J-Train Computer Rankings, 2016 Week 13

ShareShare on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Email this to someone

More information on this system can be found here. Conference rankings are listed at the bottom. Thanks to Ken Massey for the data. These rankings are included on Massey’s ranking composite page.

Rk Team Record SOS Rating % Bhnd % Bhnd 1st Prev
1 Alabama 12-0 16 72.56 1
2 Ohio St 11-1 1 70.11 5.1% 3.4% 2
3 Michigan 10-2 6 68.47 3.4% 5.6% 3
4 Washington 11-1 51 66.49 4.1% 8.4% 5
5 Clemson 11-1 30 66.38 0.2% 8.5% 4
6 Wisconsin 10-2 13 64.26 4.4% 11.4% 8
7 Penn St 10-2 15 64.14 0.2% 11.6% 6
8 Colorado 10-2 21 63.57 1.2% 12.4% 7
9 USC 9-3 3 62.95 1.3% 13.2% 9
10 W Michigan 12-0 120 61.65 2.7% 15.0% 14
11 Florida St 9-3 18 61.12 1.1% 15.8% 17
12 Oklahoma 9-2 45 60.87 0.5% 16.1% 11
13 LSU 7-4 5 60.32 1.1% 16.9% 22
14 Louisville 9-3 59 60.21 0.2% 17.0% 10
15 Stanford 9-3 20 59.77 0.9% 17.6% 16
16 Auburn 8-4 17 59.67 0.2% 17.8% 13
17 Boise St 10-2 71 58.79 1.8% 19.0% 15
18 Nebraska 9-3 26 58.09 1.4% 19.9% 12
19 Florida 8-3 38 58.01 0.2% 20.1% 18
20 South Florida 10-2 80 57.95 0.1% 20.1% 25
21 Oklahoma St 9-2 78 57.45 1.0% 20.8% 24
22 Miami FL 8-4 56 57.40 0.1% 20.9% 26
23 Tennessee 8-4 19 57.38 0.0% 20.9% 19
24 West Virginia 9-2 62 57.35 0.1% 21.0% 28
25 Texas A&M 8-4 32 57.29 0.1% 21.0% 20
26 Washington St 8-4 35 57.25 0.1% 21.1% 21
27 Houston 9-3 74 56.99 0.5% 21.5% 23
28 Navy 9-2 72 56.58 0.8% 22.0% 33
29 Iowa 8-4 41 56.23 0.7% 22.5% 40
30 Virginia Tech 9-3 68 55.99 0.5% 22.8% 30
31 Minnesota 8-4 44 55.89 0.2% 23.0% 27
32 Temple 9-3 91 55.63 0.5% 23.3% 35
33 Pittsburgh 8-4 42 55.39 0.5% 23.7% 36
34 Utah 8-4 46 55.35 0.1% 23.7% 29
35 WKU 9-3 109 55.28 0.1% 23.8% 37
36 Tulsa 9-3 81 55.22 0.1% 23.9% 31
37 Appalachian St 9-3 99 54.96 0.5% 24.2% 38
38 BYU 8-4 76 54.35 1.3% 25.1% 42
39 Toledo 9-3 107 54.04 0.7% 25.5% 32
40 Troy 9-2 115 53.87 0.3% 25.7% 43
41 North Carolina 8-4 65 53.57 0.6% 26.2% 34
42 Memphis 8-4 70 53.29 0.6% 26.6% 51
43 Georgia Tech 8-4 49 52.84 0.9% 27.2% 46
44 Northwestern 6-6 23 52.61 0.5% 27.5% 50
45 Air Force 9-3 96 52.39 0.5% 27.8% 53
46 Kansas St 7-4 69 52.24 0.3% 28.0% 45
47 Arkansas 7-5 24 51.97 0.5% 28.4% 41
48 San Diego St 9-3 123 51.89 0.2% 28.5% 39
49 Colorado St 7-5 63 51.57 0.7% 28.9% 56
50 NC State 6-6 36 51.12 0.9% 29.5% 55
51 Georgia 7-5 40 51.11 0.0% 29.6% 49
52 Kentucky 7-5 37 51.02 0.2% 29.7% 59
53 Wyoming 8-4 77 50.75 0.6% 30.0% 44
54 TCU 6-5 64 50.39 0.8% 30.5% 60
55 Vanderbilt 6-6 33 50.25 0.3% 30.7% 64
56 Louisiana Tech 8-4 121 50.11 0.3% 30.9% 48
57 Mississippi 5-7 4 49.90 0.4% 31.2% 47
58 Old Dominion 9-3 124 49.86 0.1% 31.3% 61
59 Maryland 6-6 31 49.20 1.4% 32.2% 62
60 UCF 6-6 67 49.06 0.3% 32.4% 52
61 Indiana 6-6 28 49.02 0.1% 32.4% 58
62 Mississippi St 5-7 27 48.74 0.6% 32.8% 69
63 New Mexico 8-4 112 48.04 1.5% 33.8% 75
64 California 5-7 12 47.91 0.3% 34.0% 70
65 Notre Dame 4-8 34 47.73 0.4% 34.2% 65
66 UCLA 4-8 7 47.48 0.5% 34.6% 54
67 Baylor 6-5 84 47.32 0.3% 34.8% 57
68 Oregon St 4-8 8 46.63 1.4% 35.7% 73
69 Oregon 4-8 10 46.54 0.2% 35.9% 63
70 MTSU 8-4 122 46.20 0.7% 36.3% 76
71 Texas 5-7 53 46.14 0.1% 36.4% 67
72 Wake Forest 6-6 60 46.11 0.1% 36.5% 68
73 South Carolina 6-6 48 46.03 0.2% 36.6% 71
74 Ohio 8-4 127 46.00 0.1% 36.6% 74
75 Texas Tech 5-7 58 45.95 0.1% 36.7% 80
76 Boston College 6-6 66 45.79 0.3% 36.9% 79
77 Arizona St 5-7 25 45.22 1.2% 37.7% 66
78 Idaho 7-4 97 45.19 0.1% 37.7% 81
79 Michigan St 3-9 9 44.80 0.8% 38.3% 77
80 E Michigan 7-5 100 44.71 0.2% 38.4% 84
81 Arkansas St 6-5 111 44.68 0.1% 38.4% 72
82 Missouri 4-8 29 44.58 0.2% 38.6% 86
83 UT San Antonio 6-6 105 43.84 1.5% 39.6% 87
84 SMU 5-7 50 43.74 0.2% 39.7% 78
85 Southern Miss 6-6 108 43.67 0.1% 39.8% 91
86 Army 6-5 128 43.57 0.2% 40.0% 85
87 C Michigan 6-6 98 42.89 1.4% 40.9% 82
88 Duke 4-8 43 42.73 0.3% 41.1% 83
89 N Illinois 5-7 88 42.54 0.4% 41.4% 89
90 Syracuse 4-8 22 42.00 1.1% 42.1% 88
91 Arizona 3-9 11 41.90 0.2% 42.3% 99
92 Miami OH 6-6 119 40.96 1.9% 43.5% 98
93 Illinois 3-9 14 40.62 0.7% 44.0% 90
94 Tulane 4-8 73 40.53 0.2% 44.1% 104
95 Iowa St 3-9 55 40.21 0.7% 44.6% 94
96 ULL 5-6 110 40.18 0.1% 44.6% 105
97 Utah St 3-9 57 40.16 0.1% 44.7% 93
98 Akron 5-7 95 40.11 0.1% 44.7% 95
99 Hawaii 6-7 92 40.10 0.0% 44.7% 103
100 South Alabama 5-6 117 39.96 0.3% 44.9% 92
101 Cincinnati 4-8 61 39.94 0.0% 44.9% 101
102 Ga Southern 4-7 94 39.82 0.2% 45.1% 100
103 Rutgers 2-10 2 39.50 0.7% 45.6% 97
104 Purdue 3-9 39 38.51 2.0% 46.9% 106
105 North Texas 5-7 104 37.96 1.1% 47.7% 96
106 East Carolina 3-9 54 37.60 0.7% 48.2% 107
107 ULM 4-7 87 37.51 0.2% 48.3% 109
108 Ball St 4-8 114 37.44 0.1% 48.4% 108
109 Bowling Green 4-8 89 37.04 0.8% 48.9% 115
110 Georgia St 3-8 93 36.93 0.2% 49.1% 112
111 UNLV 4-8 101 36.84 0.2% 49.2% 102
112 San Jose St 4-8 85 36.65 0.4% 49.5% 114
113 Kent 3-9 86 36.50 0.3% 49.7% 111
114 Nevada 5-7 125 36.34 0.3% 49.9% 120
115 Virginia 2-10 52 36.00 0.7% 50.4% 110
116 Charlotte 4-8 113 35.74 0.5% 50.7% 113
117 Florida Intl 4-8 103 34.87 1.8% 51.9% 117
118 Kansas 2-10 47 34.76 0.2% 52.1% 118
119 Connecticut 3-9 79 34.45 0.7% 52.5% 116
120 New Mexico St 3-8 82 34.39 0.1% 52.6% 121
121 Marshall 3-9 102 33.84 1.1% 53.4% 119
122 Massachusetts 2-10 75 33.51 0.7% 53.8% 122
123 UTEP 4-8 126 33.32 0.4% 54.1% 126
124 Rice 3-9 106 32.60 1.5% 55.1% 124
125 FL Atlantic 3-9 116 32.20 0.8% 55.6% 123
126 Fresno St 1-11 83 31.22 2.0% 57.0% 125
127 Texas St 2-9 90 29.23 4.1% 59.7% 127
128 Buffalo 2-10 118 27.91 2.7% 61.5% 128

Best win: Michigan 49-10 vs. Penn St.
Worst loss: Akron 20-41 vs. Buffalo

Rk Conference Rating Best Team Worst Team
1 SEC 54.20 72.56 44.58
2 Big 10 53.68 70.11 38.51
3 Pac-12 53.42 66.49 41.90
4 ACC 51.91 66.38 36.00
5 Big 12 49.27 60.87 34.76
6 American 48.41 57.95 34.45
7 Mountain West 44.56 58.79 31.22
8 MAC 42.65 61.65 27.91
9 Sun Belt 41.52 54.96 29.23
10 Conference USA 40.73 55.28 32.20

SOS = Strength of schedule ranking based on games played
% Bhnd = Percentage of the average team’s rating a team is behind the next highest-ranked team
% Bhnd 1st = Percentage a team is behind the number one team

ShareShare on Facebook0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+0Email this to someone

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *