J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2022 Week 6

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Ohio St 6-0 30 72.74 1
2 Alabama 6-0 25 70.39 4.7% 3.2% 2
3 Georgia 6-0 51 69.16 2.5% 4.9% 3
4 Tennessee 5-0 44 68.75 0.8% 5.5% 10
5 USC 6-0 46 67.79 1.9% 6.8% 7
6 Clemson 6-0 54 67.70 0.2% 6.9% 5
7 Mississippi St 5-1 20 66.10 3.2% 9.1% 4
8 Texas 4-2 8 65.89 0.4% 9.4% 15
9 Mississippi 6-0 78 65.64 0.5% 9.8% 9
10 TCU 5-0 83 65.52 0.3% 9.9% 11
11 Penn St 5-0 74 65.24 0.5% 10.3% 8
12 Oklahoma St 5-0 85 64.91 0.7% 10.8% 19
13 James Madison 5-0 110 64.59 0.6% 11.2% 13
14 Michigan 6-0 113 64.48 0.2% 11.4% 14
15 Syracuse 5-0 92 63.55 1.9% 12.6% 18
16 UCLA 6-0 91 63.44 0.2% 12.8% 16
17 Kansas 5-1 24 63.05 0.8% 13.3% 6
18 Wake Forest 5-1 39 62.76 0.6% 13.7% 17
19 Oregon 5-1 35 62.02 1.5% 14.7% 21
20 NC State 5-1 27 61.54 1.0% 15.4% 23
21 Kansas St 5-1 33 61.53 0.0% 15.4% 20
22 UCF 4-1 95 60.20 2.6% 17.2% 42
23 Notre Dame 3-2 1 60.11 0.2% 17.4% 36
24 LSU 4-2 14 60.04 0.1% 17.5% 12
25 Tulane 5-1 80 59.57 0.9% 18.1% 35
26 Illinois 5-1 122 59.36 0.4% 18.4% 28
27 Utah 4-2 60 58.79 1.1% 19.2% 25
28 Purdue 4-2 16 58.26 1.1% 19.9% 38
29 Maryland 4-2 43 58.07 0.4% 20.2% 22
30 Florida St 4-2 22 58.03 0.1% 20.2% 27
31 South Alabama 4-1 98 58.03 0.0% 20.2% 37
32 Liberty 5-1 82 57.26 1.5% 21.3% 29
33 Memphis 4-2 36 57.15 0.2% 21.4% 26
34 BYU 4-2 59 56.82 0.6% 21.9% 34
35 Coastal Car 6-0 120 56.42 0.8% 22.4% 49
36 Baylor 3-2 40 56.31 0.2% 22.6% 43
37 San Jose St 4-1 126 56.25 0.1% 22.7% 57
38 Cincinnati 5-1 118 55.67 1.1% 23.5% 33
39 North Carolina 5-1 94 55.60 0.2% 23.6% 47
40 Minnesota 4-1 128 55.54 0.1% 23.6% 39
41 Texas Tech 3-3 3 55.09 0.9% 24.3% 44
42 Kentucky 4-2 71 54.84 0.5% 24.6% 31
43 Washington 4-2 87 54.80 0.1% 24.7% 24
44 Houston 3-3 2 54.71 0.2% 24.8% 58
45 UAB 3-2 75 54.68 0.1% 24.8% 60
46 Washington St 4-2 50 54.66 0.0% 24.9% 46
47 Florida 4-2 37 54.62 0.1% 24.9% 53
48 Troy 4-2 56 54.25 0.7% 25.4% 54
49 Iowa St 3-3 29 54.25 0.0% 25.4% 48
50 Pittsburgh 4-2 81 54.13 0.2% 25.6% 59
51 Oklahoma 3-3 11 53.92 0.4% 25.9% 32
52 Duke 4-2 104 53.63 0.6% 26.3% 30
53 Louisville 3-3 23 53.43 0.4% 26.5% 65
54 Arkansas 3-3 7 53.42 0.0% 26.6% 45
55 Texas A&M 3-3 12 53.41 0.0% 26.6% 52
56 South Carolina 4-2 77 53.39 0.0% 26.6% 71
57 Rice 3-2 26 52.99 0.8% 27.2% 63
58 Oregon St 4-2 58 52.85 0.3% 27.3% 55
59 Auburn 3-3 6 52.39 0.9% 28.0% 51
60 UT San Antonio 4-2 70 52.16 0.4% 28.3% 66
61 California 3-2 53 51.90 0.5% 28.7% 56
62 Toledo 4-2 117 51.43 0.9% 29.3% 67
63 Appalachian St 3-3 32 51.42 0.0% 29.3% 40
64 UNLV 4-2 105 51.22 0.4% 29.6% 41
65 SMU 2-3 21 50.66 1.1% 30.4% 50
66 East Carolina 3-3 84 50.47 0.4% 30.6% 61
67 Georgia Tech 3-3 5 50.24 0.5% 30.9% 87
68 Iowa 3-3 62 50.06 0.3% 31.2% 64
69 Wisconsin 3-3 72 49.72 0.7% 31.6% 79
70 West Virginia 2-3 28 49.36 0.7% 32.1% 70
71 Marshall 3-2 119 48.78 1.1% 32.9% 74
72 Missouri 2-4 19 48.63 0.3% 33.2% 68
73 Boise St 4-2 124 47.77 1.7% 34.3% 85
74 Air Force 4-2 131 47.67 0.2% 34.5% 62
75 Wyoming 4-3 64 47.10 1.1% 35.3% 86
76 Miami FL 2-3 79 47.03 0.1% 35.3% 72
77 Arkansas St 2-4 18 46.84 0.4% 35.6% 75
78 Vanderbilt 3-3 49 46.72 0.2% 35.8% 77
79 Arizona St 2-4 10 46.56 0.3% 36.0% 106
80 Louisiana 2-3 86 46.47 0.2% 36.1% 91
81 Michigan St 2-4 15 46.37 0.2% 36.3% 76
82 Southern Miss 2-3 42 46.36 0.0% 36.3% 69
83 Ga Southern 3-3 97 46.31 0.1% 36.3% 73
84 WKU 3-3 123 45.96 0.7% 36.8% 81
85 Indiana 3-3 38 45.92 0.1% 36.9% 82
86 MTSU 3-3 76 45.75 0.3% 37.1% 78
87 Buffalo 3-3 96 45.54 0.4% 37.4% 103
88 Rutgers 3-3 73 45.15 0.8% 37.9% 80
89 Arizona 3-3 67 45.07 0.2% 38.0% 83
90 North Texas 3-3 99 44.68 0.8% 38.6% 84
91 Stanford 1-4 9 44.27 0.8% 39.1% 92
92 E Michigan 4-2 125 44.05 0.4% 39.4% 116
93 ULM 2-4 13 43.82 0.4% 39.8% 95
94 Nebraska 3-3 112 43.72 0.2% 39.9% 96
95 Texas St 3-3 102 43.62 0.2% 40.0% 114
96 Virginia 2-4 31 43.10 1.0% 40.8% 88
97 Navy 2-3 93 42.81 0.6% 41.1% 115
98 Louisiana Tech 2-3 52 42.53 0.6% 41.5% 112
99 Old Dominion 2-3 55 42.53 0.0% 41.5% 93
100 Kent 2-4 47 42.52 0.0% 41.5% 90
101 Georgia St 2-4 69 42.26 0.5% 41.9% 120
102 Connecticut 3-4 66 42.18 0.2% 42.0% 110
103 Miami OH 3-3 103 42.00 0.3% 42.3% 107
104 Ohio 3-3 100 41.91 0.2% 42.4% 111
105 FL Atlantic 2-4 106 41.65 0.5% 42.7% 104
106 Temple 2-3 108 41.65 0.0% 42.7% 97
107 Ball St 3-3 111 41.49 0.3% 43.0% 108
108 Boston College 2-4 45 41.44 0.1% 43.0% 100
109 C Michigan 1-5 17 41.17 0.5% 43.4% 98
110 Tulsa 2-4 114 41.11 0.1% 43.5% 89
111 Utah St 2-4 41 40.92 0.4% 43.7% 119
112 San Diego St 3-3 109 40.31 1.2% 44.6% 105
113 New Mexico 2-4 116 39.97 0.7% 45.1% 94
114 Virginia Tech 2-4 88 39.94 0.0% 45.1% 102
115 Army 1-4 48 39.41 1.1% 45.8% 118
116 Fresno St 1-4 57 39.30 0.2% 46.0% 101
117 South Florida 1-5 34 38.54 1.5% 47.0% 121
118 Bowling Green 2-4 61 38.06 1.0% 47.7% 99
119 W Michigan 2-4 90 37.46 1.2% 48.5% 113
120 UTEP 3-4 121 36.92 1.1% 49.2% 109
121 Northwestern 1-5 63 36.00 1.8% 50.5% 117
122 N Illinois 1-5 101 34.41 3.2% 52.7% 122
123 Massachusetts 1-5 65 33.09 2.6% 54.5% 127
124 Akron 1-5 68 33.04 0.1% 54.6% 123
125 Nevada 2-4 129 32.88 0.3% 54.8% 124
126 Colorado 0-5 4 32.33 1.1% 55.6% 125
127 Florida Intl 2-3 130 29.69 5.3% 59.2% 126
128 Colorado St 1-4 89 29.64 0.1% 59.3% 131
129 Hawaii 1-5 115 28.18 2.9% 61.3% 129
130 Charlotte 1-5 107 28.17 0.0% 61.3% 130
131 New Mexico St 1-5 127 26.95 5.5% 63.0% 128

Best win: Georgia 49-3 vs. Oregon
Worst loss: Colorado St 41-10 vs. CS Sacramento

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 12 58.98 65.89 49.36
2 SEC 58.39 70.39 46.72
3 ACC 53.72 67.70 39.94
4 Big 10 53.62 72.74 36.00
5 Pac-12 52.87 67.79 32.33
6 American 50.23 60.20 38.54
7 Sun Belt 49.41 64.59 42.26
8 Conference USA 43.20 54.68 28.17
9 Mountain West 41.77 56.25 28.18
10 MAC 41.09 51.43 33.04

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *