95 58.07 0.3% 20.4% 41
38 Iowa St 3-1 62 57.98 0.2% 20.5% 22
39 Texas A&M 3-1 44 57.90 0.2% 20.7% 46
40 Notre Dame 2-2 3 57.43 0.9% 21.3% 62
41 Pittsburgh 3-1 65 57.29 0.3% 21.5% 23
42 UCF 3-1 99 57.15 0.3% 21.7% 54
43 Utah 3-1 115 56.76 0.8% 22.2% 55
44 California 3-1 67 56.75 0.0% 22.2% 69
45 Tulane 3-1 101 56.63 0.2% 22.4% 16
46 Appalachian St 2-2 5 56.46 0.3% 22.6% 40
47 Maryland 3-1 85 56.30 0.3% 22.8% 30
48 Duke 3-1 89 56.12 0.4% 23.1% 34
49 UAB 2-1 75 56.10 0.0% 23.1% 45
50 Memphis 3-1 54 55.96 0.3% 23.3% 72
51 Purdue 2-2 15 55.50 0.9% 23.9% 49
52 Iowa 3-1 96 54.76 1.5% 25.0% 71
53 Auburn 3-1 45 54.66 0.2% 25.1% 75
54 Florida 2-2 4 54.62 0.1% 25.2% 50
55 Air Force 3-1 131 54.34 0.6% 25.5% 70
56 UNLV 3-1 114 54.33 0.0% 25.6% 60
57 Houston 2-2 7 54.21 0.2% 25.7% 86
58 Indiana 3-1 33 54.11 0.2% 25.8% 27
59 West Virginia 2-2 37 53.52 1.2% 26.7% 84
60 Michigan St 2-2 19 53.47 0.1% 26.7% 26
61 MTSU 3-1 97 53.29 0.3% 27.0% 79
62 SMU 2-2 60 51.94 2.6% 28.8% 47
63 Coastal Car 4-0 130 51.85 0.2% 28.9% 73
64 Washington St 3-1 111 51.73 0.2% 29.1% 48
65 Miami FL 2-2 56 51.36 0.7% 29.6% 51
66 Wisconsin 2-2 63 51.22 0.3% 29.8% 65
67 North Carolina 3-1 98 50.92 0.6% 30.2% 44
68 East Carolina 2-2 93 50.80 0.2% 30.4% 35
69 Wyoming 3-2 26 50.80 0.0% 30.4% 59
70 WKU 3-1 129 50.51 0.6% 30.8% 66
71 Troy 2-2 40 50.43 0.2% 30.9% 92
72 Rice 2-2 35 50.31 0.2% 31.1% 42
73 Southern Miss 2-2 41 50.19 0.2% 31.2% 90
74 Virginia 2-2 30 50.11 0.2% 31.3% 80
75 Ga Southern 3-1 117 49.87 0.5% 31.7% 83
76 Stanford 1-2 9 49.56 0.6% 32.1% 63
77 Fresno St 1-2 12 49.09 0.9% 32.7% 77
78 Tulsa 2-2 120 48.77 0.6% 33.2% 78
79 Rutgers 3-1 108 48.76 0.0% 33.2% 56
80 Vanderbilt 3-2 72 48.68 0.1% 33.3% 64
81 Missouri 2-2 76 48.29 0.8% 33.8% 81
82 Toledo 2-2 88 48.02 0.5% 34.2% 53
83 UT San Antonio 2-2 57 48.00 0.0% 34.2% 94
84 Marshall 2-2 92 47.47 1.0% 34.9% 76
85 San Jose St 2-1 119 47.36 0.2% 35.1% 115
86 ULM 2-2 21 47.27 0.2% 35.2% 100
87 South Carolina 2-2 69 47.23 0.1% 35.3% 87
88 Old Dominion 2-2 48 46.19 2.0% 36.7% 85
89 Kent 1-3 8 45.64 1.1% 37.5% 89
90 C Michigan 1-3 10 45.50 0.3% 37.6% 97
91 New Mexico 2-2 81 45.46 0.1% 37.7% 82
92 Arizona 2-2 50 45.42 0.1% 37.8% 88
93 Virginia Tech 2-2 106 44.90 1.0% 38.5% 74
94 Louisiana 2-2 118 44.77 0.2% 38.7% 68
95 Boise St 2-2 94 44.73 0.1% 38.7% 57
96 Temple 2-2 112 44.66 0.1% 38.8% 104
97 Arkansas St 1-3 25 44.45 0.4% 39.1% 95
98 Ohio 2-2 31 44.20 0.5% 39.4% 91
99 FL Atlantic 2-3 104 44.14 0.1% 39.5% 96
100 Miami OH 2-2 68 43.47 1.3% 40.4% 108
101 San Diego St 2-2 83 42.96 1.0% 41.1% 118
102 North Texas 2-3 66 42.78 0.4% 41.4% 99
103 Army 1-2 102 42.76 0.0% 41.4% 105
104 South Florida 1-3 27 41.58 2.3% 43.0% 101
105 Georgia Tech 1-3 11 40.87 1.4% 44.0% 107
106 UTEP 2-3 70 40.75 0.2% 44.2% 120
107 N Illinois 1-3 61 40.43 0.6% 44.6% 109
108 Texas St 2-2 124 39.89 1.1% 45.3% 122
109 Boston College 1-3 64 39.58 0.6% 45.8% 103
110 Bowling Green 1-3 32 38.84 1.4% 46.8% 112
111 Louisiana Tech 1-3 38 38.63 0.4% 47.1% 113
112 Nebraska 1-3 91 38.63 0.0% 47.1% 110
113 Akron 1-3 18 38.55 0.2% 47.2% 111
114 Nevada 2-3 103 38.21 0.7% 47.6% 117
115 Ball St 1-3 74 37.99 0.4% 47.9% 102
116 Connecticut 1-4 22 37.83 0.3% 48.2% 116
117 Arizona St 1-3 79 37.57 0.5% 48.5% 106
118 Navy 1-2 80 37.01 1.1% 49.3% 131
119 W Michigan 1-3 36 36.91 0.2% 49.4% 93
120 Utah St 1-3 52 36.10 1.6% 50.5% 121
121 Colorado 0-4 1 36.00 0.2% 50.7% 125
122 Buffalo 1-3 100 35.99 0.0% 50.7% 127
123 Northwestern 1-3 110 35.54 0.9% 51.3% 119
124 E Michigan 2-2 128 34.87 1.3% 52.2% 98
125 New Mexico St 1-4 78 33.80 2.1% 53.7% 129
126 Massachusetts 1-3 86 32.18 3.2% 55.9% 114
127 Hawaii 1-4 82 29.70 4.9% 59.3% 123
128 Georgia St 0-4 84 29.59 0.2% 59.5% 126
129 Florida Intl 1-2 122 26.92 5.2% 63.1% 130
130 Colorado St 0-4 42 26.47 0.9% 63.7% 124
131 Charlotte 1-4 113 25.86 7.5% 64.6% 128

Best win: Georgia 49-3 vs. Oregon
Worst loss: Colorado St 41-10 vs. CS Sacramento

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 12 60.20 67.47 53.52
2 SEC 59.36 70.65 47.23
3 Big 10 55.51 72.97 35.54
4 ACC 54.80 67.14 39.58
5 Pac-12 54.29 71.37 36.00
6 American 50.78 59.86 37.01
7 Sun Belt 48.79 66.58 29.59
8 Conference USA 43.39 56.10 25.86
9 Mountain West 43.29 54.34 26.47
10 MAC 40.87 48.02 34.87

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *