J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2021 Week 8

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Georgia 7-0 13 73.39 1
2 Michigan 7-0 23 69.93 7.0% 4.7% 2
3 Alabama 7-1 35 66.98 6.0% 8.7% 7
4 Ohio St 6-1 50 66.31 1.3% 9.6% 4
5 Cincinnati 7-0 88 66.23 0.2% 9.8% 3
6 Wake Forest 7-0 66 64.90 2.7% 11.6% 12
7 Iowa 6-1 16 64.05 1.7% 12.7% 5
8 Notre Dame 6-1 5 63.99 0.1% 12.8% 9
9 Michigan St 7-0 80 63.83 0.3% 13.0% 8
10 Mississippi 6-1 28 62.41 2.9% 15.0% 15
11 Pittsburgh 6-1 87 61.90 1.0% 15.7% 13
12 Oklahoma 8-0 89 61.16 1.5% 16.7% 10
13 Penn St 5-2 29 60.58 1.2% 17.5% 6
14 Kentucky 6-1 39 60.51 0.1% 17.5% 14
15 Oklahoma St 6-1 27 60.17 0.7% 18.0% 11
16 Baylor 6-1 83 59.82 0.7% 18.5% 16
17 UT San Antonio 8-0 120 59.52 0.6% 18.9% 22
18 Texas A&M 6-2 44 59.50 0.0% 18.9% 28
19 Wisconsin 4-3 1 59.21 0.6% 19.3% 31
20 Auburn 5-2 33 58.48 1.5% 20.3% 17
21 San Diego St 7-0 123 58.37 0.2% 20.5% 33
22 Arkansas 5-3 14 58.31 0.1% 20.6% 20
23 Oregon 6-1 74 58.20 0.2% 20.7% 30
24 Florida 4-3 19 58.18 0.0% 20.7% 23
25 SMU 7-0 127 57.96 0.4% 21.0% 29
26 Minnesota 5-2 31 57.41 1.1% 21.8% 34
27 Air Force 6-2 82 57.14 0.5% 22.1% 19
28 Texas 4-3 9 57.12 0.0% 22.2% 24
29 Virginia 6-2 45 56.87 0.5% 22.5% 43
30 Iowa St 5-2 64 56.82 0.1% 22.6% 39
31 Coastal Car 6-1 128 56.23 1.2% 23.4% 26
32 BYU 6-2 36 56.21 0.0% 23.4% 35
33 Purdue 4-3 8 56.03 0.4% 23.7% 21
34 Houston 6-1 122 55.86 0.4% 23.9% 40
35 NC State 5-2 85 55.81 0.1% 24.0% 18
36 Arizona St 5-2 91 55.51 0.6% 24.4% 32
37 Louisville 4-3 17 55.34 0.3% 24.6% 56
38 Boise St 3-4 6 55.01 0.7% 25.0% 38
39 Utah 4-3 32 54.96 0.1% 25.1% 27
40 Oregon St 5-2 73 54.90 0.1% 25.2% 48
41 Clemson 4-3 10 54.58 0.7% 25.6% 25
42 UCLA 5-3 56 54.41 0.3% 25.9% 37
43 Liberty 6-2 119 54.37 0.1% 25.9% 41
44 Appalachian St 5-2 75 53.61 1.5% 26.9% 59
45 Tennessee 4-4 24 53.45 0.3% 27.2% 36
46 Fresno St 6-2 110 53.22 0.5% 27.5% 52
47 Mississippi St 4-3 22 53.14 0.2% 27.6% 55
48 Nebraska 3-5 11 53.04 0.2% 27.7% 51
49 Nevada 5-2 103 53.03 0.0% 27.7% 44
50 Kansas St 4-3 21 52.94 0.2% 27.9% 47
51 North Carolina 4-3 46 52.73 0.4% 28.2% 57
52 Army 4-3 51 52.12 1.2% 29.0% 46
53 LSU 4-4 12 51.87 0.5% 29.3% 45
54 W Michigan 5-3 57 51.10 1.6% 30.4% 42
55 Maryland 4-3 20 50.89 0.4% 30.7% 49
56 N Illinois 6-2 79 50.76 0.3% 30.8% 58
57 Louisiana 6-1 124 50.62 0.3% 31.0% 54
58 UCF 4-3 61 50.56 0.1% 31.1% 75
59 Miami FL 3-4 7 50.54 0.0% 31.1% 78
60 Syracuse 4-4 62 50.23 0.6% 31.6% 72
61 UTEP 6-1 129 49.90 0.7% 32.0% 67
62 Rutgers 3-4 15 49.81 0.2% 32.1% 61
63 Utah St 5-2 72 49.77 0.1% 32.2% 69
64 Toledo 4-4 90 49.72 0.1% 32.3% 79
65 UAB 5-3 102 49.66 0.1% 32.3% 50
66 West Virginia 3-4 41 49.36 0.6% 32.7% 76
67 Illinois 3-5 3 49.26 0.2% 32.9% 85
68 Texas Tech 5-3 96 49.15 0.2% 33.0% 65
69 Virginia Tech 3-4 34 48.94 0.4% 33.3% 63
70 Georgia Tech 3-4 37 48.93 0.0% 33.3% 60
71 Florida St 3-4 40 48.81 0.2% 33.5% 87
72 USC 3-4 30 48.64 0.3% 33.7% 66
73 Boston College 4-3 97 48.48 0.3% 33.9% 53
74 Washington St 4-4 59 48.33 0.3% 34.1% 73
75 Marshall 4-3 125 48.24 0.2% 34.3% 77
76 Stanford 3-4 25 48.23 0.0% 34.3% 74
77 E Michigan 5-3 113 48.13 0.2% 34.4% 82
78 Miami OH 4-4 68 48.03 0.2% 34.6% 84
79 FL Atlantic 4-3 109 47.99 0.1% 34.6% 86
80 TCU 3-4 42 47.70 0.6% 35.0% 62
81 WKU 3-4 86 47.34 0.7% 35.5% 80
82 Ball St 4-4 60 46.86 1.0% 36.1% 64
83 South Carolina 4-4 38 46.75 0.2% 36.3% 68
84 Indiana 2-5 2 46.32 0.9% 36.9% 71
85 Northwestern 3-4 52 45.49 1.7% 38.0% 88
86 Colorado St 3-4 100 45.16 0.7% 38.5% 89
87 Memphis 4-4 107 44.96 0.4% 38.7% 81
88 ULM 4-3 65 44.71 0.5% 39.1% 97
89 East Carolina 3-4 78 44.66 0.1% 39.1% 91
90 Wyoming 4-3 105 44.42 0.5% 39.5% 70
91 Missouri 3-4 70 44.35 0.1% 39.6% 90
92 Georgia St 3-4 49 44.26 0.2% 39.7% 101
93 Washington 3-4 95 43.88 0.8% 40.2% 95
94 South Alabama 4-3 130 43.35 1.1% 40.9% 83
95 Kent 4-4 81 43.20 0.3% 41.1% 94
96 Buffalo 4-4 117 42.86 0.7% 41.6% 106
97 Hawaii 4-4 106 42.82 0.1% 41.7% 103
98 MTSU 3-4 98 42.72 0.2% 41.8% 105
99 Troy 4-3 126 42.66 0.1% 41.9% 96
100 Tulsa 3-4 67 42.56 0.2% 42.0% 98
101 Duke 3-4 99 42.45 0.2% 42.2% 100
102 Charlotte 4-3 121 42.23 0.4% 42.5% 93
103 C Michigan 4-4 115 41.67 1.2% 43.2% 104
104 California 2-5 84 41.60 0.1% 43.3% 109
105 South Florida 2-5 53 41.26 0.7% 43.8% 111
106 Louisiana Tech 2-5 55 41.20 0.1% 43.9% 99
107 Rice 3-4 47 41.17 0.0% 43.9% 113
108 San Jose St 4-4 112 41.13 0.1% 44.0% 107
109 Navy 1-6 4 40.23 1.8% 45.2% 112
110 New Mexico 3-5 69 39.65 1.2% 46.0% 115
111 Temple 3-4 94 39.43 0.4% 46.3% 92
112 Colorado 2-5 77 38.86 1.2% 47.0% 102
113 Tulane 1-6 18 38.31 1.1% 47.8% 108
114 Old Dominion 1-6 58 36.71 3.3% 50.0% 117
115 Bowling Green 2-6 92 35.90 1.6% 51.1% 110
116 Ga Southern 2-5 104 35.16 1.5% 52.1% 118
117 Texas St 2-5 111 34.57 1.2% 52.9% 116
118 Vanderbilt 2-6 63 34.52 0.1% 53.0% 114
119 North Texas 1-6 71 33.42 2.2% 54.5% 122
120 UNLV 0-7 43 33.37 0.1% 54.5% 120
121 Kansas 1-6 26 32.90 1.0% 55.2% 125
122 Southern Miss 1-6 76 32.87 0.1% 55.2% 123
123 Akron 2-6 101 32.65 0.4% 55.5% 119
124 Massachusetts 1-6 48 31.62 2.1% 56.9% 121
125 Arkansas St 1-6 108 31.51 0.2% 57.1% 128
126 Ohio 1-7 114 31.38 0.3% 57.2% 124
127 Arizona 0-7 54 30.80 1.2% 58.0% 127
128 Florida Intl 1-6 116 30.40 0.8% 58.6% 126
129 New Mexico St 1-7 93 30.25 0.3% 58.8% 129
130 Connecticut 1-8 118 26.70 8.3% 63.6% 130

Best win: Purdue 24-7 vs. Iowa
Worst loss: Vanderbilt 20-3 vs. Eastern Tennessee St

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 56.58 69.93 45.49
2 SEC 55.85 73.39 34.52
3 ACC 52.89 64.90 42.45
4 Big 12 52.71 61.16 32.90
5 Pac-12 48.19 58.20 30.80
6 Mountain West 47.76 58.37 33.37
7 American 47.46 66.23 38.31
8 Sun Belt 43.67 56.23 31.51
9 MAC 43.52 51.10 31.38
10 Conference USA 43.10 59.52 30.40

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *