J-Train College Football Computer Rankings, 2017 Week 7

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

This week’s full rankings:

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Alabama 7-0 20 73.99 1
2 Penn St 6-0 32 71.55 4.9% 3.3% 5
3 TCU 6-0 41 69.53 4.0% 6.0% 6
4 UCF 5-0 91 69.18 0.7% 6.5% 3
5 Georgia 7-0 55 69.07 0.2% 6.7% 4
6 Ohio St 6-1 31 68.68 0.8% 7.2% 9
7 Wisconsin 6-0 51 68.62 0.1% 7.3% 8
8 Notre Dame 5-1 33 67.85 1.5% 8.3% 7
9 Clemson 6-1 22 67.84 0.0% 8.3% 2
10 Miami FL 5-0 44 66.44 2.8% 10.2% 11
11 Michigan 5-1 17 66.16 0.6% 10.6% 10
12 USC 6-1 12 65.26 1.8% 11.8% 13
13 Michigan St 5-1 4 64.08 2.4% 13.4% 15
14 Oklahoma St 5-1 56 63.90 0.4% 13.6% 16
15 Washington 6-1 88 63.72 0.4% 13.9% 12
16 Iowa 4-2 5 63.34 0.8% 14.4% 17
17 NC State 6-1 45 62.80 1.1% 15.1% 21
18 Stanford 5-2 14 62.48 0.6% 15.5% 23
19 Oklahoma 5-1 48 62.47 0.0% 15.6% 20
20 Washington St 6-1 69 60.26 4.4% 18.6% 14
21 San Diego St 6-1 49 59.60 1.3% 19.5% 18
22 Navy 5-1 52 59.07 1.1% 20.2% 19
23 Virginia Tech 5-1 99 59.05 0.1% 20.2% 26
24 Auburn 5-2 78 58.87 0.3% 20.4% 22
25 South Florida 6-0 129 58.86 0.0% 20.4% 29
26 Boise St 4-2 28 58.69 0.3% 20.7% 35
27 South Carolina 5-2 30 58.09 1.2% 21.5% 34
28 Florida St 2-3 1 57.81 0.6% 21.9% 43
29 Texas A&M 5-2 35 57.50 0.6% 22.3% 41
30 Iowa St 4-2 59 57.46 0.1% 22.3% 33
31 Wake Forest 4-2 42 57.42 0.1% 22.4% 28
32 Mississippi St 4-2 47 57.02 0.8% 22.9% 39
33 Virginia 5-1 94 56.88 0.3% 23.1% 38
34 Memphis 5-1 67 56.82 0.1% 23.2% 46
35 Purdue 3-3 7 56.68 0.3% 23.4% 27
36 Kentucky 5-1 85 56.56 0.2% 23.6% 36
37 West Virginia 4-2 86 56.06 1.0% 24.2% 57
38 SMU 4-2 68 55.99 0.2% 24.3% 42
39 Georgia Tech 3-2 92 55.28 1.4% 25.3% 45
40 Texas Tech 4-2 65 55.26 0.0% 25.3% 25
41 Utah 4-2 80 55.23 0.1% 25.4% 47
42 LSU 5-2 60 55.07 0.3% 25.6% 55
43 Florida 3-3 6 54.90 0.3% 25.8% 32
44 Texas 3-3 21 54.83 0.1% 25.9% 30
45 Oregon 4-3 34 54.61 0.4% 26.2% 31
46 Toledo 5-1 105 54.48 0.3% 26.4% 58
47 Fresno St 4-2 77 54.07 0.8% 26.9% 66
48 Arizona 4-2 100 54.02 0.1% 27.0% 59
49 Arizona St 3-3 3 53.80 0.4% 27.3% 65
50 Marshall 5-1 119 53.52 0.6% 27.7% 56
51 Indiana 3-3 19 53.33 0.4% 27.9% 52
52 Minnesota 3-3 39 53.29 0.1% 28.0% 44
53 Houston 4-2 66 53.20 0.2% 28.1% 24
54 Louisville 4-3 50 53.11 0.2% 28.2% 40
55 California 4-3 29 52.87 0.5% 28.5% 77
56 Duke 4-3 64 52.70 0.4% 28.8% 49
57 Colorado St 5-2 102 52.52 0.4% 29.0% 51
58 Northwestern 3-3 23 52.27 0.5% 29.4% 74
59 N Illinois 4-2 96 52.17 0.2% 29.5% 61
60 North Texas 4-2 62 52.14 0.1% 29.5% 69
61 Syracuse 4-3 57 51.76 0.8% 30.0% 81
62 Maryland 3-3 10 51.49 0.5% 30.4% 37
63 W Michigan 4-3 71 51.23 0.5% 30.8% 54
64 UCLA 3-3 18 51.01 0.4% 31.1% 53
65 Army 5-2 112 50.97 0.1% 31.1% 64
66 Appalachian St 4-2 101 50.84 0.2% 31.3% 62
67 Nebraska 3-4 11 50.33 1.0% 32.0% 60
68 Mississippi 3-3 37 49.95 0.8% 32.5% 90
69 Southern Miss 4-2 115 49.92 0.0% 32.5% 71
70 FL Atlantic 3-3 76 49.61 0.6% 32.9% 67
71 Troy 4-2 89 49.55 0.1% 33.0% 50
72 Colorado 4-3 97 49.46 0.2% 33.1% 68
73 Boston College 3-4 2 49.45 0.0% 33.2% 76
74 Tulane 3-3 58 49.37 0.2% 33.3% 48
75 Akron 4-3 74 48.83 1.1% 34.0% 80
76 Arkansas 2-4 8 48.04 1.6% 35.1% 79
77 UT San Antonio 3-2 125 47.89 0.3% 35.3% 70
78 Wyoming 4-2 114 47.87 0.0% 35.3% 83
79 Vanderbilt 3-4 26 47.72 0.3% 35.5% 63
80 Tennessee 3-3 54 47.42 0.6% 35.9% 72
81 Louisiana Tech 3-3 93 47.30 0.2% 36.1% 86
82 Kansas St 3-3 107 47.18 0.2% 36.2% 75
83 Ohio 5-2 128 46.94 0.5% 36.6% 85
84 Buffalo 3-4 84 46.90 0.1% 36.6% 78
85 Tulsa 2-5 25 46.30 1.2% 37.4% 99
86 New Mexico 3-3 87 46.21 0.2% 37.5% 73
87 Air Force 2-4 38 46.02 0.4% 37.8% 84
88 Arkansas St 3-2 127 45.61 0.8% 38.4% 92
89 Utah St 3-4 83 44.91 1.4% 39.3% 82
90 E Michigan 2-4 73 44.49 0.8% 39.9% 91
91 Rutgers 2-4 46 44.47 0.0% 39.9% 98
92 UAB 4-2 121 44.41 0.1% 40.0% 100
93 Pittsburgh 2-5 27 43.55 1.7% 41.1% 94
94 Florida Intl 4-2 117 43.48 0.2% 41.2% 105
95 MTSU 3-4 79 43.41 0.1% 41.3% 88
96 WKU 4-2 130 43.19 0.4% 41.6% 103
97 Georgia St 3-2 124 42.53 1.3% 42.5% 107
98 Cincinnati 2-5 15 42.18 0.7% 43.0% 87
99 New Mexico St 3-4 103 42.11 0.1% 43.1% 97
100 ULM 3-3 118 42.08 0.1% 43.1% 89
101 UNLV 2-4 95 41.76 0.6% 43.6% 93
102 North Carolina 1-6 13 41.64 0.2% 43.7% 101
103 Illinois 2-4 40 40.67 2.0% 45.0% 96
104 Missouri 1-5 9 40.48 0.4% 45.3% 104
105 South Alabama 2-4 81 40.45 0.1% 45.3% 117
106 Temple 3-4 106 40.22 0.5% 45.6% 95
107 Miami OH 2-5 113 38.89 2.7% 47.4% 102
108 ULL 3-3 120 38.82 0.2% 47.5% 112
109 Idaho 2-4 116 38.37 0.9% 48.1% 111
110 C Michigan 3-4 109 37.89 1.0% 48.8% 106
111 BYU 1-6 24 37.50 0.8% 49.3% 108
112 Ball St 2-4 111 37.42 0.2% 49.4% 110
113 Nevada 1-6 61 36.94 1.0% 50.1% 114
114 Connecticut 2-4 98 36.78 0.3% 50.3% 121
115 Kent 2-5 53 36.37 0.8% 50.8% 113
116 Oregon St 1-6 16 36.01 0.7% 51.3% 109
117 Hawaii 3-4 122 36.00 0.0% 51.3% 116
118 Old Dominion 2-4 110 33.83 4.4% 54.3% 115
119 Baylor 0-6 36 33.59 0.5% 54.6% 118
120 Kansas 1-5 72 32.64 1.9% 55.9% 120
121 Rice 1-5 70 32.41 0.5% 56.2% 122
122 Bowling Green 1-6 82 32.19 0.4% 56.5% 119
123 East Carolina 1-6 43 31.20 2.0% 57.8% 125
124 San Jose St 1-7 75 30.30 1.8% 59.1% 123
125 Texas St 1-6 104 28.76 3.1% 61.1% 124
126 UTEP 0-7 63 28.17 1.2% 61.9% 126
127 Coastal Car 1-5 126 27.30 1.8% 63.1% 127
128 Massachusetts 0-6 123 26.55 1.5% 64.1% 128
129 Ga Southern 0-5 90 26.36 0.4% 64.4% 129
130 Charlotte 0-7 108 25.86 2.9% 65.0% 130

Best win: Oklahoma 31-16 vs. Ohio St.
Worst loss: Coastal Carolina 10-52 vs. Western Illinois

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 Big 10 57.50 71.55 40.67
2 ACC 55.41 67.84 41.64
3 SEC 55.33 73.99 40.48
4 Pac-12 54.90 65.26 36.01
5 Big 12 53.29 69.53 32.64
6 American 49.93 69.18 31.20
7 Mountain West 46.24 59.60 30.30
8 MAC 43.98 54.48 32.19
9 Conference USA 42.51 53.52 25.86
10 Sun Belt 39.40 50.84 26.36

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *