This is the first release of the 2023 season. More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.
Rk | Team | Record | SOS | Rating | % Bhnd | % Bhnd 1st | Prev | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Washington | 3-0 | 71 | 73.80 | – | – | ||
2 | Texas | 3-0 | 30 | 73.74 | 0.1% | 0.1% | ||
3 | Oklahoma | 3-0 | 72 | 73.36 | 0.8% | 0.6% | ||
4 | Miami FL | 3-0 | 21 | 70.47 | 5.7% | 4.5% | ||
5 | Rutgers | 3-0 | 73 | 70.44 | 0.1% | 4.6% | ||
6 | Mississippi | 3-0 | 49 | 67.77 | 5.3% | 8.2% | ||
7 | North Carolina | 3-0 | 45 | 67.74 | 0.1% | 8.2% | ||
8 | Michigan | 3-0 | 122 | 66.62 | 2.2% | 9.7% | ||
9 | Duke | 3-0 | 58 | 66.31 | 0.6% | 10.2% | ||
10 | UCLA | 3-0 | 67 | 65.43 | 1.7% | 11.4% | ||
11 | Florida St | 3-0 | 105 | 65.14 | 0.6% | 11.7% | ||
12 | Washington St | 3-0 | 81 | 64.87 | 0.5% | 12.1% | ||
13 | Ohio St | 3-0 | 84 | 64.84 | 0.1% | 12.1% | ||
14 | Penn St | 3-0 | 80 | 64.41 | 0.9% | 12.7% | ||
15 | Colorado | 3-0 | 69 | 63.56 | 1.7% | 13.9% | ||
16 | Notre Dame | 4-0 | 117 | 63.42 | 0.3% | 14.1% | ||
17 | Syracuse | 3-0 | 100 | 63.18 | 0.5% | 14.4% | ||
18 | Texas A&M | 2-1 | 46 | 62.52 | 1.3% | 15.3% | ||
19 | Iowa | 3-0 | 120 | 62.24 | 0.5% | 15.7% | ||
20 | Oregon St | 3-0 | 104 | 61.96 | 0.6% | 16.1% | ||
21 | Auburn | 3-0 | 87 | 61.42 | 1.1% | 16.8% | ||
22 | Georgia | 3-0 | 106 | 61.26 | 0.3% | 17.0% | ||
23 | Alabama | 2-1 | 53 | 61.07 | 0.4% | 17.3% | ||
24 | Liberty | 3-0 | 132 | 60.28 | 1.6% | 18.3% | ||
25 | Tulane | 2-1 | 34 | 60.28 | 0.0% | 18.3% | ||
26 | USC | 3-0 | 133 | 60.24 | 0.1% | 18.4% | ||
27 | Utah | 3-0 | 85 | 59.43 | 1.6% | 19.5% | ||
28 | Memphis | 3-0 | 107 | 59.41 | 0.1% | 19.5% | ||
29 | BYU | 3-0 | 90 | 59.22 | 0.4% | 19.8% | ||
30 | Air Force | 3-0 | 111 | 58.98 | 0.5% | 20.1% | ||
31 | UCF | 3-0 | 110 | 58.70 | 0.6% | 20.5% | ||
32 | Oregon | 3-0 | 125 | 58.58 | 0.2% | 20.6% | ||
33 | Louisville | 3-0 | 91 | 58.27 | 0.6% | 21.0% | ||
34 | Kentucky | 3-0 | 126 | 57.48 | 1.6% | 22.1% | ||
35 | SMU | 2-1 | 23 | 57.24 | 0.5% | 22.4% | ||
36 | TCU | 2-1 | 44 | 57.04 | 0.4% | 22.7% | ||
37 | Maryland | 3-0 | 128 | 56.88 | 0.3% | 22.9% | ||
38 | Missouri | 3-0 | 77 | 56.80 | 0.2% | 23.0% | ||
39 | Wisconsin | 2-1 | 94 | 56.77 | 0.1% | 23.1% | ||
40 | Wake Forest | 3-0 | 103 | 56.61 | 0.3% | 23.3% | ||
41 | LSU | 2-1 | 29 | 56.17 | 0.9% | 23.9% | ||
42 | Minnesota | 2-1 | 42 | 56.10 | 0.1% | 24.0% | ||
43 | Miami OH | 2-1 | 26 | 55.06 | 2.1% | 25.4% | ||
44 | Coastal Car | 2-1 | 35 | 54.92 | 0.3% | 25.6% | ||
45 | Kansas St | 2-1 | 82 | 54.57 | 0.7% | 26.1% | ||
46 | Appalachian St | 2-1 | 65 | 54.34 | 0.5% | 26.4% | ||
47 | Clemson | 2-1 | 57 | 53.64 | 1.4% | 27.3% | ||
48 | Florida | 2-1 | 50 | 53.26 | 0.8% | 27.8% | ||
49 | Michigan St | 2-1 | 38 | 53.22 | 0.1% | 27.9% | ||
50 | Arkansas | 2-1 | 76 | 53.11 | 0.2% | 28.0% | ||
51 | California | 2-1 | 74 | 53.00 | 0.2% | 28.2% | ||
52 | Kansas | 3-0 | 129 | 52.62 | 0.7% | 28.7% | ||
53 | Georgia St | 3-0 | 131 | 52.33 | 0.6% | 29.1% | ||
54 | Cincinnati | 2-1 | 78 | 52.31 | 0.0% | 29.1% | ||
55 | Rice | 2-1 | 19 | 52.14 | 0.3% | 29.4% | ||
56 | West Virginia | 2-1 | 51 | 51.46 | 1.3% | 30.3% | ||
57 | Fresno St | 3-0 | 123 | 51.28 | 0.4% | 30.5% | ||
58 | South Alabama | 2-1 | 66 | 50.90 | 0.7% | 31.0% | ||
59 | Wyoming | 2-1 | 15 | 50.73 | 0.4% | 31.3% | ||
60 | Army | 2-1 | 97 | 50.32 | 0.8% | 31.8% | ||
61 | Northwestern | 1-2 | 13 | 50.29 | 0.0% | 31.9% | ||
62 | Arizona | 2-1 | 118 | 50.26 | 0.1% | 31.9% | ||
63 | WKU | 2-1 | 56 | 50.04 | 0.5% | 32.2% | ||
64 | UNLV | 2-1 | 37 | 49.73 | 0.6% | 32.6% | ||
65 | Virginia Tech | 1-2 | 27 | 49.67 | 0.1% | 32.7% | ||
66 | Temple | 2-1 | 48 | 48.82 | 1.7% | 33.9% | ||
67 | James Madison | 3-0 | 127 | 48.81 | 0.0% | 33.9% | ||
68 | Toledo | 2-1 | 109 | 48.78 | 0.1% | 33.9% | ||
69 | Purdue | 1-2 | 28 | 48.73 | 0.1% | 34.0% | ||
70 | Marshall | 2-0 | 124 | 48.67 | 0.1% | 34.0% | ||
71 | Boise St | 1-2 | 4 | 48.65 | 0.0% | 34.1% | ||
72 | Tulsa | 1-2 | 1 | 48.50 | 0.3% | 34.3% | ||
73 | Mississippi St | 2-1 | 54 | 48.39 | 0.2% | 34.4% | ||
74 | Texas St | 2-1 | 112 | 48.30 | 0.2% | 34.6% | ||
75 | Ga Southern | 2-1 | 114 | 47.99 | 0.6% | 35.0% | ||
76 | Ohio | 3-1 | 116 | 47.80 | 0.4% | 35.2% | ||
77 | NC State | 2-1 | 88 | 47.77 | 0.1% | 35.3% | ||
78 | South Carolina | 1-2 | 5 | 47.58 | 0.4% | 35.5% | ||
79 | ULM | 2-1 | 32 | 47.51 | 0.1% | 35.6% | ||
80 | Tennessee | 2-1 | 115 | 47.49 | 0.0% | 35.6% | ||
81 | Louisiana | 2-1 | 121 | 47.33 | 0.3% | 35.9% | ||
82 | Georgia Tech | 1-2 | 8 | 47.24 | 0.2% | 36.0% | ||
83 | Colorado St | 0-2 | 2 | 47.16 | 0.2% | 36.1% | ||
84 | Nebraska | 1-2 | 70 | 46.98 | 0.4% | 36.3% | ||
85 | San Diego St | 2-2 | 17 | 46.96 | 0.0% | 36.4% | ||
86 | Indiana | 1-2 | 11 | 46.25 | 1.4% | 37.3% | ||
87 | Texas Tech | 1-2 | 43 | 46.22 | 0.1% | 37.4% | ||
88 | Utah St | 1-2 | 14 | 45.77 | 0.9% | 38.0% | ||
89 | Jacksonville St | 2-1 | 102 | 45.76 | 0.0% | 38.0% | ||
90 | Illinois | 1-2 | 24 | 45.70 | 0.1% | 38.1% | ||
91 | Bowling Green | 1-2 | 7 | 45.44 | 0.5% | 38.4% | ||
92 | Old Dominion | 1-2 | 61 | 45.43 | 0.0% | 38.4% | ||
93 | Navy | 1-2 | 12 | 45.12 | 0.6% | 38.9% | ||
94 | Iowa St | 1-2 | 40 | 44.95 | 0.3% | 39.1% | ||
95 | Houston | 1-2 | 62 | 44.46 | 1.0% | 39.8% | ||
96 | UT San Antonio | 1-2 | 93 | 44.27 | 0.4% | 40.0% | ||
97 | Vanderbilt | 2-2 | 98 | 44.19 | 0.2% | 40.1% | ||
98 | New Mexico St | 2-2 | 89 | 44.17 | 0.0% | 40.2% | ||
99 | E Michigan | 2-1 | 75 | 44.17 | 0.0% | 40.2% | ||
100 | Arkansas St | 1-2 | 3 | 43.14 | 2.0% | 41.6% | ||
101 | MTSU | 1-2 | 20 | 43.08 | 0.1% | 41.6% | ||
102 | Southern Miss | 1-2 | 10 | 42.73 | 0.7% | 42.1% | ||
103 | Louisiana Tech | 2-2 | 99 | 42.66 | 0.1% | 42.2% | ||
104 | Pittsburgh | 1-2 | 59 | 42.41 | 0.5% | 42.5% | ||
105 | Baylor | 1-2 | 47 | 42.39 | 0.0% | 42.6% | ||
106 | Florida Intl | 3-1 | 130 | 42.36 | 0.1% | 42.6% | ||
107 | Massachusetts | 1-3 | 60 | 42.19 | 0.3% | 42.8% | ||
108 | Oklahoma St | 2-1 | 119 | 42.14 | 0.1% | 42.9% | ||
109 | San Jose St | 1-3 | 25 | 41.85 | 0.6% | 43.3% | ||
110 | W Michigan | 1-2 | 9 | 41.18 | 1.3% | 44.2% | ||
111 | Sam Houston St | 0-2 | 6 | 40.96 | 0.4% | 44.5% | ||
112 | Ball St | 1-2 | 18 | 40.69 | 0.5% | 44.9% | ||
113 | Troy | 1-2 | 63 | 39.94 | 1.5% | 45.9% | ||
114 | New Mexico | 1-2 | 52 | 39.83 | 0.2% | 46.0% | ||
115 | South Florida | 1-2 | 36 | 39.79 | 0.1% | 46.1% | ||
116 | Charlotte | 1-2 | 41 | 39.71 | 0.1% | 46.2% | ||
117 | Boston College | 1-2 | 83 | 39.50 | 0.4% | 46.5% | ||
118 | Kent | 1-2 | 33 | 38.53 | 1.9% | 47.8% | ||
119 | FL Atlantic | 1-2 | 68 | 38.07 | 0.9% | 48.4% | ||
120 | North Texas | 1-2 | 108 | 37.30 | 1.5% | 49.5% | ||
121 | Akron | 1-2 | 55 | 37.09 | 0.4% | 49.7% | ||
122 | C Michigan | 1-2 | 22 | 36.83 | 0.5% | 50.1% | ||
123 | UAB | 1-2 | 86 | 36.37 | 0.9% | 50.7% | ||
124 | East Carolina | 0-3 | 16 | 35.41 | 1.9% | 52.0% | ||
125 | UTEP | 1-3 | 79 | 34.92 | 1.0% | 52.7% | ||
126 | Stanford | 1-2 | 96 | 33.71 | 2.4% | 54.3% | ||
127 | Virginia | 0-3 | 64 | 32.60 | 2.2% | 55.8% | ||
128 | Hawaii | 1-3 | 101 | 31.87 | 1.5% | 56.8% | ||
129 | Arizona St | 1-2 | 92 | 31.23 | 1.3% | 57.7% | ||
130 | N Illinois | 1-2 | 113 | 31.21 | 0.0% | 57.7% | ||
131 | Connecticut | 0-3 | 95 | 30.96 | 3.3% | 58.1% | ||
132 | Buffalo | 0-3 | 39 | 30.11 | 3.5% | 59.2% | ||
133 | Nevada | 0-3 | 31 | 26.27 | 9.8% | 64.4% |
Best win: Miami 48-33 vs. Texas A&M
Worst loss: Nevada 33-6 vs. Idaho
Rk | Conference | Rating | Best Team | Worst Team |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Big 10 | 56.39 | 70.44 | 45.70 |
2 | Pac-12 | 56.34 | 73.80 | 31.23 |
3 | SEC | 55.61 | 67.77 | 44.19 |
4 | ACC | 54.33 | 70.47 | 32.60 |
5 | Big 12 | 53.80 | 73.74 | 42.14 |
6 | Sun Belt | 48.02 | 54.92 | 39.94 |
7 | American | 45.89 | 60.28 | 35.41 |
8 | Mountain West | 44.92 | 58.98 | 26.27 |
9 | Conference USA | 44.92 | 60.28 | 34.92 |
10 | MAC | 41.41 | 55.06 | 30.11 |
SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team