J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2022 Week 14

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Georgia 13-0 20 72.66 1
2 Michigan 13-0 54 69.64 6.2% 4.2% 2
3 Ohio St 11-1 40 68.40 2.5% 5.9% 3
4 TCU 12-1 19 67.04 2.8% 7.7% 4
5 Alabama 10-2 30 65.93 2.3% 9.3% 5
6 Tennessee 10-2 26 65.33 1.2% 10.1% 6
7 Kansas St 10-3 4 64.92 0.8% 10.7% 10
8 Penn St 10-2 39 64.49 0.9% 11.2% 8
9 Texas 8-4 2 64.16 0.7% 11.7% 9
10 USC 11-2 34 63.21 1.9% 13.0% 7
11 Clemson 11-2 52 63.14 0.1% 13.1% 11
12 Utah 10-3 43 63.02 0.3% 13.3% 12
13 Oregon 9-3 32 61.48 3.1% 15.4% 13
14 Florida St 9-3 46 61.36 0.2% 15.5% 14
15 Tulane 11-2 66 60.70 1.4% 16.5% 18
16 LSU 9-4 10 59.96 1.5% 17.5% 15
17 Washington 10-2 70 59.67 0.6% 17.9% 16
18 Oregon St 9-3 49 59.51 0.3% 18.1% 17
19 Mississippi St 8-4 17 58.65 1.8% 19.3% 20
20 UCLA 9-3 57 58.63 0.0% 19.3% 21
21 Notre Dame 8-4 28 58.50 0.3% 19.5% 19
22 Mississippi 8-4 33 57.74 1.5% 20.5% 22
23 Troy 11-2 78 57.10 1.3% 21.4% 27
24 Louisville 7-5 25 56.63 1.0% 22.1% 24
25 Illinois 8-4 80 56.58 0.1% 22.1% 25
26 South Carolina 8-4 29 56.22 0.7% 22.6% 26
27 UT San Antonio 11-2 98 56.12 0.2% 22.8% 34
28 South Alabama 10-2 109 55.75 0.8% 23.3% 29
29 UCF 9-4 65 55.53 0.5% 23.6% 23
30 Oklahoma 6-6 12 55.45 0.2% 23.7% 28
31 Texas Tech 7-5 7 55.43 0.1% 23.7% 30
32 Kentucky 7-5 22 55.30 0.3% 23.9% 32
33 Wake Forest 7-5 44 55.19 0.2% 24.0% 33
34 Cincinnati 9-3 82 55.18 0.0% 24.1% 31
35 Minnesota 8-4 79 54.66 1.1% 24.8% 37
36 Oklahoma St 7-5 24 54.58 0.2% 24.9% 36
37 NC State 8-4 48 54.51 0.1% 25.0% 39
38 Baylor 6-6 16 54.48 0.1% 25.0% 38
39 Arkansas 6-6 15 54.25 0.5% 25.3% 40
40 Florida 6-6 8 54.09 0.3% 25.6% 43
41 Pittsburgh 8-4 67 54.06 0.1% 25.6% 41
42 James Madison 8-3 97 54.00 0.1% 25.7% 42
43 Maryland 7-5 45 53.84 0.3% 25.9% 44
44 Syracuse 7-5 35 53.56 0.6% 26.3% 45
45 North Carolina 9-4 62 53.44 0.2% 26.5% 35
46 Kansas 6-6 5 53.34 0.2% 26.6% 46
47 Washington St 7-5 50 53.28 0.1% 26.7% 48
48 Purdue 8-5 47 52.93 0.7% 27.2% 47
49 Duke 8-4 95 52.75 0.4% 27.4% 49
50 SMU 7-5 53 52.63 0.2% 27.6% 51
51 Iowa 7-5 58 52.48 0.3% 27.8% 52
52 Missouri 6-6 23 52.41 0.1% 27.9% 53
53 Fresno St 9-4 111 52.32 0.2% 28.0% 58
54 Marshall 8-4 85 51.75 1.1% 28.8% 54
55 Boise St 9-4 121 51.68 0.2% 28.9% 50
56 Air Force 9-3 130 51.38 0.6% 29.3% 56
57 Houston 7-5 61 51.26 0.2% 29.5% 57
58 Iowa St 4-8 6 50.74 1.0% 30.2% 59
59 Memphis 6-6 68 50.61 0.3% 30.4% 60
60 East Carolina 7-5 71 50.56 0.1% 30.4% 61
61 Coastal Car 9-3 84 50.33 0.5% 30.7% 55
62 Auburn 5-7 3 50.33 0.0% 30.7% 62
63 Wisconsin 6-6 55 50.29 0.1% 30.8% 63
64 BYU 7-5 73 50.09 0.4% 31.1% 64
65 Texas A&M 5-7 41 49.50 1.2% 31.9% 66
66 West Virginia 5-7 11 48.87 1.3% 32.7% 67
67 WKU 8-5 112 48.79 0.2% 32.9% 68
68 Ohio 9-4 118 48.75 0.1% 32.9% 65
69 Michigan St 5-7 13 48.50 0.5% 33.3% 69
70 Appalachian St 6-6 87 48.01 1.0% 33.9% 70
71 Louisiana 6-6 83 47.97 0.1% 34.0% 71
72 Toledo 8-5 123 47.73 0.5% 34.3% 78
73 Liberty 8-4 122 47.69 0.1% 34.4% 72
74 UAB 6-6 96 47.22 1.0% 35.0% 73
75 Vanderbilt 5-7 18 46.90 0.7% 35.5% 75
76 San Jose St 7-4 129 46.55 0.7% 35.9% 76
77 Arizona 5-7 31 46.24 0.6% 36.4% 77
78 North Texas 7-6 94 46.18 0.1% 36.4% 74
79 San Diego St 7-5 100 45.85 0.7% 36.9% 81
80 Army 5-6 99 45.84 0.0% 36.9% 79
81 Southern Miss 6-6 77 45.71 0.3% 37.1% 80
82 Ga Southern 6-6 81 45.33 0.8% 37.6% 82
83 California 4-8 37 45.20 0.3% 37.8% 83
84 Georgia Tech 5-7 21 44.72 1.0% 38.5% 84
85 Miami FL 5-7 64 44.42 0.6% 38.9% 85
86 Navy 4-7 59 44.19 0.5% 39.2% 86
87 Indiana 4-8 14 44.05 0.3% 39.4% 87
88 Wyoming 7-5 104 44.02 0.1% 39.4% 88
89 Nebraska 4-8 56 43.81 0.4% 39.7% 89
90 MTSU 7-5 126 43.74 0.1% 39.8% 91
91 Georgia St 4-8 72 43.40 0.7% 40.3% 90
92 E Michigan 8-4 128 43.23 0.4% 40.5% 93
93 Kent 5-7 76 43.08 0.3% 40.7% 92
94 Connecticut 6-6 91 43.02 0.1% 40.8% 96
95 Stanford 3-9 9 42.87 0.3% 41.0% 95
96 Tulsa 5-7 90 42.78 0.2% 41.1% 97
97 FL Atlantic 5-7 106 42.70 0.2% 41.2% 94
98 Arizona St 3-9 36 42.39 0.6% 41.7% 98
99 Buffalo 6-6 125 42.24 0.3% 41.9% 99
100 Rutgers 4-8 42 41.60 1.3% 42.7% 100
101 Virginia 3-7 63 41.17 0.9% 43.3% 101
102 Utah St 6-6 120 40.81 0.7% 43.8% 102
103 UNLV 5-7 113 40.57 0.5% 44.2% 105
104 Miami OH 6-6 124 40.48 0.2% 44.3% 103
105 Rice 5-7 86 40.42 0.1% 44.4% 104
106 Bowling Green 6-6 93 40.39 0.1% 44.4% 106
107 Ball St 5-7 105 40.28 0.2% 44.6% 107
108 ULM 4-8 60 39.86 0.9% 45.1% 108
109 Boston College 3-9 38 39.78 0.2% 45.2% 109
110 UTEP 5-7 117 39.44 0.7% 45.7% 111
111 Virginia Tech 3-8 74 39.43 0.0% 45.7% 110
112 New Mexico St 6-6 131 39.18 0.5% 46.1% 116
113 Texas St 4-8 92 38.97 0.4% 46.4% 112
114 W Michigan 5-7 110 38.43 1.1% 47.1% 114
115 Old Dominion 3-9 69 38.34 0.2% 47.2% 113
116 C Michigan 4-8 101 38.30 0.1% 47.3% 115
117 Arkansas St 3-9 75 37.67 1.3% 48.2% 117
118 Temple 3-9 89 37.38 0.6% 48.6% 118
119 Louisiana Tech 3-9 88 36.25 2.3% 50.1% 120
120 Northwestern 1-11 27 36.18 0.1% 50.2% 119
121 Colorado 1-11 1 35.78 0.8% 50.8% 121
122 South Florida 1-11 51 35.03 1.5% 51.8% 122
123 N Illinois 3-9 119 34.51 1.1% 52.5% 123
124 Colorado St 3-9 116 33.49 2.1% 53.9% 124
125 Hawaii 3-10 115 33.46 0.1% 54.0% 125
126 Akron 2-10 103 33.06 0.8% 54.5% 126
127 Florida Intl 4-8 127 32.16 1.8% 55.7% 127
128 Charlotte 3-9 108 31.52 1.3% 56.6% 128
129 Nevada 2-10 107 31.13 0.8% 57.2% 130
130 New Mexico 2-10 114 31.03 0.2% 57.3% 129
131 Massachusetts 1-11 102 27.58 9.4% 62.0% 131

Best win: Michigan 45-23 vs. Ohio St
Worst loss: Colorado St 41-10 vs. CS Sacramento

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 SEC 57.09 72.66 46.90
2 Big 12 56.90 67.04 48.87
3 Big 10 52.68 69.64 36.18
4 Pac-12 52.61 63.21 35.78
5 ACC 51.01 63.14 39.43
6 American 48.71 60.70 35.03
7 Sun Belt 46.73 57.10 37.67
8 Conference USA 42.23 56.12 31.52
9 Mountain West 41.86 52.32 31.03
10 MAC 40.87 48.75 33.06

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *