J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2018 Final

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Clemson 15-0 8 74.17 2
2 Alabama 14-1 6 72.22 4.0% 2.6% 1
3 Notre Dame 12-1 16 67.03 10.6% 9.6% 3
4 Georgia 11-3 5 66.67 0.7% 10.1% 4
5 Ohio St 13-1 31 66.15 1.1% 10.8% 7
6 Oklahoma 12-2 14 65.75 0.8% 11.4% 6
7 Michigan 10-3 10 64.06 3.4% 13.6% 5
8 UCF 12-1 86 63.42 1.3% 14.5% 8
9 LSU 10-3 19 62.74 1.4% 15.4% 10
10 Texas A&M 9-4 1 61.25 3.0% 17.4% 19
11 Florida 10-3 36 61.20 0.1% 17.5% 17
12 Fresno St 12-2 89 61.10 0.2% 17.6% 12
13 Penn St 9-4 22 60.94 0.3% 17.8% 9
14 Syracuse 10-3 56 60.29 1.3% 18.7% 21
15 Appalachian St 11-2 101 60.22 0.1% 18.8% 20
16 Washington St 11-2 70 60.19 0.1% 18.8% 15
17 Kentucky 10-3 30 60.16 0.1% 18.9% 16
18 Washington 10-4 37 59.75 0.8% 19.5% 13
19 Mississippi St 8-5 12 59.67 0.2% 19.6% 14
20 Iowa 9-4 45 59.38 0.6% 19.9% 24
21 Texas 10-4 20 59.31 0.1% 20.0% 26
22 Utah St 11-2 121 59.11 0.4% 20.3% 27
23 Boise St 10-3 59 58.98 0.3% 20.5% 23
24 Missouri 8-5 21 58.92 0.1% 20.6% 11
25 West Virginia 8-4 42 58.53 0.8% 21.1% 18
26 Auburn 8-5 18 58.01 1.1% 21.8% 30
27 Cincinnati 11-2 104 58.00 0.0% 21.8% 25
28 Army 11-2 100 57.45 1.1% 22.5% 31
29 Utah 9-5 43 56.92 1.1% 23.3% 22
30 Stanford 9-4 46 56.56 0.7% 23.7% 29
31 Northwestern 9-5 9 55.87 1.4% 24.7% 35
32 NC State 9-4 60 55.67 0.4% 24.9% 28
33 Wisconsin 8-5 48 54.83 1.7% 26.1% 46
34 Iowa St 8-5 39 54.66 0.4% 26.3% 34
35 Duke 8-5 32 54.48 0.4% 26.6% 48
36 Troy 10-3 97 54.41 0.1% 26.7% 45
37 Virginia 8-5 67 54.02 0.8% 27.2% 50
38 Ga Southern 10-3 109 53.96 0.1% 27.3% 44
39 Oregon 9-4 76 53.91 0.1% 27.3% 42
40 South Carolina 7-6 13 53.78 0.3% 27.5% 32
41 Ohio 9-4 119 53.76 0.0% 27.5% 47
42 UAB 11-3 120 53.62 0.3% 27.7% 52
43 Boston College 7-5 51 53.59 0.1% 27.8% 41
44 Michigan St 7-6 24 53.54 0.1% 27.8% 36
45 Pittsburgh 7-7 3 53.42 0.2% 28.0% 39
46 Purdue 6-7 4 53.31 0.2% 28.1% 33
47 Oklahoma St 7-6 41 53.03 0.6% 28.5% 54
48 Miami FL 7-6 52 52.67 0.7% 29.0% 37
49 Minnesota 7-6 29 52.51 0.3% 29.2% 59
50 Buffalo 10-4 115 52.48 0.1% 29.2% 38
51 Vanderbilt 6-7 26 51.61 1.8% 30.4% 43
52 Temple 8-5 85 51.37 0.5% 30.7% 40
53 Arizona St 7-6 53 51.24 0.3% 30.9% 49
54 BYU 7-6 64 51.10 0.3% 31.1% 62
55 TCU 7-6 33 50.94 0.3% 31.3% 61
56 Marshall 9-4 117 50.81 0.3% 31.5% 64
57 Wake Forest 7-6 40 50.57 0.5% 31.8% 65
58 Memphis 8-6 111 50.53 0.1% 31.9% 53
59 Georgia Tech 7-6 57 50.46 0.1% 32.0% 51
60 Arkansas St 8-5 110 50.09 0.8% 32.5% 56
61 North Texas 9-4 130 50.01 0.2% 32.6% 57
62 MTSU 8-6 71 49.94 0.1% 32.7% 58
63 Maryland 5-7 23 49.87 0.1% 32.8% 60
64 Baylor 7-6 49 49.75 0.3% 32.9% 77
65 Florida Intl 9-4 128 49.59 0.3% 33.1% 70
66 Houston 8-5 118 49.19 0.8% 33.7% 55
67 Texas Tech 5-7 44 49.14 0.1% 33.7% 68
68 Indiana 5-7 11 48.73 0.8% 34.3% 69
69 USC 5-7 38 48.37 0.7% 34.8% 71
70 California 7-6 66 48.34 0.1% 34.8% 67
71 Miami OH 6-6 78 48.31 0.1% 34.9% 74
72 Toledo 7-6 114 48.30 0.0% 34.9% 63
73 Tennessee 5-7 15 48.17 0.3% 35.1% 72
74 Nebraska 4-8 25 48.11 0.1% 35.1% 78
75 Mississippi 5-7 34 47.97 0.3% 35.3% 76
76 Nevada 8-5 103 47.85 0.3% 35.5% 82
77 N Illinois 8-6 63 47.62 0.5% 35.8% 66
78 E Michigan 7-6 113 47.59 0.1% 35.8% 73
79 Kansas St 5-7 47 47.59 0.0% 35.8% 81
80 Tulane 7-6 80 47.55 0.1% 35.9% 86
81 Virginia Tech 6-7 50 47.47 0.2% 36.0% 80
82 Florida St 5-7 17 46.84 1.3% 36.9% 83
83 San Diego St 7-6 79 46.78 0.1% 36.9% 75
84 Arizona 5-7 65 46.41 0.8% 37.4% 84
85 Louisiana 7-7 77 46.39 0.0% 37.5% 79
86 Louisiana Tech 8-5 122 46.28 0.2% 37.6% 94
87 FL Atlantic 5-7 74 45.90 0.8% 38.1% 87
88 Southern Miss 6-5 127 45.85 0.1% 38.2% 92
89 Wyoming 6-6 82 45.78 0.1% 38.3% 89
90 Air Force 5-7 93 45.58 0.4% 38.5% 91
91 W Michigan 7-6 91 44.79 1.6% 39.6% 85
92 Colorado 5-7 75 44.50 0.6% 40.0% 93
93 Hawaii 8-6 106 44.35 0.3% 40.2% 90
94 South Florida 7-6 96 43.98 0.8% 40.7% 88
95 UCLA 3-9 2 43.76 0.4% 41.0% 95
96 ULM 6-6 98 43.31 0.9% 41.6% 97
97 SMU 5-7 69 43.24 0.1% 41.7% 96
98 Liberty 6-6 125 41.65 3.3% 43.9% 99
99 Coastal Car 5-7 84 41.26 0.8% 44.4% 98
100 Charlotte 5-7 90 40.99 0.5% 44.7% 100
101 Illinois 4-8 62 40.38 1.3% 45.6% 102
102 Navy 3-10 54 39.96 0.8% 46.1% 101
103 Kansas 3-9 58 39.83 0.3% 46.3% 104
104 North Carolina 2-9 55 39.36 1.0% 46.9% 105
105 Arkansas 2-10 28 39.35 0.0% 46.9% 103
106 Massachusetts 4-8 81 37.97 2.8% 48.8% 106
107 UNLV 4-8 112 37.54 0.9% 49.4% 108
108 Ball St 4-8 99 37.17 0.7% 49.9% 107
109 Akron 4-8 92 37.06 0.2% 50.0% 109
110 Louisville 2-10 7 37.00 0.1% 50.1% 111
111 New Mexico 3-9 87 36.78 0.5% 50.4% 113
112 Tulsa 3-9 105 36.77 0.0% 50.4% 110
113 Old Dominion 4-8 124 36.45 0.7% 50.9% 114
114 East Carolina 3-9 83 35.98 0.9% 51.5% 112
115 Oregon St 2-10 35 35.98 0.0% 51.5% 115
116 South Alabama 3-9 73 35.77 0.4% 51.8% 117
117 Rutgers 1-11 27 35.76 0.0% 51.8% 116
118 WKU 3-9 126 34.99 1.6% 52.8% 119
119 Texas St 3-9 123 34.72 0.6% 53.2% 118
120 Colorado St 3-9 88 34.68 0.1% 53.2% 120
121 Georgia St 2-10 72 33.83 1.7% 54.4% 121
122 UT San Antonio 3-9 94 33.56 0.6% 54.8% 125
123 Bowling Green 3-9 107 33.47 0.2% 54.9% 122
124 San Jose St 1-11 61 33.33 0.3% 55.1% 124
125 Kent 2-10 95 33.19 0.3% 55.3% 123
126 New Mexico St 3-9 116 32.19 2.0% 56.6% 126
127 C Michigan 1-11 108 30.46 3.5% 58.9% 127
128 Rice 2-11 102 29.81 1.3% 59.8% 128
129 Connecticut 1-11 68 28.80 2.1% 61.2% 129
130 UTEP 1-11 129 26.14 8.8% 64.8% 130

Best win: Clemson 44-16 vs. Alabama
Worst loss: UTEP 30-10 vs. Northern Arizona

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 SEC 57.27 72.22 39.35
2 Big 10 53.10 66.15 35.76
3 Big 12 52.85 65.75 39.83
4 ACC 52.14 74.17 37.00
5 Pac-12 50.49 60.19 35.98
6 Mountain West 45.99 61.10 33.33
7 American 45.73 63.42 28.80
8 Sun Belt 45.40 60.22 33.83
9 MAC 42.85 53.76 30.46
10 Conference USA 42.42 53.62 26.14

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *