J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2017 Final

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Wisconsin 13-1 13 72.58 2
2 Alabama 13-1 24 71.70 1.8% 1.2% 6
3 Ohio St 12-2 5 71.69 0.0% 1.2% 5
4 Penn St 11-2 10 71.45 0.5% 1.6% 4
5 Georgia 13-2 9 71.34 0.2% 1.7% 3
6 Clemson 12-2 12 70.20 2.2% 3.3% 1
7 UCF 13-0 71 69.02 2.4% 4.9% 9
8 Notre Dame 10-3 3 68.74 0.6% 5.3% 8
9 Oklahoma 12-2 29 68.45 0.6% 5.7% 7
10 Auburn 10-4 11 66.16 4.6% 8.9% 10
11 Michigan St 10-3 6 64.32 3.7% 11.4% 14
12 Washington 10-3 59 64.24 0.2% 11.5% 11
13 TCU 11-3 47 63.57 1.3% 12.4% 15
14 Miami FL 10-3 18 63.56 0.0% 12.4% 13
15 Iowa 8-5 2 63.53 0.1% 12.5% 19
16 USC 11-3 22 63.13 0.8% 13.0% 12
17 Northwestern 10-3 26 62.93 0.4% 13.3% 17
18 Oklahoma St 10-3 56 62.42 1.0% 14.0% 21
19 Michigan 8-5 7 61.68 1.5% 15.0% 16
20 NC State 9-4 27 61.15 1.1% 15.8% 24
21 Mississippi St 9-4 36 61.13 0.0% 15.8% 25
22 Stanford 9-5 21 60.73 0.8% 16.3% 18
23 LSU 9-4 39 60.35 0.8% 16.9% 23
24 Boise St 11-3 66 60.27 0.1% 17.0% 26
25 FL Atlantic 11-3 91 59.62 1.3% 17.9% 30
26 Memphis 10-3 74 59.54 0.1% 18.0% 22
27 Virginia Tech 9-4 58 59.53 0.0% 18.0% 20
28 Wake Forest 8-5 20 58.75 1.6% 19.1% 31
29 Iowa St 8-5 45 58.24 1.0% 19.8% 36
30 Louisville 8-5 48 58.18 0.1% 19.9% 27
31 South Carolina 9-4 35 58.17 0.0% 19.9% 37
32 South Florida 10-2 111 58.02 0.3% 20.1% 35
33 Purdue 7-6 14 58.01 0.0% 20.1% 33
34 Boston College 7-6 8 57.53 1.0% 20.7% 29
35 Washington St 9-4 54 56.96 1.1% 21.5% 28
36 Florida St 7-6 23 56.64 0.6% 22.0% 38
37 Texas 7-6 43 56.52 0.2% 22.1% 42
38 Fresno St 10-4 82 56.11 0.8% 22.7% 41
39 San Diego St 10-3 92 56.00 0.2% 22.9% 34
40 Toledo 11-3 100 55.50 1.0% 23.5% 32
41 Army 10-3 89 55.46 0.1% 23.6% 45
42 Navy 7-6 34 55.05 0.8% 24.2% 50
43 Troy 11-2 120 54.95 0.2% 24.3% 53
44 Duke 7-6 53 54.80 0.3% 24.5% 48
45 Kansas St 8-5 68 54.37 0.9% 25.1% 55
46 Georgia Tech 5-6 28 54.20 0.3% 25.3% 43
47 Utah 7-6 64 54.06 0.3% 25.5% 47
48 Oregon 7-6 57 53.84 0.4% 25.8% 39
49 Arizona St 7-6 33 53.37 0.9% 26.5% 40
50 Texas A&M 7-6 51 53.29 0.2% 26.6% 51
51 Ohio 9-4 118 53.21 0.2% 26.7% 57
52 Houston 7-5 73 53.20 0.0% 26.7% 44
53 Missouri 7-6 62 52.79 0.8% 27.3% 46
54 West Virginia 7-6 55 52.46 0.7% 27.7% 49
55 Kentucky 7-6 49 52.43 0.1% 27.8% 59
56 Indiana 5-7 30 52.34 0.2% 27.9% 60
57 Minnesota 5-7 25 51.97 0.7% 28.4% 61
58 Appalachian St 9-4 122 51.92 0.1% 28.5% 74
59 Arizona 7-6 78 51.61 0.6% 28.9% 52
60 Texas Tech 6-7 42 51.21 0.8% 29.4% 62
61 Mississippi 6-6 60 50.93 0.6% 29.8% 63
62 Marshall 8-5 106 50.54 0.8% 30.4% 67
63 SMU 7-6 70 50.37 0.3% 30.6% 56
64 UCLA 6-7 31 50.37 0.0% 30.6% 54
65 N Illinois 8-5 97 50.17 0.4% 30.9% 58
66 Wyoming 8-5 99 50.11 0.1% 31.0% 75
67 Maryland 4-8 1 49.92 0.4% 31.2% 71
68 Temple 7-6 77 49.83 0.2% 31.3% 79
69 Florida 4-7 15 49.65 0.4% 31.6% 69
70 Pittsburgh 5-7 44 49.61 0.1% 31.6% 68
71 Nebraska 4-8 4 49.54 0.1% 31.8% 70
72 North Texas 9-5 90 49.23 0.6% 32.2% 65
73 California 5-7 61 48.85 0.8% 32.7% 66
74 Louisiana Tech 7-6 103 48.70 0.3% 32.9% 89
75 Virginia 6-7 50 48.63 0.1% 33.0% 64
76 Syracuse 4-8 19 48.62 0.0% 33.0% 73
77 Colorado St 7-6 104 47.82 1.6% 34.1% 76
78 Vanderbilt 5-7 52 47.59 0.5% 34.4% 85
79 Arkansas St 7-5 129 47.50 0.2% 34.6% 78
80 Tulane 5-7 67 47.49 0.0% 34.6% 80
81 Buffalo 6-6 102 47.42 0.1% 34.7% 82
82 W Michigan 6-6 93 47.27 0.3% 34.9% 77
83 C Michigan 8-5 105 46.96 0.6% 35.3% 72
84 Utah St 6-7 95 46.61 0.7% 35.8% 81
85 Rutgers 4-8 17 46.36 0.5% 36.1% 88
86 Colorado 5-7 75 46.31 0.1% 36.2% 84
87 Florida Intl 8-5 108 46.26 0.1% 36.3% 83
88 Southern Miss 8-5 121 45.99 0.5% 36.6% 87
89 Arkansas 4-8 32 45.95 0.1% 36.7% 91
90 MTSU 7-6 113 45.83 0.2% 36.9% 97
91 Akron 7-7 79 45.81 0.0% 36.9% 86
92 E Michigan 5-7 94 45.42 0.8% 37.4% 90
93 Tennessee 4-8 40 45.20 0.4% 37.7% 93
94 Air Force 5-7 76 45.01 0.4% 38.0% 95
95 UT San Antonio 6-5 128 44.88 0.3% 38.2% 96
96 North Carolina 3-9 38 44.55 0.7% 38.6% 94
97 UAB 8-5 130 44.12 0.8% 39.2% 92
98 Miami OH 5-7 112 43.66 0.9% 39.8% 98
99 New Mexico St 7-6 123 42.70 1.9% 41.2% 103
100 UNLV 5-7 110 41.70 2.0% 42.5% 99
101 Georgia St 7-5 127 41.70 0.0% 42.5% 107
102 BYU 4-9 83 40.89 1.6% 43.7% 101
103 Tulsa 2-10 63 40.43 0.9% 44.3% 104
104 Nevada 3-9 81 40.41 0.0% 44.3% 100
105 Cincinnati 4-8 72 40.40 0.0% 44.3% 105
106 Illinois 2-10 16 40.36 0.1% 44.4% 106
107 WKU 6-7 126 39.96 0.8% 45.0% 102
108 ULM 4-8 96 39.16 1.6% 46.0% 109
109 Massachusetts 4-8 117 39.07 0.2% 46.2% 110
110 Baylor 1-11 41 38.68 0.8% 46.7% 113
111 New Mexico 3-9 86 38.55 0.3% 46.9% 112
112 Idaho 4-8 119 38.38 0.3% 47.1% 115
113 Old Dominion 5-7 114 38.33 0.1% 47.2% 111
114 Connecticut 3-9 69 38.32 0.0% 47.2% 108
115 South Alabama 4-8 115 38.17 0.3% 47.4% 116
116 East Carolina 3-9 65 37.47 1.4% 48.4% 114
117 ULL 5-7 125 35.82 3.3% 50.7% 119
118 Bowling Green 2-10 84 35.74 0.1% 50.8% 117
119 Oregon St 1-11 46 34.77 1.9% 52.1% 118
120 Kansas 1-11 37 34.56 0.4% 52.4% 121
121 Hawaii 3-9 109 34.46 0.2% 52.5% 120
122 Coastal Car 3-9 124 32.84 3.2% 54.8% 123
123 Ga Southern 2-10 107 32.35 1.0% 55.4% 125
124 Kent 2-10 80 32.35 0.0% 55.4% 122
125 Rice 1-11 87 31.24 2.2% 57.0% 124
126 San Jose St 2-11 88 30.66 1.2% 57.8% 127
127 Ball St 2-10 101 30.49 0.4% 58.0% 126
128 Texas St 2-10 116 30.40 0.2% 58.1% 128
129 Charlotte 1-11 98 29.34 2.1% 59.6% 129
130 UTEP 0-12 85 27.08 6.8% 62.7% 130

Best win: Iowa 55-24 vs. Ohio St.
Worst loss: Coastal Carolina 10-52 vs. Western Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 58.33 72.58 40.36
2 SEC 56.19 71.70 45.20
3 ACC 56.14 70.20 44.55
4 Big 12 54.05 68.45 34.56
5 Pac-12 53.19 64.24 34.77
6 American 49.93 69.02 37.47
7 Mountain West 45.64 60.27 30.66
8 MAC 44.50 55.50 30.49
9 Conference USA 42.94 59.62 27.08
10 Sun Belt 40.49 54.95 30.40

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *