J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2021 Week 7

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Georgia 7-0 8 73.37 1
2 Michigan 6-0 19 68.70 9.8% 6.4% 2
3 Cincinnati 6-0 74 67.05 3.5% 8.6% 4
4 Ohio St 5-1 46 64.00 6.4% 12.8% 5
5 Iowa 6-1 10 63.61 0.8% 13.3% 3
6 Penn St 5-1 18 63.46 0.3% 13.5% 6
7 Alabama 6-1 51 63.37 0.2% 13.6% 8
8 Michigan St 7-0 80 62.29 2.2% 15.1% 7
9 Notre Dame 5-1 4 61.46 1.7% 16.2% 13
10 Oklahoma 7-0 66 61.39 0.1% 16.3% 11
11 Oklahoma St 6-0 36 61.26 0.3% 16.5% 15
12 Wake Forest 6-0 96 60.95 0.7% 16.9% 9
13 Pittsburgh 5-1 81 60.73 0.5% 17.2% 16
14 Kentucky 6-1 29 59.61 2.4% 18.8% 10
15 Mississippi 5-1 33 59.54 0.1% 18.8% 19
16 Baylor 6-1 83 58.20 2.8% 20.7% 32
17 Auburn 5-2 20 58.18 0.1% 20.7% 35
18 NC State 5-1 84 57.38 1.7% 21.8% 31
19 Air Force 6-1 107 56.96 0.9% 22.4% 23
20 Arkansas 4-3 3 56.92 0.1% 22.4% 12
21 Purdue 4-2 16 56.62 0.6% 22.8% 54
22 UT San Antonio 7-0 121 56.46 0.3% 23.0% 34
23 Florida 4-3 25 56.41 0.1% 23.1% 14
24 Texas 4-3 9 56.25 0.3% 23.3% 17
25 Clemson 4-2 11 56.23 0.0% 23.4% 29
26 Coastal Car 6-0 130 56.17 0.1% 23.4% 27
27 Utah 4-2 39 56.05 0.2% 23.6% 40
28 Texas A&M 5-2 48 55.99 0.1% 23.7% 30
29 SMU 6-0 126 55.46 1.1% 24.4% 21
30 Oregon 5-1 97 55.14 0.7% 24.8% 24
31 Wisconsin 3-3 1 55.05 0.2% 25.0% 41
32 Arizona St 5-2 79 54.90 0.3% 25.2% 20
33 San Diego St 6-0 129 54.72 0.4% 25.4% 28
34 Minnesota 4-2 27 54.28 0.9% 26.0% 50
35 BYU 5-2 34 54.28 0.0% 26.0% 18
36 Tennessee 4-3 45 54.19 0.2% 26.1% 25
37 UCLA 5-2 72 53.73 1.0% 26.8% 38
38 Boise St 3-4 6 53.50 0.5% 27.1% 26
39 Iowa St 4-2 86 53.32 0.4% 27.3% 55
40 Houston 5-1 123 53.24 0.2% 27.4% 39
41 Liberty 5-2 117 53.13 0.2% 27.6% 22
42 W Michigan 5-2 54 52.95 0.4% 27.8% 56
43 Virginia 5-2 62 52.77 0.4% 28.1% 53
44 Nevada 5-1 118 52.48 0.6% 28.5% 46
45 LSU 4-3 22 51.95 1.1% 29.2% 65
46 Army 4-2 87 51.39 1.2% 30.0% 44
47 Kansas St 3-3 15 51.39 0.0% 30.0% 37
48 Oregon St 4-2 90 51.34 0.1% 30.0% 57
49 Maryland 4-2 35 51.28 0.1% 30.1% 47
50 UAB 5-2 95 51.20 0.2% 30.2% 48
51 Nebraska 3-5 17 51.18 0.0% 30.2% 45
52 Fresno St 5-2 114 51.12 0.1% 30.3% 67
53 Boston College 4-2 94 51.07 0.1% 30.4% 33
54 Louisiana 5-1 116 50.95 0.3% 30.6% 74
55 Mississippi St 3-3 5 50.84 0.2% 30.7% 42
56 Louisville 3-3 31 50.30 1.1% 31.4% 59
57 North Carolina 4-3 58 50.02 0.6% 31.8% 61
58 N Illinois 5-2 60 50.01 0.0% 31.8% 52
59 Appalachian St 4-2 100 49.57 0.9% 32.4% 36
60 Georgia Tech 3-3 44 49.23 0.7% 32.9% 62
61 Rutgers 3-4 12 48.81 0.9% 33.5% 43
62 TCU 3-3 41 48.77 0.1% 33.5% 49
63 Virginia Tech 3-3 42 48.68 0.2% 33.6% 51
64 Ball St 4-3 40 48.41 0.6% 34.0% 75
65 Texas Tech 5-2 108 48.31 0.2% 34.2% 69
66 USC 3-3 52 48.18 0.3% 34.3% 72
67 UTEP 6-1 128 47.95 0.5% 34.6% 71
68 South Carolina 4-3 37 47.83 0.3% 34.8% 64
69 Utah St 4-2 70 47.75 0.2% 34.9% 63
70 Wyoming 4-2 88 47.38 0.8% 35.4% 58
71 Indiana 2-4 2 47.32 0.1% 35.5% 77
72 Syracuse 3-4 59 47.11 0.4% 35.8% 68
73 Washington St 4-3 76 46.99 0.3% 36.0% 84
74 Stanford 3-4 24 46.97 0.0% 36.0% 60
75 UCF 3-3 56 46.32 1.4% 36.9% 66
76 West Virginia 2-4 26 46.24 0.2% 37.0% 80
77 Marshall 4-3 124 45.84 0.8% 37.5% 78
78 Miami FL 2-4 13 45.82 0.0% 37.5% 73
79 Toledo 3-4 93 45.81 0.0% 37.6% 70
80 WKU 2-4 53 45.51 0.6% 38.0% 92
81 Memphis 4-3 113 45.30 0.4% 38.3% 89
82 E Michigan 4-3 106 45.29 0.0% 38.3% 76
83 South Alabama 4-2 127 45.12 0.3% 38.5% 94
84 Miami OH 3-4 65 45.12 0.0% 38.5% 91
85 Illinois 2-5 7 44.72 0.8% 39.0% 88
86 FL Atlantic 3-3 98 44.33 0.8% 39.6% 81
87 Florida St 2-4 21 44.29 0.1% 39.6% 86
88 Northwestern 3-3 91 44.12 0.3% 39.9% 102
89 Colorado St 3-3 112 43.92 0.4% 40.1% 95
90 Missouri 3-4 64 43.49 0.9% 40.7% 79
91 East Carolina 3-3 99 43.42 0.2% 40.8% 83
92 Temple 3-3 67 42.74 1.4% 41.7% 87
93 Charlotte 4-2 125 42.67 0.1% 41.8% 90
94 Kent 3-4 50 41.92 1.6% 42.9% 82
95 Washington 2-4 78 41.54 0.8% 43.4% 96
96 Troy 4-3 122 41.47 0.1% 43.5% 97
97 ULM 3-3 55 40.91 1.2% 44.2% 114
98 Tulsa 3-4 69 40.90 0.0% 44.2% 104
99 Louisiana Tech 2-4 71 40.81 0.2% 44.4% 85
100 Duke 3-4 101 40.79 0.0% 44.4% 93
101 Georgia St 2-4 28 40.79 0.0% 44.4% 99
102 Colorado 2-4 75 40.17 1.3% 45.2% 113
103 Hawaii 3-4 92 40.01 0.3% 45.5% 98
104 C Michigan 4-3 120 39.97 0.1% 45.5% 112
105 MTSU 2-4 63 39.89 0.2% 45.6% 100
106 Buffalo 3-4 105 39.74 0.3% 45.8% 101
107 San Jose St 3-4 103 38.70 2.2% 47.3% 108
108 Tulane 1-5 23 38.05 1.4% 48.1% 107
109 California 1-5 68 37.10 2.0% 49.4% 115
110 Bowling Green 2-5 85 36.97 0.3% 49.6% 109
111 South Florida 1-5 30 36.81 0.3% 49.8% 105
112 Navy 1-5 14 36.46 0.7% 50.3% 103
113 Rice 2-4 49 35.99 1.0% 50.9% 106
114 Vanderbilt 2-5 57 34.79 2.5% 52.6% 120
115 New Mexico 2-5 73 34.69 0.2% 52.7% 110
116 Texas St 2-4 109 34.67 0.1% 52.7% 118
117 Old Dominion 1-6 61 34.60 0.1% 52.8% 111
118 Ga Southern 2-5 104 33.95 1.4% 53.7% 116
119 Akron 2-5 89 33.89 0.1% 53.8% 119
120 UNLV 0-6 32 32.31 3.3% 56.0% 124
121 Massachusetts 1-5 38 31.99 0.7% 56.4% 121
122 North Texas 1-5 82 31.58 0.9% 57.0% 117
123 Southern Miss 1-6 77 31.48 0.2% 57.1% 123
124 Ohio 1-6 115 30.21 2.7% 58.8% 128
125 Kansas 1-5 47 29.86 0.7% 59.3% 125
126 Florida Intl 1-5 119 29.45 0.9% 59.9% 126
127 Arizona 0-6 43 29.10 0.7% 60.3% 122
128 Arkansas St 1-5 111 28.68 0.9% 60.9% 129
129 New Mexico St 1-6 102 28.54 0.3% 61.1% 127
130 Connecticut 1-7 110 27.39 3.6% 62.7% 130

Best win: Purdue 24-7 vs. Iowa
Worst loss: Vanderbilt 20-3 vs. Eastern Tennessee St

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 55.39 68.70 44.12
2 SEC 54.75 73.37 34.79
3 Big 12 51.50 61.39 29.86
4 ACC 51.10 60.95 40.79
5 Pac-12 46.77 56.05 29.10
6 Mountain West 46.13 56.96 32.31
7 American 45.98 67.05 36.46
8 MAC 42.53 52.95 30.21
9 Sun Belt 42.23 56.17 28.68
10 Conference USA 41.27 56.46 29.45

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *